[
Allingham, M. G. and Sandmo, A. 1972. Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics 1: 323-338.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alm, J. 2012. Measuring, explaining, and controlling tax evasion: lessons from theory, experiments, and field studies. International Tax Public Finance 19: 54-77.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alm, J. 2019. What motivates tax compliance? Journal of Economic Surveys 33 (2): 353–388.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alm, J., Bloomquist, K. M. and McKee, M. 2017. When you know your neighbor pays taxes: Information, peer effects, and tax compliance. Fiscal Studies 38: 587–613.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Andreoni, J., Erard, B. and Feinstein, J. 1998. Tax compliance. Journal of Economic Literature 36 (2): 818-860.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ashby, J.S., Webley, P. and Haslam, A.S. 2009. The role of occupational taxpaying cultures in taxpaying behaviour and attitudes. Journal of Economic Psychology 30 (2): 216–227.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beron, K. J., Tauchen, H. V. and Witte, A.D. 1992. The effect of audits and socioeconomic variables on compliance. In Why people pay taxes: tax compliance and enforcement. Edited by J. Slemrod, 67-89. University of Michigan Press, MI: Ann Arbor.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bobek, D. D. and Hatfield, R. C. 2003. An investigation of the theory of planned behavior and the role of moral obligation in tax compliance. Behavioral Research in Accounting 15 (1): 13–38.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bobek, D. D., Roberts, R. W. and Sweeney, J. T. 2007. The social norms of tax compliance: Evidence from Australia, Singapore, and the United States. Journal of Business Ethics 74 (1): 49–64.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Braithwaite, V. 2009. Defiance in taxation and governance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bruner, D. M., D‘Attoma, J. and Steinmo, S. 2017. The role of gender in the provision of public goods through tax compliance. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 71: 45-55.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bruno, R. L. 2019. Tax enforcement, tax compliance and tax morale in transition economies: a theoretical model. European Journal of Political Economy 56: 193-211.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chan, C. W., Troutman, Coleen S. and O’Bryan, D. 2000. An expanded model of taxpayer compliance: Empirical evidence from the United States and Hong Kong. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation 9: 83–103.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Christian, C., and Gupta, S. 1993. New evidence on secondary evasion. Journal of the American Taxation Association 15 (1): 72-93.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chung, J. and Trivedi, V. U. 2003. The effect of friendly persuasion and gender on tax compliance behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 47: 133–145.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clarke, G. R. G. 2021. How do women managers avoid paying bribes? Economies 9: 19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clotfelter, C. T. 1983. Tax evasion and tax rates: An analysis of individual returns. Review of Economics and Statistics 65 (3): 363–373.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cox, D. 1984. Raising revenue in the underground economy. National Tax Journal 37 (3): 283–288.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Croatian Bureau of Statistics. 2022. Population Estimate of Republic of Croatia, 2021, https://podaci.dzs.hr/hr/statistika-u-nizu/ (accessed October 3, 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cullis, J. G. and Lewis, A. 1997. Why people pay taxes: from a conventional economic model to a model of social convention. Journal of Economic Psychology 18: 305-321.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cummings, R. G., Martinez-Vazquez, J., McKee, M. and Torgler, B. 2009. Tax morale affects tax compliance: Evidence from surveys and an artefactual field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 70: 447-457.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
D’attoma, J. W., Volintiru, C. and Malézieux, A. 2020. Gender, social value orientation, and tax compliance. CESifo Economic Studies 66 (3): 265–284.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Devos, K. 2007. Measuring and analysing deterrence in taxpayer compliance research. Journal of Australian Taxation 10 (2): 182-219.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Disatnik, D. and Sivan, L. 2016. The multicollinearity illusion in moderated regression analysis. Marketing Letters 27: 403-408.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dörrenberg, P. and Peichl, A. 2018. Tax Morale and the Role of Social Norms and Reciprocity. Evidence from a Randomized Survey Experiment. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 7149.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Efebera, H., Hayes, D. C., Hunton, J. E., and O’Neil, C. 2004. Tax compliance intentions of low-income individual taxpayers. Advances in Accounting Behavioural Research 7: 1-25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Erard, B. 1993. Taxation with representation: an analysis of the role of tax practitioners in tax compliance. Journal of Public Economics 52: 163-197.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Erard, B. and Ho. C. 2001. Searching for ghosts: who are the nonfilers and how much tax do they owe? Journal of Public Economics 81: 25–50.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eriksen, K. and Fallan, L. 1996. Tax knowledge and attitudes towards taxation; A report on a quasi-experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology 17 (3): 387–402.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eurostat. 