This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Ahmadpoor, M., & Jones, B.F. (2017). The dual frontier: Patented inventions and prior scientific advance. Science, 357(6351), 583–587.AhmadpoorM.JonesB.F.2017The dual frontier: Patented inventions and prior scientific advance357635158358710.1126/science.aam952728798128Search in Google Scholar
Archambault, E., Campbell, D., Gingras, Y., & Larivière, V. (2009). “Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (7), 1320–1326. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21062ArchambaultE.CampbellD.GingrasY.LarivièreV.2009“Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus”60713201326https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.2106210.1002/asi.21062Search in Google Scholar
Bryan, K.A., Ozcan, Y., & Sampat, B. (2020). In-text patent citations: A user's guide. Research Policy, 49(4), 103946.BryanK.A.OzcanY.SampatB.2020In-text patent citations: A user's guide49410394610.3386/w25742Search in Google Scholar
Callaert, J., Pellens, M., & Van Looy, B. (2014). Sources of inspiration? Making sense of scientific references in patents. Scientometrics, 98(3), 1617–1629.CallaertJ.PellensM.Van LooyB.2014Sources of inspiration? Making sense of scientific references in patents9831617162910.1007/s11192-013-1073-xSearch in Google Scholar
Coffano, M., & Tarasconi, G. (2014). Crios—Patstat database: Sources, contents and access rules. Center for Research on Innovation, Organization and Strategy, Crios Working Paper n. 1. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2404344 (accessed: 01/06/2020). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2404344CoffanoM.TarasconiG.2014Center for Research on Innovation, Organization and StrategyCrios Working Paper n. 1. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2404344 (accessed: 01/06/2020). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.240434410.2139/ssrn.2404344Search in Google Scholar
European Patent Office. (2019). Data catalog Patstat global. Versión 5.13. EPO Patstat customers. https://www.epo.orgEuropean Patent Office2019EPO Patstat customershttps://www.epo.orgSearch in Google Scholar
Gorraiz, J., Gumpenberger, C., & Wieland, M. (2011). “Galton 2011 revisited: A bibliometric journey in the footprints of a universal genius”. Scientometrics, 88(2), 627–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0393-yGorraizJ.GumpenbergerC.WielandM.2011“Galton 2011 revisited: A bibliometric journey in the footprints of a universal genius”882627652https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0393-y10.1007/s11192-011-0393-ySearch in Google Scholar
Guerrero-Bote, V.P., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2015). “Analysis of scientific production in food science from 2003 to 2013”. Journal of food science, 80(12), R2619–R2626. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.13108Guerrero-BoteV.P.Moya-AnegónF.2015“Analysis of scientific production in food science from 2003 to 2013”8012R2619R2626https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.1310810.1111/1750-3841.1310826512941Search in Google Scholar
Guerrero-Bote, V.P., Sánchez-Jiménez, R., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2019). “The citation from patents to scientific output revisited: A new approach to Patstat / Scopus matching”. El profesional de la información, 28(4), e280401. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.jul.01Guerrero-BoteV.P.Sánchez-JiménezR.Moya-AnegónF.2019“The citation from patents to scientific output revisited: A new approach to Patstat / Scopus matching”284e280401https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.jul.0110.3145/epi.2019.jul.01Search in Google Scholar
Hane, P.J. (2004). “Elsevier announces Scopus service”. Information today. http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbreader.asp?ArticleID=16494 (accessed: 01/06/2020).HaneP.J.2004Information todayhttp://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbreader.asp?ArticleID=16494 (accessed: 01/06/2020).Search in Google Scholar
Hinze, S., & Schmoch, U. (2004). Opening the black box. In: Moed, H.F., Glänzel, W., and Schmoch, U. (2004) (eds.). Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems. Dordrecht (the Netherlands): Kluwer Academic Publishers, 215–235.HinzeS.SchmochU.2004Opening the black boxIn:MoedH.F.GlänzelW.SchmochU.2004(eds.).Dordrecht (the Netherlands)Kluwer Academic Publishers21523510.1007/1-4020-2755-9_10Search in Google Scholar
Jacsó, P. (2011). “The h-index, h-core citation rate and the bibliometric profile of the Scopus database”. Online information review, 35(3), 492–501. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521111151487JacsóP.2011“The h-index, h-core citation rate and the bibliometric profile of the Scopus database”353492501https://doi.org/10.1108/1468452111115148710.1108/14684521111151487Search in Google Scholar
Jefferson, O.A., Jaffe, A., Ashton, D., Warren, B., Koellhofer, D., Dulleck, U., Bilder, G., Ballagh, A., Moe, J., DiCuccio, M., Ward, K., Bilder, G., Dolby, K., & Jefferson, R.A. (2018). “Mapping the global influence of published research on industry and innovation”. Nature biotechnology, 36(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0818-772aJeffersonO.A.JaffeA.AshtonD.WarrenB.KoellhoferD.DulleckU.BilderG.BallaghA.MoeJ.DiCuccioM.WardK.BilderG.DolbyK.JeffersonR.A.2018“Mapping the global influence of published research on industry and innovation”3613139https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0818-772a10.1038/nbt.404929319684Search in Google Scholar
