This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Allensworth, E. M., & Clark, K. (2020). High school GPAs and ACT scores as predictors of college completion: Examining assumptions about consistency across high schools. Educational Researcher, 49(3), pp. 198–211. doi: 10.3102/0013189X20902110AllensworthE. M.ClarkK.2020High school GPAs and ACT scores as predictors of college completion: Examining assumptions about consistency across high schools49319821110.3102/0013189X20902110Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bang, H., Boe, O., Nilsen, F. A., & Eilertsen, D. E. (2015). Evaluating character strengths in cadets during a military field exercise: Consistency between different evaluation sources. EDULEARN15 Proceedings, pp. 7076–7082.BangH.BoeO.NilsenF. A.EilertsenD. E.2015EDULEARN15 Proceedings70767082Search in Google Scholar
Bang, H., Eilertsen, D. E., Boe, O., & Nilsen, F. A. (2016). Development of an observational instrument (OBSCIF) for evaluating character strengths in army cadets. EDULEARN16 Proceedings, pp. 7803–7808. doi: 10.21125/edulearn.2016.0711BangH.EilertsenD. E.BoeO.NilsenF. A.2016EDULEARN16 Proceedings7803780810.21125/edulearn.2016.0711Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bang, H., Eilertsen, D. E., Boe, O., & Nilsen, F. A. (2019). Measuring character strengths: Are self-ratings or other-ratings best? Presentation Held at The 3rd World Conference on Personality (World Association for Personality Psychology), April 2019, Hanoi, Vietnam.BangH.EilertsenD. E.BoeO.NilsenF. A.2019Presentation Held at The 3rd World Conference on Personality (World Association for Personality Psychology)April 2019Hanoi, VietnamSearch in Google Scholar
Boe O. (2016). Character strengths and their relevance for military officers. In: Rawat S. (ed.), Military Psychology: International Perspectives. Rawat Publications, Jaipur, India, pp. 114–126.BoeO.2016Character strengths and their relevance for military officersIn:RawatS.(ed.),Rawat PublicationsJaipur, India114126Search in Google Scholar
Boe, O., & Bang, H. (2017). The Big 12: The Most Important Character Strengths for Officers. Athens Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), pp. 161–173. doi: 10.30958/ajss.4-2-4BoeO.BangH.2017The Big 12: The Most Important Character Strengths for Officers4216117310.30958/ajss.4-2-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Boe, O., Bang, H., & Nilsen, F. A. (2015a). Selecting the most relevant character strengths for Norwegian army officers: An educational tool. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, pp. 801–809. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.188BoeO.BangH.NilsenF. A.2015aSelecting the most relevant character strengths for Norwegian army officers: An educational tool19780180910.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.188Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Boe, O., Bang, H., & Nilsen, F. A. (2015b). Experienced military officers’ perception of important character strengths. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 190, pp. 339–345. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.05.008BoeO.BangH.NilsenF. A.2015bExperienced military officers’ perception of important character strengths19033934510.1016/j.sbspro.2015.05.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Boe, O., Bang, H., & Nilsen, F. A. (2016). OBSCIF – Vurdering av dine karakterstyrker: Observasjonsskjema for vurdering av karakterstyrker hos kadetter (OBSCIF – Evaluation of your character strengths: An observational instrument for rating of character strengths in army cadets). The Norwegian Military Academy, Oslo.BoeO.BangH.NilsenF. A.2016The Norwegian Military AcademyOslo10.21125/edulearn.2016.0711Search in Google Scholar
Bollen, K. A., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2017). In defense of causal-formative indicators: A minority report. Psychological Methods, 22(3), pp. 581–596. doi: 10.1037/met0000056BollenK. A.DiamantopoulosA.2017In defense of causal-formative indicators: A minority report22358159610.1037/met0000056Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110(2), pp. 305–314. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.305BollenK.LennoxR.1991Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective110230531410.1037/0033-2909.110.2.305Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2003). Personality traits and academic examination performance. European Journal of Personality, 17, pp. 237–250. doi: 10.1002/per.473Chamorro-PremuzicT.FurnhamA.2003Personality traits and academic examination performance1723725010.1002/per.473Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey.CohenJ.19882nd edn.Lawrence ErlbaumNew JerseySearch in Google Scholar
Conard, M. A. (2006). Aptitude is not enough: How personality and behavior predict academic performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, pp. 339–346. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2004.10.003ConardM. A.2006Aptitude is not enough: How personality and behavior predict academic performance4033934610.1016/j.jrp.2004.10.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Connelly, B. S., & Ones, D. S. (2010). An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, pp. 1092–1122. doi: 10.1037/a0021212ConnellyB. S.OnesD. S.2010An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity1361092112210.1037/a0021212Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cornum, R., Matthews, M. D., & Seligman, M. E. (2011). Comprehensive soldier fitness: Building resilience in a challenging institutional context. American Psychologist, 66(1), pp. 4–9. doi: 10.1037/a0021420CornumR.MatthewsM. D.SeligmanM. E.2011Comprehensive soldier fitness: Building resilience in a challenging institutional context6614910.1037/a0021420Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cosentino, A. C., & Castro Solano, A. C. (2012). Character strengths: A study of Argentinean soldiers. