Transaction design standards for the operationalisation of fairness and empowerment in proactive contracting

BEVAN Nigel, KIRAKOWSKI Jurek and MAISSEL J Jonathan. What is Usability? Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on HCI, Stuttgart 1991.Search in Google Scholar

BEVAN Nigel and CURSON Ian. Methods for Measuring Usability. In HOWARD Steve, HAMMOND, Judy and LINDGAARD Gitte (eds). Human Computer Interaction INTERACT ’97. IFIP Conference Proceedings 96, Chapman & Hall, Springer, 1997.10.1007/978-0-387-35175-9_126Search in Google Scholar

BRAUCHER Jean. Contract Versus Contractarianism: The Regulatory Role of Contract Law. Washington and Lee Law Review, 1990, vol. 47, no. 4, p. 697.Search in Google Scholar

BRINCK Tom, BUNYAN John, GERGLE Darren and WOOD Scott D., BLYTHE David, and MCREYNOLDS Tom. Designing Web Sites that Work: Usability for the Web. Morgan, Kaufmann 2002.10.1016/B978-155860658-6.50010-9Search in Google Scholar

BUCHANAN Richard. Human Dignity and Human Rights: Thoughts on the Principles of Human-Centered Design. Design Issues, 2001, vol. 17, no. 3, p. 35.10.1162/074793601750357178Search in Google Scholar

BUSH Robert A., and FOLGER Joseph. The Promise of Mediation: The Transformative Approach to Conflict. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

CAPPELLETTI Mauro, GARTH Bryant and TROCKER Nicolo. Access to Justice, Variations and Continuity of a World-Wide Movement. Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht/The Rabel Journal of Comparative and International Private Law, 1982, vol. 46, no. 4, p. 664.Search in Google Scholar

DEUTSCH Morton. Justice and Conflict. In DEUTSCH Morton, COLEMAN Peter T and MARCUS Eric C. (eds). The Handbook of Conflict Resolution, Theory and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2006, pp. 43–68.Search in Google Scholar

DAVIS Kevin. Contracts as Technology. New York University Law Review, 2013, vol. 88, no. 1, p. 83Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. White Paper on Artificial Intelligence: a European Approach to Excellence and Trust, COM(2020) 65 final.Search in Google Scholar

FISHER Roger, URY William and PATTON Bruce. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving in. New York: Penguin 2011.Search in Google Scholar

HAGAN Margaret. A Human-Centered Design Approach to Access to Justice: Generating New Prototypes and Hypotheses for Interventions to Make Courts User-Friendly. Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality, 2018, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 199.Search in Google Scholar

HAAPIO Helena. and GROTON JP. From Reaction to Proactive Action: Dispute Prevention Processes In Business Agreements. IACCM EMEA Conference, Academic Symposium, London, 9 November 2007.Search in Google Scholar

HIETANEN-KUNWALD Petra. Mediation and the legal system: Extracting the legal principles of Civil and Commercial Mediation. Helsinki: Unigrafia, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

HIETANEN-KUNWALD Petra and HAAPIO, Helena. Applying Legal Design in Dispute Prevention and Resolution. Legal Design VIRTUALtable 2020 Conference, Brussels/virtual, 1–2 April 2020.Search in Google Scholar

HILLMAN Robert and RACHLINSKI Jeffrey. Standard-Form Contracting in the Electronic Age. New York University Law Review, 2002, vol. 77, no. 2, p. 429.10.2139/ssrn.287819Search in Google Scholar

HOLLANDER-BLUMOFF Rebecca. Just Negotiations. Washington University Law Review, 2010, vol. 88, no. 2, p. 381.Search in Google Scholar

HOLLANDER-BLUMOFF Rebecca. Formation of Procedural Justice Judgments in Legal Negotiation. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2017, vol. 26, issue 1, no. 3, p. 19.10.1007/s10726-016-9498-2Search in Google Scholar

HOLLANDER-BLUMOFF Rebecca and TYLER Tom R. Procedural Justice in Negotiation: Procedural Fairness, Outcome Acceptance, and Integrative Potential. Law and Social Inquiry, 2008, vol. 33, no. 2, p. 473.10.1111/j.1747-4469.2008.00110.xSearch in Google Scholar

HOLLANDER-BLUMOFF Rebecca and TYLER Tom R. Procedural Justice and the Rule of Law: Fostering Legitimacy in Alternative Dispute Resolution. Journal of Dispute Resolution, 2011, vol. 2011, no. 1, p. 1.Search in Google Scholar

HUGE, Collins. Is a Relational Contract a Legal Concept? In DEGELING Simone, EDELMAN, James and GOUDKAMP James (eds). Contract In Commercial Law. Thomson Reuters, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

HYMAN Jonathan M and LOVE Lela P. If Portia were a Mediator: an Inquiry into Justice in Mediation. Clinical Law Review, 2002, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 157.Search in Google Scholar

LENS Vicky. Principled Negotiation: A New Tool for Case Advocacy. Social Work, 2004, vol. 49, no. 3, p. 506.10.1093/sw/49.3.506Search in Google Scholar

LINDBLOM Per H. ADR – The Opiate of the Legal System: Perspectives on Alternative Dispute Resolution Generally and in Sweden. European Review of Private Law, 2008, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 63.10.54648/ERPL2008004Search in Google Scholar

