Combining O2 High Flow Nasal or Non-Invasive Ventilation with Cooperative Sedation to Avoid Intubation in Early Diffuse Severe Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Especially in Immunocompromised or COVID Patients?
Categoría del artículo: Review
Publicado en línea: 31 oct 2024
Páginas: 291 - 315
Recibido: 22 mar 2024
Aceptado: 01 ago 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jccm-2024-0035
Palabras clave
© 2024 Fabrice Petitjeans et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This article highlights the pathophysiology of classical vs. COVID-acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and the use of O2 high flow nasal (HFN) and very high flow nasal (VHFN>70 L.min−1) and inspiratory assistance (pressure support: PS) to avoid endotracheal intubation (“intubation”). This is a follow up of a manuscript devoted to early weaning of invasive ventilation [9]. In the setting of COVID-ARDS, ~41% of the patients received HFN or non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) [10], but only ~20% of the patients receive analgesics or sedatives [11]. Indeed, sedation is believed to cause respiratory depression and conceal ventilatory failure (“failure”) i.e. the clinical sign to escalate to more invasive therapy. By contrast, alpha-2 agonists (“cooperative sedation”, rousable sedation: dexmedetomidine, clonidine, etc.) are now considered as first-line sedatives in the critical care unit (CCU) [12,13,14,15,16,17]: dexmedetomidine eases NIV [18] and halves the occurrence of endotracheal intubation (“intubation”) [19].
CMV is lifesaving [20] when impending or overt ventilatory failure is ominous. Nevertheless, CMV “
Continued or intensified labored breathing (“labored breathing”) [29] leads to impending, then overt failure, additional lung injury (inflammation; self-induced lung injury: SILI [5, 30]; ventilator-induced injury: VILI). Thus, delayed intubation and ventilatory assistance may lead to overt failure, gasping, cardiac arrest and death [30,31,32,33,34].
A multimodal approach [9, 35,36,37,38,39,40] (“analytical management” [37,38,39,40,41]) hierarchizes the pathophysiology of the autonomic nervous system, the respiratory generator [42,43,44], the vasomotor center [45], the chest wall and lung mechanics [6, 8], circulation [46], kidney and metabolism. The interval between admission and intubation gives one the opportunity to address labored breathing [29], reduce the inspiratory effort (large negative esophageal pressure change), normalize the work of breathing (WOB), reverse failure, break-up SILI [40] and bypasses intubation. Our hypothesis is: cooperative sedation extends the tolerance to HFN or NIV and buys time for a multimodal approach [35] to normalize the respiratory drive. As this multimodal approach bears many research questions, they are delineated in the appendix.
Very schematically, early diffuse ARDS entails alveolar
ARDS is a broad entity characterized by severe dyspnea, hyperpnea, tachypnea, hypoxemia, decreased lung compliance (“compliance”), alveolar infiltrates [49], redefined as PaO2/FiO2=P/F<300/200/100 with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)=5 cm H2O after intubation, bilateral opacities without volume overload or cardiac failure [23]. This extends to non-intubated patients [50]. These criteria are not perfect [51]. Using PEEP= 10 cm H2O, FiO2=1 leads to underestimate ARDS [52]. FiO2=1 at low PEEP de-recruits alveoli and lowers P/F (196 to 153) [53]. As ARDS entails a spectrum of diseases [54] and several clinical presentations (“phenotype”), a CT scan individualizes management:
Typical ARDS [6] comprises two entities [55]: early diffuse ARDS entails alveolar epithelial dysfunction, unstable alveoli, fluid-filled alveoli (non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema), bilateral infiltrates that ultimately coalesce into compressive atelectasis. A direct, proportional, relationship exists between the amount of non-aerated tissue and lowered compliance [6]. Typical ARDS is addressed with high PEEP [56], except in the setting of “focal “ ARDS [55].
“focal” ARDS entails extra-pulmonary ARDS, loss of hypoxic vasoconstriction, high compliance and low inflection point on the inspiratory pressure-volume (P-V) curve (≤5 cm H2O) [55], and is addressed with low PEEP.
