[
1. Ababio v. Mensah, 1 Ghanal Law Report 565 (1989-1990).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. African-Commission. (2003). Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Fair Trial and Legal Assistance in Africa, DOC/OS(XXX)247.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Amissah, A., (1969). Police and the Courts. Review of Ghana Law (unnumbered).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Amissah, A., (1982). Criminal Procedure in Ghana.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Asamoah & another v. The Republic, Criminal Appeal No. J3/4/2017 GHASC 13 (2017).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Ashworth, A., (2006). Four Threats to the Presumption of Innocence. 10(4) International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 241.10.1350/ijep.10.4.241
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Ashworth, A., & Redmayne, M., (2010). The Criminal Process. Oxford University Press.10.1093/he/9780199547289.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Barkow, R. E. (2006). Separation of Pwers and the Criminal Law. Stanfoed Law Review, 992.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Barrett, K., (2012). Legal Counsel. In W. M. (ed), The Social History of Crimes and Punishment in America: An Encyclopedia. Sage Publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Bridge, L. (n.d.). Towards a Culture of Complacency: Criminal Justice under new Labour. 79 Criminal Justice Matters, 22.10.1080/09627250903569965
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Browne, I., (1998). New Labour Law - New Penology? Punitive Rhetoric and the Limits of Managerialism in Criminal Justice Policy. 25(3) Journal of Law and Society, 313.10.1111/1467-6478.00094
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Cape, E., (2006). Rebalancing the Criminal Justice Process: Ethical Challenges for Criminal Defense Lawyers. 9 Legal Ethics, 59.10.1080/1460728X.2006.11424251
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Commissioner of Police v. Antwi, Ghana Law Report 408 (1961).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Damaska, M., (1997). Evidence Law Adrift. New Haven, Yale University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Duff, A., Farmer, L., Marshall, S., & Tadros, V., (2007). The Trial on Trial. Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland Oregon.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Edmund Addo v. Attorney-General and Inspector-General of Police, HR/0880/2017 (unreported) (2017).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Feinberg, J., (1984). Harm to Others. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Findley, K. A., (2012). Adversarial Inquisitions: Rethinking the Search for the Truth. 56 New York Law School Review, 911-941.10.2139/ssrn.1904588
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Freiberg, A., (2005). Managerialism in Australian Criminal Justice: RIP for KPIs. 31(1) Monash University Law Review, 18.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Ghana. (1992). Ghana Constitution.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Ghana. (n.d.). Criminal and Other Offences (Procedure) Act, 1960 (Act 30).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Goodpaster, G., (1987). On the Theory of American Adversarial Criminal Trial. 78(1) Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 125.10.2307/1143577
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Ho, H. L., (2006). The Presumption of Innocence as a Human Right. In P. Roberts, & J. Hunter, Criminal Evidence and Human Rights: Reimagining Common Law Procedural. Traditions. Hart Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Ho, H. L., (2010). Liberalism and the Criminal Trial. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 90.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Jackson, J. D., (2001). Silence and Proof: Extending the Boundaries of Criminal Proceedings in the United Kingdom. 5(1) International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 145.10.1177/136571270100500301
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Jackson, J. D., (2003). Justice for All: Putting Victims at the heart of Criminal Justice. 30(2) Journal of Law and Society, 309-326.10.1111/1467-6478.00258
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Jackson, J. D., (2005). The Effects of Human Rights on Criminal Evidentiary Processes. 68(5) Modern Law Review.10.1111/j.1468-2230.2005.00559.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Judiciary. (2018). Practice Direction (Disclosure and Case Management in Criminal Proceedings). Judicial Secretary Circular SCR/209. Accra, Accra, Ghana: Office of Judicial Secretary.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Juma v. Attorney-General, 179 African Human Rights Law Report (2003).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Landsman, S., (1983). A Brief Survey of the Development of the Adversary System. 43(4) Ohio State Law Journal, 717.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Langbein, J. H., (1997). The Privilege and Common Law Criminal Procedure: The Sixteenth to the Eighteen Centuries. In H. (Ed), The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: Its Origins and Development. Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Langbein, J. H., (2003). The Origins of the Adversarial Criminal Trial. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Lawyers-Committee-for-Human-Rights. (2000). What is Fair Trial? - A Guide to Legal Standards and Practice. Retrieved January 11, 2022, from https://www.humanrightsfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf/fair_trial.pdfIt.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Leng, R., (2001). Silence Pre-trial, Reasonable Expectations and the Normative Distortion of Fact-Finding. 5(1) International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 240.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Lord-Justice-Auld. (2001). Report of the Criminal Court Review. London: The Stationary Office.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. McEwan, J., (2011). From Adversarialims to Managerialism: Criminal Justice in Transition. 31(4) Legal Studies, 520.10.1111/j.1748-121X.2011.00201.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Mills, J. S., (1963). Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. University of Toronto Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Moisidis, C., (2008). Criminal Discovery: From Truth to Proof and Back Again. Institute of Criminology Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Monaghan, N., (2015). Law of Evidence. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139097178
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Patterson Ahenkang & 2 ors v. The Republic, DLCA 4949 (2014).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Phillip Assibit Akpeena v. The Republic, H2/23/2018 (Unreported) (February 13, 2020).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. R v. P (MB), 1 SCR (1994).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Raphael Cubagee v. Michael Yeboah Asare & others, 1 Supreme Court of Ghana of Law Report, 305 (2017-2020)).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. Rawls, J. (n.d.). Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Kelly, E (ed). New York: Columbia University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. Redmayne, M., (2007). Rethinking the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination. 27(2) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 209.10.1093/ojls/gql001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. Republic v DPP ex parte Lee, 2 ALL ER 737, 747 (1999).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. Republic v. Adu Boahen, 2 Ghana Law Report 341 (1993-1994).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. Republic v. Appiah Yaw & 2 ors, Suit No, B. IND. 1/2010 (2012).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. Republic v. Baffoe Bonnie and 4 others.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
50. Republic v. Derrick Kwantreng and 4 others, Suit No. 41/2009 DLHC 7954 (2001).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
51. Republic v. Stinchcombe, SCR 326 (1991).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
52. Sasu v. Amuah-Sekyi, 1 Ghana Law Report 296 (1987-1988).10.1136/bmj.296.6626.1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
53. Sliedregt, E. V., (2009). A Contemporary Reflection on the Presumption of Innocence. Revue Internationale de Droit Penal, 247-267.10.3917/ridp.801.0247
]Search in Google Scholar
[
54. Stewart, H., (2016). The Privilege against Self-Incrimination: Reconsidering Redmayne’s Rethinking. 20(2) International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 98.10.1177/1365712716628538
]Search in Google Scholar
[
55. United-Nations. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
56. United-Nations. (2003). General Comment 32, UN. Doc. CCPR/C/GC/32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
57. White, R., (2002). The Structure and Organization of Criminal Justice in England and Wales. In M. McConville, & G. W. Geoffrey Phillip Wilson, The Handbook of Criminal Justice Process (p. 5). Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar