Lone Geniuses or One among Many? An Explorative Study of Contemporary Highly Cited Researchers

Aksnes, D.W. (2003). Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation, 12(3), 159–170. AksnesD.W. 2003 Characteristics of highly cited papers Research Evaluation 12 3 159 170 10.3152/147154403781776645 Search in Google Scholar

Aksnes, D.W. (2006). Citation rates and perceptions of scientific contribution. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 57(2), 169–185. AksnesD.W. 2006 Citation rates and perceptions of scientific contribution Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST) 57 2 169 185 10.1002/asi.20262 Search in Google Scholar

Aksnes, D.W., Langfeldt, L., & Wouters, P. (2019). Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: An overview of basic concepts and theories. SAGE Open, 9(1). doi:http://dx.doi.org10.1177/2158244019829575 AksnesD.W. LangfeldtL. WoutersP. 2019 Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: An overview of basic concepts and theories SAGE Open 9 1 doi:http://dx.doi.org10.1177/2158244019829575 10.1177/2158244019829575 Search in Google Scholar

Aksnes, D.W., Schneider, J.W., & Gunnarsson, M. (2012). Ranking national research systems by citation indicators. A comparative analysis using whole and fractionalised counting methods. Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 36–43. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2011.08.002 AksnesD.W. SchneiderJ.W. GunnarssonM. 2012 Ranking national research systems by citation indicators. A comparative analysis using whole and fractionalised counting methods Journal of Informetrics 6 1 36 43 10.1016/j.joi.2011.08.002 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Basu, A. (2006). Using ISI's ‘Highly Cited Researchers’ to obtain a country level indicator of citation excellence. Scientometrics, 68(3), 361–375. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0117-x BasuA. 2006 Using ISI's ‘Highly Cited Researchers’ to obtain a country level indicator of citation excellence Scientometrics 68 3 361 375 10.1007/s11192-006-0117-x Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Batagelj, V., & Cerinšek, M. (2013). On bibliographic networks. Scientometrics, 96(3), 845–864. BatageljV. CerinšekM. 2013 On bibliographic networks Scientometrics 96 3 845 864 10.1007/s11192-012-0940-1 Search in Google Scholar

Blumel, C., & Schniedermann, A. (2020). Studying review articles in scientometrics and beyond: A research agenda. Scientometrics, 124(1), 711–728. doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03431-7 BlumelC. SchniedermannA. 2020 Studying review articles in scientometrics and beyond: A research agenda Scientometrics 124 1 711 728 10.1007/s11192-020-03431-7 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bonaccorsi, A., Cicero, T., Haddawy, P., & Hassan, S.U. (2017). Explaining the transatlantic gap in research excellence. Scientometrics, 110(1), 217–241. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2180-2 BonaccorsiA. CiceroT. HaddawyP. HassanS.U. 2017 Explaining the transatlantic gap in research excellence Scientometrics 110 1 217 241 10.1007/s11192-016-2180-2 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bornmann, L. (2014). How are excellent (highly cited) papers defined in bibliometrics? A quantitative analysis of the literature. Research Evaluation, 23(2), 166–173. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvu002 BornmannL. 2014 How are excellent (highly cited) papers defined in bibliometrics? A quantitative analysis of the literature Research Evaluation 23 2 166 173 10.1093/reseval/rvu002 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45–80. doi:10.1108/00220410810844150 BornmannL. DanielH.D. 2008 What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior Journal of Documentation 64 1 45 80 10.1108/00220410810844150 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bornmann, L., Wagner, C., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). BRICS countries and scientific excellence: A bibliometric analysis of most frequently cited papers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1507–1513. doi:10.1002/asi.23333 BornmannL. WagnerC. LeydesdorffL. 2015 BRICS countries and scientific excellence: A bibliometric analysis of most frequently cited papers Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66 7 1507 1513 10.1002/asi.23333 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Brainard, J. (2019). Open-access megajournals lose momentum. Science, 365(6458), 1067. doi:10.1126/science.365.6458.1067 BrainardJ. 2019 Open-access megajournals lose momentum Science 365 6458 1067 10.1126/science.365.6458.1067 31515364 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Casadevall, A., & Fang, F.C. (2013). Is the Nobel Prize good for science? The FASEB Journal, 27(12), 4682–4690. CasadevallA. FangF.C. 2013 Is the Nobel Prize good for science? The FASEB Journal 27 12 4682 4690 10.1096/fj.13-23875824008752 Search in Google Scholar

