Acceso abierto

Identification, distribution, and hosts of Meloidogyne spp. infecting horticultural crops in Florida, USA with focus on Meloidogyne enterolobii

, , , , ,  y   
24 ene 2025

Cite
Descargar portada

Florida ranks second in US vegetable sales, with its major vegetable production totaling $ 1.93 billion in 2022 (NASS, 2023). Most vegetable production in Florida occurs in the open field and on plastic-mulch raised beds in combination with drip irrigation.

Root-knot nematodes (RKN) (Meloidogyne spp.) top the chart of plant parasitic nematodes, with wide host ranges that span most cultivated crops, and are one of the most economically important plant pathogens in the U.S. and worldwide. The deep, fine sandy soils of Florida are very conducive for RKN, and these nematodes have been found damaging many economically important crops since the mid-1800s (Neal, 1889). RKN are among the most widespread plant-parasitic nematodes in Florida, with almost every vegetable crop grown in the state prone to RKN damage – particularly tomato, pepper, cucumber, squash, cantaloupe, watermelon, celery, lettuce, and potato (Neal, 1889; Desaeger, 2018). Currently, 17 species of RKN have been reported in Florida (Table 1). Among these species, M. arenaria, M. enterolobii, M. hapla, M. haplanaria, M. incognita, and M. javanica have been reported on horticultural crops during the past decade (Brito et al. 2008; 2010; Baidoo et al., 2016; Joseph et al., 2017; Smith et al., 2017).

Meloidogyne spp. present in Florida.

Meloidogyne spp. County Year References
M. arenaria Alachua 1888 Neal, 1889a; Chitwood, 1949
M. artielliab Palm Beach 1986 Lehman, 2002
M. christieic Seminole 1986 Golden and Kaplan, 1986
M. cruciani Alachua 1986 Garcia-Martinez et al., 1982
M. enterolobii (= M. mayaguensis) Dade 2002 Brito et al., 2002d
M. floridensis Palm Beach Alachua 2004 Handoo et al., 2004
M. graminicola Dade 2008 Brito et al., 2008
M. graminis (= Hysoperine graminis) Polk 1959 Sledge and Golden, 1964e; Whitehead, 1968
M. hapla Orange 1955 Lehman, 2002
M. haplanaria Collier 2016 Joseph et al., 2016
M. incognita Jefferson 1955 Lehman, 2002
M. javanica Orange 1955 Lehman, 2002
M. marylandi Marion 2012 Sekora et al., 2012
M. megatylab Baker 1984 Lehman, 2002
M. partityla Madison 2005 Crow et al., 2005
M. spartinae (= Hypsoperine spartinae) Flagler 1958 Rau and Fassuliotis, 1965f; Whitehead, 1968
M. thamesi Palm Beach 1952 Chitwood et al., 1952

First found in 1888, with species description published in 1889.

These records do not provide morphological descriptions, morphometrics or illustrations of the identified samples; therefore, their identity remain uncertain.

Currently only reported in Florida, USA.

Reported in the Continental USA, Palm Beach, and Dade Counties.

First found in 1959. Nematode genus and species description were first published in 1964.

First found in 1958, with species description published in 1965.

However, there is insufficient information on the distribution and prevalence of RKN species in Florida vegetable fields. This lack of information may be attributed to the common use of fumigant nematicides that make RKN almost undetectable in treated soil, the lack of females, and the almost exclusive presence in routine diagnostic samples of second-stage juveniles (J2) (which alone make RKN speciation difficult). Many of the high-value crop producers in Florida, including most vegetable growers, fumigate their fields before planting, which typically provides good control irrespective of the root-knot species present. This is the reason why these growers are generally not concerned about which RKN species are present in their fields. However, when integrated nematode management tactics are used, such as resistant cultivars, cover crops, crop rotations and biological control, it is more imperative to know the actual RKN species present in the field. This is especially important for M. enterolobii, as this species will overcome the current RKN resistance genes in many economic plant species (Carneiro et al., 2006; Brito et al., 2007; 2020; Cetintas et al., 2008; Kiewnick et al. 2009; Pinheiro et al., 2015).

As mentioned previously, the morphological identification of Meloidogyne species is very challenging and requires morphometric and morphological analyses of females and males as well as J2. The results of these analyses, however, are not reliable because of the variability of the morphology and measurements of RKN. The use of enzymatic analyses of females has provided a solid tool to validate identification of RKN made by morphological analyses. However, these enzymatic analyses can only be performed using females and specific enzymes, particularly esterase and malate dehydrogenase, for a correct identification.

Molecular methods have been demonstrated to be a valuable and practical approach to identifying RKN species, and they have been used to explore genetic diversity and population variations, as well as the evolutionary or taxonomic relationships of closely related species (Blok and Powers, 2009; Brito et al., 2016; Moore, 2020a; 2020b; Shao et al., 2020). DNA markers – including a region of variable size in Meloidogyne spp. between the mitochondrial COII and the large (16S) rRNA gene (Powers and Harris, 1993; Tigano et al., 2005); the small subunit 18S rRNA gene (De Ley et al., 2002; Tigano et al., 2005); the large subunit 28S D2-D3 expansion segments of the rRNA gene (Tenente et al., 2004); and the ITS of rRNA gene (Landa et al., 2008) – have been used for nematode species differentiation. However, the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has proved to be much more consistent and robust for RKN species identification, particularly for the tropical species found infecting many plant species in different parts of the world (Devran and Sogut, 2009; McClure et al., 2012; Ye et at., 2015; Baidoo et al., 2016; Khanal et al., 2016).

