Acceso abierto

The Implementation of Basel Committee BCBS 239: Short analysis of the new rules for Data Management


Cite

1. BCBS (January 2013a). Principles for effective risk data aggregation and risk reporting. Committee for Banking Supervision. Retrieved from http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs239.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

2. BCBS (December 2013b). Progress in adopting the principles for effective risk data aggregation and risk reporting. Retrieved from http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs268.htm.Search in Google Scholar

3. BCBS (December 2014). Fundamental review of the trading book. Committee for Banking Supervision. Retrieved from http://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d305.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

4. BCBS (December 2016). Consultative Document Pillar 3 disclosure requirements – consolidated and enhanced framework. Retrieved from http://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d356.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

5. CEIOPS Committee of European insurance and occupational pensions supervisors (2009). CEIOPS’ Advice for Level 2 Implementing Measures on Solvency II: Technical Provisions – Article 86 f Standards for Data Quality (former CP 43). Retrieved from https://eiopa.europa.eu/CEIOPS-Archive/Documents/Advices/CEIOPS-L2-Final-Advice-on-TP-Standard-for-data-quality.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

6. Chartis Research (2016). Spotlight on BCBS 239 - It was never going to happen on time. Research Report.Search in Google Scholar

7. Chisholm, M. (2014). The Implementation of Basel Committee BCBS 239: An Industry-Wide Challenge for International Data Management, Proceedings of the 2nd International Data and Information Management Conference (IDIMC), Loughborough, UK.Search in Google Scholar

8. Grody, A.D and P. Hughes (2015). The Global Risk Regime – New Roles for Auditors. Working paper Financial InterGroup (UK) Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

9. Harreis, H.; Tavakoli, A.; Ho, T.; Machado, J.; Rowshankish, K.; Merrath, P. (2017). Living with BCBS 239, retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/risk/our-insights/living-with-bcbs-239.Search in Google Scholar

10. Hughes P., Grody A.D., Toms S. (2010). ‘Risk accounting - a next generation risk management system for financial institutions’, The Capco Institute Journal of Financial Transformation, 29 (1): 43-56.Search in Google Scholar

11. IFRS (2016). Financial instruments. International financial reporting standard. Retrieved from: http://www.ifrs.org/current-projects/iasb-projects/financial-instruments-a-replacement-of-ias-39-financial-instruments-recognitio/Pages/Financial-Instruments-Replacement-of-IAS-39.aspx.Search in Google Scholar

12. Myers, D. (2013). Dimensions of Data Quality Under the Microscope. Information Management Magazine. Retrieved from: http://www.information-management.com/news/news/dimensions-of-data-quality-under-the-microscope-10024529-1.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

13. Popovic, M. (2018). Technological Progress, Globalization, and Secular Stagnation, Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 2018, 1, pp. 79-100.Search in Google Scholar

14. Thun, C. (2015). Moodys Analytics: AnaCredit Gives Banks an Opportunity to Improve Data Management, but Challenges Remain, Enterprise Risk Solutions.Search in Google Scholar

15. Vlahovic, A. (2014). Challenges to the Implementation of a New Framework for Safeguarding Financial Stability, Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 2014, 3, pp.19-52.Search in Google Scholar

16. Vucinic, M. (2016). Importance of Macroprudential Policy Implementation for Safeguarding Financial Stability, Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 2016, 3, pp. 79-98.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2336-9205
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
3 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Business and Economics, Business Management, other