Assessing Interviewer Performance in Approaching Reissued Initial Nonrespondents

Barbier, S., C. Wuyts, P. Italiano, and G. Loosveldt. 2016. European Social Survey Round 7 Belgium: Process evaluation for the data collection. Leuven: KU Leuven.Search in Google Scholar

Beullens, K., J. Billiet, and G. Loosveldt. 2009. Selection strategies for refusal conversion of four countries in the European Social Survey, 3rd round. Leuven: KU Leuven.Search in Google Scholar

Beullens, K. and G. Loosveldt. 2012. “Should high response rates really be a primary objective?” Survey Practice 5(3): 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2012-0019.10.29115/SP-2012-0019Search in Google Scholar

Beullens, K., G. Loosveldt, C. Vandenplas C., and I. Stoop. 2018. “Response rates in the European Social Survey: Increasing, decreasing, or a matter of fieldwork efforts? Survey methods: Insights from the field.” Available at: https://surveyinsights.org/?p=9673 (accessed May 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Blom, A., E. de Leeuw, and J. Hox. 2011. “Interviewer effects on nonresponse in the European Social Survey.” Journal of Official Statistics 27(2): 359–377. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/interviewer-effects-on-nonresponse-in-the-european-social-survey.pdf (accessed May 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Brick, J.M. and R. Tourangeau. 2017. “Responsive survey designs for reducing nonresponse bias.” Journal of Official Statistics 33(3): 735–752. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2017-0034.10.1515/jos-2017-0034Search in Google Scholar

Burton, J., H. Laurie, and P. Lynn. 2006. “The long-term effectiveness of refusal conversion procedures on longitudinal surveys.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) 169(3): 459–478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00415.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00415.xSearch in Google Scholar

Chun, A.Y., S.G. Heeringa, and B. Schouten. 2018. “Responsive and adaptive design for survey optimization.” Journal of Official Statistics 34(3): 581–597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2018-0028.10.2478/jos-2018-0028Search in Google Scholar

Curtin, R., S. Presser, and E. Singer. 2000. “The effects of response rate changes on the index of consumer sentiment.” Public Opinion Quarterly 64(4): 413–428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/318638.10.1086/31863811171024Search in Google Scholar

Durrant, G., R. Groves, L. Staetsky, and F. Steele. 2010. “Effects of interviewer attitudes and behaviors on refusal in household surveys”. Public Opinion Quarterly 74(1): 1–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp098.10.1093/poq/nfp098Search in Google Scholar

European Social Survey. 2015. ESS Round 7 (2014/2015) Technical Report. London: ESS ERIC.Search in Google Scholar

European Social Survey. 2017. ESS Round 8 (2016/2017) Technical Report. London: ESS ERIC.Search in Google Scholar

Gideon, L. 2012. Handbook of survey methodology for the social sciences. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-3876-2Search in Google Scholar

Groves, R. 2006. “Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 70(5): 646–675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfl033.10.1093/poq/nfl033Search in Google Scholar

Groves, R.M. and M.P. Couper. 2012. Nonresponse in household interview surveys. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Lynn, P. and P. Clarke. 2002. “Separating refusal bias and non-contact bias: Evidence from UK national surveys.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 51(3): 319–333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9884.00321.10.1111/1467-9884.00321Search in Google Scholar

O’Muircheartaigh, C. and P. Campanelli. 1999. “A multilevel exploration of the role of interviewers in survey non-response.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 162(3): 437–446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-985X.00147.10.1111/1467-985X.00147Search in Google Scholar

Pickery, J. and G. Loosveldt. 2002. “A multilevel multinomial analysis of interviewer effects on various components of unit nonresponse.” Quality and Quantity 36(4): 427–437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020905911108.10.1023/A:1020905911108Search in Google Scholar

Schouten, B., A. Peytchev, and J. Wagner. 2017. “Adaptive Survey Design.” Series on Statistics Handbooks, Chapman and Hall/CRC.10.1201/9781315153964Search in Google Scholar

Stoop, I. 2004. “Surveying nonrespondents.” Field Methods 16(1): 23–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X03259479.10.1177/1525822X03259479Search in Google Scholar

Stoop, I., A. Koch, V. Halbherr, R. Fitzgerald, and S. Widdop. 2014. Field procedures in the European Social Survey Round 7: Enhancing response rates. The Hague: European Social Survey, SCP. Available at: http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org (accessed June 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Tarnai, J. and D.L. Moore. 2008. “Measuring and improving telephone interviewer performance and productivity.” In Advances in telephone survey methodology, edited by E. de Leeuw, L. Japec, P.J. Lavrakas, M.W. Link, and R.L. Sangster. pp. 359–384, Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470173404.ch17Search in Google Scholar

West, B.T. and K. Olson. 2010. “How much of interviewer variance is really nonresponse error variance?” Public Opinion Quarterly 74(5): 1004 – 1026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq061.10.1093/poq/nfq061Search in Google Scholar

Wright, G. 2015. “An empirical examination of the relationship between nonresponse rate and nonresponse bias.” Statistical Journal of the IAOS 31(2): 305–315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/sji-140844.10.3233/sji-140844Search in Google Scholar

Wuyts, C., L. Jacobs, D. de Coninck, P. Italiano, and G. Loosveldt. 2018. European Social Survey Round 8 Belgium: Process evaluation for data collection. Leuven: KU Leuven.Search in Google Scholar