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(1), pp. 199–215. doi: 10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n1.37310CosentinoA. C.Castro SolanoA. C.2012Character strengths: A study of Argentinean soldiers15119921510.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n1.37310Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006). Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management, 17(4), pp. 263–282. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00500.xDiamantopoulosA.SiguawJ. A.2006Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration17426328210.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00500.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16, pp. 939–944. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.xDuckworthA. L.SeligmanM. E.2005Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents1693994410.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, pp. 1087–1101. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087DuckworthA. L.PetersonC.MatthewsM. D.KellyD. R.2007Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals921087110110.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Duckworth, A. L., Quirk, A., Gallop, R., Hoyle, R. H., Kelly, D. R., & Matthews, M. D. (2019). Cognitive and noncognitive predictors of success. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(47), pp. 23499–23504. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1910510116DuckworthA. L.QuirkA.GallopR.HoyleR. H.KellyD. R.MatthewsM. D.2019Cognitive and noncognitive predictors of success11647234992350410.1073/pnas.1910510116Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Farsides, T., & Woodfield, R. (2003). Individual differences and undergraduate academic success: The roles of personality, intelligence, and application. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, pp. 1225–1243. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00111-3FarsidesT.WoodfieldR.2003Individual differences and undergraduate academic success: The roles of personality, intelligence, and application341225124310.1016/S0191-8869(02)00111-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Forsvaret (2012). FSJ grunnsyn på ledelse i Forsvaret [The Norwegian armed forces chief of defence basic view of leadership in the armed forces]. Norwegian Armed Forces Defence Staff, Norway.Forsvaret2012Norwegian Armed Forces Defence StaffNorwaySearch in Google Scholar
Gayton, S. D., & Kehoe, E. J. (2015a). A prospective study of character strengths as predictors of selection into the Australian army special force. Military Medicine, 180, pp. 151–157. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00181GaytonS. D.KehoeE. J.2015aA prospective study of character strengths as predictors of selection into the Australian army special force18015115710.7205/MILMED-D-14-00181Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gayton, S. D., & Kehoe, E. J. (2015b). Character strengths and hardiness of Australian army special forces applicants. Military Medicine, 180, pp. 857–862. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00527GaytonS. D.KehoeE. J.2015bCharacter strengths and hardiness of Australian army special forces applicants18085786210.7205/MILMED-D-14-00527Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gosnell, C. L., Kelly, D. R., Ender, M. G., & Matthews, M. D. (2020). Character strengths and performance outcomes among military brat and non-brat cadets. Military Psychology, 32(2), pp. 186–197. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1703434GosnellC. L.KellyD. R.EnderM. G.MatthewsM. D.2020Character strengths and performance outcomes among military brat and non-brat cadets32218619710.1080/08995605.2019.1703434Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (2014). The role of character strengths for task performance, job dedication, interpersonal facilitation, and organizational support. Human Performance, 27(3), pp. 183–205. doi: 10.1080/08959285.2014.913592HarzerC.RuchW.2014The role of character strengths for task performance, job dedication, interpersonal facilitation, and organizational support27318320510.1080/08959285.2014.913592Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Harzer, C., Bezuglova, N., & Weber, M. (2021). Incremental validity of character strengths as predictors of job performance beyond general mental ability and the Big Five. Frontiers of Psychology, 12, 518369. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.518369HarzerC.BezuglovaN.WeberM.2021Incremental validity of character strengths as predictors of job performance beyond general mental ability and the Big Five1251836910.3389/fpsyg.2021.518369Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hiss, W. C., & Franks, V. W. (2014). Defining promise: Optional standardized testing policies in American college and university admissions. Report of the National Association for College Admission Counseling (NACAC).HissW. C.FranksV. W.2014Report of the National Association for College Admission Counseling (NACAC).Search in Google Scholar
Hodara, M., & Cox, M. (2016). Developmental Education and College Readiness at the University of Alaska (REL 2016–123). Regional Educational Laboratory Northwest. US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, Washington, DC.HodaraM.CoxM.2016Regional Educational Laboratory Northwest. US Department of Education, Institute of Education SciencesWashington, DCSearch in Google Scholar
