[
ANDERECK, William. Yes: If they are Given Out of Beneficence Or Appreciation. The Western Journal of Medicine, 2001, vol. 175, no. 2, p. 76.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BENTHAM, Jeremy. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Kitchener: Batoche Books, 2000.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BERENTA, Juozas. Tarp kyšio policininkui ir vokelio gydytojui nėra jokio skirtumo (There is no Difference between a Bribe to a Policeman and an Envelope to a Doctor). [online]. Available at: <https://www.delfi.lt/verslas/verslas/j-berenta-tarp-kysio-policininkui-ir-vokelio-gydytojuinera-jokio-skirtumo-61604783> Accessed: 15.04.2024.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BINDER, Guyora, SMITH, Nicholas, J. Framed: Utilitarianism and Punishment of the Innocent. Rutgers LJ, 2000, vol. 32, pp. 115–224.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BIKELIS, Skirmantas. Rethinking system of sanctions for trafficing of goods: the problem of proportionality (I). Principe of proportionality and criminal sanctions. Teisės problemos, 2012, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 5–24.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CARO, Mario De. Utilitarianism and Retributivism in Cesare Beccaria. Italian Law Journal, 2016, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–12.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CLARKSON, C., M., V. Why Criminal Law? The Role of Utilitarianism: A Response to Husak. Crim Law and Philos, 2008, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 131–135.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CORLETT, J., Angelo. Making Sense of Retributivism. Philosophy, 2001, vol. 76, no. 295, pp. 77–110.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Code of Administrative Offences of the Republic of Lithuania. TAR, 2015, no. 11216.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Code of Conduct for Employees of Healthcare Institutions, TAR, 2021, no. 16035.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers. Recommendation No. R (91) 1, 1991; ECHR (1950, ETS 5).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Criminal Code of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2000, no. 89–2741.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DACHAK, Hadi. The Principle of Proportionality of Crime and Punishment in International Documents. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 2021, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 684–694.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Draft Law on Supplementing Article 250(2) of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Lithuania, 2001, no. IXP-342(2SP).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ELTA. Tyrimas: neoficialios dovanos medikams populiaresnės tarp vyresnių gyventojų (Research: Informal Gifts for Doctors are more Popular among the Elderly Population). [online]. Available at: <https://www.lrt.lt/naujienos/sveikata/682/2212965/tyrimas-neoficialios-dovanos-medikamspopuliaresnes-tarp-vyresniu-gyventoju> Accessed: 03.03.2024.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EMIGHOLZ, Carl. Utilitarianism, Retributivism and the White Collar-Drug Crime Sentencing Disparity: Toward a Unified Theory of Enforcement. Rutgers Law Review, 2006, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 583–614.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ENGLE, Eric. The History of the General Principle of Proportionality: An Overview. Dartmouth Law Journal, 2012, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–11.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission. Special Eurobarometer 534. Luxembourg: Publications Office, 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FISH, Morris, J. An Eye for an Eye: Proportionality as a Moral Principle of Punishment. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2008, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 57–71.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FRASE, Richard. Punishment Purposes. STAN. L. REV, 2005, vol. 58, no. 67, pp. 67–84.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GRAY, David. Punishment as Suffering. Vanderbilt Law Review, 2010, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 1619–1693.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HAIST, Matthew. Deterrence in a Sea of Just Deserts: Are Utilitarian Goals Achievable in a World of Limiting Retributivism. J. Crim. L. & Criminology, 2009, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 789–822.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HIRSCH, Andrew von. Proportionality in the Philosophy of Punishment. Crime and Justice, 1992, vol. 16, pp. 55–98.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KARGAUDIENĖ, Aušra. Principle of proportionality in administrative law and its application in Lithuanian courts. Jurisprudencija, 2005, vol. 78, no. 70, pp. 29–38.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LATINYTĖ, Rūta. Gift-giving as an expression of interpersonal relations in everyday practices in Lithuania at the end of the 20th – beginning of the 21st century. Doctoral thesis, Vilnius University, Vilnius, 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Law on the Civil Service of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 1999, no. 66–2130.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LETSAS, George. Proportionality as Fittingness: The Moral Dimension of Proportionality. Current Legal Problems, 2018, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 53–86.