This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
American Physical Society. (2019). Physical Review journals. Retrieved from https://journals.aps.org/about.American Physical Society2019Retrieved from https://journals.aps.org/aboutSearch in Google Scholar
Cole, J.R., & Cole, S. (1973). Social stratification in science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.ColeJ.R.ColeS.1973ChicagoThe University of Chicago PressSearch in Google Scholar
Dong, H., Li, M., Liu, R., Wu, C., & Wu, J. (2017). Allometric scaling in scientific fields. Scientometrics, 112(1), 583–594.DongH.LiM.LiuR.WuC.WuJ.2017Allometric scaling in scientific fields112158359410.1007/s11192-017-2333-ySearch in Google Scholar
Egghe, L., Rousseau, R., & Van Hooydonk, G. (2000). Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: Consequences for evaluation studies. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 51(2), 145–157.EggheL.RousseauR.Van HooydonkG.2000Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: Consequences for evaluation studies51214515710.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:2<145::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-9Search in Google Scholar
Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science. Science, 122(3159), 108–111.GarfieldE.1955Citation indexes for science122315910811110.1126/science.122.3159.108Search in Google Scholar
Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing—Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. New York: Wiley & Sons.GarfieldE.1979New YorkWiley & SonsSearch in Google Scholar
Hsu, J.W., & Huang, D.W. (2009). Distribution for the number of co-authors. Physical Review E, 80(5), 057101.HsuJ.W.HuangD.W.2009Distribution for the number of co-authors80505710110.1103/PhysRevE.80.057101Search in Google Scholar
Ibanez, A., Bielza, C., & Larranaga, P. (2013). Relationship among research collaboration, number of documents and number of citations: A case study in Spanish computer science production in 2000–2009. Scientometrics, 95(2), 689–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0883-6.IbanezA.BielzaC.LarranagaP.2013Relationship among research collaboration, number of documents and number of citations: A case study in Spanish computer science production in 2000–2009952689716https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0883-610.1007/s11192-012-0883-6Search in Google Scholar
National Research Council. (2009). A guide to the methodology of the National Research Council assessment of doctorate programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.National Research Council2009Washington, DCThe National Academies PressSearch in Google Scholar
National Research Council. (2011). A data-based assessment of research doctoral in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.National Research Council2011Washington, DCThe National Academies PressSearch in Google Scholar
Onodera, N., & Yoshikane, F. (2015). Factors affecting citation rates of research articles. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(4), 739–764.OnoderaN.YoshikaneF.2015Factors affecting citation rates of research articles66473976410.1002/asi.23209Search in Google Scholar
Price, D. de S. (1981). Letter to the editor. Science, 212, 987.PriceD. de S.1981Letter to the editor21298710.1097/00006247-198108000-00002Search in Google Scholar
Qian, Y., Rong, W., Jiang, N., Tang, J., & Xiong, Z. (2017). Citation regression analysis of computer science publications in different ranking categories and subfields. Scientometrics, 110(3), 1351–1374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2235-4.QianY.RongW.JiangN.TangJ.XiongZ.2017Citation regression analysis of computer science publications in different ranking categories and subfields110313511374https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2235-410.1007/s11192-016-2235-4Search in Google Scholar
Shen, Z., Yang, L., Pei, J., Li, M., Wu, C., Bao, J., Wei, T., Di, Z., Rousseau, R., & Wu, J. (2016). Interrelations among scientific fields and their relative influences revealed by an input-output analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 10(1), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.11.002.ShenZ.YangL.PeiJ.LiM.WuC.BaoJ.WeiT.DiZ.RousseauR.WuJ.2016Interrelations among scientific fields and their relative influences revealed by an input-output analysis1018297https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.11.00210.1016/j.joi.2015.11.002Search in Google Scholar
Smolinsky, L. (2020) Arbitrage opportunities in publication and ghost authors. Journal of Informetrics, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101016.SmolinskyL.2020Arbitrage opportunities in publication and ghost authors142https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.10101610.1016/j.joi.2020.101016Search in Google Scholar
Smolinsky, L., & Lercher, A. (2019). National Research Council's bibliometric methodology and subfields of a scientific discipline. In Catalano, G., Daraio, C., Gregori, M., Moed, H.F., & Ruocco, G. (Eds), In Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 2684–2685) Rome, Italy: Edizioni Efesto.SmolinskyL.LercherA.2019InCatalanoG.DaraioC.GregoriM.MoedH.F.RuoccoG.(Eds),In Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics26842685Rome, ItalyEdizioni EfestoSearch in Google Scholar
Smolinsky, L., & Lercher, A. (2012). Citation rates in mathematics: A study of variation by subdiscipline. Scientometrics, 91(3), 911–924.SmolinskyL.LercherA.2012Citation rates in mathematics: A study of variation by subdiscipline91391192410.1007/s11192-012-0647-3Search in Google Scholar
van Eck, N.J., Waltman, L., van Raan, A.F.J., Klautz, R.J.M., & Peul, W.C. (2013). Citation analysis may severely underestimate the impact of clinical research as compared to basic research. PLOS One, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062395.van EckN.J.WaltmanL.van RaanA.F.J.KlautzR.J.M.PeulW.C.2013Citation analysis may severely underestimate the impact of clinical research as compared to basic research84https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.006239510.1371/journal.pone.0062395363477623638064Search in Google Scholar
Walters, W.H. (2014). Do article influence scores overestimate the citation impact of social science journals in subfields that are related to higher-impact natural science disciplines? Journal of Informetrics, 8(2), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.02.001.WaltersW.H.2014Do article influence scores overestimate the citation impact of social science journals in subfields that are related to higher-impact natural science disciplines?82421430https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.02.00110.1016/j.joi.2014.02.001Search in Google Scholar
Zhu, Y., & Yan, E. (2015). Dynamic subfield analysis of disciplines: An examination of the trading impact and knowledge diffusion patterns of computer science. Scientometrics, 104(1), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1594-6.ZhuY.YanE.2015Dynamic subfield analysis of disciplines: An examination of the trading impact and knowledge diffusion patterns of computer science1041335359https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1594-610.1007/s11192-015-1594-6Search in Google Scholar