Danell, R. (2011). Can the quality of scientific work be predicted using information on the author's track record? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 50–60. doi:10.1002/asi.21454 DanellR. 2011 Can the quality of scientific work be predicted using information on the author's track record? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62 1 50 60 10.1002/asi.21454 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Dequilettes, D., Garfinkel, S., Ge, B.H., Hugelius, G., Kim, J., Marchesan, S., … Thouvenin, O. (2018). The world at their feet. Nature, 561(7723), S10–S15. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-06622-8 DequilettesD. GarfinkelS. GeB.H. HugeliusG. KimJ. MarchesanS. ThouveninO. 2018 The world at their feet Nature 561 7723 S10 S15 10.1038/d41586-018-06622-8 30232442 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Docampo, D., & Cram, L. (2019). Highly cited researchers: A moving target. Scientometrics, 118(3), 1011–1025. doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2993-2 DocampoD. CramL. 2019 Highly cited researchers: A moving target Scientometrics 118 3 1011 1025 10.1007/s11192-018-2993-2 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2001). Key Figures 2001. Special edition. Indicators for benchmarking of national research policies. Brussels. European Commission 2001 Key Figures 2001 Special edition Indicators for benchmarking of national research policies Brussels Search in Google Scholar

Ferretti, F., Pereira, A.G., Veertesy, D., & Hardeman, S. (2018). Research excellence indicators: Time to reimagine the ‘making of’? Science and Public Policy, 45(5), 731–741. doi:10.1093/scipol/scy007 FerrettiF. PereiraA.G. VeertesyD. HardemanS. 2018 Research excellence indicators: Time to reimagine the ‘making of’? Science and Public Policy 45 5 731 741 10.1093/scipol/scy007 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gallie, W.B. (1955). Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167–198. GallieW.B. 1955 Essentially Contested Concepts Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56 167 198 10.7591/9781501741319-010 Search in Google Scholar

Garfield, E. (1986). Do Nobel Prize winners write citation classics? Current Contents, 23, 3–8. GarfieldE. 1986 Do Nobel Prize winners write citation classics? Current Contents 23 3 8 Search in Google Scholar

Garfield, E. (1992). The 1991-Nobel prize winners were all citation superstars. Current Contents, 5, 3–9. GarfieldE. 1992 The 1991-Nobel prize winners were all citation superstars Current Contents 5 3 9 Search in Google Scholar

Garfield, E., & Welljams-Dorof, A. (1992). Of Nobel class: A citation perspective on high impact research authors. Theoretical Medicine, 13(2), 117–135. GarfieldE. Welljams-DorofA. 1992 Of Nobel class: A citation perspective on high impact research authors Theoretical Medicine 13 2 117 135 10.1007/BF021636251412072 Search in Google Scholar

Gauffriau, M., & Larsen, P.O. (2005). Counting methods are decisive for rankings based on publication and citation studies. Scientometrics, 64(1), 85–93. GauffriauM. LarsenP.O. 2005 Counting methods are decisive for rankings based on publication and citation studies Scientometrics 64 1 85 93 10.1007/s11192-005-0239-6 Search in Google Scholar

Glänzel, W., & Czerwon, H.-J. (1992). What are highly cited publications? A method applied to German scientific papers, 1980–1989. Research Evaluation, 2(3), 135–141. GlänzelW. CzerwonH.-J. 1992 What are highly cited publications? A method applied to German scientific papers, 1980–1989 Research Evaluation 2 3 135 141 10.1093/rev/2.3.135 Search in Google Scholar

