Spatial Configuration and Users’ Behavior in Co-Working Spaces

[1] CHAN, J. K., BECKMAN, S. L., LAWRENCE, P. G., Workplace Design: A New Managerial Imperative, California Management Review, volume 49 (2007), no. 2, 6-22.10.2307/41166380Search in Google Scholar

[2] SPINUZZI, C., Working Alone Together, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, volUME 26 (2012), no. 4, 399-441.10.1177/1050651912444070Search in Google Scholar

[3] https://hbr.org/2015/05/why-people-thrive-in-coworking-spacesSearch in Google Scholar

[4] ALLEN, T. J., HENN, G., The organization and architecture of innovation: Managing the flow of technology, Amsterdam Butterworth-Heinemann, 2007.10.4324/9780080545370Search in Google Scholar

[5] DUFFY, F., POWELL, K., The New Office: Conran Octopus, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

[6] HILLIER, B., Space Is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

[7] https://www.gensler.com/uploads/document/126/file/2008_Gensler_Workplace_Workplace_Survey_US_09_30_2009.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

[8] ZEISEL, J., Inquiry by Design: Tools for Environment-Behaviour Research, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Search in Google Scholar

[9] BARKER, R. G., Ecological psychology : concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior, Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1968.Search in Google Scholar

[10] GIBSON, J. J., The ecological approach to visual perception, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979.Search in Google Scholar

[11] HALL, E. T., The hidden dimension, Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1966.Search in Google Scholar

[12] LANG, J., Privacy, Territoriality and Personal Space - Proxemic Thoery. , Creating Architectural Theory: The role of the behavioral sciences in design, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1987. pp. 145-156.Search in Google Scholar

[13] BRILL, M., MARGULIS, S. T., KONAR, E., BOSTI, Using office design to increase productivity, Buffalo, N.Y Workplace Design and Productivity, Inc., 1985.Search in Google Scholar

[14] GOODRICH, R., Seven Office Evaluations, Environment and Behavior, volume 14 (1982), no. 3, 353-378.10.1177/0013916582143006Search in Google Scholar

[15] HEERWAGEN, J. H., KAMPSCHROER, K., POWELL, K. M., LOFTNESS, V., Collaborative knowledge work environments, Building Research & Information, vol. 32 (2004), no. 6, 510-528.10.1080/09613210412331313025Search in Google Scholar

[16] STUDER, R., The dynamics of behavior-contingent physical systems, Design Methods in Architecture, A. Ward and G. Broadbent, eds., London: Lund Humphries, 1969.Search in Google Scholar

[17] MICHELSON, W. M., Behavioral research methods in environmental design: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, 1975.Search in Google Scholar

[18] CANTER, D. V., The psychology of place: Architectural Press, 1977.Search in Google Scholar

[19] ITTELSON, W. H., LEANNE, G. R., HAROLD, M. P., The use of behavioral maps in environmental psychology, Environmental psychology: Man and his physical setting, H. M. Proshansky., W. H. Ittelson., L. G. Rivlin., eds., New York Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976.Search in Google Scholar