Judicial Approaches to Political Questions: A Comparative Study of the United States and South Korea

BARKOW, Rachel, E. More Supreme than Court? The Fall of the Political Question Doctrine and the Rise of Judicial Supremacy. Columbia Law Review, 2002, vol. 102, pp. 239–241.10.2307/1123824Search in Google Scholar

BICKEL, Alexander, The Least Dangerous Branch. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1962, p. 184.Search in Google Scholar

CHEMERINSKY, Erwin, Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies. Fifth Edition. New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2015, p. 135.Search in Google Scholar

CHEMERINSKY, Erwin, Interpreting the Constitution. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1987, pp. 99–105.Search in Google Scholar

COHEN, Harlan, Grant. A Politics-Reinforcing Political Question Doctrine. Arizona State Law Journal, 2017, vol. 49, pp. 5–6.Search in Google Scholar

Court of Korea, Organization: Justices. [online]. Available at: <http://english.ccourt.go.kr/cckhome/eng/introduction/organization/organization.do#none> Accessed: 08.12.2018. Constitutional Court of Korea [CCK] Aug. 30, 2011, 23-2(A) KCCR 366, 2006Hun-Ma788 (S. Kor.).Search in Google Scholar

Constitutional Court of Korea, About the Court. [online]. Available at: <http://english.ccourt.go.kr/cckhome/eng/introduction/aboutTheCourt/aboutTheCourt.do> Accessed: 08.12.2018.Search in Google Scholar

Constitutional Court of Korea, History of Constitutional Adjudication. [online]. Available at: <http://english.ccourt.go.kr/cckhome/eng/introduction/history/historyOfCons-Adju.do> Accessed: 08.12.2018.Search in Google Scholar

Constitutional Court of Korea, Jurisdiction: Adjudication on Competence Dispute. [online]. Available at: <http://english.ccourt.go.kr/cckhome/eng/jurisdiction/jurisdiction/adjuOnConsOfStatutes.do> Accessed: 08.12.2018.Search in Google Scholar

Constitutional Court of Korea, Jurisdiction: Adjudication on Dissolution of a Political Party. [online]. Available at: <http://english.ccourt.go.kr/cckhome/eng/jurisdiction/jurisdiction/adjuOnConsOfStatutes.do> Accessed: 08.12.2018.Search in Google Scholar

Constitutional Court of Korea, Jurisdiction: Adjudication on Impeachment. [online]. Available at: <http://english.ccourt.go.kr/cckhome/eng/jurisdiction/jurisdiction/adjuOn-ConsOfStatutes.do> Accessed: 08.12.2018.Search in Google Scholar

Constitutional Court of Korea, Jurisdiction: Adjudication on the Constitutionality of Statutes. [online]. Available at: <http://english.ccourt.go.kr/cckhome/eng/jurisdiction/jurisdiction/adjuOnConsOfStatutes.do> Accessed: 08.12.2018.Search in Google Scholar

Constitutional Court of Korea, Jurisdiction: Constitutional Complaint. [online]. Available at: <http://english.ccourt.go.kr/cckhome/eng/jurisdiction/jurisdiction/adjuOnConsOfStatutes.do> Accessed: 08.12.2018.Search in Google Scholar

DANSBY, Joshua W. Rule of Law in the United States. Stability is One of the World’s Most Valued Commodities. International and Comparative Law Review, 2017, vol. 17, p. 147.10.2478/iclr-2018-0006Search in Google Scholar

DORSEN, Norman et al., Comparative Constitutionalism: Cases and Materials. Third Edition. St. Paul: West Academic Publishing, 2016, pp. 38–39.Search in Google Scholar

FIELD, Oliver, P. The Doctrine of Political Questions in the Federal Courts. Minnesota Law Review, 1924, vol. 8, p. 512.Search in Google Scholar

FREEMAN, Michelle. The Right to Dignity in the United States. Hastings Law Journal, 2017, vol. 68, p. 1137.Search in Google Scholar

HAHM, Chaihark. Beyond “Law v. Politics” in Constitutional Adjudication: Lessons from South Korea. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2012, vol. 10, p. 1.10.1093/icon/mos004Search in Google Scholar

HAHM, Chaihark. To Make “We the People”: Constitutional Founding in Postwar Japan and South Korea. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2010, vol. 8, p. 3.10.1093/icon/mor007Search in Google Scholar

HENKIN, Louis. Is There a “Political Question” Doctrine?. Yale Law Journal, 1976, vol. 85, p. 599.10.2307/795454Search in Google Scholar

LAU, Holning. Introduction to the Symposium Issue: Pluralism in Asia. North Carolina Journal of International Law & Commercial Regulation, 2011. vol 36, p. 499.Search in Google Scholar

LAU, Holning. The Language of Westernization in Legal Commentary. American Journal of Comparative Law, 2013, vol. 61, p. 508.10.5131/AJCL.2012.0024Search in Google Scholar

LIM, Jibong. A Comparative Study of the Constitutional Adjudication Systems of the U.S., Germany and Korea. Tulsa Journal of Comparative & International Law, 1999, vol. 6, pp. 142–144.Search in Google Scholar

LIM, Jibong. Korean Constitutional Court Standing at the Crossroads: Focusing on Real Cases and Variational Types of Decisions. Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, 2002, vol. 24, p. 328.Search in Google Scholar

MULHERN, Peter, J. In Defense of the Political Question Doctrine, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1988, vol. 137, p. 97.10.2307/3312167Search in Google Scholar

PARK, Jonghyun. The Judicialization of Politics in Korea. Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal, 2008, vol. 10, pp. 66–67.Search in Google Scholar

REDISH, Martin. Judicial Review and the Political Question. Northwestern University Law Review, 1985, vol. 79, pp. 1045–1046.Search in Google Scholar

SCHARPF, Fritz. Judicial Review and the Political Question Doctrine: A Functional Analysis. Yale Law Journal, 1966, vol. 75, pp. 539–540.10.2307/794865Search in Google Scholar

SCHAUER, Frederick. Easy Cases. Southern California Law Review, 1985, vol. 58, p. 404.Search in Google Scholar

SIMONIS, Mindaugas. The Role of Judicial Ethics in Court Administration: From Setting the Objectives to Practical Implementation. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 2017, vol. 10, pp. 92–93.10.1515/bjlp-2017-0004Search in Google Scholar

SKINNER, Gwynne. Misunderstood, Misconstrued, and Now Clearly Dead: The “Political Question Doctrine” as a Justiciability Doctrine. Journal of Law and Politics, 2014, vol. 29, p. 431.10.2139/ssrn.2315237Search in Google Scholar

The Constitutional Court of Korea: The First Ten Years of the Korean Constitutional Court. Sixteenth Volume. Seoul, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

TOMOSZEK, Maxim. Impeachment in the U.S. Constitution and Practice – Implications for the Czech Constitution, International and Comparative Law Review, 2017, vol. 17, pp. 133–136.10.2478/iclr-2018-0005Search in Google Scholar