[Alpkokin P, Hayashi Y, Black J, Gercek H (2005) Polycentric employment growth and impacts on urban commuting patterns: Case study of Istanbul. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 6: 3835–3850.]Search in Google Scholar
[Astrop A, Palmner C, Maunder D, Babu DM (Eds.) (1996) The urban travel behaviour and constraints of low income households and females in Pune. Citeseer, India.]Search in Google Scholar
[Aziz A, Nawaz MS, Nadeem M, Afzal L (2018) Examining suitability of the integrated public transport system: A case study of Lahore. Transportation Research Part a: Policy and Practice 117: 13–25.10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Boarnet MG, Sarmiento S (1998) Can land-use policy really affect travel behaviour? A study of the link between non-work travel and land-use characteristics. Urban Studies 35(7): 1155–1169.10.1080/0042098984538]Search in Google Scholar
[Cao X, Handy SL, Mokhtarian PL (2006) The influences of the built environment and residential self-selection on pedestrian behavior: evidence from Austin, TX. Transportation 33(1): 1–20.10.1007/s11116-005-7027-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Cervero R (1996) Mixed land-uses and commuting: Evidence from the American housing survey. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 30(5): 361–377.10.1016/0965-8564(95)00033-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Cervero R (1996b) Jobs-housing balance revisited: Trends and impacts in the San Francisco Bay Area. Journal of the American Planning Association 62: 492–511.10.1080/01944369608975714]Search in Google Scholar
[Cervero R (2002) Built environments and mode choice: toward a normative framework. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 7(4): 265–284.10.1016/S1361-9209(01)00024-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Cervero R, Duncan M (2006) Which reduces vehicle travel more: Jobs-housing balance or retail-housing mixing? Journal of the American Planning Association 72: 475–490.10.1080/01944360608976767]Search in Google Scholar
[Cervero R, Kockelman K (1997) Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2(3): 199–219.10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Cervero R, Menotti V (1994) Market profiles of rail-based housing projects in California. Institute of Urban and Regional Development. Berkeley. Working Paper 622.Cervero, R., & Radisch, C. (1996) Travel choices in pedestrian versus automobile oriented neighborhoods. Transport Policy 3(3): 127–141.10.1016/0967-070X(96)00016-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Crane R, Crepeau R (1998) Does neighborhood design influence travel?: A behavioral analysis of travel diary and GIS data. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 3(4): 225–238.10.1016/S1361-9209(98)00001-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Farber S, Marino MG (2017) Transit accessibility, land development and socioeconomic priority: A typology of planned station catchment areas in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area 10(1): 879–902.10.5198/jtlu.2017.980]Search in Google Scholar
[Frank LD, Pivo G (1994) Impacts of mixed use and density on utilization of three modes of travel: single-occupant vehicle, transit, and walking. Transportation Research Record 1466: 44–52.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frank LD, Pivo G (1994b) Relationship between land use and travel behavior in the Puget Sound Region.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gordon P, Kumar A, Richardson HW (1989) The influence of metropolitan spatial structure on commuting time. Journal of Urban Economics 26: 138–151.10.1016/0094-1190(89)90013-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Gordon P, Richardson HW, Jun M-J (1991) The commuting paradox evidence from the Top Twenty. Journal of the American Planning Association 57: 416–420.10.1080/01944369108975516]Search in Google Scholar
[Gouda AA, Masoumi HE (2018) Compactness, connectivity, and walking accessibility on the neighborhood level according to sustainability certifications: improvement or downgrade? A case study of Cairo, Egypt. Journal of Geographical Systems 20(4): 413–449.10.1007/s10109-018-0272-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Government of Pakistan (2018) District and Tehsil level population summary with region breakup. Retrieved from http://www.pbscensus.gov.pk/sites/default/files/bwpsr/pun-jab/LAHORE_SUMMARY.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Handy SL (1992) Regional versus local accessibility: neotraditional development and its implications for non-work travel. Built Environment 18(4): 253–267]Search in Google Scholar
[Handy S (1996) Methodologies for exploring the link between urban form and travel behavior. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 1(2): 151–165.10.1016/S1361-9209(96)00010-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Handy S, Cao X, & Mokhtarian P (2005) Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 10(6): 427–444.10.1016/j.trd.2005.05.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Holtzclaw J (1994) Using residential patterns and transit to decrease auto dependence and costs (Vol. 11). San Francisco, CA: Natural Resources Defense Council.]Search in Google Scholar
[Homes and Communities Agency (2015) Employment density guide. <https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/484133/employment_density_guide_3rd_edition.pdf>]Search in Google Scholar
[Horner MW, Mefford JN (2007) Investigating urban spatial mismatch using job–housing indicators to model home–work separation. Environment and Planning A 39: 1420–1440.10.1068/a37443]Search in Google Scholar
[Ibrahim M, Riaz S (2018) Lahore growth - Past and future. <http://urbanunit.gov.pk/Upload/Photos/Urban%20Gazette%20Issue%202018.pdf>]Search in Google Scholar
[Jiangping Z, Chun Z, Xiaojian C, Wei H, Peng Y (2014) Has the legacy of Danwei persisted in transformations?: The jobs-housing balance and commuting efficiency in Xi’an. Journal of Transport Geography 40: 64–76.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.04.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Kamran M, Batool Z, Rehman Z (2016) Comparison of Urban Form Parameters of Lahore with its Neighboring Cities. Pakistan Journal of Science 68.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kitamura R, Mokhtarian PL, Laidet L (1997) A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation 24(2): 125–158.10.1023/A:1017959825565]Search in Google Scholar
