This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Ba, Z., Cao, Y., Mao, J., & Li, G. (2019). A hierarchical approach to analyzing knowledge integration between two fields—a case study on medical informatics and computer science. Scientometrics, 119(3), 1455–1486.BaZ.CaoY.MaoJ.LiG.2019A hierarchical approach to analyzing knowledge integration between two fields—a case study on medical informatics and computer scienceScientometrics11931455148610.1007/s11192-019-03103-1Search in Google Scholar
Bahadoran, Z., Mirmiran, P., Kashfi, K., & Ghasemi, A. (2019). The principles of biomedical scientific writing: Title. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 17(4), e98326.BahadoranZ.MirmiranP.KashfiK.GhasemiA.2019The principles of biomedical scientific writing: TitleInternational Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism174e9832610.5812/ijem.98326694216831998383Search in Google Scholar
Bertin, M., Atanassova, I., Gingras, Y., & Larivière, V. (2016). The invariant distribution of references in scientific articles. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(1), 164–177.BertinM.AtanassovaI.GingrasY.LarivièreV.2016The invariant distribution of references in scientific articlesJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology67116417710.1002/asi.23367Search in Google Scholar
Chi, R., & Young, J. (2013). The interdisciplinary structure of research on intercultural relations: A co-citation network analysis study. Scientometrics, 96(1), 147–171.ChiR.YoungJ.2013The interdisciplinary structure of research on intercultural relations: A co-citation network analysis studyScientometrics96114717110.1007/s11192-012-0894-3Search in Google Scholar
Della Mea, V. (2001). What is e-Health (2): The death of telemedicine? Journal of Medical Internet Research, 3(2), e22.Della MeaV.2001What is e-Health (2): The death of telemedicine?Journal of Medical Internet Research32e2210.2196/jmir.3.2.e22176190011720964Search in Google Scholar
Ding, Y., Song, M., Han, J., Yu, Q., Yan, E., Lin, L., & Chambers, T. (2013). Entitymetrics: Measuring the impact of entities. PloS ONE, 8(8), e71416.DingY.SongM.HanJ.YuQ.YanE.LinL.ChambersT.2013Entitymetrics: Measuring the impact of entitiesPloS ONE88e7141610.1371/journal.pone.0071416375696124009660Search in Google Scholar
Eysenbach, G. (2001). What is e-health? Journal of Medical Internet Research, 3(2), e20.EysenbachG.2001What is e-health?Journal of Medical Internet Research32e2010.2196/jmir.3.2.e20176189411720962Search in Google Scholar
Gupta, S., & Manning, C.D. (2011). Analyzing the dynamics of research by extracting key aspects of scientific papers. In Proceedings of 5th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (pp. 1–9). Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing, Chiang Mai.GuptaS.ManningC.D.2011Analyzing the dynamics of research by extracting key aspects of scientific papersIn Proceedings of 5th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing19Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing, Chiang MaiSearch in Google Scholar
Heffernan, K., & Teufel, S. (2018). Identifying problems and solutions in scientific text. Scientometrics, 116(2), 1367–1382.HeffernanK.TeufelS.2018Identifying problems and solutions in scientific textScientometrics11621367138210.1007/s11192-018-2718-6609666030147202Search in Google Scholar
Jaidka, K., Khoo, C.S., & Na, J.C. (2019). Characterizing human summarization strategies for text reuse and transformation in literature review writing. Scientometrics, 121(3), 1563–1582.JaidkaK.KhooC.S.NaJ.C.2019Characterizing human summarization strategies for text reuse and transformation in literature review writingScientometrics12131563158210.1007/s11192-019-03250-5Search in Google Scholar
Kondo, T., Nanba, H., Takezawa, T., & Okumura, M. (2009). Technical trend analysis by analyzing research papers’ titles. In Language and Technology Conference (pp. 512–521). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.KondoT.NanbaH.TakezawaT.OkumuraM.2009Technical trend analysis by analyzing research papers’ titlesIn Language and Technology Conference512521SpringerBerlin, Heidelberg10.1007/978-3-642-20095-3_47Search in Google Scholar
Lu, W., Li, X., Liu, Z., & Cheng, Q. (2019). How do Author-Selected Keywords Function Semantically in Scientific Manuscripts? Knowledge Organization, 46(6), 403–418.LuW.LiX.LiuZ.ChengQ.2019How do Author-Selected Keywords Function Semantically in Scientific Manuscripts?Knowledge Organization466403418Search in Google Scholar
Mao, J., Wang, S., & Shang, X. (2020). Investigating interdisciplinary knowledge flow from the content perspective of citances. EEKE@JCDL 2020 (pp. 40–44).MaoJ.WangS.ShangX.2020Investigating interdisciplinary knowledge flow from the content perspective of citancesEEKE@JCDL 20204044Search in Google Scholar
Mesbah, S., Fragkeskos, K., Lofi, C., Bozzon, A., & Houben, G.J. (2017). Facet embeddings for explorative analytics in digital libraries. In International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (pp. 86–99). Springer, Cham.MesbahS.FragkeskosK.LofiC.BozzonA.HoubenG.J.2017Facet embeddings for explorative analytics in digital librariesIn International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries8699SpringerCham.10.1007/978-3-319-67008-9_8Search in Google Scholar
Nichols, L.G. (2014). A topic model approach to measuring interdisciplinarity at the National Science Foundation. Scientometrics, 100(3), 741–754.NicholsL.G.2014A topic model approach to measuring interdisciplinarity at the National Science FoundationScientometrics100374175410.1007/s11192-014-1319-2Search in Google Scholar
