[Andridge, R.R. and R.J.A. Little. 2011. “Proxy Pattern-Mixture Analysis for Survey Nonresponse.” Journal of Official Statistics 27: 153–180. Available at: http://www.jos.nu/Articles/abstract.asp?article=272153.]Search in Google Scholar
[Andridge, R.R. and K.J. Thompson. 2015. “Using the Fraction of Missing Information to Identify Auxiliary Variables for Imputation Procedures via Proxy Pattern-Mixture Models.” International Statistical Review 83(3): 472–492. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/insr.12091.10.1111/insr.12091]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Baker, R., J.K. Brick, N.A. Bates, M. Battaglia, M.P. Couper, J.A. Dever, K.J. Gile, and R. Tourangeau. 2013. “Summary Report of the AAPOR Task Force on Non-Probability Sampling.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 1(2): 90–137.10.1093/jssam/smt008]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M. and S.G. Heeringa. 2006. “Responsive Design for Household Surveys: Tools for Actively Controlling Survey Errors and Costs.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 169: 439–457. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hansen, M.H. and W.N. Hurwitz. 1946. “The Problem of Non-Response in Sample Surveys.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 41: 517–529.10.1080/01621459.1946.1050189420279350]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaputa, S.J., L. Bechtel, K.J. Thompson, and D. Whitehead. 2014. “Strategies for Subsampling Nonrespondents for Economic Programs.” In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, August 6, 2014. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.]Search in Google Scholar
[Little, R.J. and S. Vartivarian. 2005. “Does Weighting for Nonresponse Increase the Variance of Survey Means?” Survey Methodology 31(2): 161–168.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lohr, S.L. 2010. Sampling: Design and Analysis (2nd Edition). Boston, MA: Brooks/Cole.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marquette, E., M. Kornbau, and J. Toribio. 2015. “Testing Contact Strategies to Improve Response in the 2012 Economic Census.” In Proceedings of the Section on Government Statistics: American Statistical Association, August 10, 2015. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peytcheva, E. and R.M. Groves. 2009. “Using Variation in Response Rates of Demographic Subgroups as Evidence of Nonresponse Bias in Survey Estimates.” Journal of Official Statistics 25: 193–201.]Search in Google Scholar
[Phipps, P. and D. Toth. 2012. “Analyzing Establishment Nonresponse Using an Interpretable Regression Tree Model with Linked Administrative Data.” The Annals of Applied Statistics 6(2): 772–794. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/11-AOAS521.10.1214/11-AOAS521]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Särndal, C.E. 2011. “The 2010 Morris Hansen Lecture: Dealing with Survey Nonresponse in Data Collection in Estimation.” Journal of Official Statistics 27: 1–21.]Search in Google Scholar
[Särndal, C. and P. Lundquist. 2014. “Accuracy in Estimation with Nonresponse: A Function of Degree of Imbalance and Degree of Explanation.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 2(4): 361–3087.10.1093/jssam/smu014]Search in Google Scholar
[Särndal, C., B. Swensson, and J. Wretman. 1992. Model Assisted Survey Sampling, New York: Springer Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4612-4378-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B., M. Calinescu, and A. Luiten. 2013. “Optimizing Quality of Response through Adaptive Survey Designs.” Survey Methodology 39(2): 29–58.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thompson, K.J. and S. Kaputa. 2017. Investigating Adaptive Nonresponse Follow-up Strategies for Small Businesses through Embedded Experiments. Journal of Official Statistics. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2017-0038.10.1515/jos-2017-0038]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Thompson, K.J. and B.E. Oliver. 2012. “Response Rates in Business Surveys: Going Beyond the Usual Performance Measure.” Journal of Official Statistics 28: 221–237. Available at: http://www.jos.nu/Articles/abstract.asp?article=282221.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagner, J. 2012. “A Comparison of Alternative Indicators for the Risk of Nonresponse Bias.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76(3): 555–575. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs032.10.1093/poq/nfs032627697530538342]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Wilson, T., J. McCarthy, and A. Dau. 2016. Adaptive Design in an Establishment Survey: Targeting, Applying and Measuring ‘Optimal’ Data Collection Procedures in the Agricultural Resource Management Survey. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Establishment Surveys.]Search in Google Scholar