The use of the molecular approach for the identification of RKN has become more common in recent years in Florida (Brito et al., 2004; 2008; 2016; 2020; Jeyaprakash et al., 2006; Tigano et al., 2010; Smith et al., 2015; Baidoo et al., 2016; Moore et al., 2020a; 2020b), but has been mostly limited to isolated findings. Molecular species information on the distribution of Meloidogyne spp. in Florida is still limited, especially in vegetable and fruit fields. The overall aim of this study was to learn more about the distribution, hosts and species of the RKN found in these fields in Central and South Florida, with particular focus on M. enterolobii, and acquire more insight into the usefulness of the molecular approach to identify RKN species in large-scale surveys. The specific objectives were to (i) identify RKN infecting vegetables, fruit, and other crops; (ii) document host plants; (iii) determine RKN distribution; (iv) gain insight on the relatedness of Florida M. enterolobii with other populations from the USA and other geographical areas. For this phylogenetic study, we used some of the DNA sequences newly obtained with COXII, which have shown to be of high diagnostic value in distinguishing M. enterolobbii from the other RKN species.

Materials and Methods

Sampling and processing: A total of 304 root and soil samples from 56 different mostly fruit and vegetable crops were collected in 12 counties located in Central and South Florida from September 2019 to January 2023. The Global Positioning System (GPS) coordinates for each site were recorded using the GPS Tracks version 4.0.6 smartphone app (DM Software Solutions, LLC). Samples were collected from different cropping systems, including commercial vegetable farms; fruit and Asian vegetable farms; research farms; horticultural gardens; and natural landscapes. Samples were collected throughout the year and typically towards the end of the crop season, when symptoms, such as stunting, chlorosis and wilting, were most visible. A conical core sampler and shovel were used to take soil and root samples up to a depth of about 20 cm; the soil was collected with roots, with an effort to maintain their quality). The number of subsamples taken per sample depended on the location and size of the field and varied from a single sample in horticultural gardens and natural landscapes to three to ten plants per sample in commercial and research fields. Together with the roots, at least 500 cm3 of soil were collected and stored in a cooler (about 4 °C) for further nematode extraction, using a modified Baermann method (Regmi and Desaeger, 2020) when needed to confirm the absence of RKN in certain sample as stated below. Roots were carefully washed, and the presence of females and egg masses were checked under a dissecting microscope (Leica KL300 LED, Danaher Corporation, Washington, DC, USA). Three individual females per root system were hand-picked and used for RKN species identification. If no root galling, females, or egg masses were found, J2 were extracted from the soil sample, and in their absence, the sample was recorded as free from RKN. Plants were considered hosts of a given RKN species when root galls, females, and/or egg masses of that RKN were detected in their roots.

DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing: DNA from each hand-picked female (N = 3) was extracted using the NaOH digestion method (Hübschen et al., 2004). Nematode species identification was conducted using nonspecific primer sets followed by species-specific primers (Table 2) and DNA sequencing of selected populations. DNA sequencing was only performed for populations that were previously identified as M. enterolobii and for a few other RKN populations where PCR identification gave inconsistent results. At least one nonspecific and species-specific primer set was used to identify the RKN present in each sample. PCR was performed using an Eppendorf Mastercycler Pro Thermal Cycler (Enfield, CT) in a 25 μl reaction volume consisting of 12.5 μl of 2 × Apex™ Taq Blue DNA Polymerase Master Mix (Genesee Scientific, San Diego, CA), 1 μl of DNA extract, 0.25 μl of each 10 μM primer stock, and 11 μl of sterile water. The PCR amplification conditions are reported in Table 3. The amplicons were separated by gel electrophoresis using a 1.2% Apex general purpose agarose gel (Genesee Scientific, El Cajon, CA), at 110 V for 60 min. Gels were stained with GelRed Nucleic Acid Stain (Biotium Inc., Hayward, CA), and DNA fragments were visualized under UV light using the Gel Doc EZ Imager (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). DNA samples of M. arenaria, M. enterolobii, M. incognita, M. javanica (RKN collection, Division of Plant Industry, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Gainesville, FL) and M. hapla (RKN collection, Gulf Coast and Education Center University of Florida, Wimauma, FL) were used as positive controls for PCR in this study. As mentioned above, PCR products identified as positive for M. enterolobii were subject to DNA sequencing. For each M. enterolobii-positive sample, the best PCR product from at least one primer set was sent to Genewiz Company (South Plainfield, NJ, USA) for DNA purification and Sanger DNA sequencing. Newly obtained sequences were edited using Geneious Prime (version 2023.0.3, Biomatters, Ltd.) and deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) with the accession numbers indicated (Table 4).

Primers used in this study.

