Acceso abierto

Improving sensitivity in the deep regions of a volume conductor using electrical focused impedance methods

Mahjabin Mobarak

Mahjabin Mobarak

Southeast UniversityDhaka, Bangladesh
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Mobarak, Mahjabin
 y 
K Siddique-e Rabbani

K Siddique-e Rabbani

Department of Biomedical Physics and Technology, University of DhakaDhaka, Bangladesh
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Rabbani, K Siddique-e
  
06 sept 2024
Improving sensitivity in the deep regions of a volume conductor using electrical focused impedance methods's Cover Image
Acerca de este artículo
Artículo anterior
Artículo siguiente
Cite
Descargar portada
Publicado en línea: 06 sept 2024
Páginas: 107 - 115
Recibido: 18 may 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/joeb-2024-0012
Palabras clave
© 2024 Mahjabin Mobarak et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Figure 1:

Schematic representation of the sensitive region on a transverse plane of a volume conductor for two orthogonal TPIMs (a, b) from which FIM-4 (c) is obtained. The current drive electrodes (red dots) and the potential electrodes (blue dots) are shown in the first two diagrams for the respective TPIM configurations [12].
Schematic representation of the sensitive region on a transverse plane of a volume conductor for two orthogonal TPIMs (a, b) from which FIM-4 (c) is obtained. The current drive electrodes (red dots) and the potential electrodes (blue dots) are shown in the first two diagrams for the respective TPIM configurations [12].

Figure 2:

(a) A 3D perspective of a rectangular phantom (33 cm × 26 cm × 12 cm) showing the placement of electrodes on the two opposite sides. (b) Cross sectional view showing schemes for 4-electrode configuration showing current and voltage electrodes: 1st step – measuring TPIM1 (left hand figure), 2nd step – measuring TPIM2 (right hand figure), changing the electrode connections indicated by I’ (current drive, red) and V’ (potential electrodes, black), respectively. FIM was obtained as an algebraic average of TPIM1 and TPIM2.
(a) A 3D perspective of a rectangular phantom (33 cm × 26 cm × 12 cm) showing the placement of electrodes on the two opposite sides. (b) Cross sectional view showing schemes for 4-electrode configuration showing current and voltage electrodes: 1st step – measuring TPIM1 (left hand figure), 2nd step – measuring TPIM2 (right hand figure), changing the electrode connections indicated by I’ (current drive, red) and V’ (potential electrodes, black), respectively. FIM was obtained as an algebraic average of TPIM1 and TPIM2.

Figure 3:

A cross-sectional view of the modelled phantom showing the points where the centers of the spherical objects were placed (black dots, with lettered names). Along the X-axis, AB = 3 cm, AC = 6.5 cm, AD = 13 cm, AE = 20.5 cm, AF = 28 cm, AG = 30 cm, and along the Y-axis, SQ = 2.1 cm, SP = 3.25 cm, SO = 6.5 cm and SE = 13 cm. Red dots show the positions of the electrodes.
A cross-sectional view of the modelled phantom showing the points where the centers of the spherical objects were placed (black dots, with lettered names). Along the X-axis, AB = 3 cm, AC = 6.5 cm, AD = 13 cm, AE = 20.5 cm, AF = 28 cm, AG = 30 cm, and along the Y-axis, SQ = 2.1 cm, SP = 3.25 cm, SO = 6.5 cm and SE = 13 cm. Red dots show the positions of the electrodes.

Figure 4:

Phantom with electrodes and the instrument for electrical impedance measurement (Maltron Bioscan 920-II) used for the experimental study.
Phantom with electrodes and the instrument for electrical impedance measurement (Maltron Bioscan 920-II) used for the experimental study.

Figure 5:

Simulation results of the percentage change of impedance for TPIM1, TPIM2, and FIM with a spherical insulator (a) and conductor (b) placed at different points along the width of the Phantom (Y-position). The same for the experimental phantom(c) with insulator and (d) conductor.
Simulation results of the percentage change of impedance for TPIM1, TPIM2, and FIM with a spherical insulator (a) and conductor (b) placed at different points along the width of the Phantom (Y-position). The same for the experimental phantom(c) with insulator and (d) conductor.

Figure 6:

Simulation results of the percentage change of impedance for TPIM1, TPIM2, and FIM with a spherical insulator (a) and conductor (b) placed at different points along the width of the Phantom (X-position). The same for the experimental phantom(c) with insulator and (d) conductor.
Simulation results of the percentage change of impedance for TPIM1, TPIM2, and FIM with a spherical insulator (a) and conductor (b) placed at different points along the width of the Phantom (X-position). The same for the experimental phantom(c) with insulator and (d) conductor.
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
1 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Ingeniería, Bioingeniería e ingeniería biomédica, Electrónica biomédica, Ciencias de la vida, Biofísica, Medicina, Ingeniería biomédica, Física, Espectroscopia y metrología
RSS Feed de revista