[
Alem Fonseca, M., Tsolakis, N., & Kittipanya-Ngam, P. (2024). Breaking the cycle of inertia in food supply chains: A systems thinking approach for innovation and sustainability. Supply Chain Management, 29(3), 414-443. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-01-2023-0019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chaudhuri, R., Singh, B., Agrawal, A. K., Chatterjee, S., Gupta, S., & Mangla, S. K. (2024). A TOE-DCV approach to green supply chain adoption for sustainable operations in the semiconductor industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 275, 109327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109327
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chen, Y. (2024). How blockchain adoption affects supply chain sustainability in the fashion industry: A systematic review and case studies. International Transactions in Operational Research, 31(6), 3592–3620. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13273
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP). (n.d.). Supply chain management definitions. Available online: https://cscmp.org/CSCMP/CSCMP/Educate/SCM_Definitions_and_Glossary_of_Terms.aspx (retrieved 5 August 2024).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Das, A. (2024). Predictive value of supply chain sustainability initiatives for ESG performance: A study of large multinationals. Multinational Business Review, 32(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-09-2022-0149
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Doğaner Duman, B., Adak, M., & Güleç, A. (2024). VOSviewer analysis of studies on software selection in the logistics sector. Logistics, Supply Chain, Sustainability and Global Challenges, Ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.2478/jlst-2024-0002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission. (2020). Communication from the European Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions. EU biodiversity strategy for 2030. Bringing nature back into our lives (380 final). https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0380 (retrieved 3 August 2024).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission. (2023). Circular economy action plan: For a cleaner and more competitive Europe (European et al. (2023) 99 final). European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/index_en.htm
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission. (2024). Directive (EU) 2024/1760 of the European Parliament and of the Council on corporate sustainability due diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 and Regulation (EU) 2023/2859. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L_202401760 (retrieved 3 August 2024).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission. (2024a). Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs. Critical raw materials. https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/sectors/raw-materials/areas-specific-interest/critical-raw-materials_en#fifth-list-2023-of-critical-raw-materials-for-the-eu (retrieved 3 August 2024).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Francis, J. R., Mairose, B. M., & Tichy, E. M. (2021). 2020 – The year the world was awakened to the importance of supply chain. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes, 5(1), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2020.10.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gage, E., Wang, X., Xu, B., Foster, A., Evans, J., Terry, L. A., & Falagán, N. (2024). Reducing food loss and waste contributes to energy, economic, and environmental sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 451, 142068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142068
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goel, R. K., Saunoris, J. W., & Goel, S. S. (2021). Supply chain performance and economic growth: The impact of COVID-19 disruptions. Journal of Policy Modeling, 43(2), 298–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2021.01.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haseli, G., Nazarian-Jashnabadi, J., Shirazi, B., Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M., & Moslem, S. (2024). Sustainable strategies based on the social responsibility of the beverage industry companies for the circular supply chain. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 133, 108253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108253
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hezam, I. M., Ali, A. M., Sallam, K., & others. (2024). Digital twin and fuzzy framework for supply chain sustainability risk assessment and management in supplier selection. Scientific Reports, 14, 17718. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67226-z
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kumar, D., Agrawal, S., Singh, R. K., & others. (2023). Coordination of circular supply chain for online recommerce platform in Industry 4.0 environment: A game-theoretic approach. Operations Management Research, 16, 2081–2103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-023-00384-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mariadoss, B. J., Chi, T., Tansuhaj, P., & Pomirleanu, N. (2016). Influences of firm orientations on sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3406–3414.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marty, J., Christopher, M., & Ageron, B. (2024). Making supply chains more sustainable through customer and consumer engagement: The case of rare metals. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(2), 895–908. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2610
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Merroun El M., Bartók, M. I., & Alkhlaifat, O. (2024). Achieving environmental sustainability through the adoption of Industry 4.0: An exploratory case study within the information technology industry. Logistics, Supply Chain, Sustainability and Global Challenges, Ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.2478/jlst-2024-0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Najjar, M., Yasin, M. M., Zorzini Bell, M., & Bell, D. (2024). Investigating social sustainability practices in global supply networks: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 447, 141590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141590
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Otero, I., Farrell, K. N., Pueyo, S., et al. (2020). Biodiversity policy beyond economic growth. Conservation Letters, 13, e12713. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12713
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pandey, A. K., Daultani, Y., & Pratap, S. (2024). Blockchain technology enabled critical success factors for supply chain resilience and sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), 1533–1554. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3548
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SDEWES Center. (n.d.). About SDEWES Centre. Available online: https://www.sdewes.org/home.php (retrieved 3 August 2024).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Salmi, A., Quarshie, A. M., Scott-Kennel, J., & Kähkönen, A. K. (2023). Biodiversity management: A supply chain practice view. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 29(4), 100865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2023.100865
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilkinson, T. J., Nye, C., Lobley, M., West, H. G., Clappison, A., Hilton, J., & Goodwin, A. (2024). Transforming public food procurement: Stakeholder understandings of barriers and opportunities for more localised procurement. Journal of Rural Studies, 108, 103281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103281
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ye, Y., Lau, K. H., & Teo, L. (2023). Alignment of green supply chain strategies and operations from a product perspective. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 34(6), 1566-1600. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-11-2021-0557
]Search in Google Scholar