“diffuse” ARDS entails pulmonary ARDS, high dead space and PaCO2 [57, 58], low compliance [59] (
Early COVID-ARDS entails pulmonary vascular endothelial dysfunction [47, 48], pulmonary vascular abnormalities [6], loss of hypoxic vasoconstriction with hyperperfusion of non-aerated, gasless tissue at variance with areas of no-perfusion and normal aeration [6], micro- and macroemboli [47, 48, 61], well aerated lung volume [62], high compliance and low driving pressure (DP) [63]. Intrapulmonary shunt (“shunt”) is perfusion of non-aerated alveoli (low or zero VA/Q [4]). The implication is that a high shunt fraction goes to gasless tissue [62]. Micro-emboli prevent recruited alveoli to participate in gas exchange. Venous admixture is intrapulmonary shunt+VA/Q mismatch [8]. In COVID-ARDS, VA/Q mismatch is more important than shunt i.e., predominantly low perfusion of ventilated alveoli. By contrast, in typical ARDS, shunt is more important than VA/Q mismatch i.e., adequate perfusion of nonventilated alveoli [8] (COVID-ARDS: high VA/Q and dead space; diffuse typical ARDS: low VA/Q) [63]). In COVID-ARDS, profound hypoxemia [48] occurs when compared to typical ARDS with same compliance. Typical ARDS presents with a higher P/F for the same compliance [6]). Recruitment is highly variable [63]. In the COVID-ARDS setting, low Vt results in increased dead space, reabsorption atelectasis, hypoventilation, hypercarbia, high hypercapnic drive and high sedative requirement. Low Vt-high PEEP conventionally proposed in typical ARDS appears of modest benefit in COVID-ARDS [6, 62].
The mechanisms observed in early ARDS progress toward fibrosis more rapidly in COVID-ARDS compared to typical ARDS. Consequently, starting from admission, the intensivist is essentially racing against time, contending with ventilatory failure on one front and the rapid progression towards fibrosis on the other.
Upon admission, the clinical presentation involves silent hypoxemia

The clinical signs of ventilatory failure are: discomfort, intolerance to device, mental deterioration, diaphoresis, dyspnea (hyperpnea> tachypnea), inspiratory effort [use of accessory muscles, phasic activation of the sternomastoid muscle (palpation of the sterno-mastoid muscle as an index of drive in ARDS [69]), tracheal tug [69], thoraco-abdominal swing, suprasternal notch retraction (index of large negative esophageal pressure change), intercostal recession [69], nasal flaring, gasping [70]], copious respiratory secretions [71], airway bleeding, circulatory instability, electrocardiographic changes, P/F trend. An index of drive, airway occlusion pressure (P0.1), is set to 0.5 ms in the spontaneous breathing setting (P0.5) [125] and used as such.
NIV is set to avoid dyssynchrony: low inspiratory trigger, high pressurization time, lowest expiratory trigger. Helmet NIV requires faster pressurization time≤50 ms, cycling off=30% of peak inspiratory flow, higher PS level (+33–50%) and PEEP. High inspiratory assistance should not sum up with negative esophageal pressure change to avoid high transpulmonary pressure and further inflammation. HFN or NIV allows one to buy time and combine physiological tools (circulatory, respiratory, ventilatory, autonomic) within a multimodal approach. The check list is
Abbreviations: HFN: O2 high flow nasal; VHFN: very high flow nasal; NIV: non-invasive ventilation; CMV: controlled mandatory ventilation; PEEP: positive end-expiratory pressure; PS: pressure support, inspiratory assistance.
Hypoxemia results from reduced O2 diffusion (typical ARDS) or inadequate alveolar perfusion (COVID-ARDS: micro- or macroemboli [48]) and is not necessarily accompanied by muscle dysfunction and signs of ventilatory failure, e.g., during “silent hypoxemia” [73,74,75]. Isolated hypoxemia without labored breathing is addressed with HFN/VHFN. Nevertheless, prolonged silent hypoxemia may lead to clinical deterioration, continued labored breathing, and eventually intubation.
