[Andersson, P.G. and C.-E. Särndal. 2016. “Calibration for nonresponse treatment: in one or two steps?” Statistical Journal of the IAOS 32: 1–7.10.3233/SJI-160996]Search in Google Scholar
[Bang, H. and J.M. Robins. 2005. “Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models.” Biometrics 61: 962–972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00377.x.10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00377.x16401269]Search in Google Scholar
[Bethlehem, J.G. 1988. “Reduction of nonresponse bias through regression estimation.” Journal of Official Statistics 4: 251–260. Available at: https://search.proquest.com/openview/90feaa08b1f293c8544d8576e6d94436/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=105444 (accessed February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Bethlehem, J., F. Cobben, and B. Schouten. 2011. Handbook of Nonresponse in Household Surveys. Hoboken: Wiley.10.1002/9780470891056]Search in Google Scholar
[Brick, M.J. 2013. “Unit nonresponse and weighting adjustments: A critical review.” Journal of Official Statistics 29: 329–353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2013-0026.10.2478/jos-2013-0026]Search in Google Scholar
[Canty, A. and A. Davison. 1999. “Resampling-based Variance Estimation for Labour Force Surveys.” The Statistician 48: 379–391.10.1111/1467-9884.00196]Search in Google Scholar
[Carpenter, J.R., M.G. Kenward, and S. Vansteelandt. 2006. “A comparison of multiple imputation and doubly robust estimation for analyses with missing data.” J. R. Statist. Soc. A 169: 571–584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00407.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00407.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Cassel, C.M., C.-E. Särndal, and J.H. Wretman. 1983. “Some uses of statistical models in connection with the nonresponse problem.” In Incomplete Data in Sample Surveys, edited by W.G. Madow, I. Olkin, and D.B. Rubin, vol. 3, 143–160. New York: Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cochran, W. 1953. Sampling Techniques. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Leeuw, E. and W. de Heer. 2002. “Trends in household survey nonresponse – a longitudinal and international comparison.” In Survey Nonresponse, edited by R. Groves, D. Dillman, J. Eltinge, and R.J.A. Little, 41–54. New York: Wiley. Available at: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Survey+Nonresponse-p-9780471396277.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eltinge, J.L. and I.S. Yansaneh. 1997. “Diagnostics for formation of nonresponse adjustment cells, with an application to income nonresponse in the U.S. consumer expenditure survey.” Survey Methodology 23: 33–40. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/12-001-X19970013103 (accessed February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Haziza, D. and É. Lesage. 2016. “A discussion of weighting procedures for unit nonresponse.” Journal of Official Statistics 32: 129–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2016-0006.10.1515/jos-2016-0006]Search in Google Scholar
[Kalton, G. and I. Flores-Cervantes. 2003. “Weighting methods.” Journal of Official Statistics 19: 81–97. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41-fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/weighting-methods.pdf (accessed February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kalton, G. and D. Kasprzyk. 1986. “The treatment of missing survey data.” Survey Methodology 12: 1–16. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/12-001-X198600114404 (accessed February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kang, J.D.Y. and J.L. Schafer. 2007. “Demystifying double robustness: A comparison of alternative strategies for estimating a population mean from incomplete data.” Statistical Science 22: 523–539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/07-STS227.10.1214/07-STS227239755518516239]Search in Google Scholar
[Kim, J. and D. Haziza. 2014. “Doubly robust inference with missing data in survey sampling.” Statistica Sinica 24: 375–394. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5705/ss.2012.005.10.5705/ss.2012.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Kott, P.S. and D. Liao. 2015. “One step or two? Calibration weighting from a complete list frame with nonresponse.” Survey Methodology 41: 165–181. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/12-001-x/2015001/article/14172-eng.htm (accessed February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Little, R.J.A. 1986. “Survey nonresponse adjustments for estimates of means.” International Statistical Review 54: 139–157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1403140.10.2307/1403140]Search in Google Scholar
[Little, R.J. and D.B. Rubin. 1987. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Little, R.J. and S. Vartivarian. 2005. “Does weighting for nonresponse increase the variance of survey means?” Survey Methodology 31: 161–168. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/12-001-X20050029046 (accessed February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Lunceford, J.K. and M. Davidian. 2004. “Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: A comparative study.” Statist. Med. 23: 2937–2960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1903.10.1002/sim.190315351954]Search in Google Scholar