Otto, W., Ghavimi, B., Mayr, P., Piryani, R., & Singh, V.K. (2019). Highly cited references in PLOS ONE and their in-text usage over time. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.11693.OttoW.GhavimiB.MayrP.PiryaniR.SinghV.K.2019Highly cited references in PLOS ONE and their in-text usage over timearXiv preprint arXiv:1903.11693.Search in Google Scholar
Ou, S., & Kim, H. (2019). Identification of citation and cited texts for fine-grained citation content analysis. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 56(1), 740–741.OuS.KimH.2019Identification of citation and cited texts for fine-grained citation content analysisProceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology56174074110.1002/pra2.156Search in Google Scholar
Pettigrew, K.E., & McKechnie, L. (2001). The use of theory in information science research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(1), 62–73.PettigrewK.E.McKechnieL.2001The use of theory in information science researchJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology521627310.1002/1532-2890(2000)52:1<62::AID-ASI1061>3.0.CO;2-JSearch in Google Scholar
Porter, A., Cohen, A., David Roessner, J., & Perreault, M. (2007). Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity. Scientometrics, 72(1), 117–147.PorterA.CohenA.David RoessnerJ.PerreaultM.2007Measuring researcher interdisciplinarityScientometrics72111714710.1007/s11192-007-1700-5Search in Google Scholar
Porter, A.L., Roessner, J.D., Cohen, A.S., & Perreault, M. (2006). Interdisciplinary research: Meaning, metrics and nurture. Research Evaluation, 15(3), 187–195.PorterA.L.RoessnerJ.D.CohenA.S.PerreaultM.2006Interdisciplinary research: Meaning, metrics and nurtureResearch Evaluation15318719510.3152/147154406781775841Search in Google Scholar
Radoulov, R. (2008). Exploring automatic citation classification (master’s thesis). Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: The University of Waterloo.RadoulovR.2008Exploring automatic citation classification (master’s thesis)Waterloo, Ontario, CanadaThe University of WaterlooSearch in Google Scholar
Rinia, E.D., Van Leeuwen, T., Bruins, E., Van Vuren, H., & Van Raan, A. (2001). Citation delay in interdisciplinary knowledge exchange. Scientometrics, 51(1), 293–309.RiniaE.D.Van LeeuwenT.BruinsE.Van VurenH.Van RaanA.2001Citation delay in interdisciplinary knowledge exchangeScientometrics51129330910.1023/A:1010589300829Search in Google Scholar
Sahragard, R., & Meihami, H. (2016). A diachronic study on the information provided by the research titles of applied linguistics journals. Scientometrics, 108(3), 1315–1331.SahragardR.MeihamiH.2016A diachronic study on the information provided by the research titles of applied linguistics journalsScientometrics10831315133110.1007/s11192-016-2049-4Search in Google Scholar
Serenko, A., Dohan, M.S., & Tan, J. (2017). Global ranking of management- and clinical-centered e-health journals. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 41(1), 9.SerenkoA.DohanM.S.TanJ.2017Global ranking of management- and clinical-centered e-health journalsCommunications of the Association for Information Systems4119Search in Google Scholar
Small, H., Tseng, H., & Patekc, M. (2017). Discovering discoveries: Identifying biomedical discoveries using citation contexts. Journal of Informetrics, 11, 46–62.SmallH.TsengH.PatekcM.2017Discovering discoveries: Identifying biomedical discoveries using citation contextsJournal of Informetrics11466210.1016/j.joi.2016.11.001Search in Google Scholar
Sun, Y., & Latora, V. (2020). The evolution of knowledge within and across fields in modern physics. Scientific Reports, 10(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68774-w.SunY.LatoraV.2020The evolution of knowledge within and across fields in modern physicsScientific Reports10110.1038/s41598-020-68774-wOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tsai, C.T., Kundu, G., & Roth, D. (2013). Concept-based analysis of scientific literature. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management (pp. 1733–1738).TsaiC.T.KunduG.RothD.2013Concept-based analysis of scientific literatureIn Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management1733173810.1145/2505515.2505613Search in Google Scholar
Wagner, C.S., Roessner, J.D., Bobb, K., Klein, J.T., Boyack, K.W., Keyton, J., . . . & Börner, K. (2011). Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 14–26.WagnerC.S.RoessnerJ.D.BobbK.KleinJ.T.BoyackK.W.KeytonJ.BörnerK.2011Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literatureJournal of Informetrics51142610.1016/j.joi.2010.06.004Search in Google Scholar
Wang, Y., & Zhang, C. (2018). What type of domain knowledge is cited by articles with high interdisciplinary degree? Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 55(1), 919–921.WangY.ZhangC.2018What type of domain knowledge is cited by articles with high interdisciplinary degree?Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology55191992110.1002/pra2.2018.14505501176Search in Google Scholar
Xu, H., Guo, T., Yue, Z., Ru, L., & Fang, S. (2016). Interdisciplinary topics of information science: A study based on the terms interdisciplinarity index series. Scientometrics, 106(2), 583–601.XuH.GuoT.YueZ.RuL.FangS.2016Interdisciplinary topics of information science: A study based on the terms interdisciplinarity index seriesScientometrics106258360110.1007/s11192-015-1792-2Search in Google Scholar
Xu, J., Bu, Y., Ding, Y., Yang, S., Zhang, H., Yu, C., & Sun, L. (2018). Understanding the formation of interdisciplinary research from the perspective of keyword evolution: A case study on joint attention. Scientometrics, 117(2), 973–995.XuJ.BuY.DingY.YangS.ZhangH.YuC.SunL.2018Understanding the formation of interdisciplinary research from the perspective of keyword evolution: A case study on joint attentionScientometrics117297399510.1007/s11192-018-2897-1Search in Google Scholar