Limited Tendering – A Barrier to Get the Best Value for Money or Effective Solution for Extraordinary Situations?

BOVIS, Christopher. EU Public Procurement Law. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2012, 544 p. ISBN: 978085793842810.4337/9780857938428Search in Google Scholar

DOSTÁL, Ondrej. Koronavírus: smerácky biznis na rozlúčku? Denník N, 16 March 2020. [online] Available at: https://dennikn.sk/1803703/koronavirus-smeracky-biznis-narozlucku/ Accessed: 10.12.2020Search in Google Scholar

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. Value for money: EU programme funding in the field of democracy and rule of law – European Union. 2017. [online] doi:10.2861/14536, ISBN: 978-92-846-0377-0Search in Google Scholar

GLENDINNING, R. The Concept of Value for Money. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 1988, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 42–50, ISSN: 095-355810.1108/eb002926Search in Google Scholar

HORUBSKI, Krzysztof. Public Contracts by Negotiated Procedure in Cases of Urgency – A New interpretation of the Legal Basis in Light of Experiences with Organization of the 2012 European Football Championships – Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics, 2014, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 105–118, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/wrlae-2013-0046 ISSN: 2084-1264. [online] Available at: https://content.sciendo.com/configurable/contentpage/journals$002fwrlae$002f3$002f1$002farticle-p104.xml Accessed: 10.12.202010.2478/wrlae-2013-0046Search in Google Scholar

KRÜGER, Kai. Urgent Needs – Derogatory Procurement Law Scenarios: Reflections over Ius Necessitatis in the Area of Public Contracting – Á propos the EC Directive 2007/66, Amending Directive 89/655/EC on Remedies in Public Contracting. 3^rdInternational Public Procurement Conference Proceedings – Enhancing Best Practices in Public Procurement, 2008, pp. 165–190. [online] Available at: http://www.ippa.org/IPPC3/Proceedings/Chaper%2013.pdf Accessed: 10.12.2020Search in Google Scholar

LOZOVSKY, Ilya. In Europe’s Scramble to Buy COVID-19 Supplies, Anti-Corruption Measures Fall Away. 21 April 2020. OCCRP. [online] Available at: https://www.occrp.org/en/coronavirus/in-europes-scramble-to-buy-COVID-19-supplies-anti-corruption-measures-fall-away Accessed: 6.12.2020Search in Google Scholar

NAČIŠČIONIS, Jānis, TUMALAVIČIUS, Vladas, SKRASTINA, Una, RADZEVIČS, Juris, PRAKAPIENÈ, Daila. Issues of Public Security: Legal Consequences of Determining Unforseeable Extraordinary Events. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 2020, vol.9, no.3 pp. 1117–1127, DOI: 10.9770/jssi.2020.9.3(34), ISSN: 2020-7025. [online] Available at: https://jssidoi.org/jssi/uploads/papers/36/Naciscionis_Issues_of_Public_Security_Legal_Consequences_of_Determining_Unforeseeable_Extraordinary_Events.pdf Accessed: 10.12.202010.9770/jssi.2020.9.3(34)Search in Google Scholar

SANCHEZ-GRAELLS, Albert. European Commission´s Guidance on Extreme Emergency Procurement and Covid-19 – Some Thoughts and a Word on the Dyson Contract. 2020. [online] Available at: https://www.howtocrackanut.com/blog/2020/4/1/european-commissions-guidance-on-extreme-emergency-procurement-and-covid-19-some-thoughts Accessed: 10.12.2020Search in Google Scholar

STEINICKE, Michael, VESTERDORF, Peter L. EU Public Procurement Law, Brussels Commentary – Baden-Baden : NOMOS, C. H. BECK, HART, 1.st edition, 2018, pp. 1448, ISBN: 978-3-8487-0120-9Search in Google Scholar

Agreement on Government Procurement. Revised text (2012).Search in Google Scholar

Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC, (OJ L 94, 28. 3. 2014, pp 65–242)Search in Google Scholar

Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (OJ L 94, 28. 3. 2014, pp. 243–374)Search in Google Scholar

Guidance from the European Commission on using the public procurement framework in the emergency situation related to the COVID-19 crisis (OJ C 108I, 1. 4. 2020, p. 1–5)Search in Google Scholar

Judgement of the Court of 4 June 2009 in case Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic, C-250/07, ECLI:EU:C:2009:338Search in Google Scholar

Judgement of the Court of 2 June 2005 in case Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic, C-394/02, ECLI:EU:C:2005:336Search in Google Scholar

Judgement of the Court of 10 March 1987 in case Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic, 199/85, ECLI:EU:C:1987:115Search in Google Scholar

Judgement of the Court of 14 September 2004 in case Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic, C-385/02, ECLI:EU:C:2004:522Search in Google Scholar

Judgement of the Court of 11 September 2014 in case Ministero dell´Interno v Fastweb SpA, C-19/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2194Search in Google Scholar

Judgement of the Court of 22 April 2010 in case European Commission v Kingdom of Spain, C-423/07, ECLI:EU:C:2010:211Search in Google Scholar

Judgement of the Court of 2 August 1993 in case Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic, ECLI:EU:C:1993:344Search in Google Scholar

Judgement of the Court of 18 March 1992 in case Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain, C-24/91, ECLI:EU:C:1992:134Search in Google Scholar

Judgement of the Court of 27 October 2005 in case Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic, C-525/03, ECLI:EU:C:2005:648Search in Google Scholar

Opinion of Advocate General Jacobs delivered on 2 June 2005 in case C-525/03, Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic, ECLI:EU:C:2005:343Search in Google Scholar

Judgement of the Court of 28 March 1996 in case Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany, C-318/94, ECLI:EU:C:1996:149Search in Google Scholar