This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Cernat, V. (2024). The unprincipled principal: How Romania’s inconsistent research reform impacted scientific output. Scientometrics, 129(9), 5557–5575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05118-9CernatV. (2024). The unprincipled principal: How Romania’s inconsistent research reform impacted scientific output. Scientometrics, 129(9), 5557–5575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05118-9Search in Google Scholar
Hladchenko, M. (2022). Implications of publication requirements for the research output of Ukrainian academics in Scopus in 1999–2019. Journal of Data and Information Science, 7(3), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2022-0016HladchenkoM. (2022). Implications of publication requirements for the research output of Ukrainian academics in Scopus in 1999–2019. Journal of Data and Information Science, 7(3), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2022-0016Search in Google Scholar
Hladchenko, M., & Moed, H. F. (2021). The effect of publication traditions and requirements in research assessment and funding policies upon the use of national journals in 28 post-socialist countries. Journal of Informetrics, 15(4), 101190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101190HladchenkoM.MoedH. F. (2021). The effect of publication traditions and requirements in research assessment and funding policies upon the use of national journals in 28 post-socialist countries. Journal of Informetrics, 15(4), 101190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101190Search in Google Scholar
Korytkowski, P., & Kulcyzcki, E. (2019). Examining how country-level science policy shapes publication patterns: The case of Poland. Scientometrics, 119(3), 1519–1543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03092-1KorytkowskiP.KulcyzckiE. (2019). Examining how country-level science policy shapes publication patterns: The case of Poland. Scientometrics, 119(3), 1519–1543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03092-1Search in Google Scholar
Marco-Cuenca, G., Salvador-Oliván, J. A., & Arquero-Avilés, R. (2021). Fraud in scientific publications in the European Union. An analysis through their retractions. Scientometrics, 126(6), 5143–5164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03977-0Marco-CuencaG.Salvador-OlivánJ. A.Arquero-AvilésR. (2021). Fraud in scientific publications in the European Union. An analysis through their retractions. Scientometrics, 126(6), 5143–5164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03977-0Search in Google Scholar
Oransky, I. (2018). Volunteer watchdogs pushed a small country up the rankings. Science, 362, 395. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.362.6413.395OranskyI. (2018). Volunteer watchdogs pushed a small country up the rankings. Science, 362, 395. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.362.6413.395Search in Google Scholar
Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Erfanmanesh, M. A. (2021). Errata and retractions associated with research papers published by authors with Hungarian affiliations. European Science Editing, 47, e60203. https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2021.e60203Teixeira da SilvaJ. A.ErfanmaneshM. A. (2021). Errata and retractions associated with research papers published by authors with Hungarian affiliations. European Science Editing, 47, e60203. https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2021.e60203Search in Google Scholar
Van Noorden, R. (2025). These universities have the most retracted scientific articles. Nature, 638, 596–599. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-00455-yVan NoordenR. (2025). These universities have the most retracted scientific articles. Nature, 638, 596–599. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-00455-ySearch in Google Scholar