Pre-Trial Detention Challenges in Sweden and Ukraine

1 Åklagarmyndigheten, (2014). Häktningstider och restriktioner. https://www.aklagare.se/nyheter-press/aktuellt-pa-aklagarmyndigheten/haktningstideroch-restriktioner/. Search in Google Scholar

2 Åklagarmyndigheten, (2021). Åklagarmyndighetens årsredovisning. https://www.aklagare.se/globalassets/dokument/planering-ochuppfoljning/arsredovisningar/arsredovisning-2021.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

3 Andersson, E., (2015). Maxtidsgräns för häktning - En välkommen åtgärd på vägen mot att lösa problemet med långa häktningstider? [Master thesis, Uppsala University]. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:817398/FULLTEXT01. Search in Google Scholar

4 Brottsförebyggande rådet [Brå], (2000-2021). Crime statistics. https://bra.se/bra-in-english/home/crime-and-statistics/crime-statistics.html. Search in Google Scholar

5 Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics, (2000-2021). SPACE I Reports. https://wp.unil.ch/space/space-i/annual-reports/. Search in Google Scholar

6 Council of Europe anti-torture Committee, (2022). Response of the Swedish Government to the report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on its visit to Sweden from 18 to 29 January 2021. https://rm.coe.int/1680a5a35d. Search in Google Scholar

7 Council of Europe anti-torture Committee [CPT], (2017). Report to the Ukrainian Government on the visit to Ukraine carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 21 to 30 November 2016. https://rm.coe.int/pdf/1680727930. Search in Google Scholar

8 Council of Europe anti-torture Committee [CPT], (2020). Report to the Ukrainian Government on the visit to Ukraine carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 4 to 13 August 2020. https://rm.coe.int/1680a0b93c. Search in Google Scholar

9 Council of Europe anti-torture Committee [CPT], (2021). Report to the Swedish Government on the visit to Sweden carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 18 to 29 January 2021. https://www.coe.int/en/web/cpt/-/council-of-europe-anti-torture-committee-publishes-the-response-of-the-swedish-authorities-to-the-report-on-the-2021-vis-1. Search in Google Scholar

10 Criminal Code of Ukraine, (2003). (as amended). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14. Search in Google Scholar

11 Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, (1960). (as amended). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1001-05#Text. Search in Google Scholar

12 Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, (2012). (as amended). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text. Search in Google Scholar

13 Dykiy, O. V., (2017). Modern crime trends in Ukraine in the context of the dynamics of the criminal law. Traditions and innovations of legal science: past, present, future: Mater. International science and practice Conf. (Odesa, May 19, 2017), 2, 313-315. Search in Google Scholar

14 Dykyi, O.V., (2017). Crediting the term of pre-trial detention to the term of punishment: problems and prospects. Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University, ½, 99-102. Search in Google Scholar

15 General Prosecutor’s Office of Ukraine, (2013-2022). A single report on criminal offenses by state. https://old.gp.gov.ua/ua/stst2011.html?dir_id=114140&libid=100820&c=edit&_c=fo. Search in Google Scholar

16 Hidayat, A.T., (2016). Mot en humanare häktningsreglering?-En rättsvetenskaplig analys av SOU 2016:52. [Master thesis, Lund University]. https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/search/publication/8896977. Search in Google Scholar

17 ICPS, (2000-2022). World Prison Brief. https://www.prisonstudies.org. Search in Google Scholar

18 Jerlström, M., Olsson, E., (2019). Pre-trial detention. The compatibility of the Swedish Regulation with the European Convention on Human Rights. http://www.diva-portal.se/smash/get/diva2:1353003/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

19 Justitieutskottet, (2020). Justitieutskottets betänkande 2020/21:JuU43. Effektivare hantering av häktningar och minskad isolering. https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokumentlagar/arende/betankande/effektivare-hantering-av-haktningar-ochminskad_H801JuU43/html. Search in Google Scholar

20 Knapen, M.M., (2009). Sweden. In C. Morgenstern (Ed.). Pre-trial Detention in the European Union (pp.901-929). Tilburg: Wolf Legal Publishers. Search in Google Scholar

21 Law of Ukraine, “On Amendments to the Criminal Code of Ukraine to improve the procedure for crediting pre-trial detention”. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/838-19#Text. Search in Google Scholar

22 Law of Ukraine, “On pre-trial detention” (as amended). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3352-12#Text. Search in Google Scholar