Code Meloidogyne spp. Primer Sequence 5′-3′ Gene region Reference
Far M. arenaria TCGAGGGCATCTAATAAAGG SCAR Adams et al., 2007
Rar M. arenaria GGGCTGAATATTCAAAGGAA SCAR Adam et al., 2007
JMV-1 M. hapla GGATGGCGTGCTTTCAAC IGS - SCAR Adam et al., 2007
JMV-2 M. hapla AAAAATCCCCTCGAAAAATCCACC IGS - SCAR Adam et al., 2007
Me-F M. enterolobii AACTTTTGTGAAAGTGCCGCTG IGS - rRNA Long et al., 2006
Me-R M. enterolobii TCAGTTCAGGCAGGATCAACC IGS - rRNA Long et al., 2006
MI-F M. incognita GTGAGGATTCAGCTCCCCAG SCAR Meng et al., 2004
MI-R M. incognita ACGAGGAACATACTTCTCCGTCC SCAR Meng et al., 2004
Fjav M. javanica GGTGCGCGATTGAACTGAGC SCAR Zijlstra et al., 2000
Rjav M. javanica GGCCTTAACCGACAATTAGA SCAR Zijlstra et al., 2000
1108 Nonspecific TACCTTTGACCAATCACGCT COX2-l-rRNA Powers and Harris, 1993
C2F3 Nonspecific GGTCAATGTTCAGAAATTTGTGG COX2-l-rRNA Powers and Harris, 1993
D2A Nonspecific CAAGTACCGTGAGGGAAAGTTG 28S Nunn, 1992
D3B Nonspecific TCGGAAGGAACCAGCTACTA 28S Nunn, 1992
MORF Nonspecific ATCGGGGTTTAATAATGGG IGS and tRNA-His Hugall et al., 1994
MTHIS Nonspecific AAATTCAATTGAAATTAATAGC IGS and tRNA-His Hugall et al., 1994
NAD5-F2 Nonspecific TATTTTTTGTTTGAGATATATTAG NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5 Janssen et al., 2016
NAD5-R1 Nonspecific CGTGAATCTTGATTTTCCATTTTT NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5 Janssen et al., 2016
TRNAH Nonspecific TGAATTTTTTATTGTGATTAA tRNA-His and l-rRNA Stanton et al., 1997
MRH106 Nonspecific AATTTCTAAAGACTTTTCTTAGT tRNA-His and l-rRNA Stanton et al., 1997

The procedure of the PCR amplification used in this study.

Primer Response parameter (35 cycle)
Initial degeneration Degeneration Annealing Extension Final extension
C2F3/1108 95 °C, 15 min 95 °C, 45 s 55 °C, 45 s 72 °C, 60 s 72 °C, 10 min
D2A/D3B 72 °C, 10 min
TRNAH/MRH106 95 °C, 30 s 50 °C, 30 s 68 °C, 60 s 68 °C, 10 min
MORF/MTHIS 68 °C, 10 min
Far/Rar 54 °C, 30 s 72 °C, 60 s 72 °C, 10 min
Fjav/Rjav 64 °C, 30 s 72 °C, 10 min
JMV1/JMV2 50 °C, 30 s 72 °C, 10 min
Me-F/Me-r 68 °C, 30 s 72 °C, 10 min
MI-F/MI-R 62 °C, 30 s 72 °C, 10 min
NAD5-F2/NAD5-R1 94 °C, 2 min 94 °C, 60 s 45 °C, 60 s 72 °C, 90 s 72 °C, 10 min

Meloidogyne species and GenBank accession numbers of the newly DNA sequences obtained in the present study.

Sample No. Location (County) Plant host RKN species Gene region Accession number References
FL 21 Hillsborough Cucumis sativus M. arenaria NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5 OR043670 This study
FL 22 Hillsborough Solanum lycopersicum M. arenaria NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5 OR043669 This study
FL 2 Manatee Solanum lycopersicum M. enterolobii COX2 - l-rRNA OQ680023 This study
FL 3 Hillsborough Luffa cylindrica M. enterolobii COX2 - l-rRNA OQ680018 This study
FL 4 Hillsborough Ipomoea batatas M. enterolobii COX2 - l-rRNA OQ680019 This study
FL 11 Manatee Solanum lycopersicum M. enterolobii COX2 - l-rRNA OQ835723 This study
FL 13 Hendry Capsicum annuum M. enterolobii COX2 - l-rRNA OQ680020 This study
FL 14 Manatee Cucumis sativus M. enterolobii COX2 - l-rRNA OQ680021 This study
Fl 15 Hillsborough Capsicum annuum M. enterolobii COX2 - l-rRNA OQ680022 This study
FL 16 Hillsborough Capsicum annuum M. enterolobii COX2 - l-rRNA OR161827 This study
FL 13 Hendry Capsicum annuum M. enterolobii 28S rRNA OQ508955 This study
FL 4 Hillsborough Ipomoea batatas M. enterolobii tRNA-His and l-rRNA OQ680025 This study
FL 11 Manatee Solanum lycopersicum M. enterolobii tRNA-His and l-rRNA OQ835724 This study
FL 13 Hendry Capsicum annuum M. enterolobii tRNA-His and l-rRNA OQ680026 This study
FL 16 Hillsborough Capsicum annuum M. enterolobii tRNA-His and l-rRNA OQ680027 This study
Fl 17 Hillsborough Nopalea cochenillifera M. enterolobii tRNA-His and l-rRNA OQ835727 This study
FL 18 Palm Beach Capsicum annuum M. enterolobii tRNA-His and l-rRNA OQ835725 This study
FL 19 Palm Beach Capsicum annuum M. enterolobii tRNA-His and l-rRNA OQ835726 This study
FL 20 Hillsborough Cucurbita pepo M. enterolobii tRNA-His and l-rRNA OQ680028 This study
FL 2 Manatee Solanum lycopersicum M. enterolobii tRNA-His and l-rRNA OQ680024 This study
FL 3 Hillsborough Luffa cylindrica M. enterolobii tRNA-His and l-rRNA OR161828 This study
FL 24 Miami Dade Lablab purpureus M. incognita NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5 OR043668 This study
FL 25 Manatee Solanum lycopersicum M. incognita NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5 OR033166 This study
FL 26 Manatee Solanum lycopersicum M. incognita NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5 OR033167 This study
FL 27 Manatee Solanum lycopersicum M. incognita NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5 OR043667 This study
FL 28 Palm Beach Cucumis sativus M. incognita NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5 OR033164 This study
FL 29 Palm Beach Solanum lycopersicum M. incognita NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5 OR033168 This study
FL 30 Palm Beach Abelmoschus esculentus M. incognita NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5 OR033163 This study
FL 31 Hillsborough Solanum lycopersicum M. incognita NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5 OR033165 This study

