Cite

Figure 1.

Pedagogical interpretation of the sports standard “R-Engine” results.
Pedagogical interpretation of the sports standard “R-Engine” results.

Figure 2.

Electrode application diagram.
Electrode application diagram.

Results of the study of the General Functional Athlete Readiness with using the method "R-Engine" in all experimental series separately.

Indicators 1st series 2nd series 3rd series 4th series 5th series
HRstart, bpm 102.8 ± 13.6 137.1 ± 15.7 144.4 ± 17.9 148.2 ± 15.1 152.1 ± 16.2
HRfinish, bpm 158.4 ± 15.7 167.9 ± 14.7 173.1 ± 11.9 173.9 ± 11.6 176.8 ± 11.9
RRstart, rpm 17.1 ± 6.9 19.4 ± 4.7 22.1 ± 5.7 23.4 ± 4.7 24.1 ± 6.0
RRfinish, rpm 33.7 ± 6.5 35.1 ± 5.1 37.6 ± 7.2 39.5 ± 7.9 40.0 ± 7.6
M, % 66.7 ± 8.4 65.9 ± 7.2 67.7 ± 5.9 67.2 ± 7.1 68.4 ± 7.0
HRM, bpm 129.5 ± 18.1 134.7 ± 17.4 134.7 ± 17.4 140.1 ± 15.7 143.4 ± 15.7
GFAR, units 2.51 ± 0.70 2.48 ± 0.63 2.59 ± 0.64 2.54 ± 0.60 2.61 ± 0.57
CANAC Q, beats 5.7 ± 1.29 5.9 ± 0.87 5.7 ± 1.13 5.4 ± 0.92 5.5 ± 0.99

The degree of correlation of functional indicators with CANAC Q.

Functional indicators Group as a whole (n=80) Degree of correlation with CANAC Q
M, % 67.2 ± 7.2 r = 0.241; p < 0.01
HRM, bpm 137.5 ± 17.1 r = 0.237; p < 0.01
GFAR, units 2.55 ± 0.63 r = 0.406; p < 0.01

Classification of the studied functional indicators.

Functional indicators Group in full (n=80)
HRstart, bpm 136.9 ± 23.7
HRfinish, bpm 170.0 ± 14.8
RRstart, rpm 21.2 ± 6.2
RRfinish, rpm 37.1 ± 7.4
CANAC (Q, beats) 5.6 ± 1.07

The degree of correlation of functional indicators with CANAC Q in the study.

Indicators 1st series 2nd series 3rd series 4th series 5th series
M, % r = 0.50 r = 0.41 r = 0.18 r = 0.09 r = 0.02
p < 0.01 p < 0.01 p > 0.05 p > 0.05 p > 0.05
HRM, bpm r = 0.55 r = 0.40 r = 0.19 r = 0.08 r = 0.04
p < 0.01 p < 0.01 p > 0.05 p > 0.05 p > 0.05
GFAR, units r = 0.53 r = 0.51 r = 0.38 r = 0.29 r = 0.33
p < 0.01 p < 0.01 p < 0.05 p > 0.05 p > 0.05