[Aquilino, W. 1994. “Interview Mode Effects in Surveys of Drug and Alcohol Use.” Public Opinion Quarterly 58: 210–240. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1086/269419.10.1086/269419]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bernstein, R., A. Chadha, and R. Montjoy. 2001. “Over-reporting Voting: Why it Happens and Why it Matters.” Public Opinion Quarterly 65: 22–44. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1086/320036.10.1086/320036]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bradburn, N. 1983. “Response Effects.” In Handbook of Survey Research, edited by P. Rossi, J. Wright, and A. Anderson, 289–328. New York: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-598226-9.50014-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Brazier, J.E., R. Harper, N.M.B. Jones, A. O’Cathain, K.J. Thomas, T. Usherwood, and L. Westlake. 1992. “Validating the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire: New Outcome Measure for Primary Care.” British Medical Journal 305(6846): 160–164. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160.10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Caltabiano, M. and G. Dalla-Zuanna. 2012. “A Comparison of Survey Techniques on Sensitive Sexual Behavior in Italy.” Journal of Sex Research 50(6): 537–547. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.674573.10.1080/00224499.2012.674573]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Couper, M.P., E. Singer, and R. Tourangeau. 2003. “Understanding the Effects of Audio-CASI on Self-Reports of Sensitive Behavior.” Public Opinion Quarterly 67: 385–395. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1086/376948.10.1086/376948]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dahlhamer, J., J. Dixon, P. Doyle, J. Eargle, D.H. Griffin, and P. McGovern. 2003. “Quality at the Item Level: Terms, Methods, and Guidelines for Cross-Survey Comparisons.” In Proceedings of the Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology Research Conference, Sheraton Crystal City Hotel, VA (November 2003): 17–19. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/James_Dahlhamer/publication/265540556_Quality_at_the_Item_Level_Terms_Methods_and_Guidelines_for_Cross-Survey_Comparisons_1/links/54b441750cf26833efd0123b.pdf (accessed November 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Dahlhamer, J., J. Dixon, P. Doyle, J. Eargle, and P. McGovern. 2004. “Quality at the Item Level: Decomposing Item and Concept Response Rates.” Proceedings of the European Conference on Quality and Methodology in Official Statistics (Q2004), May 24–26, Mainz, Germany.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dahlhamer, J.M., A. Galinsky, S. Joestl, M. Cynamon, J. Madans, and V. Cain. 2013. “Minor Design Changes with Major Impacts: Testing Explicit Versus Implicit Don’t Know and Refused Options in Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interviewing.” Presented at the AAPOR 68th Annual Conference, May 17. Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Leeuw, E.D. and J. van der Zouwen. 1988. “Data Quality in Telephone and Face-to-Face Surveys: A Comparative Meta-Analysis.” In Telephone survey methodology, edited by R.M. Groves, P.P. Biemer, L.E. Lyberg, J.T. Massey, W.L. II, Nicholls, and J. Waksberg, 283–299. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Des Jarlais, D.C., D. Paone, J. Milliken, C.F. Turner, H. Miller, J. Gribble, Q. Shi, H. Hagan, and S.R. Friedman. 1999. “Audio-Computer Interviewing to Measure Risk Behaviour for HIV among Injecting Drug Users: A Quasi-Randomised Trial.” The Lancet 353(9165): 1657–1661. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07026-3.10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07026-3]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Derouvray, C. and M.P. Couper. 2002. “Designing a Strategy for Reducing ‘No Opinion’ Responses in Web Surveys.” Social Science Computer Review 20(1): 3–9. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1.1.877.199.10.1177/089443930202000101]Search in Google Scholar
[Dialsingh, I. 2008. “Face-to-Face Interviewing.” In Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods, edited by P. Lavrakas, 260–262. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. DOI: http://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947.10.4135/9781412963947]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dolezal, C., S.L. Marhefka, E.K. Santamaria, C-S. Leu, E. Brackis-Cott, and C.A. Mellins. 2012. “A Comparison of Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interviews to Face-to-Face Interviews of Sexual Behavior among Perinatally HIV-Exposed Youth.” Archives of Sexual Behavior 41: 401–410. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9769-6.10.1007/s10508-011-9769-6362197621604065]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Drydakis, N. 2014. “Sexual Orientation and Labor Market Outcomes.” IZA World of Labor 111: 1–10. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.111.10.15185/izawol.111]Search in Google Scholar