2022. Tax revenue statistics, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php?title=Tax_revenue_statistics (accessed on 11 December 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fischer, C.M., Wartick, M. and Mark, M. 1992. Detection probability and taxpayer compliance: A review of the literature. Journal of Accounting Literature 11: 1-49.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fox, N., Hunn, A. and Mathers, N. 2007. Sampling and Sample Size Calculation. The NIHRRDS for the East Midlands / Yorkshire & the Humber.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Franić, J. 2020. Repression, voluntary compliance and undeclared work in a transition setting: Some evidence from Poland. Post-Communist Economies 32 (2): 250–266.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frey, B. S. 1997. Not just for the money – An economic theory of personal motivation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gangl, K. and Torgler, B. 2020. How to achieve tax compliance by the wealthy: a review of the literature and agenda for policy. Social Issues and Policy Review 14: 108-151.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gërxhani, K. 2007. Explaining gender differences in tax evasion: the case of Tirana, Albania. Feminist Economics 13: 119-155.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Górecki, M. A. and Letki, N. 2020. Social norms moderate the effect of tax system on tax evasion: Evidence from a large-scale survey experiment. Journal of Business Ethics: 1-20.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hartmann, A.J., Gangl, K., Kasper, M., Kirchler, E., Kocher, M. G., Mueller, M. and Sonntag, A. 2022. The economic crisis during the COVID-19 pandemic has a negative effect on tax compliance: Results from a scenario study in Austria. Journal of Economic Psychology 93: 102572.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hasseldine, J. 1999. Gender differences in tax compliance. Asia-Pacific Journal of Taxation 3: 73–89.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hasseldine, J. and Hite, P. A. 2003. Framing, gender and tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology 24: 517-533.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hauptman, L., Gürarda, Ş. and Korez-Vide, R. 2015. Exploring voluntary tax compliance factors in Slovenia: Implications for tax administration and policymakers. Lex Localis 13 (3): 639–659.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hayes, F. A. 2018. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regresion-based approach. The Guliford Press, New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hite, P. 1997. Identifying and mitigating taxpayer compliance. Australian Tax Forum 13: 155-80.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hofmann, E., Voracek, M., Bock, C. and Kirchler, E. 2017. Tax compliance across sociodemographic categories: Meta-analyses of survey studies in 111 countries. Journal of Economic Psychology 62: 63–71.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jackson, B. R. and Milliron, V. C. 1986. Tax compliance research: findings, problems and prospects. Journal of Accounting Literature 5: 135-166.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kastlunger, B., Dressler, S.G., Kirchler, E., Mittone, L. and Voracek, M. 2010. Sex differences in tax compliance: Differentiating between demographic sex, gender-role orientation, and prenatal masculinization (2D:4D). Journal of Economic Psychology 31 (4): 542- 552.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E. and Wahl, I. 2008. Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The “slippery slope” framework. Journal of Economic Psychology 29 (2): 210–225.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kirchler, E., Niemirowski, A. and Wearing, A. 2006. Shared subjective views, intent to cooperate and tax compliance: similarities between Australian taxpayers and tax officers. Journal of Economic Psychology 27: 502-17.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Levenko, N. and Staehr, K. 2022. Self-reported tax compliance in post-transition Estonia, Economic Systems: 101047.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lilliefors, Hubert W. 1967. On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown, Journal of the American Statistical Association 62 (318): 399–402.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Loo, E.C. 2006. The influence of the introduction on self-assessment on compliance behaviour of individual taxpayers in Malaysia. PhD thesis. University of Sydney.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mason, R. and Lowry, H. 1981. An estimate of income tax evasion in Oregon. Working Paper. Corvallis, Oregon: Survey Research Center, Oregon State University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McClelland, G. H., Irwin, J. R., Disatnik, D. and Sivan, L. (2017). Multicollinearity is a red herring in the search for moderator variables: A guide to interpreting moderated multiple regression models and a critique of Iacobucci, Schneider, Popovich, and Bakamitsos. Behavior Research Methods 49: 394-402.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McKerchar, M. 2002. The effects of complexity on unintentional noncompliance for personal taxpayers in Australia. Australian Tax Forum 17: 131-138.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meyer, J.T. 1979. Fundamental research statistics for the behavioural sciences. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muehlbacher, S., Kirchler, E. and Schwarzenberger, H. 2011. Voluntary versus enforced tax compliance: Empirical evidence for the ‘‘slippery slope” framework. European Journal of Law and Economics 32: 89–97.