This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abramo, G., & D’angelo, C.A. (2014). How do you define and measure research productivity? Scientometrics, 101(2), 1129–1144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1269-8AbramoG.D’angeloC.A.2014How do you define and measure research productivity?Scientometrics101211291144https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1269-810.1007/s11192-014-1269-8Search in Google Scholar
Aguillo, I.F. (2018). 2258 Highly Cited Researchers (h>100) according to their Google Scholar Citations public profiles. Retrieved from http://www.webometrics.info/en/node/58AguilloI.F.20182258 Highly Cited Researchers (h>100) according to their Google Scholar Citations public profilesRetrieved from http://www.webometrics.info/en/node/58Search in Google Scholar
Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., Hug, S.E., & Daniel, H.D. (2011). A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants. Journal of Informetrics, 5(3), 346–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.01.006BornmannL.MutzR.HugS.E.DanielH.D.2011A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variantsJournal of Informetrics53346359https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.01.00610.1016/j.joi.2011.01.006Search in Google Scholar
Daraio, C. (2019). Econometric approaches to the measurement of research productivity. (M. Glänzel, Wolfgang and Moed, Henk F. and Schmoch, Ulrich, and Thelwall, Ed.). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_24DaraioC.2019Econometric approaches to the measurement of research productivityM. GlänzelWolfgangMoedHenk F.SchmochUlrichThelwallEd.Springer International Publishinghttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_2410.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_24Search in Google Scholar
Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7EggheL.2006Theory and practise of the g-indexScientometrics691131152https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-710.1007/s11192-006-0144-7Search in Google Scholar
Gagolewski, M., & Grzegorzewski, P. (2009). A geometric approach to the construction of scientific impact indices. Scientometrics, 81(3), 617–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2253-yGagolewskiM.GrzegorzewskiP.2009A geometric approach to the construction of scientific impact indicesScientometrics813617634https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2253-y10.1007/s11192-008-2253-ySearch in Google Scholar
Harzing, A.W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), 787–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9HarzingA.W.AlakangasS.2016Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparisonScientometrics1062787804https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-910.1007/s11192-015-1798-9Search in Google Scholar
Hauke, J., & Kossowski, T. (2011). Comparison of values of pearson's and spearman's correlation coefficients on the same sets of data. Quaestiones Geographicae, 30(2), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10117-011-0021-1HaukeJ.KossowskiT.2011Comparison of values of pearson's and spearman's correlation coefficients on the same sets of dataQuaestiones Geographicae3028793https://doi.org/10.2478/v10117-011-0021-110.2478/v10117-011-0021-1Search in Google Scholar
Hirsch, J.E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102HirschJ.E.2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research outputProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America102461656916572https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.050765510210.1073/pnas.0507655102Search in Google Scholar
Hirsch, J.E., & Buela-Casal, G. (2014). The meaning of the h-index. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 14(2), 161–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1697-2600(14)70050-XHirschJ.E.Buela-CasalG.2014The meaning of the h-indexInternational Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology142161164https://doi.org/10.1016/S1697-2600(14)70050-X10.1016/S1697-2600(14)70050-XSearch in Google Scholar
Jain, R., Chiu, D.-M., & Hawe, W.R. (1984). A quantitative measure of fairness and discrimination for resource allocation in shared computer system. DEC Technical Report TR301. Retrieved from http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~jain/papers/ftp/fairness.pdfJainR.ChiuD.-M.HaweW.R.1984A quantitative measure of fairness and discrimination for resource allocation in shared computer systemDEC Technical Report TR301. Retrieved from http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~jain/papers/ftp/fairness.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Jin, B.H., Liang, L.M., Rousseau, R., & Egghe, L. (2007). The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index. Chinese Science Bulletin, 52(6), 855–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-007-0145-9JinB.H.LiangL.M.RousseauR.EggheL.2007The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-indexChinese Science Bulletin526855863https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-007-0145-910.1007/s11434-007-0145-9Search in Google Scholar