Prior to phylogeny inference, sequences were aligned and trimmed to remove ambiguously aligned residues using Geneious Prime. Phylogenetic assumptions, stationarity (constant nucleotide frequencies over time), and homogeneity (constant substitution rates over time) were assessed using matched-pairs tests of symmetry implemented in IQ-TREE (version 2.1.2; Minh et al., 2020; Naser-Khdour et al., 2019). The best-fit substitution model was then determined by ModelFinder for each partition according to Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) (Kalyaanamoorthy et al., 2017), resulting in HKY + F + G4 for both COX2-l-rRNA and l-rRNA genes. Phylogenetic tree construction, based on the two nonspecific primer sets mentioned above, was performed using MrBayes (version 3.2.7; Ronquist et al., 2012) with the following settings: two independent runs, one million generations, sampling every 1,000 generations, and discarding the first 25% of trees as burn-in. The remaining trees were used for generating a 50% majority-rule consensus tree with posterior probabilities for each node, and nodal support was estimated based on 1,000 standard bootstrap replicates. The phylogenetic trees were rooted to the outgroup species of each gene, visualized, and edited using FigTree (version 1.4.4; http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/) and Inkscape (version 1.0.1; https://inkscape.org/), respectively. The sequence alignments used in this study to build the phylogenetic trees can be found in the GenBank accession numbers listed on each phylogenetic tree.

For the phylogenetic tree based on DNA fragments of the COX2-l-rRNA gene from C2F3/1108 primer, a total of 44 sequences –36 from GenBank and 8 of M. enterolobii – were selected for this study. These sequences were from 13 countries (Australia, Brazil, Burkina Faso, China, Kenya, Mexico, Portugal, Italy, Ivory Coast, Japan, Slovenia, South Africa, and USA). The USA sequences were from six states (Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Nebraska, North Carolina, and South Carolina). For the phylogenetic tree based on the tRNA-His and l-rRNA gene from TRNAH/MRH106 primers, a total of 36 sequences – 26 from GenBank and 10 of M. enterolobii – were selected for this study. These sequences were from five countries (Brazil, China, Kenya, Mexico, and USA). The USA sequences were from four states (Georgia, Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina).

Survey data collection and display: Data concerning the RKN species identified were listed according to their geographical location, plant host, and the management practices of the field operations sampled.

Results

The findings of our survey have agronomic significance for agricultural specialists at local and national level. They enrich their knowledge about the host preference of the RKN identified in the vegetable crop systems adopted in Florida operations. The survey data are therefore presented in different categories to facilitate their interpretation by growers, agricultural specialists and extension agents in Florida and in the USA.

By geography: A total of 304 root and soil samples were collected from 12 counties (Alachua [2], Charlotte [20], Collier [10], DeSoto [26], Hardee [1], Hendry [3], Highlands [8], Hillsborough [176], Manatee [11], Miami Dade [14], Palm Beach [13] and, Sarasota [20]) in Central and South Florida from September of 2019 to January of 2023 (Fig. 1). Samples were collected from different locations, including commercial vegetable farms, fruit and Asian vegetable farms, research farms, horticultural gardens, and natural landscapes (Fig. 2). At least one RKN species was detected in every county sampled, except Charlotte (Fig. 1). RKN species were detected in 247 (81.25%) of the 304 samples collected. At least 741 females were subject to molecular analysis (247 × 3).

Figure 1:

Florida's map showing the 12 counties sampled, distribution, and prevalence of each Meloidogyne species identified in this study. Out of 304 samples collected, 247 were positive for root-knot nematodes. Counties sampled and number of samples positive for Meloidogyne spp. were Alachua (2), Collier (1), DeSoto (20), Hardee (1), Hendry (1), Highlands (8), Hillsborough (171), Manatee (10), Miami-Dade (5), Palm Beach (8), and Sarasota (20). No root-knot nematodes were found in the samples collected in Charlotte County. Map was made using ArcGIS Prop software (Esri, Redlands, CA).

Figure 2:

Distribution of Meloidogyne species across different cropping systems found in this study.