[Lundström, S. and C.-E. Särndal. 1999. “Calibration as a Standard Method for Treatment of Nonresponse.” Journal of Official Statistics 15: 305–327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1903.10.1002/sim.190315351954]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyer, B.D., W.K.C. Mok, and J.X. Sullivan. 2015. “Household surveys in crisis.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 29: 199–226. Available at: https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdf/10.1257/jep.29.4.199 (accessed September 2019).10.1257/jep.29.4.199]Search in Google Scholar
[Oh, H.L. and F.S. Scheuren. 1983. “Weighting adjustments for unit nonresponse.” In Incomplete Data in Sample Surveys, edited by W.G. Madow, I. Olkin, and D.B. Rubin, vol. 2, 143–184. New York: Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Robins, B.J.M. and N. Wang. 2000. “Inference for imputation estimators.” Biometrika 87: 113–124. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3214/538c562c010bdb-b055582e04fc3a4d7b6ce9.pdf (accessed February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Robins, J.M., A. Rotnitzky, and L.P. Zhao. 1994. “Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed.” J. Am. Statist. Ass. 89: 846–866. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1994.10476818.10.1080/01621459.1994.10476818]Search in Google Scholar
[Särndal, C.-E. and S. Lundström. 2005. Estimation in Surveys with Nonresponse. Chichester: Wiley.10.1002/0470011351]Search in Google Scholar
[Särndal, C.-E. and S. Lundström. 2008. “Assessing auxiliary vectors for control of nonresponse bias in the calibration estimator.” Journal of Official Statistics 24: 167–191. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/assessing-auxiliary-vectors-for-control-of-nonresponse-bias-in-the-calibration-estimator.pdf (accessed February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Särndal, C.-E. and S. Lundström. 2010. “Design for estimation: Identifying auxiliary vectors to reduce nonresponse bias.” Survey Methodology 36: 131–144. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/12-001-x/2010002/article/11376-eng.pdf?st=XFmzYjVz (accessed February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B. 2007. “A selection strategy for weighting variables under a not-missing- at-random assumption.” Journal of Official Statistics 23: 51–68. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/634f/ca032e7c166eef11ee65b84192e5aca1e039.pdf (accessed February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Stoop, I., J. Billiet, A. Koch, and R. Fitzgerald. 2010. Improving Survey Response: Lessons Learned from the European Social Survey. Chichester, UK: Wiley.10.1002/9780470688335]Search in Google Scholar
[Thomsen, I. 1973. “A note on the efficiency of weighting subclass means to reduce the effects of non-response when analyzing survey data.” Statistisk Tidskrift 11: 278–285. Available at: https://www.statistics.no/a/histstat/ano/ano_io73_02.pdf (accessed February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Thomsen, I. 1978. “A second note on the efficiency of weighting subclass means to reduce the effects of non-response when analyzing survey data.” Statistisk Tidskrift 16: 278–285. Available at: https://www.statistics.no/a/histstat/ano/ano_io73_02.pdf (accessed February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Thomsen, I. and L.-C. Zhang. 2001. “The effects of using administrative registers in economic short term statistics: The Norwegian Labour Force Survey as a case study.” Journal of Official Statistics 17: 285–294. Available at: https://www.scb.se/content-assets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/the-effects-of-using-administrative-regis-ters-in-economic-short-term-statistics-the-norwegian-labour-force-survey-as-a-case-study.pdf (accessed February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang, L.-C. 1999. “A note on post-stratification when analyzing binary survey data subject to nonresponse.” Journal of Official Statistics 15: 329–334. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/a-note-on-post-stratification-when-analyzing-binary-survey-data-subject-to-nonresponse.pdf (accessed February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang, L.-C. 2005. “On the bias in gross labour flow estimates due to nonresponse and mis-classification.” Journal of Official Statistics 21: 591–604. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/on-the-bias-in-gross-labour-flow-estimates-due-to-nonresponse-and-misclassification.pdf (accessed February 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang, L.-C., I. Thomsen, and Ø. Kleven. 2013. “On the use of auxiliary and para-data for dealing with non-sampling errors in household surveys.” International Statistical Review 81: 270–288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12009.10.1111/insr.12009]Search in Google Scholar