Glenny, A.M., Worthington, H.V., Esposito, M., & Nieri, M. (2009). What are clinical guidelines? European Journal of Oral Implantology, 2(2), 145–148. GlennyA.M. WorthingtonH.V. EspositoM. NieriM. 2009 What are clinical guidelines? European Journal of Oral Implantology 2 2 145 148 Search in Google Scholar

Hallonsten, O. (2016). Big Science Transformed. Science, Politics and Organization in Europe and the United States: Palgrave Macmillan. HallonstenO. 2016 Big Science Transformed Science, Politics and Organization in Europe and the United States Palgrave Macmillan 10.1007/978-3-319-32738-9 Search in Google Scholar

Harzing, A.W. (2013). Document categories in the ISI Web of Knowledge: Misunderstanding the Social Sciences? Scientometrics, 94(1), 23–34. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0738-1 HarzingA.W. 2013 Document categories in the ISI Web of Knowledge: Misunderstanding the Social Sciences? Scientometrics 94 1 23 34 10.1007/s11192-012-0738-1 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lamont, M. (2009). How professors think: Inside the curious world of academic judgment. Harvard University Press. LamontM. 2009 How professors think: Inside the curious world of academic judgment Harvard University Press 10.4159/9780674054158 Search in Google Scholar

Langfeldt, L., Nedeva, M., Sorlin, S., & Thomas, D.A. (2020). Co-existing notions of research quality: A framework to study context-specific understandings of good research. Minerva, 58(1), 115–137. doi:10.1007/s11024-019-09385-2 LangfeldtL. NedevaM. SorlinS. ThomasD.A. 2020 Co-existing notions of research quality: A framework to study context-specific understandings of good research Minerva 58 1 115 137 10.1007/s11024-019-09385-2 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., Sugimoto, C.R., & Tsou, A. (2015). Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1323–1332. doi:10.1002/asi.23266 LariviereV. GingrasY. SugimotoC.R. TsouA. 2015 Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900 Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66 7 1323 1332 10.1002/asi.23266 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Leydesdorff, L., & Park, H.W. (2017). Full and fractional counting in bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 11(1), 117–120. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2016.11.007 LeydesdorffL. ParkH.W. 2017 Full and fractional counting in bibliometric networks Journal of Informetrics 11 1 117 120 10.1016/j.joi.2016.11.007 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Li, J.C., Yin, Y., Fortunato, S., & Wang, D.S. (2020). Scientific elite revisited: patterns of productivity, collaboration, authorship and impact. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 17(165). doi:10.1098/rsif.2020.0135 LiJ.C. YinY. FortunatoS. WangD.S. 2020 Scientific elite revisited: patterns of productivity, collaboration, authorship and impact Journal of the Royal Society Interface 17 165 10.1098/rsif.2020.0135 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Li, J.T. (2016). What we learn from the shifts in highly cited data from 2001 to 2014? Scientometrics, 108(1), 57–82. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1958-6 LiJ.T. 2016 What we learn from the shifts in highly cited data from 2001 to 2014? Scientometrics 108 1 57 82 10.1007/s11192-016-1958-6 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L., & Randal, R.J. (1951). Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 193, 265–275. LowryO.H. RosebroughN.J. FarrA.L. RandalR.J. 1951 Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent Journal of Biological Chemistry 193 265 275 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6 Search in Google Scholar

Martin, B.R., & Irvine, J. (1983). Assessing basic research: Some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy. Research Policy, 12, 61–90. MartinB.R. IrvineJ. 1983 Assessing basic research: Some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy Research Policy 12 61 90 10.1016/0048-7333(83)90005-7 Search in Google Scholar

Merton, R.K. (1979). Foreword. In E. Garfield (Ed.), Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. John Wiley & Sons. MertonR.K. 1979 Foreword In GarfieldE. (Ed.), Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities John Wiley & Sons 10.1016/B978-044452245-0/50000-9 Search in Google Scholar

