This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Alam, S. & Wilson, L. (2023). Perspectives from a publishing ethics and research integrity team for required improvements. Journal of Data and Information Science, 8(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2023-0018AlamS. & WilsonL.(2023).Perspectives from a publishing ethics and research integrity team for required improvements.,8(3),1–14. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2023-0018Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Audisio, K., Robinson, N. B., Soletti, G. J., Cancelli, G., Dimagli, A., Spadaccio, C., Olaria, R. P., Chadow, D., Rahouma, M., Demetres, M., Tam, D. Y., Benedetto, U., Girardi, L. N., Kurlansky, P., Fremes, S. E., and Gaudino, M. (2022). A survey of retractions in the cardiovascular literature. International Journal of Cardiology, 349, 109–114.AudisioK.RobinsonN. B.SolettiG. J.CancelliG.DimagliA.SpadaccioC.OlariaR. P.ChadowD.RahoumaM.DemetresM.TamD. Y.BenedettoU.GirardiL. N.KurlanskyP.FremesS. E. and GaudinoM.(2022).A survey of retractions in the cardiovascular literature.,349,109–114.Search in Google Scholar
Bar-Ilan, J. & Halevi, G. (2018). Temporal characteristics of retracted articles. Scientometrics, 116(3), 1771–1783.Bar-IlanJ. & HaleviG.(2018).Temporal characteristics of retracted articles.,116(3),1771–1783.Search in Google Scholar
Brainard, J. (2018). Rethinking retractions. Science, 362(6413), 390–393.BrainardJ.(2018).Rethinking retractions.,362(6413),390–393.Search in Google Scholar
Cokol, M., lossifov, I., Rodriguez-Esteban, R., & Rzhetsky, A. (2007). How many scientific papers should be retracted? Embo Reports, 8(5), 422–423.CokolM.lossifovI.Rodriguez-EstebanR. & RzhetskyA.(2007).How many scientific papers should be retracted?,8(5),422–423.Search in Google Scholar
Davis, M. S., Riske-Morris, M., & Diaz, S. R. (2007). Causal factors implicated in research misconduct: Evidence from ORI case files. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13(4), 395–414.DavisM. S.Riske-MorrisM. & DiazS. R.(2007).Causal factors implicated in research misconduct: Evidence from ORI case files.,13(4),395–414.Search in Google Scholar
Fanelli, D. (2013). Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good sign. PloS Medicine, 10(12): e1001563.FanelliD.(2013).Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good sign.,10(12): e1001563.Search in Google Scholar
Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G., & Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(42), 17028–17033.FangF. C.SteenR. G. & CasadevallA.(2012).Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications.,109(42),17028–17033.Search in Google Scholar
Furman, J. L., Jensen, K., & Murray, F. (2012). Governing knowledge in the scientific community: Exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine. Research Policy, 41(2), 276–290.FurmanJ. L.JensenK. & MurrayF.(2012).Governing knowledge in the scientific community: Exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine.,41(2),276–290.Search in Google Scholar
Furuse, Y. (2024). Characteristics of retracted research papers before and during the covid-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Medicine, 10:1288014.FuruseY.(2024).Characteristics of retracted research papers before and during the covid-19 pandemic.,10:1288014.Search in Google Scholar
Gilbert, F. & Denison, A. (2003). Research misconduct. Clinical Radiology, 58(7), 499–504.GilbertF. & DenisonA.(2003).Research misconduct.,58(7),499–504.Search in Google Scholar
Grieneisen, M. L. & Zhang, M. (2012). A comprehensive survey of retracted articles from the scholarly literature. PLOS ONE, 7(10): e44118.GrieneisenM. L. & ZhangM.(2012).A comprehensive survey of retracted articles from the scholarly literature.,7(10): e44118.Search in Google Scholar
Gross, C. (2016). Scientific misconduct. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 693–711.GrossC.(2016).Scientific misconduct.,67,693–711.Search in Google Scholar
He, T. (2013). Retraction of global scientific publications from 2001 to 2010. Sciento- metrics, 96(2), 555–561.HeT.(2013).Retraction of global scientific publications from 2001 to 2010.,96(2),555–561.Search in Google Scholar
Hesselmann, F., Graf, V., Schmidt, M., & Reinhart, M. (2017). The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles. Current Sociology, 65(6), 814–845.HesselmannF.GrafV.SchmidtM. & ReinhartM.(2017).The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles.,65(6),814–845.Search in Google Scholar
Hsiao, T.-K. & Schneider, J. (2022). Continued use of retracted papers: Temporal trends in citations and (lack of) awareness of retractions shown in citation contexts in biomedicine. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(4), 1144–1169.HsiaoT.-K. & SchneiderJ.(2022).Continued use of retracted papers: Temporal trends in citations and (lack of) awareness of retractions shown in citation contexts in biomedicine.,2(4),1144–1169.Search in Google Scholar
Li, M. & Shen, Z. (2024). Science map of academic misconduct. The Innovation, 5(2):100593.LiM. & ShenZ.(2024).Science map of academic misconduct.,5(2):100593.Search in Google Scholar
Lu, S. F., Jin, G. Z., Uzzi, B., and Jones, B. (2013). The retraction penalty: Evidence from the web of science. Scientific Reports, 3:3146.LuS. F.JinG. Z.UzziB. and JonesB.(2013).The retraction penalty: Evidence from the web of science.,3:3146.Search in Google Scholar
Madlock-Brown, C. R. & Eichmann, D. (2015). The (lack of) impact of retraction on citation networks. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(1), 127–137.Madlock-BrownC. R. & EichmannD.(2015).The (lack of) impact of retraction on citation networks.,21(1),127–137.Search in Google Scholar