The present opinion regarding
Criteria for non-invasive ventilatory failure [76]
Absence of improvement or worsening of clinical signs observed on admission, including oxygenation data and increased respiratory rate Appearance of signs of ventilatory muscle fatigue or use of accessory muscles Presence of acidosis, both respiratory and metabolic Inability to properly clear respiratory secretions Signs of circulatory instability, including hyperlactatemia Deterioration of consciousness or presence of seizures Intolerance to device, especially mask wearers |
Muscle dysfunction involves overly active muscles. In contrast to the acute over chronic fatigue seen in COPD, muscle function in ARDS is typically intact at baseline, i.e. prior the onset of ARDS. However, muscle failure can occur due to various factors, including a) septic dysfunction [79], b) acute cardiac failure leading to exhaustion and death [80], and c) prolonged evolution (as mentioned above).
In early ARDS, a high inspiratory activity (“respiratory drive”, “drive”, “neural demand” [42, 43]) impinges upon intact muscles. A high muscular activity of intact muscles requires transpulmonary pressure to be addressed specifically (low inspiratory assistance, low pressure support: PS using upfront helmet NIV). This contrasts with acute over chronic fatigue of muscles observed in decompensated chronic COPD with reduced CO2 excretion: in the setting of COPD, unloading the muscles is necessary for hours or days with high PS to overcome fatigue and decompensation [68]. By contrast, high PS is inappropriate for ARDS.
Respiratory and ventilatory physiology refer to brain stem processes vs. lung and chest wall function, respectively. Located in the lower brain stem, apposed to the vasomotor center, the respiratory generator (“generator”) controls the respiratory rhythm and phrenic activity and integrates the myriads of factors leading to the drive and the activation of the ventilatory muscles:
As oxygenation is not the key issue anymore in ARDS [21, 35], the rationale for using high PEEP does not rest on oxygenation. Poor oxygenation (P/F<150) is
In the setting of diffuse alveolar damage, solid-like behavior leading to pendelluft, increased spontaneous ventilatory effort [35, 87], atelectrauma, WOB and SILI are to be avoided. High PEEP prevents cyclic collapse of the bronchiolar tree [88] or of alveoli (atelectrauma) [89], thus suppresses the mechanical inflammation (SILI or VILI). As observed during the first breath after birth (−70 cm H2O [90]), the first inflation of a kid’s balloon requires very high transmural (transalveolar) pressure; further inflation requires minimal incremental pressure. Once inflated by adequate PEEP, the “baby lung” in adult ARDS operates on the highest slope of the
The low PEEP achieved with HFN/VHFN/NIV may suit the relatively high compliance and low PEEP requirements observed in the setting of early COVID-ARDS [61, 63] and focal ARDS. PEEP is set as a function of the considered disease, using various techniques a) immediately following admission, a “
ARDS is managed [26] using intubation, general anesthesia [101] (GA renamed “deep sedation” [102], analgesia-sedation), paralysis [103], proning [22] and low DP [104]. Nevertheless, this is despite remarkable results [103], paralysis should be used sparingly, e.g., high drive [106]. deep sedation is associated with ventilator-to-patient dyssynchrony [107] and death [85] in ARDS patients [108]. no comparison of SB vs. paralysis [109] has been published. SB with airway pressure release ventilation [110, 111] is not discussed. Three issues are to be considered:
no trial addresses the various Vt in the setting of ARDS (2, 4, 6, etc. mL.kg−1; appendix). The only evidence is the retrospective linear association between improved outcome and lowered DP<14 cm H2O [104]. proning: That many humans sleep in the prone position is not an argument for awake proning in early COVID-ARDS: humans move freely from supine to prone and back during sleep, at variance with imposed prolonged proning in a CCU environment with discomfort.
The excellent epidemiological result [22] is methodologically weak. First, the results are not segregated between P/F<100 vs. <150, mixing severe and moderate ARDS. Second, no comparison exists between supine vs. prone vs. lateral+prone+lateral positioning;
Mechanically, collapse is a function of the hydrostatic pressure imposed on the alveolus (i.e. the weight of the heart on the left lung). Thus, proning opens more non-dependent dorsal zones than it collapses in dependent sternal regions [112]. Indeed, proning leads often to a small improvement in PaO2 [62], due to better VA/Q matching in vaso-dysregulated tissue [6] or perfusion redistribution in response to pressure or gravity [62] but not to alveolar recruitment. Given high compliance, minimal P/F improvement linked to CCU proning presents minimal interest in the setting of early COVID-ARDS, imposing on limited staff resources ([6] “responders”: P/F increase >20 mm Hg in 75% of the patients; [62, 113]). In intubated patients, proning vs. upright position increases P/F to a similar extent in patients with the lowest P/F (moderate and severe ARDS, panel B,
the absence of a prone vs. upright position trial (reverse Trendelenburg, head-up +60°, legs down: −45°) [7].