MACNEIL Ian R. Relational Contract: What We Do and Do Not Know. Wisconsin Law Review, 1985, vol. 1985, p. 483.Search in Google Scholar

MACNEIL Ian R. Relational Contract Theory: Challenges and Queries. Northwestern University Law Review, 2000, vol 94, no. 3, p. 877.Search in Google Scholar

MARRELLA Andres and CATARCI Tiziana. Measuring the Learnability of Interactive Systems Using a Petri Net Based Approach. Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2018 – DIS ’18, ACM Press, 2018.10.1145/3196709.3196744Search in Google Scholar

NIELSEN Jakob. 10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design. Nielsen Norman, Group 1, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

NORMAN Don. The design of everyday things.New York. Basic books, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

PASSERA Stefania. Enhancing Contract Usability and User Experience Through Visualization-an Experimental Evaluation. 16th International Conference on Information Visualisation, IEEE 2012.10.1109/IV.2012.69Search in Google Scholar

PITKÄSALO Eliisa and KALLIOMAA-PUHA Laura. Democratizing Access to Justice: the Comic Contract as Intersemiotic Translation. Translation Matters, 2019, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 30.10.21747/21844585/tm1_2a2Search in Google Scholar

PRUITT Dean G and CARNEVALE Peter J. Negotiation in social conflict (Mapping social psychology series). Buckingham: Open University Press, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

RASKIN Max. The Law and Legality of Smart Contracts. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 2017, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 304.Search in Google Scholar

Redström, Johan. Designing Everyday Computational Things. Gothenburg Studies in Informatics no. 20, Göteborg University 2001.Search in Google Scholar

ROSSI Arianna and HAAPIO Helena. Proactive Legal Design: Embedding Values in the Design of Legal Artefacts. In SCHWEIGHOFER, Erich, KUMMER, Franz and SAARENPÄÄ, Ahti (eds). Internet of Things. Proceedings of the 22nd International Legal Infomatics Symposium IRIS 2019. Bern: Editions Weblaw, 2019, p. 537Search in Google Scholar

SCORSONE Eric. New Development: What are the Challenges in Transferring Lean Thinking to Government? Public Money and Management, 2008, vol. 28, no. 1, p. 61.Search in Google Scholar

SHAPIRA Omer. A Theory of Mediators’ Ethics: Foundations, Rationale, and Application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

SMITH Henry E. Modularity in Contracts: Boilerplate and Information Flow. Michigan Law Review, 2006, vol. 104, 1175.Search in Google Scholar

SHNEIDERMAN, Ben, PLAISANT, Catherine, COHEN, Maxime, JACOBS, Steven, ELMQVIST, Niklas and DIAKOPOULOS, Nicholas. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-computer Interaction. Pearson, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

SIEDEL George J and HAAPIO Helena. Proactive Law for Managers: A Hidden Source of Competitive Advantage. New York: Routledge, 2016.10.4324/9781315602240Search in Google Scholar

SOLARTE-VASQUEZ Maria Claudia and HIETANEN-KUNWALD Petra. Responsibility and Responsiveness in the Design of Automated Dispute Resolution Processes. In SCHWEIGHOFER, Erich, HÖTZENDORFER, Walter, KUMMER, Franz and SAARENPÄÄ, Ahti (eds). Verantwortunsbewusste Digitalisierung/Responsible digitalisation. Proceedings of the 23nd International Legal Informatics Symposium IRIS 2020. Bern: Editions Weblaw, 2020, pp. 451–458.10.38023/2038d4dc-d497-49eb-9179-0d2c77f64132Search in Google Scholar

SOLARTE-VASQUEZ Maria Claudia; JÄRV Natalia and NYMAN-METCALF Katrin. Usability Factors in Transactional Design and Smart Contracting. In KERIKMÄE, Tanel and RULL, Addi (eds). The Future of Law and eTechnologies.Springer, Cham, 2016, p. 149.10.1007/978-3-319-26896-5_8Search in Google Scholar

SOLARTE-VASQUEZ Maria Claudia and NYMAN-METCALF Katrin. Smart Contracting: a Multidisciplinary and Proactive Approach for the EU Digital Single Market. Baltic Journal of European Studies, 2017, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 208.10.1515/bjes-2017-0017Search in Google Scholar

SOLARTE-VASQUEZ Maria Claudia; RUNGI Mait and NYMAN-METCALF Katrin Merike. Perceptions on Self-regulation and Transaction Friendliness Relevant to Smart Contracting. International Journal of Law and Management, 2019, vol. 61, p. 286.10.1108/IJLMA-03-2018-0061Search in Google Scholar

SUSSKIND Richard. Online Courts and the Future of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.10.1093/oso/9780198838364.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

TYLER Tom R. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven and London. Yale University Press 1990.Search in Google Scholar

WAGNER Gerhard. Harmonisation of Civil Procedure: Policy Perspectives. In KRAMER, Xandra E and RHEE, C. H. van (eds). Civil Litigation in a Globalising World. The Hague: T. M. C. Asser Press; Springer, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

WALDMAN Ellen. Mediation Ethics: Cases and Commentaries. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass 2011.Search in Google Scholar

ZIMMERMANN Reinhard and WHITTAKER Simon (eds). Good faith in European Contract Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2000.Search in Google Scholar