Mena, J. D., Ndoye, M., Cohen, A. J., Kamal, P., & Breyer, B. N. (2019). The landscape of urological retractions: the prevalence of reported research misconduct. BJU International, 124(1), 174–179.MenaJ. D.NdoyeM.CohenA. J.KamalP. & BreyerB. N.(2019).The landscape of urological retractions: the prevalence of reported research misconduct.,124(1),174–179.Search in Google Scholar
Mongeon, P. & Lariviere, V. (2016). Costly collaborations: The impact of scientific fraud on co-authors’ careers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(3), 535–542.MongeonP. & LariviereV.(2016).Costly collaborations: The impact of scientific fraud on co-authors’ careers.,67(3),535–542.Search in Google Scholar
Mousavi, T. & Abdollahi, M. (2020). A review of the current concerns about misconduct in medical sciences publications and the consequences. Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 28(1), 359–369.MousaviT. & AbdollahiM.(2020).A review of the current concerns about misconduct in medical sciences publications and the consequences.,28(1),359–369.Search in Google Scholar
Palla, I. A., Singson, M., and Thiyagarajan, S. (2023). Systematic examination of post- and precitation of Indian-authored retracted papers. Learned Publishing, 36(4), 638–650.PallaI. A.SingsonM. and ThiyagarajanS.(2023).Systematic examination of post- and precitation of Indian-authored retracted papers.,36(4),638–650.Search in Google Scholar
Peng, H., Romero, D. M., & Horvat, E.-A. (2022). Dynamics of cross-platform attention to retracted papers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(25): e2119086119.PengH.RomeroD. M. & HorvatE.-A.(2022).Dynamics of cross-platform attention to retracted papers.,119(25): e2119086119.Search in Google Scholar
Rong, L. Q., Audisio, K., Rahouma, M., Soletti, G. J., Cancelli, G., & Gaudino, M. (2022). A systematic review of retractions in the field of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 36(2), 403–411.RongL. Q.AudisioK.RahoumaM.SolettiG. J.CancelliG. & GaudinoM.(2022).A systematic review of retractions in the field of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.,36(2),403–411.Search in Google Scholar
Rosenkrantz, A. B. (2016). Retracted publications within radiology journals. American Journal of Roentgenology, 206(2), 231–235.RosenkrantzA. B.(2016).Retracted publications within radiology journals.,206(2),231–235.Search in Google Scholar
Sharma, K. (2021). Team size and retracted citations reveal the patterns of retractions from 1981 to 2020. Scientometrics, 126(10), 8363–8374.SharmaK.(2021).Team size and retracted citations reveal the patterns of retractions from 1981 to 2020.,126(10),8363–8374.Search in Google Scholar
Sharma, P., Sharma, B., Reza, A., Inampudi, K. K., & Dhamija, R. K. (2023). A systematic review of retractions in biomedical research publications: reasons for retractions and their citations in Indian affiliations. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 597.SharmaP.SharmaB.RezaA.InampudiK. K. & DhamijaR. K.(2023).A systematic review of retractions in biomedical research publications: reasons for retractions and their citations in Indian affiliations.,10(1),597.Search in Google Scholar
Steen, R. G. (2011). Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(4), 249–253.SteenR. G.(2011).Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?,37(4),249–253.Search in Google Scholar
Steen, R. G. and Hamer, R. M. (2014). A case-control comparison of retracted and non-retracted clinical trials: Can retraction be predicted? Publications, 2(1), 27–37.SteenR. G. and HamerR. M.(2014).Publications,2(1),27–37.Search in Google Scholar
Steneck, N. H. (2006). Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 53–74.SteneckN. H.(2006).Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions.,12(1),53–74.Search in Google Scholar
Teixeira da Silva, J. & Nazarovets, S.(2023).Assessment of retracted papers, and their retraction notices, from a cancer journal associated with “paper mills”. Journal of Data and Information Science, 8(2) 118–125. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2023-0009Teixeira da SilvaJ. & NazarovetsS.(2023).Assessment of retracted papers, and their retraction notices, from a cancer journal associated with “paper mills”.,8(2)118–125. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2023-0009Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tong, S., Shen, Z., Huang, T., & Yang, L. (2022). Fighting against academic mis-conduct: What can scientometricians do? Journal of Data and Information Science, 7(2), 4–5.TongS.ShenZ.HuangT. & YangL.(2022).Fighting against academic mis-conduct: What can scientometricians do?,7(2),4–5.Search in Google Scholar
Trikalinos, N. A., Evangelou, E., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2008). Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(5), 464–470.TrikalinosN. A.EvangelouE. & IoannidisJ. P. A.(2008).Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers.,61(5),464–470.Search in Google Scholar
Van Noorden, R. (2023). More than 10, 000 research papers were retracted in 2023-a new record. Nature, 624(7992), 479–481.Van NoordenR.(2023).More than 10, 000 research papers were retracted in 2023-a new record.,624(7992),479–481.Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, J. K. K. (2023). The right to retract and the danger of retractions. Society, 60(2), 167–175.WilsonJ. K. K.(2023).The right to retract and the danger of retractions.,60(2),167–175.Search in Google Scholar