Moed, H.F. (2005). Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Springer. MoedH.F. 2005 Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation Springer Search in Google Scholar

Moore, S., Neylon, C., Eve, M.P., O’Donnell, D.P., & Pattinson, D. (2017). “Excellence R Us”: university research and the fetishisation of excellence. Palgrave Communications, 3, 16105. doi:10.1057/palcomms.2016.105 MooreS. NeylonC. EveM.P. O’DonnellD.P. PattinsonD. 2017 “Excellence R Us”: university research and the fetishisation of excellence Palgrave Communications 3 16105 10.1057/palcomms.2016.105 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Nielsen, M.W., & Andersen, J.P. (2021). Global citation inequality is on the rise. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of the USA (PNAS). 118 (7), e2012208118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2012208118 NielsenM.W. AndersenJ.P. 2021 Global citation inequality is on the rise Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of the USA (PNAS) 118 7 e2012208118 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2012208118 10.1073/pnas.2012208118789632833558230 Search in Google Scholar

Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Waltman, L., & van Eck, N.J. (2016). Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1178–1195. Perianes-RodriguezA. WaltmanL. van EckN.J. 2016 Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting Journal of Informetrics 10 4 1178 1195 10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006 Search in Google Scholar

Piro, F.N., Aksnes, D.W., & Rorstad, K. (2013). A macro analysis of productivity differences across fields: Challenges in the measurement of scientific publishing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 307–320. doi:10.1002/asi.22746 PiroF.N. AksnesD.W. RorstadK. 2013 A macro analysis of productivity differences across fields: Challenges in the measurement of scientific publishing Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 2 307 320 10.1002/asi.22746 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Plomp, R. (1994). The highly cited papers of professors as an indicator of a research group's scientific performance. Scientometrics, 29(3), 377–393. PlompR. 1994 The highly cited papers of professors as an indicator of a research group's scientific performance Scientometrics 29 3 377 393 10.1007/BF02033446 Search in Google Scholar

Porter, A.L., Chubin, D.E., & Jin, X.Y. (1988). Citations and scientific progress: comparing bibliometric measures with scientist judgments. Scientometrics, 13(3–4), 103–124. PorterA.L. ChubinD.E. JinX.Y. 1988 Citations and scientific progress: comparing bibliometric measures with scientist judgments Scientometrics 13 3–4 103 124 10.1007/BF02017178 Search in Google Scholar

Price, D.J.d.S. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149, 510–515. PriceD.J.d.S. 1965 Networks of scientific papers Science 149 510 515 10.1515/9781400841356.149 Search in Google Scholar

Schmoch, U. (2020). Mean values of skewed distributions in the bibliometric assessment of research units. Scientometrics, 125, 925–935. doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03476-8 SchmochU. 2020 Mean values of skewed distributions in the bibliometric assessment of research units Scientometrics 125 925 935 10.1007/s11192-020-03476-8 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Seglen, P.O. (1992). The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(9), 628–638. SeglenP.O. 1992 The skewness of science Journal of the American Society for Information Science 43 9 628 638 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199210)43:9<628::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-0 Search in Google Scholar

Seglen, P.O. (1997). Citations and journal impact factors: Questionable indicators of research quality. Allergy, 52(11), 1050–1056. SeglenP.O. 1997 Citations and journal impact factors: Questionable indicators of research quality Allergy 52 11 1050 1056 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1997.tb00175.x Search in Google Scholar

Shapin, S. (1989). The invisible technician. American Scientist, 77(6), 554–563. ShapinS. 1989 The invisible technician American Scientist 77 6 554 563 Search in Google Scholar

Simonton, D.K. (2013). After Einstein: Scientific genius is extinct. Nature, 493(7434), 602. doi:10.1038/493602a SimontonD.K. 2013 After Einstein: Scientific genius is extinct Nature 493 7434 602 10.1038/493602a Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Stilgoe, J. (2014). Against excellence. The Guardian. StilgoeJ. 2014 Against excellence The Guardian Search in Google Scholar