23 Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., O’Brien, K.K., (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Sci 5, 69. https://doi-org.libproxy.uregina.ca/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69. Search in Google Scholar

24 Lönnqvist, E., (2020). The Forgotten Prisoners: Individual Rights and Collective Interests in Swedish Remand Policy 1955-2020 [Master thesis, Stockholm University]. https://www.criminology.su.se/polopoly_fs/1.509506.1594795890!/menu/standard/file/Lö nnqvistEmeli_Master.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

25 Ortwein, B.M., (1995). The Swedish Legal System: An Introduction. Indiana International & Comparative Law Review. https://journals.iupui.edu/index.php/iiclr/article/view/17766. Search in Google Scholar

26 Pivnenko, L.V., (2016). Bail is an alternative to the use of a preventive measure in the form of detention. Collection of scientific works of Kharkiv National Pedagogical University named after H. S. Skovoroda “Law”, 24, 169-174. Search in Google Scholar

27 Prylutsky, S.V., (2010). Judicial review or prosecution? (Actual issues regarding pre-trial detention in the criminal process of Ukraine). Bulletin of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine, 11, 65-73. Search in Google Scholar

28 Rudko, A.A., (2013). House arrest as an alternative to detention. International legal provision of stability and security of society: materials of the scientific and theoretical conference of teachers, graduate students and students, Faculty of Law, Sumy, 102-104. Search in Google Scholar

29 Report to the Romanian Government on the ad hoc visit to Romania carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT), (2022). https://rm.coe.int/1680a62e4b. Search in Google Scholar

30 Semenov, K., (2010). Reforming the pretrial detention system in Ukraine. Quo Vadis?. https://minjust.gov.ua/m/str_29590. Search in Google Scholar

31 Sharenko, S.L., Shilo, O.H., (2016). Precautionary measure in the form of detention: problems of legal regulation and law enforcement. Bulletin of Criminal Justice, 1, 50-57. Search in Google Scholar

32 Smith, P.S., (2017). Punishment Without Conviction? Scandinavian Pre-trial Practices and the Power of the “Benevolent” State. In T. Ugelvik (Ed.). Scandinavian Penal History, Culture and Prison Practice. Embraced by the Welfare state? (pp.129-155). London: Palgrave. Search in Google Scholar

33 Statens offentliga utredningar [SOU], (2016). Färre i häkte och minskad isolering. https://www.regeringen.se/4a4461/contentassets/17535107f07745839499d8de4e84eefa/farre-i-hakte-och-minskad-isolering-sou-201652. Search in Google Scholar

34 Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention (Brå), (2017). Reducing isolation in detention Situation and proposals. English summary of Brå report 2017:6. https://bra.se/download/18.4a33c027159a89523b15ded3/1486540817077/2017_6_Reducing_isolation_in_detention.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

35 Swedish Parliamentary Ombudsmen [OPCAT], (2020). Isolation of inmates in remand prisons. https://www.jo.se/Global/NPM-protokoll/Opcat_thematic_report_isolation_of_inmates_2020_web.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

36 Tarasenko, R.V., (2015). The Detention to Ensure the Security of the Accused: Jesuit Practice or Exceptional Necessity? European Reforms Bulletin, 2, 57-61. Search in Google Scholar

37 Tishchenko, O.I., (2014). Detention: individual issues of law enforcement realities. Scientific Bulletin of the Uzhhorod National University, 135-138. Search in Google Scholar

38 Topchiy, V.V., (2015). Application of a preventive measure in the form of detention in the course of a pre-trial investigation. Scientific Bulletin of the National Academy of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, 32-36. Search in Google Scholar

39 US State Department, (2010). US State Department, 2010 Human Rights Report: Sweden. https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/2010/index.htm. Search in Google Scholar

40 Wigen, L., (2016). Restriktioner vid häktning. En analys av SOU 2016:52 i relation till CPT:s kritik och rekommendationer. [Master thesis, Lund University]. https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/search/publication/8897120. Search in Google Scholar

41 Yurchenko, V., (2020). Psychological features of the initiation and application of a preventive measure in the form of detention during a pre-trial investigation in Ukraine. Polish Scientific Bulletin, 27, 50-54. Search in Google Scholar

42 Rättegångsbalken, (1942). (as amended). https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokumentlagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/rattegangsbalk-1942740_sfs-1942-740. Search in Google Scholar