Based on the molecular analyses, including species-specific primers (Fig. 3) and DNA sequencing a total of five RKN species were identified in this study: M. arenaria, M. enterolobii, M. hapla, M. incognita, and M. javanica. M. incognita and M. enterolobii were the two most prevalent species, with each present in 76 (25.00%) samples. M. javanica was identified in 50 samples (16.44%), followed by M. arenaria with 25 samples (8.22%) and M. hapla with 16 samples (5.27%). Mixed populations of M. enterolobii and M. incognita were identified in four samples (1.31%). Hillsborough County was the most intensively sampled, with 171 samples positive for RKN. Other counties sampled where RKN was detected on at least one sample were Alachua (2), Collier (1), DeSoto (20), Hardee (1), Hendry (1), Highlands (8), Manatee (10), Miami-Dade (5), Palm Beach (8), and Sarasota (20) (Fig. 1). M. enterolobii was found in seven counties: Alachua, Hendry, Highlands, Hillsborough, Manatee, Palm Beach, and Sarasota. This represents 58% of the sampled counties and 63% of the counties found to be positive for RKN (Fig. 1).

Figure 3:

PCR amplification product generated using species-specific primer sets. A) Me = Meloidogyne enterolobii genomic DNA amplified using Me-F/Me-R primer set; B) Ma = Meloidogyne arenaria genomic DNA amplified using Far/Rar primer set; C) Mi = Meloidogyne incognita genomic DNA amplified using MI-F/MI-R primer set; D) Mj = Meloidogyne javanica genomic DNA amplified using Fjav/Rjav primer set; N = Water; M = 100-bp DNA ladder (New England Biolabs, MA), with the arrow indicating the position of the 500/517 bp band.

By growing conditions and farm type: Most samples were collected from commercial vegetable, fruit, and ornamental farms, representing a total of 145 samples (47.70%) with 106 positive samples for RKN. The crops sampled were tomato (46), pepper (23), strawberry (11), squash (7), cantaloupe (6), caladium (6), okra (5), cucumber (4), eggplant (3), guava (3), cherry tomato (3), boniato (3), parsley (3), sugar cane (3), sugarbeet (2), watermelon (2), bean (2), Caesar weed (1), corn (1), elephant ear (1), indigo (1), jackfruit (1), lily (1), luffa (1), Italian parsley (1), and peach (1) (Table 5). Five species of RKN nematodes were identified from these farms: M. incognita, M. enterolobii, M. javanica, M. hapla, M. arenaria and mixed populations of M. enterolobii and M. incognita. These represented 40 (27.58%), 20 (13.80%), 19 (13.10%), 15 (10.34%), 10 (6.90%) and 2 (1.38%) samples, respectively (Fig. 2).

Meloidogyne species found infecting different plant species in this study.

Crop Scientific name Family Total number of samplesa M. arenaria M. enterolobii M. incognita M. javanica M. hapla M. enterolobii/M. incognita
Tomato Solanum lycopersicum Solanaceae 67 (9) 4 6 22 25 0 1
Pepper Capsicum annuum Solanaceae 28 (1) 0 16 10 0 1 0
Caladium Caladium bicolor Araceae 14 14 0 0 0 0 0
Strawberry Fragaria × ananassa Rosaceae 14 (1) 0 0 0 2 11 0
Sweet potato Ipomoea batatas Convolvulaceae 14 0 14 0 0 0 0
Cucumber Cucumis sativus Cucurbitaceae 13 1 1 8 3 0 0
Cowpea Vigna unguiculata Fabaceae 11 0 1 0 10 0 0
Okra Abelmoschus esculentus Liliaceae 10 (1) 0 1 6 1 0 1
Squash Cucurbita pepo Cucurbitaceae 10 (1) 0 1 7 1 0 0
Luffa Luffa cylindrica Cucurbitaceae 9 (1) 0 7 1 0 0 0
Pumpkin Cucurbita pepo Cucurbitaceae 8 0 6 1 0 0 1
Basil Ocimum basilicum Lamiaceae 7 0 7 0 0 0 0
Cantaloupe Cucumis melo Cucurbitaceae 7 0 0 1 2 4 0
Eggplant Solanum melongena Solanaceae 6 (2) 0 4 0 0 0 0
Lettuce Lactuca sativa Asteraceae 6 (3) 0 0 3 0 0 0
Bean Phaseolus vulgaris L. Fabaceae 4 (2) 0 1 1 0 0 0
Cherry tomato Solanum lycopersicum Solanaceae 4 0 0 4 0 0 0
Lablab bean Lablab purpureus Fabaceae 4 (3) 0 0 1 0 0 0
Sugar cane Saccharum officinarum Poaceae 4 (4) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Amaranth Amaranthus sp. Amaranthaceae 3 0 0 3 0 0 0
Boniato Ipomoea batatas Convolvulaceae 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Corn Zea mays Poaceae 3 (3) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Guava Psidium guajava Myrtaceae 3 (3) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Malabar spinach Basella alba Basellaceae 3 0 2 1 0 0 0
Parsley Petroselinum crispum Apiaceae 3 (3) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Watermelon Citrullus lanatus Cucurbitaceae 3 (2) 0 0 0 1 0 0
Artichoke Cynara cardunculus Asteraceae 2 0 0 1 1 0 0
Bok choy Brassica rapa Brassicaceae 2 0 0 1 0 0 0
Ginger Zingiber officinale Zingiberaceae 2 2 0 0 0 0 0
Golden Egg Solanum macrocarpon Solanaceae 2 0 2 0 0 0 0
Hemp Cannabis sativa Cannabaceae 2 2 0 0 0 0 0
Indigo Indigofera tinctoria Fabaceae 2 (1) 0 0 0 1 0 0
Jute Corchorus olitorius Tiliaceae 2 0 2 0 0 0 0
Perilla Perilla frutescens Lamiaceae 2 0 2 0 0 0 0
Radish Raphanus sativus Brassicaceae 2 (1) 0 0 0 1 0 0
Sugar beet Beta vulgaris Amaranthaceae 2 0 2 0 0 0 0
Sunflower Helianthus annuus Asteraceae 2 (1) 0 0 1 0 0 0
Thai basil Ocimum basilicum Lamiaceae 2 0 0 1 1 0 0
Cactus Nopalea cochenillifera Cactaceae 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Caesar Weed Urena lobata Malvaceae 1(1) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cauliflower Brassica oleracea Brassicaceae 1 (1) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Chrysanthemum Chrysanthemum indicum Asteraceae 1 (1) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Coriander Coriandrum sativum Apiaceae 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Elephant ear Colocasia esculenta Araceae 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
Italian Parsley Petroselinum crispum Apiaceae 1 (1) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jackfruit Artocarpus heterophyllus Moraceae 1 (1) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lavender Lavandula angustifolia Lamiaceae 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Leek Allium ampeloprasum Amaryllidaceae 1 (1) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lily Lilium Lamiaceae 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
Mustard Brassica nigra Brassicaceae 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
Napa cabbage Brassica rapa Brassicaceae 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Peach Prunus persica Rosaceae 1 (1) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Turnip Brassica rapa Brassicaceae 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Water spinach Ipomoea aquatica Convolvulaceae 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Wild tomato Solanum capsicoides Solanaceae 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
Zucchini Cucurbita pepo Cucurbitaceae 1 (1) 0 0 0 0 0 0

