Blue Origin's
On January 11, 2016, the Space Acceleration Measurement System (SAMS) team was approached by NASA Headquarters (HQ) regarding flying an accelerometry unit on an upcoming flight on Blue Origin's
The SAMS is primarily used for precision accelerometry aboard the International Space Station (ISS). This system was designed to characterize the vibratory regime, and therefore cannot measure accurately low-frequency, low-magnitude (residual) acceleration. Multiple triaxial sensor heads located throughout the ISS send acceleration measurements to a centralized control unit, which is used for configuration control, commanding, and data downlink. These data are continuously streamed to the ground. The Blue Origin flight configuration used the same SAMS sensor head without a centralized control unit, allowing for the relatively short turn-around needed to meet mission readiness milestones.
Logistically, the Blue Origin flight most closely resembled previous SAMS missions on parabolic aircraft, sounding rockets, and drop towers dating back to 1991. This flight on Blue Origin's
The SAMS unit was launched within a Blue Origin Single Payload Locker mounted on a stack inside the pressurized capsule cabin (Figure 1). Blue Origin's flight accelerometers, which were used for correlation, were similarly hard mounted inside the cabin. The SAMS X-axis was aligned with the vertical flight direction, pointing towards the nose of the capsule.
Figure 1
SAMS sensor location within the

The mechanical interface between the SAMS and Blue Origin's
The SAMS Triaxial Sensor Head–Ethernet Standalone (TSH-ES S/N 14) used on
The sensor was powered on during a pre-launch, automated sequence. After booting up, it could obtain measurements continuously, limited only by battery and recording capacity. Total recording time for this flight was 15.7 min. Recording spanned continuously from 163 s pre-launch to 169 s post-landing.
To correlate SAMS acceleration data with flight events recorded by Blue Origin over the course of the flight, it was necessary to first perform post-flight processing with interpolation and cross-correlation between the SAMS acceleration data and the Blue Origin flight log information. These calculations showed that the SAMS acceleration data led Blue Origin by 163.255 s, ignoring structural transmission and propagation time between the location of the Blue Origin accelerometer and the SAMS sensor.
The remainder of this document will focus on describing the results obtained from considering three overlapping periods surrounding the flight's apogee, in order to provide future users of Blue Origin's
There can be widely differing objectives and requirements with regard to the platform on which a given payload's near-weightless investigations should be conducted. This paper is not intended as a comprehensive analysis to cover all of those conditions. Instead, we aim here to present a clear and incisive accounting of some of the key features and characteristics of the vibratory environment as measured by the SAMS on Blue Origin's
Figure 2
Per-axis plot of SAMS acceleration measurements up to 204.2 Hz versus time for three main periods. Note that the mean value computed during the Microgravity Period is subtracted off. The colored bands at the top represent flight periods. The pink band (top) demarks the Separation Period, which was ~2.8 min in duration from 1 s after the Separation event to the Coast End event. The blue band (middle) indicates the Coast Period, which was ~2.2 min in duration from the Coast Start event to the Coast End event. The green band (bottom) marks the very quiet Microgravity Period, which was ~46.8 s in duration from 521.86 s to 568.61 s.

For a spectral overview of the vibratory environment during the
Figure 3
Spectrogram computed from SAMS measurements and Blue Origin flight information. This three-dimensional plot shows the acceleration spectrum via color-mapped power spectral density (PSD) magnitude versus frequency on the vertical axis, and versus time on the horizontal axis. The PSD color scale was chosen for emphasis during free fall and represents the squared deviation of the acceleration with respect to the mean acceleration during free fall. Although a Hanning window was used to reduce spectral leakage for each of the constituent PSDs in this spectrogram (k = 918), the strong signal near zero frequency should be disregarded as attributable to spectral leakage from sensor bias.

The Post-Separation Period, spanning from 1 s after the flight log's Separation event to the Coast End event, lasted approximately 2.8 min. This period provides the longest duration for a quiescent vibratory environment; however, multiple, small impulsive accelerations occurred during this period as expected. These impulses were the result of reaction control thruster firings immediately after separation and upon atmospheric reentry to control vehicle orientation.
Table 1 shows the RMS acceleration levels for two different frequency limits that were calculated for the Post-Separation Period, where the total value was calculated from the root sum of squares of the per-axis PSDs. Table 2 shows the five-number statistical summary of acceleration magnitudes that was also computed (Table 2), where the total value is that of the vector sum of the per-axis components.
Root-mean-square accelerations calculated for the Post-Separation Period.
Below 50 Hz | 0.25 | 0.94 | 0.75 | 1.23 |
Below 200 Hz | 8.60 | 3.66 | 6.06 | 11.14 |
Five-number statistical summary of acceleration magnitudes during the Post-Separation Period.
25th | 0.28 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.47 | |
50th | 1.45 | 0.62 | 0.92 | 3.37 | Median |
75th | 8.60 | 3.07 | 5.01 | 11.91 | |
97.5th | 51.11 | 10.25 | 16.92 | 54.75 | |
MAX | 230.48 | 143.29 | 178.41 | 276.18 |
The Coast Period, spanning from the flight log's Coast Start event to the Coast End event, was approximately 2.2 min in duration. This period, a subset of the Post-Separation Period, was well-defined in terms of flight log event markers. This provided a relatively long duration for a quiescent vibratory environment; however, impulsive accelerations due to thruster firings were prominent here as well, due to reaction control system (RCS) firings to compensate for unexpected vehicle dynamics near the end of the Coast Period.
The RMS acceleration levels are shown in Table 3, and Table 4 shows the five-number statistical summary of acceleration magnitudes, which were computed for the Coast Period as they were for the Post-Separation Period above.
Root-mean-square accelerations calculated for the Coast Period.
Below 50 Hz | 0.32 | 1.23 | 1.00 | 1.23 |
Below 200 Hz | 10.10 | 4.13 | 7.03 | 11.14 |
Five-number statistical summary of acceleration magnitudes during the Coast Period.
25th | 0.29 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.47 | |
50th | 2.38 | 0.91 | 1.46 | 5.13 | Median |
75th | 10.29 | 3.51 | 5.81 | 13.68 | |
97.5th | 57.34 | 10.56 | 17.64 | 59.93 | |
MAX | 230.48 | 143.29 | 178.41 | 276.18 |
The Microgravity Period was partitioned as the longest contiguous span when the SAMS acceleration vector magnitude was less than 4 m
Root-mean-square accelerations calculated for the Microgravity Period.
Below 50 Hz | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.08 |
Below 200 Hz | 0.32 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.45 |
Five-number statistical summary of acceleration magnitudes during the Microgravity Period.
25th | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.25 | |
50th | 0.22 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.36 | Median |
75th | 0.37 | 0.24 | 0.27 | 0.52 | |
97.5th | 0.76 | 0.48 | 0.56 | 0.94 | |
MAX | 2.27 | 1.18 | 1.45 | 2.77 |
We focused on three main periods most relevant to low-
A network interface and software supplied to Blue Origin Payload Controller users allows for real-time monitoring of vehicle mission data such as the Coast Start/End events mentioned earlier. This information can be used to trigger scripted actions based on these data. This can be leveraged by payloads to control various aspects of their operations using these triggered actions.
The longest quiescent period observed was the Post-Separation Period, which on this flight lasted about 2.8 min. The start of this period was selected to be 1 s after separation to allow recoil/ringing to damp out. At the reentry end of the analysis window, an alternative end point for this period might be when the X-axis acceleration (perhaps a sliding mean value) starts diverging from the Microgravity Period's mean value. Researchers interested in ultra-quiet environments to support their science goals should consider isolating payloads against vibrations greater than 50 Hz to significantly reduce
The Coast Period was similar in character and duration to the Post-Separation Period, with the only potential advantage for researchers being its better-defined Coast Start and Coast End event markers available for triggering at the cost of a somewhat shorter duration.
While the Microgravity Period was only 46.8 s, the vibratory acceleration environment in this span provides a much quieter vibratory environment, with acceleration magnitudes on all three measurement axes roughly an order of magnitude smaller. Blue Origin also predicts the duration of this period will improve in future flights.
When we consider a widening bandwidth in the form of a cumulative RMS acceleration versus frequency plot, we can potentially address various investigators’ concerns across the entire bandwidth measured by the SAMS sensor (Figure 4). When this is plotted, we see that the Post-Separation Period closely resembles the Coast Period, albeit for a longer duration. Furthermore, we see that the Microgravity Period stays well below 1 m
Figure 4
A cumulative RMS acceleration versus frequency plot for the three main periods of interest. The Post-Separation Period (red) and Coast Period (blue) mostly track each other, and the

Figure 5
Comparison of RMS acceleration levels below 10 Hz versus microgravity duration for several different types of platforms (Ross, 2001).

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Root-mean-square accelerations calculated for the Coast Period.
Below 50 Hz | 0.32 | 1.23 | 1.00 | 1.23 |
Below 200 Hz | 10.10 | 4.13 | 7.03 | 11.14 |
Five-number statistical summary of acceleration magnitudes during the Microgravity Period.
25th | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.25 | |
50th | 0.22 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.36 | Median |
75th | 0.37 | 0.24 | 0.27 | 0.52 | |
97.5th | 0.76 | 0.48 | 0.56 | 0.94 | |
MAX | 2.27 | 1.18 | 1.45 | 2.77 |
Five-number statistical summary of acceleration magnitudes during the Post-Separation Period.
25th | 0.28 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.47 | |
50th | 1.45 | 0.62 | 0.92 | 3.37 | Median |
75th | 8.60 | 3.07 | 5.01 | 11.91 | |
97.5th | 51.11 | 10.25 | 16.92 | 54.75 | |
MAX | 230.48 | 143.29 | 178.41 | 276.18 |
Root-mean-square accelerations calculated for the Microgravity Period.
Below 50 Hz | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.08 |
Below 200 Hz | 0.32 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.45 |
Root-mean-square accelerations calculated for the Post-Separation Period.
Below 50 Hz | 0.25 | 0.94 | 0.75 | 1.23 |
Below 200 Hz | 8.60 | 3.66 | 6.06 | 11.14 |
Five-number statistical summary of acceleration magnitudes during the Coast Period.
25th | 0.29 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.47 | |
50th | 2.38 | 0.91 | 1.46 | 5.13 | Median |
75th | 10.29 | 3.51 | 5.81 | 13.68 | |
97.5th | 57.34 | 10.56 | 17.64 | 59.93 | |
MAX | 230.48 | 143.29 | 178.41 | 276.18 |
Polyethersulfone (PES) Membrane on Agar Plates as a Plant Growth Platform for Spaceflight A Novel Approach to Teaching a General Education Course on Astrobiology Short-Term Hypergravity-Induced Changes in Growth, Photo synthetic Parameters, and Assessment of Threshold Values in Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)Nonlinear Agglomeration of Bimodal Colloids under Microgravity Design of Spaceflight Hardware for Plant Growth in a Sealed Habitat for Experiments on the Moon