[
Abbott, M.B., Bathurst, J.C., Cunge, J.A., O’Connell, P.E., Rasmussen, J., 1986. An introduction to the European Hydrological System – Systeme Hydrologique Europeen (SHE). Part 1. History and philosophy of a physically-based distributed modelling system. Journal of Hydrology, 87, 45–59.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Abebe, A.J., Price, R.K., 2004. Information theory and neural networks for managing uncertainty in flood routing. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 18, 4, 373–380.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Abrahart, R.J., See, L.M., 2007. Neural network modelling of non-linear hydrological relationships. Journal of Earth System Science, 11, 5, 1563–1579.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ahmad, S., Simonovic, S.P., 2005. An artificial neural network model for generating hydrograph from hydro-meteorological parameters. Journal of Hydrology, 315, 1–4, 236–251.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anctil, F., Perrin, C., Andreassian, V., 2003. ANN output updating of lumped physically rainfall/runoff forecasting models. Water Resources Bulletin, 39, 5, 1269–1279.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anctil, F., Claude, M., Charles, P., Vazken, A., 2004. A soil moisture index as an auxiliary ANN input for stream flow forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 286, 155–167.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anctil, F., Rat, A., 2005. Evaluation of neural network streamflow forecasting on 47 watersheds. Journal of Hydrology, 10, 1, 85–88.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Asquith, W.H., Slade, R.M., 1997. Regional equations for estimation of peak-stream frequency for natural basins in Texas. Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4307, U.S. Geological Survey, Austin, Texas.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ASCE Task Committee on Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology, 2000. Artificial neural networks in hydrology. Journal of Hydrological Engineering, 5, 2, 124–137.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aytek, A., Asce, M., Alp, M., 2008. An application of artificial intelligence for rainfall-runoff modeling. Journal of Earth System Science, 117, 2, 145–155.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bertsekas, D.P., Tsitsiklis, J.N., 1996. Neuro-Dynamic Programming. Athena Scientific, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beven, K.J., 2001. Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: The Primer. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bhattacharya, B., Solomatine, D.P., 2000. Application of neural networks in stage-discharge relationships. In: Proc. 4th International Conference on Hydroinformatics, Iowa City, USA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Box, G.E.P., Jenkins, G.M., 1970. Time Series Analysis, Forecasting and Control. Holden-Day, San Francisco, California, 537 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coulibaly, P., Anctil, F., Bobe’e, B., 2001. Multivariate reservoir inflow forecasting using temporal neural networks. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 6, 5, 367–376.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cunderlik, J.M., 2003. Hydrologic Model Selection for the CFCAS Project: Assessment of Water Resources Risk and Vulnerability to Changing Climatic Condition, Water Resources Research Report no. 046. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, 38 p. ISBN: (print) 978-0-7714-2622-3; (online) 978-0-7714-2623-0.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cunderlik, J.M., Simonovic, S.P., 2004. Assessment of water resources risk and vulnerability to changing climatic conditions: Calibration and verification data for the HEC-HMS hydrologic model, Report No. II. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Devulapalli, R.S., 1995. Flood volume-duration-frequencies for ungaged rural catchment. Ph.D. Dissertation, Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fleming, M., Neary, V., 2004. Continuous hydrologic modeling study with the Hydrologic Modeling System. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 9/3, 175–183.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Foresee, F.D., Hagan, M.T., 1997. Gauss-Newton approximation to Bayesian regularization. In: Proc. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 1930–1935.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gan, K.C., McMahon, T.A., O’Neill, I.C., 1991. Transposition of monthly streamflow data to ungauged catchments. Nordic Hydrology, 22, 2, 109–122.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gosain, A.K., Mani, A., Dwivedi, C., 2009. Hydrological modelling literature review: Report No.1. Indo-Norwegian Institutional Cooperation Program 2009–2011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goswami, M., O’Connor, K.M., Bhattarai, K.P., Shamseldin, A.Y., 2005. Assessing the performance of eight real-time updating models and procedures for the Brosna River. Journal of Earth System Science, 9, 4, 394–411.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Govindaraju, R.S., Rao, A.R., 2000. Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hagan, M.T., Menhaj, M.B., 1994. Training feedforward networks with Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 5, 6, 989–993.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hsu, K., Gupta, V.H., Sorroshian, S., 1995. Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall-runoff process. Water Resources Research, 31, 10, 2517–2530.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Iyer, M.S., Rhinehart, R.R., 1999. A method to determine the required number of neural-network training repetitions. