[
Agentura pro socialní začleňování (2021) Index sociálního vyloučení. Available at: <https://www.socialni-zaclenovani.cz/index_socialniho_vylouceni>
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arnstein S (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association 35(4): 216–224.10.1080/01944366908977225
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bernard J, Šimon M (2017) Inner peripheries in the Czech Republic: The multidimensional nature of social exclusion in rural areas. Czech Sociological Review 53(1): 3–28.10.13060/00380288.2017.53.1.299
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chambers R (1994) The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development 22(7): 953–969.10.1016/0305-750X(94)90141-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dahl RA, Tufte ER (1973) Size and democracy (Vol. 2). Stanford University Press, Stanford.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dalton RJ (2017) The participation gap: Social status and political inequality. Oxford University Press, Oxford.10.1093/oso/9780198733607.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Demerath N (1947) Ecology, framework for city planning. Social Forces 26(1): 62–67.10.2307/2572606
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Elstub S, Escobar O (2019 eds.) Handbook of democratic innovation and governance. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.10.4337/9781786433862
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fung A (2006) Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review 66(s1): 66–75.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Geissel B, Newton K (2012) Evaluating Democratic Innovations. Curing the democratic malaise? Routledge, London.10.4324/9780203155196
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gnat M, Leszek K, Olszewski R (2016) The use of geoinformation technology, augmented reality and gamification in the urban modeling process. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 9787: 484–496.10.1007/978-3-319-42108-7_37
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gomes W (2008) Internet e participação política em sociedades democráticas. Revista FAMECOS 12(27): 58.10.15448/1980-3729.2005.27.3323
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gomes W (2011) A democracia digital e o problema da participação civil na decisão política. Fronteiras - Estudos Midiáticos 7(3): 214–222.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guldi J (2017) A History of the participatory map. Public Culture 29(1 81): 79–112.10.1215/08992363-3644409
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hurlbert M, Gupta J (2015) The split ladder of participation: A diagnostic, strategic, and evaluation tool to assess when participation is necessary. Environmental Science and Policy 50: 100–113.10.1016/j.envsci.2015.01.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hurtíková H, Soukop M (2019) Participative and deliberative democracy on the local level: How the political characteristics of municipalities in the Czech Republic relate to the use of selected democratic innovation within their territory? Lex Localis 17(2): 369–393.10.4335/17.2.369-393(2019)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Inglehart R (1971) The Silent Revolution in Europe: Intergenerational Change in Post-Industrial Societies. American Political Science Review 65(4): 991–1017.10.2307/1953494
]Search in Google Scholar
[
International Association of Public Participation (2018) IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation. Available at: <https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.iap2.org/resource/resmgr/pillars/Spectrum_8.5x11_Print.pdf>
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jacobs J (1961) The death and life of American cities. Random House, New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kar B, Sieber R, Haklay M, Ghose R (2016) Public Participation GIS and Participatory GIS in the Era of GeoWeb. Cartographic Journal 53(4): 296–299.10.1080/00087041.2016.1256963
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lysek J (2016) Participatory Democracy and local representation: A Czech Case Study. <https://ecpr.eu/Events/Event/PaperDetails/28794>
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lysek J, Pánek J, Lebeda T (2020) Who are the voters and where are they? Using spatial statistics to analyse voting patterns in the parliamentary elections of the Czech Republic. Journal of Maps 17(1): 33–38.10.1080/17445647.2020.1819901
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ministry of Regional Development (2021) Strategie regionálního rozvoje ČR 2021+.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Olszewski R, Trojanowska H, Turek A, Kietlinska B (2017) Solving smart city revitalisation problems with geoparticipation process and fuzzy methods. In: ICNC-FSKD 2017 - 13th International Conference on Natural Computation, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, pp. 2497–2503.10.1109/FSKD.2017.8393168
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Olszewski R, Turek A (2018) Using Fuzzy Geoparticipation Methods to Optimize the Spatial Development Process in a Smart City. In: 2018 IEEE 4th International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC), pp. 430–437.10.1109/CIC.2018.00065
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pánek J (2016) From mental maps to GeoParticipation. The Cartographic Journal 53(4): 300–307.10.1080/00087041.2016.1243862
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pászto V, Burian J, Marek L, Voženílek V, Tuček P (2016) Membership of Czech municipalities to rural and urban areas: A fuzzy-based approach. Geografie-Sbornik CGS 121(1): 156–186.10.37040/geografie2016121010156
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pateman C (1970) Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511720444
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Poplin A, Pereira GC, Rocha MCF (2013) The participatory cube: A framework for analysis of online participation platforms. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography 199649: 395–414.10.1007/978-3-642-37533-0_23
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Putnam RD (2000) Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster, New York.10.1145/358916.361990
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rocha EM (1997) A Ladder of Empowerment. Journal of Planning Education and Research 17(1): 31–44.10.1177/0739456X9701700104
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith G (2009) Democratic innovations: Designing institutions for citizen participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511609848
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schlozman KL, Verba S, Brady HE (2013) The unheavenly chorus: Unequal political voice and the broken promise of American democracy. Princeton University Press, Princeton.10.23943/princeton/9780691154848.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taylor N (1998) Urban planning theory since 1945. Sage, London.10.4135/9781446218648
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thoneick R (2021) Integrating online and onsite participation in urban planning: Assessment of a digital participation system. International Journal of E-Planning Research 10(1): 1–20.10.4018/IJEPR.2021010101
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tulloch DL (2007) Many, many maps: Empowerment and online participatory mapping. First Monday 12(2).10.5210/fm.v12i2.1620
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Economic Opportunity Act, 20 Public Law 88 (1964) Available at: <https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-78/pdf/STATUTE-78-Pg508.pdf>
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Voženílek V, Kaňok J (2011) Metody tématické kartografie: vizualizace prostorových jevů. Univerzita Palckého v Olomouci, Olomouc.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhang S (2018) Public participation in the Geoweb era: Geosocial media use in local government. University of Waterloo, Waterloo.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhang S (2019) Public participation in the Geoweb era: Defining a typology for geo-participation in local governments. Cities 85: 38–50.10.1016/j.cities.2018.12.004
]Search in Google Scholar