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lithuania v. A.Ž. Supreme Court of Lithuania. Judgment of 23 February 2022. Application no. 2K-35-719/2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lithuania v. I.P., I.A., Ž.L. Supreme Court of Lithuania. Judgment of 3 November 2020. Application no. 2K-221-942/2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lithuania v. K.D. Supreme Court of Lithuania. Judgment of 3 February 2022. Application no. 2K-23-628/2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lithuania v. R.K. et al. Court of Appeal of Lithuania. Judgment of 22 November 2023. Application no. 1A-40-307/2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lithuania v. R.P. Supreme Court of Lithuania. Judgment of 10 November 2015. Application no. 2K-P-100-222/2015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lithuania v. R.T. et al. Supreme Court of Lithuania. Judgment of 27 December 2007. Application no. 2K-594/2007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lithuania v. V.R. Supreme Court of Lithuania. Judgment of 29 December 2016. Application no. 2K-449-942/2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lithuania v. V.Š. Court of Appeal of Lithuania. Judgment of 28 February 2024. Application no. 1A-166-870/2024.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MACKAY, Kathryn. Rules and Resistance: A Commentary on “An Archeology of Corruption in Medicine”. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 2022, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 123–127.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MALINAUSKAS, Vygantas. Theoretical and methodological aspects of ensuring a balance between human rights and public interest. Doctoral thesis, Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, 2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MONRO, Charles, Henry (trans). The Digest of Justinian. Cambridge University Press, 1904.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
POSNER, Richard, A. An Economic Theory of the Criminal Law. Columbia Law Review, 1985, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 1193–1231.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
R. v. M. (CA). [1996] 1 SCR 500 (Canadian case).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ROBINSON, Paul, H. Distributive Principles of Criminal Law: Who Should be Punished How Much. University of Pennsylvania, 2008.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
The ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of 2 October 2001. Official Gazette, 2001, no. 85–2977.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
The ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of 6 December 2000. Official Gazette, 2000, no. 105–3318.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
The ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of 10 November 2005. Official Gazette, 2005, no. 134–4819.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
The ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of 13 December 2004. Official Gazette, 2004, no. 181–6708.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
The ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of 29 December 2004. Official Gazette, 2005, no. 1–7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
The ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of 29 September 2005. Official Gazette, 2005, no. 117–4239.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SAKALAUSKAS, Gintautas, BIKELIS, Skirmantas, KALPOKAS, Vaidas, POCIENĖ, Aušra. Criminal Policy in Lithuania: Trends and Comparative Aspects. Vilnius: Law Institute of Lithuania, 2012.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SINKEVIČIUS, Vytautas. Principles and limits of interpretation of the Constitution. Jurisprudencija, 2005, vol. 67, no. 59, pp. 7–19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SLOT, Brigitte, SWART, Linette de, WEISTRA, Kim, OORTWIJN, Wija, WANROOIJ, Niels van, RAETS, Tess. Updated Study on Corruption in the Healthcare Sector. Luxembourg: Publications Office, 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SPECTOR, Horacio. Constitutional proportionality and moral deontology. Jurisprudence, 2021, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1–25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SUMMERS, Robert, S. H.L.A. Hart on Justice. The Journal of Philosophy, 1962, vol. 59, no. 18, pp. 497–500.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ŠEDBARAS, Stasys. Administracinė atsakomybė (Administrative Liability). Vilnius: Justitia, 2005.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
TOPCHII, Vasyl, ZADEREIKO, Svitlana, DIDKIVSKA, Galyna, BODUNOVA, Olesia, SHEVCHENKO, Dmytro. International Anti-Corruption Standards. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 2021, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 277–286.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VALANČIUS, Virgilijus, NORKUS, Rimvydas. Aspects of Contact of Administrative and Criminal Justice in Lithuania. Jurisprudencija, 2006, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 91–98.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ZHU, Jiangnan. Do Severe Penalties Deter Corruption? A Game Theoretic Analysis of the Chinese Case. China Review, 2012, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1–32.
]Search in Google Scholar