These weaknesses leave recommendations [26] with shaky foundation [115]: “
CPAP vs. inspiratory assistance: HFN provides CPAP and increased end-expiratory volume
High vs. low inspiratory assistance: The high inspiratory effort, and Vt, is influenced by inflammation and drive but independent of the level of inspiratory assistance (PS level) [72, 117]. A high inspiratory effort manifests as hyperpnea, hypocapnia, a large inspiratory esophageal pressure drop (∆Pes=26–40 cm H2O) and low dynamic compliance (Vte/∆PL) [2]. Excessive inspiratory assistance further amplifies the inspiratory esophageal pressure change, the transpulmonary pressure [81, 118], Vt, atelectrauma, and inflammation. Therefore, inspiratory assistance is required only to alleviate the WOB caused by the ventilatory apparatus rather than to unload the muscles (valves, tubings; PS=3–5 cm H2O [116]). More, inspiratory assistance cannot alleviate solid-like behavior, atelectrauma and mechanical inflammation. Adequate PEEP can achieve this when the lung is at its optimal compliance. Setting PS to achieve a Vt=7–10 mL.kg−1 [33] will completely unload the ventilatory muscles but may be detrimental because the baby lung does not tolerate such high Vt [119]. Rather, esophageal [2] or nasal [70] pressure changes should be limited. Therefore, an uncontrollable drive leading to labored breathing and increased WOB does not necessitate increased PS but rather a reduction in drive, with early initiation of helmet NIV [82, 120]. Failed NIV is defined as the absence of reduction in ∆Pes<10 cm H2O within 2h (reduced dyspnea and hyperpnea i.e., success: ∆Pes=8–15; failure: 30–36 cm H2O) [2]. Accordingly, increased Vt>9.6–12 mL.kg−1 is the hallmark of early NIV failure [72]. NIV failure is associated with death either because of uncontrollable drive in a very sick patient [20], or a too high PS level. By contrast, successful NIV require close observation with early escalation only if continued labored breathing persists: HFN, VHFN, mask NIV, helmet NIV (Figure 1).
Classical [121] or updated [122, 123] Optiflow™ help normalizing labored breathing while simultaneously addressing the ancillary work (figure 1) and a multimodal approach [35]. In the setting of early ARDS, HFN takes precedence over NIV [124], with certain caveats [82, 120]. HFN increases CO2 wash-out and dynamic compliance, comfort, oxygenation [125] and clearance of secretions [10]. HFN reduces inspiratory effort, CO2 production and RR due to a resistive effect and prolonged expiration. The degree of improvement correlates with the flow rate and PEEP, leading to increased FRC, restored fluid-like behavior, and decreased inspiratory WOB. For instance, administering HFN at 50 L.min−1 to patients in septic shock diminish the respiratory drive (P 0.5) and esophageal pressure change [125].
With HFN, O2 flow up to 60–80 L.min−1 is achieved through conventional Optiflow or a ventilator. Modified Optiflow can administer up to 120 L.min−1 [123]: two blenders into one nasal prong convey a very high flow (VHFN; 1.5 mL.kg−1 [123]). In healthy volunteers, the mean airway pressure ranges from ~3 to ~12 cm H2O, generating PEEP (35 L.min−1: range: 1.5–5.3 cm H2O; 100 L.min−1: range: 7.3–16.2 cm H2O [121, 122]). In the setting of early focal and COVID-ARDS, this may allow enough recruitment to avoid intubation when silent hypoxemia without labored breathing is the principal derangement. However, VHFN appears poorly tolerated after 20 min [123]. The reason is unclear : poor humidification? high expiratory resistance and expiratory WOB [123]? This leads to the combination of discontinuous NIV and discontinuous HFN, making the technique complex and possibly inadequate to avoid intubation.
In the setting of acute failure, high inspiratory peak flow leads to room air entrainment under HFN. Exercise generates a peak inspiratory flow up to 255 L.min−1 [126, 127] and mimics the peak flow observed during acute failure [127]. A challenge is to match such a high peak inspiratory flow. Simple tools minimize air entrainment, either alone or combined:
A simple surgical mask applied over the mouth in addition to HFN 60 L.min−1 decreases the RR (28 to 26 breaths per min: bpm), increases the PaO2 (59 to 79 mm Hg) and P/F (83 to 111) [128]. Adding a “double trunk” mask without adding O2 to HFN=40–60 L.min−1 increases PaO2 (63 to 88 mmHg in 11 responders out of 15 patients) [129]. in healthy volunteers, HFN 50 L.min−1 within a standard helmet achieves stable high PEEP=8 cm H2O and increases CO2 washout (PetCO2=33 mm Hg) [130]. in addition to the nasal prong, insertion of up to 2 prongs through the mouth can achieve O2 flow~120–180 L.min−1. In our experience, two classical Opti-flow prongs, oral and nasal, achieves O2~120–140 L.min−1 and high SaO2 (Quintin, unpublished data). cooperative sedation (above: 2<RASS<0) evokes indifference to CCU stimuli and lowered VO2, enhancing tolerance to continuous HFN/NIV, noise, humidification, and nasal prong(s) for days.
Labored breathing and fatigue lead to NIV, which is a consequence of either continued or increased drive or to the absence of any inspiratory assistance with HFN/VHFN. Criteria for escalation to NIV are P/F<100, and/or RR>25 bpm, and/or ventilatory distress and dyspnea despite HFN>60 L.min−1 [70].
To our surprise, with a tightly adjusted mask, Drager ventilators (Evita XL, Infinity V500) combined to cooperative sedation allows for achieving PEEP up to 20 cm H2O with minimal leaks, for days [136]. Despite leaks and tolerance issues, since the pathophysiology of ARDS differs only in the amplitude of the dysfunction in intubated vs. non-intubated patients and the literature is limited, parameters set under invasive ventilation are used [9, 36, 37, 40]:
PS=5, PEEP=5–15 cm H2O, high Vt (500–600 mL) resulting in improved dyspnea in the setting of early ARDS following acquired immunodeficiency syndrome [138]. PS=7 cm H2O, PEEP<10 cm H2O to minimize leaks [72]. The Vt was ~8–9 in the success group vs. 11–12 mL.kg−1 in the failure group. In contrast, late ARDS is characterized by low Vt (rapid shallow breathing: ~4.2 mL.kg−1 [139]). In our experience, with a normalized WOB, the “ The reduction in esophageal pressure changes observed in the NIV success group is associated with the following initial settings: PEEP~10 cm H2O and P~10 cm H2O adjusted to achieve Vt<9.5 mL.kg−1 [2]. After 2 h, PS was lowered (~11 cm H2O to ~9 cm H2O) in the in the setting of ARDS, a low inspiratory assistance (PS=6 cm H2O) was used to confirm high Vt independent of PS level [144].
Patients presenting with a low inspiratory effort and small esophageal change on HFN require low PS, to avoid high transpulmonary pressure [82] during helmet NIV. When a high inspiratory effort and large negative esophageal change under HFN are observed, helmet NIV is superior to HFN (P/F≤200; shortest pressurization time, PEEP~10–12, PS~8–10 cm H2O; reduced dyspnea, intermediate discomfort) [82]. The reduction of inspiratory effort during helmet NIV was larger in patients with the largest inspiratory effort during HFN, linked to inflammation or deteriorating mechanics, but
Partial muscle relaxation [144] may represent an additional tool when the negative evolution of esophageal swings leads to helmet NIV combined to a multimodal approach, before a decision to intubate. In patients presenting with ARDS and a high Vt>8 mL.kg−1 a rocuronium infusion (5–37 mg over 6–60 min) was titrated to reduce the Vt (~9 to ~6 mL.kg−1, with increased PaCO2) and maintained for 2 h under conventional sedation (midazolam or propofol, sufentanil). Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) preserved diaphragmatic activity [144]. Such an approach may be useful in intubated or non-intubated patients under the care of anesthesia personnel with appropriate end tidal CO2, Vt, SaO2 monitoring. Although time-consuming, it may allow for the multimodal approach to achieve the temperature, agitation, systemic and microcirculation, kidney and metabolic goals under slow alpha-2 agonist sedation. Taken together, this suggests a 2 h window to improve the patient physiologically (HFN, NIV) [2, 72], then an additional 2 h using partial muscle relaxation [144], while running the multi-modal approach from admission onwards (Figure 1). Continued or increased labored breathing despite this full-fledged treatment implies intubation, and low PS under continued multimodal approach [9].
The sickest patients may benefit from immediate helmet NIV+multimodal approach. Within 2h, failed NIV leads to intubation+CMV+proning (
Within the factors evoking hyperpnea and tachypnea (Equation 1), lung and systemic inflammation, metabolic acidosis and inadequate microcirculation are difficult to control. Many patients are managed with CMV either due to inappropriate NIV set up or inappropriate sedation with anesthetics/opioids, or extensive illness [20]. For example, full physiological support may coexist with high transpulmonary pressure (38 mm Hg), oedema, inflammation, and micro-emboli (PS=10, PEEP=15 cm H2O, ECMO to remove 77% VCO2, normalized pH, PaCO2, PaO2) [155]. Thus, when the drive exceeds the muscle capacity despite a multimodal approach, rigorous clinical criteria for intubation+CMV are needed.
The multimodal approach (Figure 1) is common to HFN, VHFN, NIV and early SB following short term CMV+paralysis [9]. It relies on normalizing the respiratory drive: regardless of the ventilatory tool, the drive is normalized with Equation 1 as a checklist: (Vt, RR)=f(temperature, agitation, cardiac output, micro-circulation, inflammation, lung water-diuresis, systemic pH, PaCO2).
A baby lung allows only for baby O2 consumption (VO2) requirements. Thus, to reduce VO2, temperature is lowered to 36<θ<35°C i.e., the lowest temperature of human at night. In patients with reduced cardioventilatory reserve, VO2 is lowered [157] (~8–10% per °C [158] e.g., minus ~30% from 39.5 to 35.5°C). In ARDS patients, fever control is associated with improved survival [156]. Furthermore, in healthy volunteers, adrenaline infusion increases VO2 and Vt (respectively: +11; +17% [159]) and the inspiratory flow [159], unlike a reduced drive. As the ARDS patient is often septic and requires vasopressors, they further increase VO2.
By contrast, alpha-2 agonists lower a) the activation threshold of cold defense effectors (“set point”) [160,161,162] b) the temperature by >1°C in healthy volunteers [163] c) energy expenditure and VO2 by ~15–18% [163, 164] d) muscular tremor [165] and VO2, when baseline is high [166, 167]. Upon admission, paracetamol and external cooling are immediately followed by the administration of an alpha-2 agonist.
Agitation independent of the ventilatory failure (such as anxiety, delirium, pain) is to be addressed. Dexmedetomidine or clonidine are administered as
Alpha-2 agonists should not be used in cases of hypovolemia, sick sinus syndrome and atrio-ventricular block [15,16,17]. Positive pressure ventilation and PEEP require volume expansion to prevent hypotension and the need for vasopressors [203] as well as to avoid a pseudo-normalized intrapulmonary shunt [4].
Adequate CO and adequate lung perfusion (Q) are necessary to normalize shunt. This also requires sufficient PEEP to achieve proper end-expiratory O2 diffusion (VA) [4]. Firstly, upfront normalization of CO enhances pulmonary flow (Q); second, high PEEP recruits ventilated alveoli (VA). Together, this normalizes the VA/Q distribution and improves oxygenation (patient 10 in [4]).
Conversely, a pseudo-normalized shunt results from inadequate CO. First, high PEEP reduces CO, leading to decreased flow to unventilated alveoli, and an increased VA/Q ratio. Secondly, high PEEP increases the ventilation to unperfused alveoli, causing an increase in dead space [92]. As a resulted, despite an elevated PaO2, the shunt remains “pseudo-normalized” [4], as the skewed VA/Q distribution persists unchanged by PEEP itself, and the low VA/Q does not improve.
To achieve adequate VA/Q, first, iterative echocardiography monitors the ventilation-induced changes in vena cava diameter, the right ventricular dilation, the mitral and aortic flows, the left ventricular [LV] contractility and the presence of foramen ovale (present in ~20% of the patients [204]). Various tools as volume, vasopressor, inotrope, pulmonary vasodilator are used to achieve adequate CO, mixed venous saturation, CO2 gap, pH and lactate. Additionally, the combination of PEEP and SB acts synergistically. SB evokes diaphragmatic compression of the hepatosplanchnic blood [205] enhancing venous return, while PEEP decreases LV afterload [206]. Second, in addition to arterial and venous gases, impedance tomography or lung echography may assist in observing adequate VA.
Patients have transitioned from young trauma patients with preserved immune system at baseline and heading into severe delayed injury-acquired immunodeficiency [210], to elderly patients presenting with chronic baseline heightened inflammation, such as those with COVID-ARDS. Acute inflammation can result from conditions like sepsis, emphasizing the importance of early source control, or systemic acidosis, or impaired ventilatory mechanics (SILI or VILI).
Direct immuno-modulation can be targeted (e.g., anti-IL-6) or non-targeted (e.g., steroids). Both address the non-mechanical inflammation caused by the disease (e.g., steroids and SARS-CoV2 [211]) or the syndrome (e.g., systemic sepsis). In addition, steroids may address the inflammation caused by atelectrauma and SILI.
Indirect immuno-modulation: alpha-2 agonists present
Mechanical inflammation and SILI: Reduction of esophageal pressure changes is co-related to Vt reduction and radiologic improvement, respectively after 12 and 24 h [2]. Therefore, a normalized drive normalizes the WOB and suppresses SILI [5], early on.
Reducing lung water is crucial [221, 222] when inflammation [223] play a significant role, such as in high permeability edema or large negative esophageal changes. Once CO is normalized, volume infusion should be minimized. Indeed, in the setting of SB, low Vt and compliance [222], a ~10–15% CO increase to passive leg raising does
Additionally, a) SB facilitates better lymphatic drainage compared to CMV [225] b) sympathetic blockade reduces pulmonary vein pressure and lung edema [226] c) alpha-2 agonists evoke diuresis through an anti-ADH effect [227]. The issue is not anymore the total volume of fluids administered during early resuscitation or the first day on admission, but the overall
Hypocapnia is an ominous sign in the setting of early ARDS [72]. PaCO2 is lower when NIV failure occurs [2, 72],
The striking observation is the occurrence of hyperpnea
In COVID-ARDS, under paralysis+CMV, micro- or macrothrombi leads to high dead space, hypercapnia and a high respiratory drive: a low normal temperature (35–36°C) will help normalizing the VCO2 and hypercapnic drive, allowing for SB, under HFN/NIV.
Hypoxemia, silent without or with overt failure, requires immediate treatment. Nevertheless, alleviating hypoxemia is not the ultimate objective:
Improved oxygenation and reduced mortality are unrelated [233]. Thus, low SaO2 alone is not an indication for intubation [21]; rather labored breathing and impending/overt failure are. In rats, inflammation increases in response to acute hypoxia, In late-stage ARDS, hypoxemia is associated with increased RR and reversed by high FiO2 [78]. This holds true in early ARDS: in non-intubated non-paralyzed patients, the hypoxic drive should be suppressed by combining high FiO2 with the highest PEEP achievable with HFN/NIV. Permissive hypoxemia is avoided to lower Vt and RR, ideally without hyperoxemia (SaO2≥92–100%: roughly the flat portion of the dissociation curve). Hypoxemia act as a
Rather than simultaneously lowering the FiO2 and the PEEP [97], they are adjusted
The supine position worsens sick human (reduced FRC, increased abdominal pressure with atelectasis next to the diaphragm) [237]. Thus, the upright position presents some rationale to improve oxygenation [7]. Nevertheless, the head up position may worsen compliance and driving pressure in late ARDS (“paradoxical” positioning [240]). Furthermore, the rationale for extended upright intervals in a healthy human does not automatically transfer to a sick biped. To our knowledge, upright has not been documented in the setting of COVID-ARDS. As VHFN/NIV may evoke gastric dilation [2], the intraabdominal pressure should be reduced early (gastric and bladder catheters, enhanced intestinal motility).
This multimodal approach bases itself on progress in the pathophysiology of ARDS [2, 6, 8, 42, 43, 72]. This synthesis of autonomic, respiratory, circulatory and ventilatory physiological advances combines with technological advances to avoid intubation, unless “absolutely necessary” [21]. Would this allow to reap “