Kang, B., & Tarasconi, G. (2016). “Patstat revisited: Suggestions for better usage”. World patent information, 46, 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2016.06.001KangB.TarasconiG.2016“Patstat revisited: Suggestions for better usage”465663https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2016.06.00110.1016/j.wpi.2016.06.001Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., Moya Anegón, F., & Guerrero-Bote, V.P. (2010). “Journal maps on the basis of Scopus data: A comparison with the Journal Citation Reports of the ISI”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(2), 352–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21250LeydesdorffL.Moya AnegónF.Guerrero-BoteV.P.2010“Journal maps on the basis of Scopus data: A comparison with the Journal Citation Reports of the ISI”612352369https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.2125010.1002/asi.21250Search in Google Scholar
Lissoni, F. (2012). “Academic patenting in Europe: An overview of recent research and new perspectives”. World patent information, 34(3), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2012.03.002LissoniF.2012“Academic patenting in Europe: An overview of recent research and new perspectives”343197205https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2012.03.00210.1016/j.wpi.2012.03.002Search in Google Scholar
Lotti, F., & Marin, G. (2013). “Matching of Patstat applications to AIDA firms: Discussion of the methodology and results”. Bank of Italy occasional paper, n. 166. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2283111 (accessed: 01/06/2020). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2283111LottiF.MarinG.2013“Matching of Patstat applications to AIDA firms: Discussion of the methodology and results”https://ssrn.com/abstract=2283111 (accessed: 01/06/2020). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.228311110.2139/ssrn.2283111Search in Google Scholar
Lundberg, J. (2007). “Lifting the crown—citation z-score”. Journal of Informetrics, 1(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2006.09.007LundbergJ.2007“Lifting the crown—citation z-score”12145154https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2006.09.00710.1016/j.joi.2006.09.007Search in Google Scholar
Magerman, T., Van-Looy, B., & Song, X.Y. (2006). Data production methods for harmonized patent statistics: Patentee name standardization. Technical report, K.U. Leuven. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3888793/5836029/KS-AV-06-002-EN.PDF (accessed: 01/06/2020).MagermanT.Van-LooyB.SongX.Y.2006Technical report, K.U. Leuven. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3888793/5836029/KS-AV-06-002-EN.PDF (accessed: 01/06/2020).Search in Google Scholar
Maraut, S., & Martínez, C. (2014). “Identifying author–inventors from Spain: Methods and a first insight into results”. Scientometrics, 101(1), 445–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1409-1MarautS.MartínezC.2014“Identifying author–inventors from Spain: Methods and a first insight into results”1011445476https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1409-110.1007/s11192-014-1409-1Search in Google Scholar
Martínez, C. (2011). “Patent families: When do different definitions really matter?”, Scientometrics, v. 86, pp. 39–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0251-3MartínezC.2011“Patent families: When do different definitions really matter?”863963https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0251-310.1007/s11192-010-0251-3Search in Google Scholar
Moya-Anegón, F., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Vargas-Quesada, B., Corera-Álvarez, E., Muñoz-Fernández, F.J., González-Molina, A., & Herrero-Solana, V. (2007). “Coverage analysis of Scopus: A journal metric approach”. Scientometrics, 73(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1681-4Moya-AnegónF.Chinchilla-RodríguezZ.Vargas-QuesadaB.Corera-ÁlvarezE.Muñoz-FernándezF.J.González-MolinaA.Herrero-SolanaV.2007“Coverage analysis of Scopus: A journal metric approach”7315378https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1681-410.1007/s11192-007-1681-4Search in Google Scholar
Moya-Anegón, F., Guerrero-Bote, V.P., López-Illescas, C., & Moed, H.F. (2018). “Statistical relationships between corresponding authorship, international co-authorship and citation impact of national research systems”. Journal of informetrics, 12(4), 1251–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.10.004Moya-AnegónF.Guerrero-BoteV.P.López-IllescasC.MoedH.F.2018“Statistical relationships between corresponding authorship, international co-authorship and citation impact of national research systems”12412511262https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.10.00410.1016/j.joi.2018.10.004Search in Google Scholar
