<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>One of the continuing problems, which had faced the African Charter, is many of its substantive provisions that are raven with qualifications without reasonable justification. These rights guaranteed under the Charter are subject to “claw-back” clauses that are introduced by governments and public authorities thereby undermining their citizen‟s basic constitutional rights of securing fundamental freedoms. They are those rights that impose negative duty on the state and are meant to promote the values of pluralism, equality and human dignity, which should be enjoyed free from state interference. It is in the interference of these rights that commentators have frequently criticized the African Charter for rendering its protective mandate meaningless and unenforceable. With hindsight, it is evident that the foregoing critique levelled against the “claw-back” clauses under Charter is justified, as they have a chilling effect on the exercise of human and peoples‟ rights on the African continent. Such condition has produced intense academic discussion on the interpretation and implications of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Charter. None the less, the scope and the significance of the legal measures adopted by the African Commission have minimized the impact of the clauses affected considerably. Accordingly, a strong principle of interpretation adopted by the Commission has contributed to shaping the Charter‟s legal structure in harmony with international human rights law standards.</p></abstract>

One of the continuing problems, which had faced the African Charter, is many of its substantive provisions that are raven with qualifications without reasonable justification. These rights guaranteed under the Charter are subject to “claw-back” clauses that are introduced by governments and public authorities thereby undermining their citizen‟s basic constitutional rights of securing fundamental freedoms. They are those rights that impose negative duty on the state and are meant to promote the values of pluralism, equality and human dignity, which should be enjoyed free from state interference. It is in the interference of these rights that commentators have frequently criticized the African Charter for rendering its protective mandate meaningless and unenforceable. With hindsight, it is evident that the foregoing critique levelled against the “claw-back” clauses under Charter is justified, as they have a chilling effect on the exercise of human and peoples‟ rights on the African continent. Such condition has produced intense academic discussion on the interpretation and implications of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Charter. None the less, the scope and the significance of the legal measures adopted by the African Commission have minimized the impact of the clauses affected considerably. Accordingly, a strong principle of interpretation adopted by the Commission has contributed to shaping the Charter‟s legal structure in harmony with international human rights law standards.

Re-Assessment of “Claw-Back” Clauses in the Enforcement of Human and Peoples’ Rights in Africa

Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration

Journal of Legal Studies

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

One of the continuing problems, which had faced the African Charter, is many of its substantive provisions that are raven with qualifications without...

Re-Assessment of “Claw-Back” Clauses in the Enforcement of Human and Peoples’ Rights in Africa

Publicado en línea: 11 dic 2019

Páginas: 1 - 22

Recibido: 01 ago 2019

Aceptado: 01 oct 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jles-2019-0006

Palabras clave
protection, promotion, human rights, peoples‟ rights, national laws, democracy, participation, African Commission, liberties and freedoms, interpretation and enforcement mechanisms

© 2019 William Edward Adjei, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Re-Assessment of “Claw-Back” Clauses in the Enforcement of Human and Peoples’ Rights in Africa

Publicado en línea: 11 dic 2019

Páginas: 1 - 22

Recibido: 01 ago 2019

Aceptado: 01 oct 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jles-2019-0006

Palabras claveprotection, promotion, human rights, peoples‟ rights, national laws, democracy, participation, African Commission, liberties and freedoms, interpretation and enforcement mechanisms

© 2019 William Edward Adjei, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Palabras clave
protection, promotion, human rights, peoples‟ rights, national laws, democracy, participation, African Commission, liberties and freedoms, interpretation and enforcement mechanisms