[Floyd, F.J. and R. Bakeman. 2006. “Coming-Out across the Life Course: Implications of Age and Historical Context.” Archives of Sexual Behavior 35(3): 287–296. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9022-x.10.1007/s10508-006-9022-x16804747]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Fowler, F. 1993. Survey Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fowler, F. 1995. Improving Survey Questions: Design and Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fredriksen-Goldsen, K.I. and A. Muraco. 2010. “Aging and Sexual Orientation: A 25-Year Review of the Literature.” Research on Aging 32(3): 372–413. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1177/0164027509360355.10.1177/0164027509360355378953124098063]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Fu, H., J.E. Darroch, S.K. Henshaw, and E. Kolb. 1998. “Measuring the Extent of Abortion Underreporting in the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.” Family Planning Perspectives 30: 128–133 & 138. DOI: http://doi.org/10.2307/2991627.10.2307/2991627]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ghanem, K.G., H.E. Hutton, J.M. Zenilman, and E.J. Erbelding. 2005. “Audio Computer Assisted Self Interview and Face to Face Interview Modes in Assessing Response Bias among STD Clinic Patients.” Sexually Transmitted Infections 81: 421–425. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1136/sti.2004.013193.10.1136/sti.2004.013193174502916199744]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gfroerer, J. and A. Hughes. 1992. “Collecting Data on Illicit Drug Use by Phone.” In Survey Measurement of Drug Use: Methodological Studies, edited by C. Turner, J. Lessler, and J. Gfroerer, 277–295. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M., F.J. Fowler, M.P. Couper, J.M. Lepkowski, E. Singer, and R. Tourangeau. 2004. Survey Methodology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. DOI: http://doi.org/10.2307/27590808.10.2307/27590808]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Healthy People 2020. (n.d.) “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Health.” Available at: https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-transgender-health (accessed November 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Hox, J.J. and E.D.D. de Leeuw. 1994. “A Comparison of Nonresponse in Mail, Telephone, and Face-to-Face Surveys.” Quality and Quantity 28(4): 329–344. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/BF01097014.10.1007/BF01097014]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2011. The Health of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People: Building a Foundation for Better Understanding. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. DOI: http://doi.org/0.17226/13128.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaya, M.J.H., M.J. Hindin, and S. Ahmed. 2008. “Differences in Young Peoples’ Reports of Sexual Behaviors According to Interview Methodology: A Randomized Trial in India.” American Journal of Public Health 98(1): 169–174. DOI: http://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2006.099937.10.2105/AJPH.2006.099937215605418160677]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Juster, F.P. and J.T. Smith. 1997. “Improving the Quality of Economic Data: Lessons from HRS and AHEAD.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 92: 1268–1278. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1997.10473648.10.1080/01621459.1997.10473648]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kurth, A.E., D.P. Martin, M.R. Golden, N.S. Weiss, P.J. Heagerty, F. Speilberg, H.H. Handsfield, and K.K. Holmes. 2004. “A Comparison between Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interviews and Clinician Interviews for Obtaining the Sexual History.” Sexually Transmitted Diseases 31(12): 719–726. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1097/01.olq.0000145855.36181.13.10.1097/01.olq.0000145855.36181.1315608586]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Legate, N., R.M. Ryan, and N. Weinstein. 2012. “Is Coming Out Always a “Good Thing”? Exploring the Relations of Autonomy Support, Outness, and Wellness for Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Individuals.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 3(2): 145–152. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611411929.10.1177/1948550611411929]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Malagoda, M. and J. Traynor. 2008. “Developing Survey Questions on Sexual Identity: Report on National Statistics Omnibus Trial 4.” London: Social Economic Micro-Analysis and Reporting Division, Office for National Statistics.]Search in Google Scholar
[McDonald, M.P. 2003. “On the Over-Report Bias of the National Election Study Turnout Rate.” Political Analysis 11: 180–186. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpg006.10.1093/pan/mpg006]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[McGarrity, L.A. and D.M. Huebner. 2014. “Is Being Out about Sexual Orientation Uniformly Healthy? The Moderating Role of Socioeconomic Status in a Prospective Study of Gay and Bisexual Men.” Annals of Behavioral Medicine 47(1): 28–38. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9575-6.10.1007/s12160-013-9575-6]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Midanik, L.T. and T.K. Greenfield. 2008. “Interactive Voice Response Versus Computer-Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI) Surveys and Sensitive Questions: The 2005 National Alcohol Survey.” Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 69: 580–588. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2008.69.580.10.15288/jsad.2008.69.580]Search in Google Scholar
[Miller, K. and J.M. Ryan. 2011. Design, Development and Testing of the NHIS Sexual Identity Question. Hyattsville, MD: Cognitive Testing Report, Questionnaire Design Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Methodology, National Center for Health Statistics. Available at: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/qbank/report/Miller_NCHS_2011_NHIS%20Sexual%20Identity.pdf (accessed June 2013).]Search in Google Scholar
[Moore, J., L. Stinson, and E. Welniak. 1999. “Income Reporting in Surveys: Cognitive Issues and Measurement Error.” Chapter 10 in Cognition and Survey Research, edited by M. Sirkin, D. Herrmann, S. Schechter, N. Schwarz, J. Tanur, and R. Tourangeau. New York: John Wiley & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pew Research Center. 2013. “A Survey of LBGT Americans: Attitudes, Experiences and Values in Changing Times.” Washington, DC: The Pew Research Center. Available at: https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/files/2013/06/SDT_LGBT-Americans_06-2013.pdf (accessed June 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Potdar, R. and M.A. Koenig. 2005. “Does Audio-CASI Improve Reports of Risky behavior? Evidence from a Randomized Field Trial among Young Urban Men in India.” Studies in Family Planning 36(2): 107–116. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2005.00048.x.10.1111/j.1728-4465.2005.00048.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rogers, S.M., G. Willis, A. Al-Tayyib, M.A. Villarroel, C.F. Turner, L. Ganapathi, J. Zenilman, and R. Jadack. 2005. “Audio Computer Assisted Interviewing to Measure HIV Risk Behaviors in a Clinic Population.” Sexually Transmitted Infections 1: 501–507. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1136/sti.2004.014266.10.1136/sti.2004.014266]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rosenfeld, D. 1999. “Identity Work among Lesbian and Gay Elderly.” Journal of Aging Studies 13(2): 121–144. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/s0890-4065(99)80047-4.10.1016/s0890-4065(99)80047-4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Shoemaker, P., M. Eicholz, and E. Skewes. 2002. “Item Nonresponse: Distinguishing between Don’t Know and Refuse.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 14: 193–201. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/14.2.193.10.1093/ijpor/14.2.193]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Simoes, A.A., F.I. Bastos, R.I. Moreira, K.G. Lynch, and D.S. Metzger. 2006. “A Randomized Trial of Audio Computer and In-Person Interview to Assess HIV Risk among Drug and Alcohol Users in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.” Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 30: 237–243. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2005.12.002.10.1016/j.jsat.2005.12.00216616168]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[SMART (Sexual Minority Assessment Research Team). 2009. Best Practices for Asking Questions about Sexual Orientation on Surveys. Los Angeles: The Williams Institute, University of California School of Law. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/706057d5 (accessed November 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Sykes, W. and M. Collins. 1988. “Effect of Mode of Interview: Experiments in the UK.” In Telephone Survey Methodology, edited by R.M. Groves, P.P. Biemer, L.E. Lyberg, J.T. Massey, W.L. Nicholls II, and J. Waksberg, 301–320. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tideman, R.L., M.Y. Chen, M.K. Pitts, S. Ginige, M. Slaney, and C.K. Fairley. 2007. “A Randomised Control Trial Comparing Computer-Assisted with Face-to-Face Sexual History Taking in a Clinical Setting.” Sexually Transmitted Infections 83: 52–56. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1136/sti.2006.020776.10.1136/sti.2006.020776259859917098771]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tourangeau, R., L. Rips, and K. Rasinski. 2000. The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819322.10.1017/CBO9780511819322]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tourangeau, R. and T.W. Smith. 1996. “Asking Sensitive Questions: The Impact of Data Collection Mode, Question Format, and Question Context.” Public Opinion Quarterly 60: 275–304. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1086/297751.10.1086/297751]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tourangeau, R. and T. Yan. 2007. “Sensitive Questions in Surveys.” Psychological Bulletin 133(5): 859–883. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859.10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.85917723033]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Turner, C.F., J.T. Lessler, and J. Devore. 1992. “Effects of Mode of Administration and Wording on Reporting of Drug Use.” In Survey Measurement of Drug Use: Methodological Studies, edited by C. Turner, J. Lessler, and J. Gfroerer, 177–220. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.]Search in Google Scholar
[Villarroel, M.A., C.F. Turner, E. Eggleston, A. Al-Tayyib, S.M. Rogers, A.M. Roman, P.C. Cooley, and H. Gordek. 2006. “Same-Gender Sex in the United States: Impact of T-ACASI on Prevalence Estimates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 70(2): 166–196. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfj023.10.1093/poq/nfj023319119721998488]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar