[BECK, U. (2013). La società del rischio. Verso una seconda modernità. A cura di Walter Privitera. Rome: Carocci.]Search in Google Scholar
[BECK, U., and SZNAIDER, N. (2006). Unpacking Cosmopolitanism for the Social Sciences: A Research Agenda. The British Journal of Sociology, 57 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00091.x.]Search in Google Scholar
[BRAUDEL, F. (2012). Espansione europea e capitalismo: 1450-1650. Bologna: Il mulino.]Search in Google Scholar
[CLIFFORD, J. (2013). Returns. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[DeLANDA, M. (2016). Assemblage Theory. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474413640.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eames Office, reg. (2010). Powers of TenTM (1977). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fKBhvDjuy0.]Search in Google Scholar
[ESCOBAR, A. (2015). Territorios de diferencia: la ontología política de los “derechos al territorio”. Cuadernos de Antropología Social, fasc. 41: 25–38.]Search in Google Scholar
[FOSTER, J. B., BRETT, C., and RICHARD, Y. (2011). The ecological rift: Capitalism’s war on the earth. New York: New York University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[GIDDENS, A. (1973). Capitalism and Modern Social Theory: An Analysis Of The Writings Of Marx, Durkheim And Max Weber. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[HARAWAY, D. (2015). Anthropocene, capitalocene, plantationocene, chthulucene: Making kin. Environmental humanities, 6 (1): 159–65.]Search in Google Scholar
[LATOUR, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university press.]Search in Google Scholar
[LATOUR, B. (2014). Agency at the Time of the Anthropocene. New literary history, 45 (1): 1–18.]Search in Google Scholar
[LEVIN, S. (1992). Pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology, 73: 1943–67.]Search in Google Scholar
[LOVELOCK, J. E. (1989). Geophysiology, the Science of Gaia. Reviews of Geophysics, 27 (2): 215–22. https://doi.org/10.1029/RG027i002p00215.]Search in Google Scholar
[MALM, A. (2019). Against hybridism: Why we need to distinguish between nature and society, now more than ever. Historical Materialism, 27 (2): 156–87.]Search in Google Scholar
[MOORE, J. W. (2016). Anthropocene or capitalocene?: Nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism. New York: Pm Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[MORTON, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[POLLINI, J. (2013). Bruno Latour and the ontological dissolution of nature in the social sciences: A critical review. Environmental Values, 22 (1): 25–42.]Search in Google Scholar
[SASSEN, S. (2001). The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[SCHMITT, C. (2003). The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum. Telos Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[SERRES, M. (1995). The Natural Contract. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[WHITESIDE, K. H. (2013). A representative politics of nature? Bruno Latour on collectives and constitutions. Contemporary Political Theory, 12: 185–205.]Search in Google Scholar
[WOODS, D. (2014). Scale Critique for the Anthropocene. The Minnesota Review, 2014 (83): 133–42. https://doi.org/10.1215/00265667-2782327.]Search in Google Scholar
