[
AAPOR (American Association for Public Opinion research). 2016. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. AAPOR.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bavdaz, M., D. Giesen, D.L. Moore, P.A. Smith, and J. Jones. 2019. “Qualitative Testing for Official Establishment Survey Questionnaires”. Survey Research Methods 13(3): 267–288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2019.v13i3.7366.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beckler, D.G., and K. Ott. 2006. “Indirect Monetary Incentives with a Complex Agricultural Establishment Survey”. In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Research Methodology Section, 2741–2748. Alexandria, VA, USA. American Statistical Association. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.511.9782&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed November 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beullens, K., G. Loosveldt, C. Vandenplas, and I. Stoop. 2018. “Response Rates in the European Social Survey: Increasing, Decreasing, or a Matter of Fieldwork Efforts?” Survey Methods: Insights from the Field: 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2018-00003.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brick, J.M., and R. Tourangeau. 2017. “Responsive Survey Designs for Reducing Nonresponse Bias.” Journal of Official Statistics 33(3): 735–752. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/JOS-2017-0034.10.1515/jos-2017-0034
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brick, J.M., and D. Williams. 2013. “Explaining Rising Nonresponse Rates in Cross-sectional Surveys.” In The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 645: 36–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212456834.10.1177/0002716212456834
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brixy, U., S. Kohaut, and C. Schnabel. 2007. “Do Newly Founded Firms Pay Lower Wages? First Evidence from Germany.” Small Business Economics 29(1-2): 161–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-0015-x.10.1007/s11187-006-0015-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Christianson, A., and R.D. Tortora. 1995. “Issues in Surveying Businesses: An International Survey.” In Business Survey Methods, 235–256. New York: John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118150504.ch14.10.1002/9781118150504.ch14
]Search in Google Scholar
[
D’Aurizio, L., and G. Papadia. 2019. “Using Administrative Data to Evaluate Sampling Bias in a Business Panel Survey.” Journal of Official Statistics 35(1): 67–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2019-0004.10.2478/jos-2019-0004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davis, W.R., and N. Pihama. 2009. “Survey Response as Organisational Behaviour: An Analysis of the Annual Enterprise Survey 2003-2007.” New Zealand Association of Economists Conference 2009: 1–16. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zeland Association of Economists. Available at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/eispapers/826/ (accessed November 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De Leeuw, E., and W. de Heer. 2002. “Trends in Household Survey Nonresponse: A Longitudinal and International Comparison.” In Survey Nonresponse, edited by R.M. Groves, D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, and R.J.A. Little, 41–54. New York: Wiley.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dillman, D.A., J.D. Smyth, and L.M. Christian. 2014. Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Earp, M., D. Toth, P. Phipps, and C. Oslund. 2018. “Assessing Nonresponse in a Longitudinal Establishment Survey Using Regression Trees.” Journal of Official Statistics 34(2): 463–481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2018-0021.10.2478/jos-2018-0021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellguth, P., S. Kohaut, and I. Möller. 2013. “The IAB Establishment Panel – Methodological Essentials and Data Quality.” Journal for Labour Market Research 47: 27–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12651-013-0151-0.10.1007/s12651-013-0151-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellguth, P., and S. Kohaut. 2019. “A Note on the Decline of Collective Bargaining Coverage: The Role of Structural Change.” Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 239(1): 39–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2017-0163.10.1515/jbnst-2017-0163
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eurofound. 2015. Third European Company Survey – Overview Report: Workplace Practices – Patterns, Performance and Well-Being. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/field_ef_document/ef1502en_0.pdf (accessed November 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fischer, G., F. Janik, D. Müller, and A. Schmucker. 2008. “The IAB Establishment Panel – from Sample to Survey to Projection.” FDZ Methodenreport 01/2008: Nuremberg. Available at: https://core.ac.uk/reader/6561380 (accessed November 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fisher, S., J. Bosley, K. Goldenberg, W. Mockovak, and C. Tucker. 2003. “A Qualitative Study of Nonresponse Factors Affecting BLS Establishment Surveys: Results.” Presented at the Annual Joint Statistical Meetings, San Francisco, CA. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/osmr/research-papers/2003/pdf/st030230.pdf (accessed November 1st 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Groves, R.M. 2006. “Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 70(5): 646–675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfl033.10.1093/poq/nfl033
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Groves, R.M., and M.P. Couper. 1998. Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118490082
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Groves, R.M., and E. Peytcheva. 2008. “The Impact of Nonresponse Rates on Nonresponse Bias: A Meta-Analysis.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72(2): 167–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn011.10.1093/poq/nfn011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henze, p. 2014. “Structural Change and Wage Inequality: Evidence from German Micro Data.” Center for European, Governance and Economic Development Research Working Paper 204. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2422471.10.2139/ssrn.2422471