Hodara, M., & Lewis, K. (2017). How Well does High School Grade Point Average Predict College Performance by Student Urbanicity and Timing of College Entry? REL 2017–250. Regional Educational Laboratory Northwest. US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, Washington, DC.HodaraM.LewisK.2017US Department of Education, Institute of Education SciencesWashington, DCSearch in Google Scholar
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), pp. 85–98. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85JamesL. R.DemareeR. G.WolfG.1984Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias691859810.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Karris Bachik, M. A., Carey, G., & Craighead, W. E. (2020). VIA character strengths among US college students and their associations with happiness, well-being, resiliency, academic success and psychopathology. The Journal of Positive Psychology, pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2020.1752785Karris BachikM. A.CareyG.CraigheadW. E.2020VIA character strengths among US college students and their associations with happiness, well-being, resiliency, academic success and psychopathology11410.1080/17439760.2020.1752785Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kelly, D. R., Matthews, M. D., & Bartone, P. T. (2014). Grit and hardiness as predictors of performance among West Point cadets. Military Psychology, 26, pp. 327–342. doi: 10.1037/mil0000050KellyD. R.MatthewsM. D.BartoneP. T.2014Grit and hardiness as predictors of performance among West Point cadets2632734210.1037/mil0000050Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Køber, P. K., Lang-Ree, O. C., Stubberud, K. V., & Martinussen, M. (2017). Predicting basic military performance for conscripts in the Norwegian armed forces. Military Psychology, 29(6), pp. 560–569, doi: 10.1037/mil0000192KøberP. K.Lang-ReeO. C.StubberudK. V.MartinussenM.2017Predicting basic military performance for conscripts in the Norwegian armed forces29656056910.1037/mil0000192Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kobrin, J. L., Patterson, B. F., Shaw, E. J., Mattern, K. D., & Barbuti, S. M. (2008). Validity of the SAT® for Predicting First-Year College Grade Point Average. Research Report No. 2008-5. College Board Publications, New York, NY.KobrinJ. L.PattersonB. F.ShawE. J.MatternK. D.BarbutiS. M.2008Research Report No. 2008-5.College Board PublicationsNew York, NYSearch in Google Scholar
Kolditz, T. A. (2010). In Extremis Leadership: Leading as if Your Life Depended On It. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, USA.KolditzT. A.2010Jossey BassSan Francisco, USASearch in Google Scholar
Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., & Schmeck, R. R. (2009). Role of the Big Five personality traits in predicting college students’ academic motivation and achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), pp. 47–52. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.07.001KomarrajuM.KarauS. J.SchmeckR. R.2009Role of the Big Five personality traits in predicting college students’ academic motivation and achievement191475210.1016/j.lindif.2008.07.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), pp. 155–163. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012KooT. K.LiM. Y.2016A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research15215516310.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), pp. 815–852. doi: 10.1177/1094428106296642LeBretonJ. M.SenterJ. L.2008Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement11481585210.1177/1094428106296642Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lounsbury, J. W., Fisher, L. A., Levy, J. J., & Welsh, D. P. (2009). An investigation of character strengths in relation to the academic success of college students. Individual Differences Research, 7(1), pp. 52–69.LounsburyJ. W.FisherL. A.LevyJ. J.WelshD. P.2009An investigation of character strengths in relation to the academic success of college students715269Search in Google Scholar
Lounsbury, J. W., Sundstrom, E., Loveland, J. M., & Gibson, L. W. (2003). Intelligence, “Big Five” personality traits, and work drive as predictors of course grade. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, pp. 1231–1239. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00330-6LounsburyJ. W.SundstromE.LovelandJ. M.GibsonL. W.2003Intelligence, “Big Five” personality traits, and work drive as predictors of course grade351231123910.1016/S0191-8869(02)00330-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Maddi, S. R., Matthews, M. D., Kelly, D. R., Villarreal, B., & White, M. (2012). The role of hardiness and grit in predicting performance and retention of USMA cadets. Military Psychology, 24, pp. 19–28. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2012.639672MaddiS. R.MatthewsM. D.KellyD. R.VillarrealB.WhiteM.2012The role of hardiness and grit in predicting performance and retention of USMA cadets24192810.1080/08995605.2012.639672Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Matthews, M. D. (2008). Positive psychology: Adaptation, leadership, and performance in exceptional circumstances. In: Hancock, P. A., & Szalma, J. L. (eds.), Performance Under Stress. Ashgate, Burlington, Vermont, pp. 163–180.MatthewsM. D.2008Positive psychology: Adaptation, leadership, and performance in exceptional circumstancesIn:HancockP. A.SzalmaJ. L.(eds.),AshgateBurlington, Vermont163180Search in Google Scholar
Matthews, M. D. (2012). Cognitive and non-cognitive factors in soldier performance. In: Laurence, J. H., & Matthews, M. D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Military Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 197–217.MatthewsM. D.2012Cognitive and non-cognitive factors in soldier performanceIn:LaurenceJ. H.MatthewsM. D.(eds.),New YorkOxford University Press19721710.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399325.013.0073Search in Google Scholar
