The impact of extra long-term storage of logging residues on fuel quality in Estonian conditions – a case study
, , , , y
13 abr 2024
Acerca de este artículo
Categoría del artículo: Research paper
Publicado en línea: 13 abr 2024
Páginas: 51 - 65
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fsmu-2023-0012
Palabras clave
© 2023 Allar Padari et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Figure 11.

Figure 12.

Figure 13.

Figure 14.

Results of ANCOVA of different characteristics (Equation 1)_
Dependent variable ( |
p-value | Standard error | R2 | Figure |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ash content | 0.0032 | 0.4825 | 0.1286 | |
Net calorific value of dry matter | <0.0001 | 0.1026 | 0.2120 | |
Net calorific value of moist fuel | <0.0001 | 0.6905 | 0.3940 | |
Bulk density | <0.0001 | 0.0733 | 0.7789 | |
Energy density | <0.0001 | 0.3962 | 0.7718 | |
Shrinkage of diameter | 0.0015 | 1.3550 | 0.0989 |
Parameter estimates for the relationship between drying shrinkage, storage time, and moisture content (Equation 2 and 3)_
Species | Parameter | Estimation | p-value |
---|---|---|---|
Silver birch | 3.851 | <0.0001 | |
0.02156 | 0.0432 | ||
3.572·10−283 | <0.0001 | ||
−1.944·10−7 | 0.0175 | ||
R2 | 0.240 | ||
SE | 1. 098 | ||
p | 0.0010 | ||
Norway spruce | 0.15284 | <0.0001 | |
0.37387 | <0.0001 | ||
R2 | 0.937 | ||
SE | 0.990 | ||
p | <0.0001 |
Relationship between moisture content and month number (Equation 4)_
Sample | p-value | Standard error | R2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Birch, covered | 58.654 | −7.687 | 0.423 | 0.0235 | 8.289 | 0.415 |
Birch, uncovered | 78.481 | −11.882 | 0.863 | 0.0967 | 12.862 | 0.284 |
Spruce, covered | 57.448 | −9.080 | 0.561 | 0.0428 | 8.637 | 0.363 |
Spruce, uncovered | 65.693 | −10.981 | 0.722 | 0.0407 | 9.484 | 0.367 |
Decline of energy content of logging residues during long-term storage by species and place in pile_
Storage time, year | Spruce, top | Spruce, middle | Birch, top | Birch, middle |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
1 | 95.9 | 95.8 | 90.5 | 90.4 |
2 | 92.0 | 91.7 | 81.9 | 81.7 |
3 | 88.2 | 87.9 | 74.2 | 73.9 |
4 | 84.6 | 84.2 | 67.1 | 66.8 |
5 | 81.2 | 80.6 | 60.8 | 60.4 |
6 | 77.9 | 77.2 | 55.0 | 54.5 |
7 | 74.7 | 73.9 | 49.8 | 49.3 |
8 | 71.6 | 70.8 | 45.1 | 44.6 |
Estimations and significance probabilities of parameters of ANCOVA Equation 1_
Dependent variable ( |
Figure | Parameter | Estimation | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ash content, % | 1.561477 | <0.0001 | ||
0.000941 | <0.0001 | |||
0.315644 | 0.0230 | |||
−0.000310 | 0.0045 | |||
−0.000140 | 0.0341 | |||
−0.000122 | 0.0633 | |||
Net calorific value of dry matter, kWh/kg | 5.323000 | <0.0001 | ||
0.000085 | 0.0081 | |||
−0.000039 | 0.0052 | |||
0.000021 | 0.1380 | |||
Net calorific value of moist fuel, kWh/kg | 4.162196 | <0.0001 | ||
−0.001087 | <0.0001 | |||
−0.643537 | <0.0001 | |||
0.000423 | <0.0001 | |||
Bulk density, g/cm3 | 0.571200 | <0.0001 | ||
−0.000160 | <0.0001 | |||
0.173900 | <0.0001 | |||
−0.042530 | 0.0013 | |||
0.000046 | 0.0069 | |||
Energy density, MWh/m3 | 3.055000 | <0.0001 | ||
−0.000846 | <0.0001 | |||
0.925200 | <0.0001 | |||
−0.232900 | 0.0012 | |||
0.000248 | 0.0068 | |||
Shrinkage of diameter, % | 4.284253 | <0.0001 | ||
−0.791850 | 0.0012 | |||
0.000150 | 0.0973 |
Dates of samples_
No | Date of sampling | Days from the start of the experiment |
---|---|---|
1 | 16.06.2010 | 0 |
2 | 02.09.2010 | 78 |
3 | 22.11.2010 | 159 |
4 | 07.03.2011 | 264 |
5 | 02.09.2011 | 443 |
6 | 15.02.2012 | 609 |
7 | 25.04.2012 | 679 |
8 | 04.06.2012 | 719 |
9 | 24.08.2012 | 800 |
10 | 23.11.2012 | 891 |
11 | 16.05.2013 | 1065 |
12 | 26.11.2013 | 1259 |
13 | 25.06.2014 | 1470 |
14 | 12.12.2014 | 1640 |
15 | 26.08.2015 | 1897 |
16 | 28.08.2016 | 2265 |
17 | 18.03.2018 | 2832 |