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Janik, F. 2011. “Unit Non-response in Establishments Surveyed for the First Time in the IAB Establishment Panel.” FDZ Methodenreport 04/2011: Nuremberg. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228956272_Unit_non-response_in_establishments_surveyed_for_the_first_time_in_the_IAB_Establishment_Panel (accessed November 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Janik, F., and S. Kohaut. 2012 “Why Don’t They Answer? Unit Non-response in the IAB Establishment Panel.” Quality & Quantity 46: 917–934. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9436-y.10.1007/s11135-011-9436-y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jobber, D., H. Mirza, and K.H. Wee. 1991. “Incentives and Response Rates to Cross-national Business Surveys: A Logit Model Analysis.” Journal of International Business Studies 22: 711–721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490852.10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490852
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kohler, U., and F. Kreuter. 2012. Datenanalyse mit Stata: Allgemeine Konzepte der Datenanalyse und ihre praktische Anwendung. München: Oldenbourg.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Luiten, A., J Hox, and E. de Leeuw. 2020. “Survey Nonresponse Trends and Fieldwork Effort in the 21st Century: Results of an International Study across Countries and Surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics 36(3): 469–487. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/JOS-2020-0025.10.2478/jos-2020-0025
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Luo, A., and G.D. White. 2005. “Exploring a New Establishment Survey Incentive to Improve Response Rates.” In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Research Methodology Section, May 12-15, 2005. 3915–3918. Miami Beach, Florida. American Statistical Association. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.528.9845&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed November 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mullins, J.P. 2016. “One Hundred Years of Current Employment Statistics – an Overview of Survey Advancements.” Monthly Labor Review. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21916/mlr.2016.39.10.21916/mlr.2016.39
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paxson, M.C., D.A. Dillman, and J. Tarnai. 1995. “Improving Response to Business Mail Surveys.” In Business Survey Methods, edited by B.G. Cox, D.A. Binder, B.N. Chinnappa, A. Christianson, M.J. Colledge, and P.S. Kott, 303-316. New York: Wiley.10.1002/9781118150504.ch17
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Petroni, R., R. Sigman, D. Willimack, S. Cohen, and C. Tucker. 2004 “Response Rates and Nonresponse in Establishment Surveys–BLS and Census Bureau.” Presented to the Federal Economic Statistics Advisory Committee, 1–50. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.485.5983&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed November 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Phipps, P., and D. Toth. 2012. “Analyzing Establishment Nonresponse Using an Interpretable Regression Tree Model with Linked Administrative Data.” The Annals of Applied Statistics 6(2): 772–794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/11-AOAS521.10.1214/11-AOAS521
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sakshaug, J.W., and M. Huber. 2016. “An Evaluation of Panel Nonresponse and Linkage Consent Bias in a Survey of Employees in Germany.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 4(1): 71–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smv034.10.1093/jssam/smv034
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sakshaug, J.W., S. Hülle, A. Schmucker, and S. Liebig. 2019a. “Panel Survey Recruitment With or Without Interviewers? – Implications for Nonresponse Bias, Panel Consent Bias, and Total Recruitment Bias.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 8(3): 540–565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz012.10.1093/jssam/smz012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sakshaug, J.W., B. Vicari, and M.P. Couper. 2019b. “Paper, E-mail, or Both? Effects of Contact Mode on Participation in a Web Survey of Establishments.” Social Science Computer Review 37(6): 750–765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318805160.10.1177/0894439318805160
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmucker, A., A. Ganzer, J. Stegmaier, and S. Wolter. 2018. “Establishment History Panel 1975-2017.” FDZ Datenreport 09/2018: Nuremberg. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5164/IAB.FDZD.1809.en.v1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Seiler, C. 2010. “Dynamic Modelling of Nonresponse in Business Surveys.” Ifo Working Paper No. 93. Munich: ifo Institute – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich. Available at: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/73706/1/IfoWorkingPaper-93.pdf (accessed November 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
StataCorp. 2017. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sudman, S., D.K. Willimack, E. Nichols, and T.L. Mesenbourg. 2000. “Exploratory Research at the U.S. Census Bureau on the Survey Response Process in Large Companies.” In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Establishment Surveys, June 17-21, 2000: 327–337. Buffalo, New York. American Statistical Association.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tomaskovic-Devey, D., J. Leiter, and S. Thompson. 1995. “Item Nonresponse in Organizational Surveys.” Sociological Methodology 25: 77–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/271062.10.2307/271062
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wagner, J. 2012. “Average Wage, Qualification of the Workforce and Export Performance in German Enterprises: Evidence from KombiFiD Data.” Journal for Labour Market Research 45: 161–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12651-012-0106-x.10.1007/s12651-012-0106-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Willimack, D.K., E. Nichols, and S. Sudman. 2002. “Understanding Unit and Item Nonresponse in Business Surveys.” In Survey Nonresponse, edited by R.M. Groves, D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, and R.J.A. Little, 213–227. New York: Wiley.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Willimack, D.K., and E. Nichols. 2010. “A Hybrid Response Process Model for Business Surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics 26 (1): 3–24. Available at: https://www.scb.se/-contentassets/f6bcee6f397c4fd68db6452fc9643e68/a-hybrid-response-process-model-for-business-surveys.pdf%20 (accessed November 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Willimack, D.K., and G. Snijkers. 2013. “The Business Context and Its Implications for the Survey Response Process.” In Designing and Conducting Business Surveys, edited by G. Snijkers, G. Haraldsen, J. Jones, and D.K. Willimack, 39–82. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118447895.ch02
]Search in Google Scholar