[Kockelman MK (1997) Travel behavior as function of accessibility, land use mixing, and land use balance: evidence from San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation research record 1607(1): 116–125.10.3141/1607-16]Search in Google Scholar
[Levine J (1998) Rethinking Accessibility and jobs-housing balance. Journal of the American Planning Association 64: 133–149.10.1080/01944369808975972]Search in Google Scholar
[Long Y, Thill J-C (2015) Combining smart card data and household travel survey to analyze jobs–housing relationships in Beijing. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 53: 19–35.10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.02.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Margolis J (1957) Municipal fiscal structure in a metropolitan region. Journal of Political Economy 65: 225–236.10.1086/257921]Search in Google Scholar
[Masoumi HE (2015) Transformation of urban form and the effects on travel behavior in Iran. Discussion paper No. 36/15 published by Center for Technology and Society of Technische Universität Berlin. <https://www.tu-berlin.de/fileadmin/f27/PDFs/Discussion_Papers_neu/discussion_paper_Nr__36.pdf>]Search in Google Scholar
[Masoumi HE, Gouda AA, Layritz L, Stendera P, Matta C, Tabbakh H, ... Kılınç Ö (2018) Urban travel behavior in large cities of MENA Region: Survey results of Cairo, Istanbul, and Tehran. Discussion paper No. 41/18 published by Center for Technology and Society of Technische Universität Berlin. <https://www.tu-berlin.de/fileadmin/f27/PDFs/Discussion_Papers_neu/discussion_paper_Nr._41_18.pdf>]Search in Google Scholar
[Masoumi HE (2019) A Discrete Choice Analysis of Transport Mode Choice Causality and Perceived Barriers of Sustainable Mobility in the MENA Region. Transport Policy, in press.10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.04.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Niedzielski MA, O’Kelly ME, Boschmann EE (2015) Synthesizing spatial interaction data for social science research: Validation and an investigation of spatial mismatch in Wichita, Kansas. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 54: 204–218.10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.09.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Niemeier D, Bai S, Handy S (2011) The impact of residential growth patterns on vehicle travel and pollutant emissions. Transport and Land Use 4(3): 65–80.10.5198/jtlu.v4i3.226]Search in Google Scholar
[Peng Z-R (1997) The jobs-housing balance and urban commuting. Urban Studies 34: 1215–1235.10.1080/0042098975600]Search in Google Scholar
[Qin P, Wang L (2017) Job opportunities, institutions, and the jobs-housing spatial relationship: Case study of Beijing. Transport Policy. Advance online publication.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ransom MR (2018) The effect of light rail transit service on nearby property values: Quasi-experimental evidence from Seattle. Journal of Transport and Land Use 11(1).10.5198/jtlu.2018.1096]Search in Google Scholar
[Sun B, Li N, Song J, Wu X (Eds.) (2010) A Study on the impact of job-housing balance on commuting travels: An empirical test of a traditional idea in the field of urban planning [J].]Search in Google Scholar
[Sun B, Pan X, Ning YM (Eds.) (2008) Analysis on influence of job-housing balance on commute travel in Shanghai. Urban Planning Forum 01. <http://en.cnki.com.cn>]Search in Google Scholar
[Ta N, Chai Y, Zhang Y, Sun D (2017) Understanding job-housing relationship and commuting pattern in Chinese cities: Past, present and future. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 52: 562–573.10.1016/j.trd.2016.11.011]Search in Google Scholar
[UN-Habitat (2013) Planning and design for sustainable urban mobility: Global report on human settlements 2013. Taylor & Francis, New York.10.4324/9781315857152]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang E, Song J, Xu T (2011) From “spatial bond” to “spatial mismatch”: An assessment of changing jobs–housing relationship in Beijing. Habitat International 35: 398–409.10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.11.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang L, Waddell P, Outwater ML (2011) Incremental integration of land use and activity-based travel modeling: Workplace choices and travel demand. Transportation Research Record 2255: 1–10.10.3141/2255-01]Search in Google Scholar
[Won S, Kim S (2017) Mobility is in the eye of the beholder: A comparison of travel patterns and urban spatial use between migrants and the original residents of Danang, Vietnam. Cities 67: 63–73.10.1016/j.cities.2017.04.016]Search in Google Scholar
[Wu Q (2013) Jobs-housing balance: the right ratio for the right place.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang M, He S, Zhao P (2018) Revisiting inequalities in the commuting burden: Institutional constraints and job-housing relationships in Beijing. Journal of Transport Geography 71: 58–71.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.06.024]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang P, Zhou J, Zhang T (2017) Quantifying and visualizing jobs-housing balance with big data: A case study of Shanghai. Cities 66: 10–22.10.1016/j.cities.2017.03.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhao P, Lu B, Linden GJJ (2009) The effects of transport accessibility and jobs–housing balance on commuting time: Evidence from Beijing. International Planning Studies 14: 65–83.10.1080/13563470902726402]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhao P, Lü B, Roo GD (2011) Impact of the jobs-housing balance on urban commuting in Beijing in the transformation era. Journal of Transport Geography 19: 59–69.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.09.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhou J, Long Y (2014) Jobs-housing balance of bus commuters in Beijing. Transportation Research Record 2418: 1–10.10.3141/2418-01]Search in Google Scholar