Number of samples that were collected from each of the crops, with the number between parentheses representing the number of sample negative for Meloidogyne species infection.

Asian vegetable farms represented 58 samples (19.07%), with 50 of them positive for RKN. Three RKN species were detected with M. enterolobii as the predominant species, accounting for 42 samples (72.41%), followed by M. incognita with 6 samples (10.34%), and M. arenaria, with two samples (3.44%) (Fig. 2). The crops sampled were sweet potato (14), luffa (8), basil (7), pumpkin (7), perilla (2), Malabar spinach (2), amaranth (2), ginger (2), golden egg (2), jute (2), Thai basil (1), water spinach (1), radish (1), Napa cabbage (1), lettuce (1), leek (1), eggplant (1), chrysanthemum (1), cauliflower (1), and bok choy (1) (Table 5).

A total of 68 samples (22.37%) represented research institutions, including private companies and University of Florida Research Centers, with 59 positive samples for RKN. Five species of RKN were detected, with M. javanica representing 31 positive samples (45.59%), followed by M. arenaria, M. incognita, M. enterolobii and M. hapla, representing 11 (16.18%), 9 (13.23%), 7 (10.30%) of samples, and one (1.48%) positive sample, respectively (Fig. 2). The crops sampled were tomato (15), cowpea (10), caladium (9), cucumber (8), strawberry (3), squash (2), okra (2), pepper (2), squash (2), artichoke (2), corn (2), zucchini (1), watermelon (1), Thai basil (1), sunflower (1), sugar cane (1), radish (1), lettuce (1), lavender (1), indigo (1), eggplant (1), and cantaloupe (1) (Table 5).

A total of 30 (9.87%) samples were collected from horticultural gardens, with 29 positive samples for RKNs. Only two RKN species were found, with M. incognita the most common, being found in 21 (70.00%) of the samples; M. enterolobii in six of the samples (20.00%); and mixed populations of M. incognita and M. enterolobii in two of the samples (6.67%) (Fig. 2). The crops sampled were tomato (6), lettuce (4), okra (3), pepper (3), sunflower (1), squash (1), pumpkin (1), mustard (1), Malabar spinach (1), eggplant (1), cucumber (1), cowpea (1), coriander (1), cherry tomato (1), cactus (1), bok choy (1), and amaranth (1) (Table 5). Three samples were collected from natural areas; two samples were from hemp (Cannabis sativa) at a private home and were positive for M. arenaria; and one sample was collected from a wild tomato (Solanum capsicoides) in a natural preserve and was positive for M. enterolobii (Fig. 2).

By crop and plant species: A total of 56, crops belonging to 22 different families, were sampled (Table 5). Tomato was the most-sampled crop, followed by pepper, caladium, sweet potato, and strawberry. Among the plant families, Solanaceae had 108 samples, followed by Cucurbitaceae (51), Fabaceae (21), Convolvulaceae (18), and Araceae (16) (Fig. 4, Table 5). M. enterolobii was found infecting 20 different plant species, with pepper (16), sweet potato (14), basil (7), luffa (7), pumpkin (6), and tomato (6) being the most common hosts. For comparison, M. incognita was found on 21 different plant species, M. javanica on 12, M. arenaria on six and M. hapla on three (Table 5).