Kosmulski, M. (2007). MAXPROD—A new index for assessment of the scientific output of an individual, and a comparison with the h-index. Cybermetrics, 11(1), 14–18.KosmulskiM.2007MAXPROD—A new index for assessment of the scientific output of an individual, and a comparison with the h-indexCybermetrics1111418Search in Google Scholar
Kuan. (2011). Ranking patent assignee performance by h-index and shape descriptors. Journal of Informetrics, 5(2), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.01.002Kuan2011Ranking patent assignee performance by h-index and shape descriptorsJournal of Informetrics52303312https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.01.00210.1016/j.joi.2011.01.002Search in Google Scholar
López-Cózar, E.D., Robinson-García, N., & Torres-Salinas, D. (2014). The Google Scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(3), 446–454. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23056López-CózarE.D.Robinson-GarcíaN.Torres-SalinasD.2014The Google Scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicatorsJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology653446454https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.2305610.1002/asi.23056Search in Google Scholar
Lou, W., & He, J. (2015). Does author affiliation reputation affect uncitedness? Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2015.1450520100103LouW.HeJ.2015Does author affiliation reputation affect uncitedness?Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology52114https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010010310.1002/pra2.2015.1450520100103Search in Google Scholar
Mesiar, R., & Gagolewski, M. (2016). H-index and other sugeno integrals: Some defects and their compensation. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 6706(c), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2516579MesiarR.GagolewskiM.2016H-index and other sugeno integrals: Some defects and their compensationIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems6706(c), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.251657910.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2516579Search in Google Scholar
Mester, G. (2016). Rankings scientists, journals and countries using h-Index. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 14(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.14.1.1MesterG.2016Rankings scientists, journals and countries using h-IndexInterdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems14119https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.14.1.110.7906/indecs.14.1.1Search in Google Scholar
Meyers, M.A., & Quan, H. (2017). The use of the h-index to evaluate and rank academic departments. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 6(4), 304–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2017.09.004MeyersM.A.QuanH.2017The use of the h-index to evaluate and rank academic departmentsJournal of Materials Research and Technology64304311https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2017.09.00410.1016/j.jmrt.2017.09.004Search in Google Scholar
Rochim, A.F., Muis, A., & Sari, R.F. (2017). Discrimination measurement method on H-index and G-index Using Jain's Fairness Index. In Proceedings of the—16th International Conference of International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, pp. 446–447. Wuhan, China.RochimA.F.MuisA.SariR.F.2017Discrimination measurement method on H-index and G-index Using Jain's Fairness IndexInProceedings of the—16th International Conference of International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics446447Wuhan, ChinaSearch in Google Scholar
Rochim, A.F., Muis, A., & Sari, R.F. (2018). Improving fairness of H-index: RA-index. Journal of Library and Information Technology, 38(6), 378–386, https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.38.6.12937RochimA.F.MuisA.SariR.F.2018Improving fairness of H-index: RA-indexJournal of Library and Information Technology386378386https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.38.6.1293710.14429/djlit.38.6.12937Search in Google Scholar
Van Raan, A.F.J. (2004). Sleeping Beauties in science. Scientometrics, 59(3), 467–472. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018543.82441.f1Van RaanA.F.J.2004Sleeping Beauties in scienceScientometrics593467472https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018543.82441.f110.1023/B:SCIE.0000018543.82441.f1Search in Google Scholar
Waltman, L., Van Eck, N.J., & Wouters, P. (2013). Counting publications and citations: Is more always better? Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 635–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.04.001WaltmanL.Van EckN.J.WoutersP.2013Counting publications and citations: Is more always better?Journal of Informetrics73635641https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.04.00110.1016/j.joi.2013.04.001Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, C.T. (2013). The h’-Index, effectively improving the h-Index Based on the citation distribution. PLoS One, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059912ZhangC.T.2013The h’-Index, effectively improving the h-Index Based on the citation distributionPLoS One84https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.005991210.1371/journal.pone.0059912361489623565174Search in Google Scholar