Moya-Anegón, F., López-Illescas, C., Guerrero-Bote, V.P., & Moed, H.F. (2020). The citation impact of social sciences and humanities upon patentable technology. Scientometrics, to be published.Moya-AnegónF.López-IllescasC.Guerrero-BoteV.P.MoedH.F.2020The citation impact of social sciences and humanities upon patentable technologyto be published.10.1007/s11192-020-03530-5Search in Google Scholar
Narin, F., & Olivastro, D. (1992). Status report: Linkage between technology and science. Research Policy, 21, 237–249.NarinF.OlivastroD.1992Status report: Linkage between technology and science2123724910.1016/0048-7333(92)90018-YSearch in Google Scholar
Narin, F., Hamilton, K.S., & Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research Policy, 26, 317–330.NarinF.HamiltonK.S.OlivastroD.1997The increasing linkage between US technology and public science2631733010.1016/S0048-7333(97)00013-9Search in Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). OECD Patent Statistics Manual, OECD, Paris. https://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentstatisticsmanual.htmOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development2009OECDParishttps://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentstatisticsmanual.htmSearch in Google Scholar
Pickering, B. (2004). “Elsevier prepares Scopus to rival ISI Web of science”. Information world review, n. 8.PickeringB.2004“Elsevier prepares Scopus to rival ISI Web of science”8Search in Google Scholar
Poege, F., Harhoff, D., Gaessler, F., & Baruffaldi, S. (2019). Science quality and the value of inventions. Science advances, 5(12), easy7323.PoegeF.HarhoffD.GaesslerF.BaruffaldiS.2019Science quality and the value of inventions512easy732310.1126/sciadv.aay7323690586631844673Search in Google Scholar
Price, D.J.D (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149, 510–515.PriceD.J.D1965Networks of scientific papers14951051510.1515/9781400841356.149Search in Google Scholar
Raffo, J.D., & Lhuillery, S. (2009). “How to play the ‘Names game’: Patent retrieval comparing different heuristics”. Research policy, 38(10), 1617–1627. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1441172RaffoJ.D.LhuilleryS.2009“How to play the ‘Names game’: Patent retrieval comparing different heuristics”381016171627https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.144117210.1016/j.respol.2009.08.001Search in Google Scholar
Schmoch, U., & Khan, M. (2019). Methodological challenges for creating patent indicators. In: Glanzel, W., Moed, H.F., Schmoch, U., & Thelwall, M. (eds.), Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Cham (Switzerland): Springer Nature, 907–927.SchmochU.KhanM.2019Methodological challenges for creating patent indicatorsIn:GlanzelW.MoedH.F.SchmochU.ThelwallM.(eds.),Cham (Switzerland)Springer Nature90792710.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_37Search in Google Scholar
Schoen, A., Heinisch, D., & Buenstorf, G. (2014). “Playing the ‘Name game’ to identify academic patents in Germany”. Scientometrics, 101(1), 527–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1400-xSchoenA.HeinischD.BuenstorfG.2014“Playing the ‘Name game’ to identify academic patents in Germany”1011527545https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1400-x10.1007/s11192-014-1400-xSearch in Google Scholar
SCImago Research Group. (2010). SIR Methodology: General Considerations. https://www.scimagoir.com/methodology.php (accessed: 01/06/2020).SCImago Research Group2010https://www.scimagoir.com/methodology.php (accessed: 01/06/2020).Search in Google Scholar
Thoma, G., & Torrisi, S. (2007). Creating powerful indicators for innovation studies with approximate matching algorithms. A test based on Patstat and Amadeus databases (No. 211). KITeS, Centre for Knowledge, Internationalization and Technology Studies, Università Bocconi, Milano, Italy. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.573.8107&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed: 01/06/2020).ThomaG.TorrisiS.2007KITeS, Centre for Knowledge, Internationalization and Technology Studies, Università BocconiMilano, Italyhttp://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.573.8107&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed: 01/06/2020).Search in Google Scholar
Van Raan, A.F.J. (2017). Patent Citations Analysis and Its Value in Research Evaluation: A Review and a New Approach to Map Technology-relevant Research. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2, 13–50.Van RaanA.F.J.2017Patent Citations Analysis and Its Value in Research Evaluation: A Review and a New Approach to Map Technology-relevant Research2135010.1515/jdis-2017-0002Search in Google Scholar
Veugelers, R., & Wang, J. (2019). Scientific novelty and technological impact. Research Policy, 48(6), 1362–1372.VeugelersR.WangJ.2019Scientific novelty and technological impact4861362137210.1016/j.respol.2019.01.019Search in Google Scholar
Waltman, L., van Eck, N.J., van Leeuwen, T.N., Visser, M.S., & van Raan, A.F. (2011). “Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations”. Journal of informetrics, 5(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.08.001WaltmanL.van EckN.J.van LeeuwenT.N.VisserM.S.van RaanA.F.2011“Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations”513747https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.08.00110.1016/j.joi.2010.08.001Search in Google Scholar