Figure 4:

Distribution of Meloidogyne species by crop found in this study.

Several new host records for M. enterolobii were found in this study: new worldwide host records of M. enterolobii infecting wild tomato (Solanum capsicoides); new continental USA host records of M. enterolobii infecting cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and cactus (Nopalea cochenillifera); and new Florida host records of M. enterolobii infecting bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). There were also new state host records for Florida of M. arenaria infecting hemp (Cannabis sativa); elephant ear (Colocasia esculenta); and lily (Lilium sp.), M. hapla infecting cantaloupe (Cucumis melo), and M. incognita infecting lavender (Lavandula angustifolia) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus).

Phylogenetic study: Meloidogyne enterolobii sequences obtained from this study formed a monophyletic clade with other M. enterolobii populations with 100% support. All selected sequences from this study and other locations collected in the US and other parts of the world were used for comparisons grouped together, presenting genetic similarities among them.

The phylogenetic tree, based on DNA fragments of the COX2-l-rRNA gene from C2F3/1108 primer set, placed RKN populations into five distinct groups (Fig. 5). The RKN populations clustered in five distinct clades containing sequences of 11 RKN species. In this tree, M. enterolobii, M. hapla, M. haplanaria and M. partityla showed genetic variation and clustered in four different clades. M. arenaria, M. ethiopica, M. floridensis, M. hispanica, M. incognita, M. javanica and M. luci clustered together in another separate clade, presenting genetic similarities among those species.

Figure 5:

Bayesian 50% majority-rule consensus tree inferred from mitochondrial DNA DNA fragment of cytochrome c oxidase subunit II to large subunit 16S rRNA genes from C2F3/1108 primer set. Populations of Meloidogyne enterolobii obtained in this study are represented in bold. GenBank accession number proceed species and origin. *Recently reclassified as Meloidogyne luci (Stare et al., 2017).

In the phylogenetic tree based on the tRNA-His and l-rRNA gene from TRNAH/MRH106 primer set, the RKN populations clustered in five distinct clades (Fig. 6) containing sequences of 11 RKN species. Meloidogyne enterolobii, M. hapla, M. haplanaria and M. mali clustered in four separate and distinct clades. M. arenaria, M. ethiopica, M. floridensis, M. hispanica, M. incognita, M. javanica and M. luci clustered in another separate clade, presenting genetic similarities among those species. The clade with M. enterolobii sequences contained a subclade with 66% support. In this subclade, two M. enterolobii isolates (OQ835725 and OQ835726) from this study clustered together with other isolates (KJ146864, MH800965, MN840972, MT094620, MW802190, ON320402, ON320404 and ON320406) from China, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina.

Figure 6:

Bayesian 50% majority-rule consensus tree inferred from mitochondrial DNA fragment of partial l-rRNA gene from TRNAH/MRH106 primer set. Meloidogyne enterolobii from this study are represented in bold. Branch lengths represent means of posterior distribution. GenBank accession number precedes species and origin. *Recently reclassified as Meloidogyne luci (Stare et al., 2017).

Discussion

Root-knot nematodes find perfect conditions in Florida and have been a menace to vegetable and specialty crop growers in the state since the early days of agriculture (Neal, 1889; Desaeger, 2021). Since the first report of M. enterolobii in Florida (Brito et al., 2002; 2004), two Meloidogyne surveys were carried out in the state (Brito et al. 2008, 2010). Both studies used isozyme analysis, mainly esterase (EST) and malate dehydrogenase (MDH) phenotypes, to characterize and identify the species of Meloidogyne present. In both these surveys, the most common RKN species found were M. arenaria, M. incognita and M. javanica, with M. enterolobii the most frequently found in ornamental plants. Many ornamental plants have been reported to be susceptible to M. enterolobii, and it is becoming clear that infected ornamental plants, during planting, are one of the major pathways of introducing and spreading M. enterolobii among several parts of the world (Moore et al. 2020a; 2020b; EPPO, 2023; de Heij, 2023).

In the southern US, M. incognita is the most identified RKN species in commercial fields (Schwarz et al., 2020; Marquez and Hajihassani, 2023; Faske et al., 2023). Our findings confirm the prevalence of M. incognita as the most common RKN species in Florida, but they also (and maybe surprisingly) confirm that M. enterolobii is just as prevalent. M. enterolobii was identified in 20 different crops, from large commercial fields to small community gardens. Several new host records for M. enterolobii were found in this study (as well as for other RKN species), confirming, and further expanding the already extremely broad host range that has been reported from ornamental, horticultural and agronomic crops, as well as turfgrass and weed plants, in previous studies from Florida (Brito et al., 2007, 2010; Baidoo et al., 2016; Joseph et al., 2016; Kaur et al., 2007).

In Asian vegetable farms, RKN, especially M. enterolobii, were very prevalent, often in high numbers. Most of these farms grow crops year-round, providing a continuous food supply to the nematodes, as most crops are good hosts to many RKN species (Bui et al, 2022a; 2022b). Nematode management is non-existent in these farms, and farmers generally have no knowledge about RKN or other nematodes. Due to language and cultural barriers (most farmers are of Vietnamese origin), Asian vegetable farms have had limited access to pest management information in general. It is quite likely that RKN, including M. enterolobii, has been spread across these farms with infested plant material, such as ginger rhizomes and sweetpotato tubers.

