Porcine or Bovine Tissue Valves: Which are Better for Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement?

1 Jawitz OK. Surgical aortic valve replacement for failed TAVR prostheses: one more piece of the puzzle. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(16):1860-1. Search in Google Scholar

2 Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, Milojevic M, Baldus S, Bauersachs J, et al. 2021 ESC/ EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;60(4):727-800. Search in Google Scholar

3 Johnston DR, Soltesz EG, Vakil N, Rajeswaran J, Roselli EE, Sabik JF 3^rd, et al. Long-term durability of bioprosthetic aortic valves: implications from 12,569 implants. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99(4):1239-47. Search in Google Scholar

4 Carpentier A, Lemaigre G, Robert L, Carpentier S, Dubost C. Biological factors affecting long-term results of valvular heterografts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1969;58(4):467-83. Search in Google Scholar

5 Ionescu MI, Pakrashi BC, Holden MP, Mary DA, Wooler GH. Results of aortic valve replacement with frame-supported fascia lata and pericardial grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1972; 64(3):340-53. Search in Google Scholar

6 Thiene G, Valente M. Anticalcification strategies to increase bioprosthetic valve durability. J Heart Valve Dis. 2011;20(1):37-44. Search in Google Scholar

7 Yap KH, Murphy R, Devbhandari M, Venkateswaran V. Aortic valve replacement: is porcine or bovine valve better? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013;16(3):361-73. Search in Google Scholar

8 Thalji MN, Suri MR, Michelena HI, Greason KL, Dearani JA, Daly RC, et al. Do differences in early hemodynamic performance of current generation biologic aortic valves predict outcomes 1 year following surgery? 2015;149(1):163-73. Search in Google Scholar

9 Balsam LB, DeAnda A Jr. The Mitroflow aortic valve: A past, present, and future illuminated. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153(1):40-2. Search in Google Scholar

10 Hartrumpf M, Kuehnel R, Erb M, Loladze G, Mueller T, Albes J. Favorable gradients with the mitroflow aortic valve prosthesis in everyday surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;60(5):326-33. Search in Google Scholar

11 Vyavahare NR, Hirsch D, Lerner E, Baskin JZ, Zand R, Schoen FJ, et al. Prevention of calcification of glutaraldehyde-crosslinked porcine aortic cusps by ethanol preincubation: mechanistic studies of protein structure and water-biomaterial relationships. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;15(40):577-85. Search in Google Scholar

12 Edmunds LH, Clark RE, Cohn LH, Grunkemeier GL, Miller DC, Weisel RD. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. Annal Thorac Surg. 1996;10(9):812-6. Search in Google Scholar

13 Iturra SA, Suri RM, Greason KL, Stulac JM, Burkhart HM, Dearani JA, et al. Outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement in moderate risk patients: implications for determination of equipoise in the transcatheter era. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147(1)127-32. Search in Google Scholar

14 Kalogerakos PD, Kontopodis N, Ioannou CV, Kladou E, Chalkiadakis G, Athanasiou T, et al. Hemodynamics and reverse remodeling associated with Mosaic, Perimount and Trifecta aortic bioprostheses. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019;16(8):743-51. Search in Google Scholar

15 Chambers JB, Rajani R, Parkin D, Rimington HM, Blauth CI, Venn GE, et al. Bovine pericardial versus porcine stented replacement aortic valves: Early results of a randomized comparison of the Perimount and the Mosaic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136(5):1142-8. Search in Google Scholar

16 Dalmau MJ, González-Santos JM, Blázquez JA, Sastre JA, López-Rodríguez J, Bueno M, et al. Hemodynamic performance of the Medtronic Mosaic and Perimount Magna aortic bioprostheses: five-year results of a prospectively randomized study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;39(6):844-52. Search in Google Scholar

17 Persson M, Glaser N, Franco-Cereceda A, Nilsson J, Holzmann MJ, Sartipy U. Porcine vs Bovine Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves: Long-Term Clinical Results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021;111(2):529-35. Search in Google Scholar

18 Asch FM, Heimansohn D, Doyle D, Dembitsky W, Ferdinand FD, Swanson J, et al. Mitroflow aortic bioprosthesis 5-year follow-up: North American prospective multicenter study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94(4):1198-203. Search in Google Scholar