[
Bárczi, Géza and Országh, László, eds. A magyar nyelv értelmező szótára [The Explicatory Dictionary of Hungarian Language]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1959–1962.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coleman, Linda and Kay, Paul. “Prototype semantics. The English word lie.” Linguistics, vol. 57, no. 1, 1981, pp. 26–44.10.1353/lan.1981.0002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Croft, William. “Connecting frames and constructions. A case study of eat and feed.” Constructions and Frames, vol. 1, no. 1, 2009, pp. 7‒28.10.1075/cf.1.1.02cro
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Croft, William and Cruse, D. Alan. Cognitive linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.10.1017/CBO9780511803864
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Croft, William. Radical construction grammar. Syntactic theory in typological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dimény, Hajnalka. “Sound symbolism and meaning patterns.” Roczniki Humanistyczne, vol. 66, no. 11, 2018, pp. 47–57.10.18290/rh.2018.66.11-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fauconnier, Gilles and Turner, Mark. “Polysemy and conceptual blending.” In Nerlich, Brigitte, Todd, Zazie and Clarke, David D., eds. Polysemy. Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2003, pp. 79–94.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fellbaum, Christiane. “English Verbs as a Semantic Net.” International Journal of Lexicography, vol. 3, no. 4, 1990, pp. 278–301.10.1093/ijl/3.4.278
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gentner, Dedre and France, Ilene M. “The verb mutability effect. Studies of the combinatorial semantics of nouns and verbs.” In Small, Steven, Cottrell, Garrison and Tananhaus, Michael, eds. Lexical ambiguity resolution. Perspective from Psycholinguistics, Neuropsychology and Artificial Intelligence. San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1988, pp. 343–382.10.1016/B978-0-08-051013-2.50018-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goldberg, Adele E. Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in language. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jaggar, Philip J. and Buba, Malami. “Metaphorical extensions of ‘eat’ ⇒ [overcome] and ‘drink’ ⇒ [undergo] in Hausa”. In Newman, John, ed. The linguistics of eating and drinking. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2009, pp. 229–252.10.1075/tsl.84.11jag
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, George. Women, fire, and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago–London: The University of Chicago Press, 1987.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Newman, John. “Eating and drinking as sources of metaphor in English.” International Journal of Lexicography, vol. 6, no. 2, 1997, pp. 213–231.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Newman, John. “A cross-linguistic overview of ’eat’ and ’drink’”. In Newman, John, ed. The linguistics of eating and drinking. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2009a, pp. 1–26.10.1075/tsl.84.02new
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Newman, John, ed. The linguistics of eating and drinking. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2009b.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oravecz, Csaba, Váradi, Tamás and Sass, Bálint. “The Hungarian National Gigaword Corpus.” Proceedings of LREC 2014 (MNSZ), 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pusztai, Ferenc. Magyar értelmező kéziszótár [Hungarian Explicative Dictionary]. Second, extended edition. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 2006.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Radden, Günter. “Motion metaphorized: The case of coming and going.” In Casad, Eugen H. ed. Cognitive linguistics in the redwoods. Part 1. Berlin‒New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1996, pp. 423‒458.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Raukko, Jarno. “Polysemy as flexible meanings: experiments with English get and Finnish pitaa.” In Nerlich, Birigitte, Todd, Zazie and Clarke, David D., eds. Polysemy. Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2003, pp. 161–194.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rosch, Eleanor. “Principles of Categorization.” In Rosch, Eleanor and Lloyd, Barbara, eds. Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1978, pp. 27–48.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rosch, Eleanor and Mervis, Carolyn B. Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, no. 7, 1975, pp. 573–605.10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szilágyi N., Sándor. “Hangulatfestés – de mit is festünk?” [Sound symbolism – but what does it symbolize?] In Kádár, Edit and Szilágyi N., Sándor, eds. Motiváltság és nyelvi ikonicitás [Motivation and iconicity in language]. Kolozsvár: Erdélyi Múzeum-Egyesület, 2015, pp. 23‒42.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szilágyi N., Sándor. Hogyan teremtsünk világot. Rávezetés a nyelvi világ vizsgálatára [How to create a world. Introduction to the study of worlds through language]. Kolozsvár: Erdélyi Tankönyvtanács, 1996.
]Search in Google Scholar
