Acceso abierto

Nonlinear Agglomeration of Bimodal Colloids under Microgravity

Adam J. Cecil

Adam J. Cecil

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Louisville
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Cecil, Adam J.
, 
John E. Payne

John E. Payne

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Louisville
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Payne, John E.
, 
Luke T. Hawtrey

Luke T. Hawtrey

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Louisville
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Hawtrey, Luke T.
, 
Ben King

Ben King

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Louisville
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
King, Ben
, 
Gerold A. Willing

Gerold A. Willing

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Louisville
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Willing, Gerold A.
 y 
Stuart J. Williams

Stuart J. Williams

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Louisville
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Williams, Stuart J.
  
08 abr 2022
Nonlinear Agglomeration of Bimodal Colloids under Microgravity's Cover Image
Acerca de este artículo
Artículo anterior
Artículo siguiente
Cite
Descargar portada
Categoría del artículo: Research Note
Publicado en línea: 08 abr 2022
Páginas: 1 - 9
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/gsr-2022-0001
Palabras clave
© 2022 Adam J. Cecil et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Figure 1

Images of a low-concentration nanoparticle (0.01% ZrO2) well (A) on the first day after being mixed and (B) 12 days later.
Images of a low-concentration nanoparticle (0.01% ZrO2) well (A) on the first day after being mixed and (B) 12 days later.

Figure 2

Progression of cluster size analysis. (A) Cropped image, (B) binarized, (C) cleaned, (D) – particle outlines drawn in red over original cropped image.
Progression of cluster size analysis. (A) Cropped image, (B) binarized, (C) cleaned, (D) – particle outlines drawn in red over original cropped image.

Figure 3

(A) Average cluster size of 800 μm2; (B) average cluster size of 1,100 μm2; (C) average cluster size of 1,400 μm2.
(A) Average cluster size of 800 μm2; (B) average cluster size of 1,100 μm2; (C) average cluster size of 1,400 μm2.

Figure 4

Average cluster versus days since mixed for 0.01% ZrO2 concentration.
Average cluster versus days since mixed for 0.01% ZrO2 concentration.

Figure 5

Average cluster size versus days since mixed for 0.055% ZrO2 concentration.
Average cluster size versus days since mixed for 0.055% ZrO2 concentration.

Figure 6

Average cluster size versus days since mixed for 0.1% ZrO2 concentration.
Average cluster size versus days since mixed for 0.1% ZrO2 concentration.

Figure 7

Ground control sedimentation experiment of 0.01% ZrO2 at 0 h (A), 10 h (B), and 36 h (C).
Ground control sedimentation experiment of 0.01% ZrO2 at 0 h (A), 10 h (B), and 36 h (C).
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
2 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Ciencias de la vida, Ciencias de la vida, otros, Ciencia de los materiales, Ciencia de los materiales, otros, Física, Física, otros
RSS Feed de revista