Matthews, M. D., Eid, J., Kelly, D., Bailey, J. K., & Peterson, C. (2006). Character strengths and virtues of developing military leaders: An international comparison. Military Psychology, 18, pp. 557–568. doi: 10.1207/s15327876mp1803s_5MatthewsM. D.EidJ.KellyD.BaileyJ. K.PetersonC.2006Character strengths and virtues of developing military leaders: An international comparison1855756810.1207/s15327876mp1803s_5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Matthews, M. D., Peterson, C., & Kelly, D. R. (2006). Character strengths predict retention of west point cadets. Paper presented at the American Psychological Society Meeting, New York.MatthewsM. D.PetersonC.KellyD. R.2006Paper presented at the American Psychological Society MeetingNew YorkSearch in Google Scholar
McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1(1), pp. 30–46. doi: 10.1037/1082-989XMcGrawK. O.WongS. P.1996Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients11304610.1037/1082-989XOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Niemiec, R. M. (2018). Character Strengths Interventions: A Field Guide for Practitioners. Hogrefe, Boston.NiemiecR. M.2018HogrefeBoston10.1027/00492-000Search in Google Scholar
Park, N. (2005). Congressional medal of honor recipients: A positive psychology perspective. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Meeting, Washington, DC.ParkN.2005Paper presented at the American Psychological Association MeetingWashington, DCSearch in Google Scholar
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification. Oxford University Press, New York/American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.PetersonC.SeligmanM. E. P.2004Oxford University Press, New York/American Psychological AssociationWashington, DCSearch in Google Scholar
Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), pp. 322–328. doi: 10.1037/a0014996PoropatA. E.2009A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance135232232810.1037/a0014996Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Roth, B., Becker, N., Romeyke, S., Schäfer, S., Domnick, F., & Spinath, F. M. (2015). Intelligence and school grades: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 53, pp. 118–137. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2015.09.002RothB.BeckerN.RomeykeS.SchäferS.DomnickF.SpinathF. M.2015Intelligence and school grades: A meta-analysis5311813710.1016/j.intell.2015.09.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, pp. 262–274. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262SchmidtF. L.HunterJ. E.1998The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings12426227410.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Strenze, T. (2007). Intelligence and socioeconomic success: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal research. Intelligence, 35, pp. 401–426. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2006.09.004StrenzeT.2007Intelligence and socioeconomic success: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal research3540142610.1016/j.intell.2006.09.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sundet, J. M., Barlaug, D. G., & Torjussen, T. M. (2004). The end of the Flynn effect? A study of secular trends in mean intelligence test scores of Norwegian conscripts during half a century, Intelligence, 32, pp. 349–362. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2004.06.004SundetJ. M.BarlaugD. G.TorjussenT. M.2004The end of the Flynn effect? A study of secular trends in mean intelligence test scores of Norwegian conscripts during half a century3234936210.1016/j.intell.2004.06.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. L. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4(1), pp. 25–29.ThorndikeE. L.1920A constant error in psychological ratings41252910.1037/h0071663Search in Google Scholar
Thorndike, R. L. (1949). Personnel Selection: Test and Measurement Techniques. Wiley, New York.ThorndikeR. L.1949WileyNew YorkSearch in Google Scholar
Wagerman, S. A., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Acquaintance reports of personality and academic achievement: A case for conscientiousness. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), pp. 221–229. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.03.001WagermanS. A.FunderD. C.2007Acquaintance reports of personality and academic achievement: A case for conscientiousness41122122910.1016/j.jrp.2006.03.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wagner, L., Holenstein, M., Wepf, H., & Ruch, W. (2020). Character strengths are related to students’ achievement, flow Experiences, and enjoyment in teacher-centered learning, individual, and group work beyond cognitive ability. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, p. 1324. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01324WagnerL.HolensteinM.WepfH.RuchW.2020Character strengths are related to students’ achievement, flow Experiences, and enjoyment in teacher-centered learning, individual, and group work beyond cognitive ability11132410.3389/fpsyg.2020.01324Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wiberg, M., & Sundström, A. (2009). A comparison of two approaches to correction of restriction of range in correlation analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 14(1), Article 5. doi: 10.7275/as0k-tm88WibergM.SundströmA.2009A comparison of two approaches to correction of restriction of range in correlation analysis141Article 5.10.7275/as0k-tm88Open DOISearch in Google Scholar