Meloidogyne arenaria was found in hemp, tomato, and cucumber, but was especially common in caladium, a very valuable ornamental crop that is grown for its tubers. Caladium has been reported to be susceptible to the three major RKN species, as well as to M. enterolobii and M. floridensis (Kokalis-Burelle et al., 2017). Additionally, caladium has a long growing period of more than six months, and RKN is the most important pathogen infecting this crop, especially when grown in sandy soil (Gu and Desaeger, 2021). Although hot water treatment, by soaking the tubers in water at 43° C for two hours, is considered an effective procedure to sanitize caladium tubers from RKN and Pythium, it has been observed that some nematodes are likely to survive (Gu and Desaeger, 2021), possibly (just like ginger in Asian vegetable farms) facilitating the spread of M. arenaria across caladium fields with tubers infested by nematodes that escaped the treatment.

Meloidogyne javanica was found on 12 different plants and was the most common RKN species on tomato. M. javanica was also detected infecting a specific strawberry cultivar, Winterstar, but it did not infect any of six other strawberry cultivars that were planted together with this cultivar (Oliveira et al., 2023). This was the first report of M. javanica infesting strawberry in Florida, where M. hapla has been the most reported RKN species on this crop. This has been confirmed by the findings in this study and previous field observations conducted by Oliveira (2022), indicating that M. hapla is being introduced into Florida fields with nematode-infested strawberry propagative material imported from northern states and Canada. Every year, more than 100 million strawberry transplants carrying the nematode are imported into Florida strawberry operations. Meloidogyne hapla can cause some late-season damage to Florida strawberry, but it can also reproduce rapidly on double- or relay-cropped vegetables grown soon after strawberry, preventing their establishment and severely stunting their growth (Desaeger, 2018; Khanal and Desaeger, 2020).

Significant regional differences in the prevalence of RKN throughout the state's vegetable area were noted. In the drier deep sand soils in west-central Florida, RKN has been long reported to be widely distributed (Neal, 1889), and visible crop damage was common in this area during our survey. In the Everglades agricultural region in south Florida (sections of Collier, Hendry, Palm Beach, and Miami-Dade counties) which has large areas of organic “muck” soils and a naturally high water table, vegetable crops rarely showed nematode damage, and RKN were also much more sporadic. The high water table and seasonal flooding of some of these fields, as well as the high organic content of the muck soils, naturally suppress RKN. Flooding has been used to control RKN since the 1930s (Brown, 1933), and organic soils are well-known to often provide excellent natural suppression of many plant-parasitic nematodes.

Meloidogyne enterolobii sequences from this study formed a monophyletic clade with other M. enterolobii populations with 100% support. The phylogenetic analysis of 12 different M. enterolobii isolates obtained from this study and 24 isolates of M. enterolobii from the USA and other countries clearly separated M. enterolobii from other RKN species and revealed low variability amongst them, clustering the isolates in one clade. This confirms the results of other studies from Brazil, South Africa and China (Tigano et al., 2010; Onkendi and Moleleki, 2013; Rashidifard et al., 2018, Shao et al., 2020). The lack of variation among M. enterolobii species can be explained by their mode of reproduction through mitotic parthenogenesis, and could also indicate possible transportation or movement of infected plant material and/or infested soil around the world. M. enterolobii has been intercepted in several European countries, including the Netherlands, Germany, United Kingdom, several times in plant material imported from Asia, South America, and Africa, including Cactaceae, Syngonium sp., Ficus sp., Ligustrum sp., Brachychiton sp., and Rosa sp. (EPPO, 2023; de Heij et al., 2023). While the M. enterolobii sequences here presented a lack of genetic diversity, it is important to point out the low number of analyses (< 100 samples), as well as the fact that phylogenetic trees based on l-rRNA indicated little variability among the isolates and placed the M. enterolobii isolates into a subclade with 66% support. Further studies analyzing more sequences are necessary to keep investigating possible genetic variation among populations found infecting different plant species in the USA and other counties.

This study confirmed the prevalence of RKN in South and Central Florida and revealed that M. incognita and M. enterolobii are the most common species in these parts of the state. On the other hand, M. enterolobii reports from North Florida are few, which may be related to the difference in crops grown there (Z. Grabau, UF, pers. comm.). Peanut (Arachis hypogeae) and corn (Zea mays), which are both non-hosts or poor hosts of M. enterolobii in the US, are mostly grown in North Florida, and much less in South and Central Florida. Knowing the prevalence, hosts, and geographic distribution of M. enterolobii is extremely important to help limit its introduction and dissemination in new areas. Because of its broad host range and the lack of RKN resistance in commercially-available vegetable and fruit cultivars, current options for managing M. enterolobii are extremely limited, which is why increased awareness is so important. This is especially important considering that M. enterolobii has been included in the list of quarantinable pathogens in some states in the USA and Europe. Knowledge from this study on the prevalence, hosts, and distribution of the nematode in Florida is critical and can be used for improving and establishing new control measures for RKN, particularly M. enterolobii.

Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
1 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Ciencias de la vida, Ciencias de la vida, otros