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD. 2019. Tax Morale: What Drives People and Businesses to Pay Tax? OECD Publishing, Paris. https://www.oecdilibrary.org/taxation/tax-morale_f3d8ea10-en (accessed December 8, 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Olsen, J., Kasper, M., Enachescu, J., Benk, S., Budak, T. and Kirchler, E. 2018. Emotions and tax compliance among small business owners: An experimental survey. International Review of Law and Economics 56: 42–52.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Onu, D. 2016. Measuring tax compliance attitudes: What surveys can tell us about tax compliance behaviour. Advances in Taxation 23: 173–190.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Onu, D., Oats, L. and Kirchler, E. 2019. The dynamics of inter-nalised and extrinsic motivation in the ethical decision-making of small business owners. Applied Psychology 68 (1): 177–201.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Orviska, M. and Hudson, J. 2002. Tax evasion, civic duty, and the law-abiding citizen. European Journal of Political Economy 19 (1): 83–102.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paleka, H., Karanović, G. and Badulescu, D. 2022. Tax compliance determinants: Empirical evidence from Croatia. Technological and Economic Development of Economy 28 (6): 1915-1932.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Park, C., and Hyun, J.K. 2003. Examining the determinants of tax compliance by experimental data: A case of Korea. Journal of Policy Modelling 25: 673-684.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Richardson, G. 2006. Determinants of tax evasion: A cross-country investigation, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 15: 150-169.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Richardson, G. 2008. The relationship between culture and tax evasion across countries: Additional evidence and extensions. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 17 (2): 67–78.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rinken, S., Domínguez-Álvarez, J.-A., Trujillo, M., Lafuente, R., Sotomayor, R., & Serrano-del-Rosal, R. 2020. Combined mobile-phone and social-media sampling for web survey on social effects of COVID-19 in Spain. Survey Research Methods 14 (2): 165–170.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Seid, Y. and Fissha, A. 2020. Gender and tax compliance: Firm level evidence from Ethiopia. Institute of Development Studies 113 (11): 1–46.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shaver, L. G., Khawer, A., Yi, Y., Aubrey-Bassler, K., Etchegary, H., Roebothan, B., Asghari, S., and Wang, P. P. 2019. Using Facebook Advertising to Recruit Representative Samples: Feasibility Assessment of a Cross-Sectional Survey. Journal of medical Internet research 21 (8): e14021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shieh, G. 2010. On the misconception of multicollinearity in detection of moderating effects: Multicollinearity is not always detrimental. Multivariate Behavioral Research 45 (3): 483-507.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Slemrod, J. 1985. An empirical test for tax evasion. Review of Economics and Statistics 67 (2): 232–238.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Slemrod, J. 2007. Cheating ourselves: The economics of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Perspectives 21 (1): 25–48.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Slemrod, J. and Yitzhaki, S. 2002. Tax avoidance, evasion and administration. In Handbook of Public Economics, edited by A. J. Auerbach and M. S. Feldstein, 1423- 1470. New York: Elsevier.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sunardi, S., Damayanti, T.W., Supramono, S. and Hermanto, Y.B. 2022. Gender, perception of audits, access to finance, and self-assessed corporate tax compliance. Economies 10: 65.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tenidou, E., Valsamidis, S., Petasakis, I. And Mandilas, A. 2015. Elenxis, an effective tool for the war against tax avoidance and evasion. Procedia Economics and Finance 33: 303–312.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Torgler, B. 2006. The importance of faith: Tax morale and religiosity. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 61: 81-109.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Torgler, B. 2007. Tax Compliance and Tax Morale: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Cheltenham: EE.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Torgler, B. and Murphy, K. 2004. Tax morale in Australia: What factors shape it and has it changed over time? Journal of Australian Taxation 7: 298-335.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Torgler, B. and Schneider, F. 2005. Attitudes towards paying taxes in Austria: An empirical analysis. Empirica 32: 231-250.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Torgler, B. and Schneider, F. 2007. What shapes attitudes toward paying taxes? evidence from multicultural European countries. Social Science Quarterly 88 (2): 443–470.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
van Dijke, M., Gobena, L. B. and Verboon, P. 2019. Make me want to pay. A three-way interaction between procedural justice, distributive justice, and power on voluntary tax compliance. Frontiers in Psychology 10: 1632.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wahlund, R. 1992. Tax changes and economic behavior: the case of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology 13: 657-677.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wärneryd, K.E., and Walerud, B. 1982. Taxes and economic behaviour: Some interview data on tax evasion in Sweden. Journal of Economic Psychology 2: 187-211.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wenzel, M. 2002. The impact of outcome orientation and justice concerns on tax compliance: the role of taxpayers’ identity. Journal of Applied Psychology 87: 629–645.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Witte, A. D. and Woodbury, D. F. 1985. The effect of tax laws and tax administration on tax compliance: the case of the U.S. individual income tax. National Tax Journal 38: 1 - 13.
]Search in Google Scholar
, 