[1. Bruyère O, Burlet N, Delmas PD, Rizzoli R, Cooper C, Reginster JY. Evaluation of symptomatic slow-acting drugs in osteoarthritis using the GRADE system. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2008;11:165.10.1186/1471-2474-9-165262784119087296]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Gidwani S, Fairbank A. The orthopaedic approach to managing osteoarthritis of the knee. BMJ. 2004;11:1220-1224.10.1136/bmj.329.7476.122052936715550426]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Gross AE. Cartilage resurfacing: filling defects. J Arthroplasty. 2003;11:14-17.10.1054/arth.2003.5008412730921]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Hunziker EB. Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2002;11:432-463.10.1053/joca.2002.080112056848]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Disler DG, McCauley TR, Kelman CG, et al. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy. Am J Roentgenol. 1996;11:127-132.10.2214/ajr.167.1.86593568659356]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Halbrecht JL, Jackson DW. Office arthroscopy: a diagnostic alternative. Arthroscopy. 1992;11:320-326.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Mathieu L, Bouchard A, Marchaland JP, et al. Knee MR-arthrography in assessment of meniscal and chondral lesions. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;11:40-47.10.1016/j.otsr.2008.09.00519251236]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Dzoleva-Tolevska R, Poposka A, Samardziski M, Georgieva D. Comparative analysis of diagnostic methods in meniscal lesions. US National Library of Medicine, Prilozi. 2013;34:79-84;]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Reed ME, Villacis DC, Hatch GH, Burke WS. 3.0-Tesla MRI and arthroscopy for assessment of knee articular cartilage lesions. Orthopedics. 2013;36:e1060-4.10.3928/01477447-20130724-2423937754]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Bisson LJ, Kluczynski MA, Hagstrom LS, Marzo JM. A prospective study of the association between bone contusion and intra-articular injuries associated with acute anterior cruciate ligament tear. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:1801-1807.10.1177/036354651349064923744907]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Siddiqui MA, Ahmad I, Sabir AB. Clinical examination vs. MRI: evaluation of diagnostic accuracy in detecting ACL and meniscal injuries in comparison to arthroscopy. Pol Orthop Traumatol. 2013;78:59-63.10.1007/978-1-4471-4462-5_7]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Notohamiprodjo M, Horng A, Kuschel B, Paul D. 3D-imaging of the knee with an optimized 3D-FSE-sequence and a 15-channel knee-coil. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:3441-3449.10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.04.02022579529]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Ercin E, Kaya I, Sungur I, Demirbas E. History, clinical findings, magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic correlation in meniscal lesions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:851-856.10.1007/s00167-011-1636-421833511]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Magarelli N, Carducci C, Cannataro G. MR in the evaluation of new anterior cruciate ligament and tibial tunnel position: correlation with clinical and functional features. Radiol Med. 2011;116:1124-1133.10.1007/s11547-011-0685-621509546]Search in Google Scholar
[15. von Engelhardt LV, Lahner M, Klussmann A. Arthroscopy vs. MRI for a detailed assessment of cartilage disease in osteoarthritis: diagnostic value of MRI in clinical practice. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:75.10.1186/1471-2474-11-75287346320406481]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Böttcher P, Brühschwein A, Winkels P. Value of low-field magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing meniscal tears in the canine stifle: a prospective study evaluating sensitivity and specificity in naturally occurring cranial cruciate ligament deficiency with arthroscopy as the gold standard. Vet Surg. 2010;39:296-305.10.1111/j.1532-950X.2010.00650.x20345538]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Notohamiprodjo M, Horng A, Pietschmann MF, Müller PE. MRI of the knee at 3T: first clinical results with an isotropic PDfs-weighted 3D-TSE-sequence. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:585-597.10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181b4c1a119668001]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Esparragoza-Montero R, Rodriguez-Diaz J, Lanier-Dominguez J. Evaluation of meniscal morphology and relation between the diagnostic findings of magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy in lesions of the knee. Invest Clin. 2009;50:35-44;]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Rayan F, Bhonsle S, Shukla DD, Clinical. MRI, and arthroscopic correlation in meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Int Orthop. 2009;33:129-132.10.1007/s00264-008-0520-4289920218297284]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Mughetti M, De Masi M, Teodorani A. Computerized tomography false positives in knee medial meniscus injuries. Retrospective study of 400 cases. Radiol Med. 1998;96:310-312.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Brossmann J, Muhle C, Büll CC, Schröder C. Evaluation of patellar tracking in patients with suspected patellar malalignment: cine MR imaging vs arthroscopy. AJR – Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162:361-367;10.2214/ajr.162.2.83109288310928]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Broderick LS, Turner DA, Renfrew DL. Severity of articular cartilage abnormality in patients with osteoarthritis: evaluation with fast spin-echo MR vs arthroscopy. AJR – Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162:99-103;10.2214/ajr.162.1.82737008273700]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Tung GA, Davis LM, Wiggins ME. Tears of the anterior cruciate ligament: primary and secondary signs at MR imaging. Radiology. 1993;188:661-617.10.1148/radiology.188.3.83513298351329]Search in Google Scholar