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 10, 2, 427–432.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jain, A., Srinivasulu, S., 2006. Integrated approach to model decomposed flow hydrograph using artificial neural network and physically techniques. Journal of Hydrology, 317, 3–4, 291–306.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jennings, M.E., Thomas W.O., Riggs, H.C., 1994. Nationwide Summary of U. S. Geological Survey Regression Equations for Estimating Magnitude and Frequency of Floods for Ungaged Sites. Water-Resources Investigations Report 94-4002, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MacKay, D.J.C., 1992. Bayesian interpolation. Neural computation, 4, 3, 415–447.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moradkhani, H., Hsu, K.L, Gupta, H., Sorooshian, S., 2004. Improved streamflow forecasting using self-organizing radial basis function artificial neural networks. Journal of Hydrology, 295, 1–4, 246–262.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nash, J.E., Sutcliffe, J.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models, Part I - A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10, 3, 282–290.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nguyen, D., Widrow, B., 1990. Improving the learning speed of 2-layer neural networks by choosing initial values of the adaptive weights. In: Proc. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 3, 21–26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Parent, A., Anctil, F., Cantin, V., Boucher, M., 2008. Neural network input selection for hydrological forecasting affected by snowmelt. Water Resources Bulletin, 44, 3, 679–688.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Poff, N.L., Tokar, S., Johnson, P., 1996. Stream hydrological and ecological responses to climate change assessed with an artificial neural network. Limnology and Oceanography, 41, 5, 857–863.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prodanovic, P., Simonovic, S.P., 2006. Assessment of risk and vulnerability to changing climatic conditions: Inverse Flood Risk Modelling of the Upper Thames River Basin, Report No. VIII. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rajurkar, M.P., Kothyari, U.C., Chaube, U.C., 2004. Modeling of the daily rainfall runoff relationship with artificial neural network. Journal of Hydrology, 285, 96–113.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Refsgaard, J.C., 1996. Terminology, modelling protocol and classification of hydrologic model codes. In: Abbott. M.B., Refsgaard, J.C. (Eds.): Distributed Hydrologic Modelling, pp. 41–54.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schreider, S., Young, P., Jakeman, A., 2001. An application of the Kalman filtering technique for streamflow forecasting in the Upper Murray Basin. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 33, 733–743.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Takagi, T., Sugeno, M., 1985. Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modelling and control. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernectics, 15, 116–132.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thirumalaiah, K., Deo, M.C., 1998. River stage forecasting using artificial neural networks. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 3, 1, 26–32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
USACE, 2000. Hydrologic Modelling System HEC–HMS: Technical reference manual. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, California.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
UTRCA, 2009. Inspiring a Healthy Environment: Flooding on the Thames River. Upper Thames River Conservation Authority, London, Ontario, Canada. Available online at http://www.thamesriver.on.ca/Water_Management/flood_history.htm - last accessed January 29, 2010.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vrugt, J.A., Diks, C.G.H., Gupta, H.V., Bouten, W., Verstraten, J.M., 2005. Improved treatment of uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: combining the strengths of global optimization and data assimilation. Water Resour. Res., 41, 1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wardah, T., Abu Bakar, S.H., Bardossy, A., Maznorizan, M., 2008. Use of geostationary meteorological satellite images in convective rain estimation for flash-flood forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 356, 3–4, 283–298.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilcox, I., Quinlan, C., Rogers, C., Troughton, M., McCallum, I., Quenneville, A., Heagy, E., Dool, D., 1998. The Thames River Basin: A Background Study for Nomination under the Canadian Heritage Rivers System. Upper Thames River Conservation Authority, London, Ontario, Canada.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wurbs, R.A., Sisson, E.D., 1999. Comparative evaluation of methods for distributing naturalized streamflows from gauged to ungauged sites. Technical Report No. 179, College Station: Texas A & M University, Water Resources Institute.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xiong, L., O’Connor, K.M., 2002. Comparison of four updating models for real-time river flow forecasting. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 47, 4, 621–639.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xiong, L., O’Connor, K.M., Guo, S., 2004. Comparison of three updating schemes using artificial neural network in flow forecasting. Journal of Earth System Science, 8, 2, 247–255.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yu, F.X.Y., Pardue, J., Adrian, D.D., 1997. Evaluation of nine models for ungauged urban basins in Louisiana. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 33, 1, 97–110.
]Search in Google Scholar