Tijssen, R., & Winnink, J. (2018). Capturing ‘R&D excellence’: Indicators, international statistics, and innovative universities. Scientometrics, 114(2), 687–699. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2602-9 TijssenR. WinninkJ. 2018 Capturing ‘R&D excellence’: Indicators, international statistics, and innovative universities Scientometrics 114 2 687 699 10.1007/s11192-017-2602-9 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Tijssen, R.J.W., Visser, M.S., & van Leeuwen, T.N. (2002). Benchmarking international scientific excellence: Are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference? Scientometrics, 54(3), 381–397. doi:10.1023/a:1016082432660 TijssenR.J.W. VisserM.S. van LeeuwenT.N. 2002 Benchmarking international scientific excellence: Are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference? Scientometrics 54 3 381 397 10.1023/a:1016082432660 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

van Leeuwen, T.N., Visser, M.S., Moed, H.F., Nederhof, T.J., & van Raan, A.F.J. (2003). Holy grail of science policy: Exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence. Scientometrics, 57(2), 257–280. doi:10.1023/a:1024141819302 van LeeuwenT.N. VisserM.S. MoedH.F. NederhofT.J. van RaanA.F.J. 2003 Holy grail of science policy: Exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence Scientometrics 57 2 257 280 10.1023/a:1024141819302 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Vazire, S. (2017). Our obsession with eminence warps research. Nature, 547(7661), 7. doi:10.1038/547007a VazireS. 2017 Our obsession with eminence warps research Nature 547 7661 7 10.1038/547007a Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Wagner, C.S. (2008). The new invisible college: Science for development. Brookings Institution Press. WagnerC.S. 2008 The new invisible college: Science for development Brookings Institution Press Search in Google Scholar

Wallace, M.L., Lariviere, V., & Gingras, Y. (2012). A small world of citations? The influence of collaboration networks on citation practices. Plos One, 7(3), e33339. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033339 WallaceM.L. LariviereV. GingrasY. 2012 A small world of citations? The influence of collaboration networks on citation practices Plos One 7 3 e33339 10.1371/journal.pone.0033339 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Waltman, L. (2012). An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 700–711. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.008 WaltmanL. 2012 An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing Journal of Informetrics 6 4 700 711 10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.008 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Web of Science Group. (2018). Highly cited researchers. Identifying top talent in the sciences and social sciences. Retrieved from https://clarivate.com/tag/highly-cited-researchers/ Web of Science Group 2018 Highly cited researchers. Identifying top talent in the sciences and social sciences Retrieved from https://clarivate.com/tag/highly-cited-researchers/ Search in Google Scholar

Wilsdon, J. (2015). We need a measured approach to metrics. Nature, 523(7559), 129. doi:10.1038/523129a WilsdonJ. 2015 We need a measured approach to metrics Nature 523 7559 129 10.1038/523129a Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Wouters, P., Thelwall, M., Kousha, K., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., Rushforth, A., & Franssen, T. (2015). The Metric Tide: Literature Review (Supplementary Report I to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management). WoutersP. ThelwallM. KoushaK. WaltmanL. de RijckeS. RushforthA. FranssenT. 2015 The Metric Tide: Literature Review (Supplementary Report I to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management) Search in Google Scholar

Wu, L.F., Wang, D.S., & Evans, J.A. (2019). Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology. Nature, 566(7744), 378–382. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9 WuL.F. WangD.S. EvansJ.A. 2019 Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology Nature 566 7744 378 382 10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9 30760923 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Wuchty, S., Jones, B.F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. doi:10.1126/science.1136099 WuchtyS. JonesB.F. UzziB. 2007 The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge Science 316 5827 1036 1039 10.1126/science.1136099 17431139 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar