This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Alberto, F. J., Aitken, S. N., Alía, R., González-Martínez, S. C., Hänninen, H., Kremer, A. et al., 2013: Potential for evolutionary responses to climate change evidence from tree populations. Global Change Biology, 19:1645–1661.Search in Google Scholar
Besnard, G., Achère, V., Faivre Rampant, P., Favre, J. M., Jeandroz, S., 2003: A set of cross-species amplifying microsatellite markers developed from DNA sequence databanks in Picea (Pinaceae). Molecular Ecology Notes, 3:380–383.Search in Google Scholar
Bräutigam, K., Vining, K. J., Lafon-Placette, C., Fossdal, C. G., Mirouze, M., Marcos, J. G. et al., 2013: Epigenetic regulation of adaptive responses of forest tree species to the environment. Ecology and Evolution, 3:399–415.Search in Google Scholar
Brommer, J. E., 2011: Whither PST? The approximation of QST by PST in evolutionary and conservation biology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 24:1160–1168.Search in Google Scholar
Browne, L., MacDonald, B., Fitz-Gibbon, S., Wright, J. W., Sork, V. L., 2021: Genome-wide variation in DNA methylation predicts variation in leaf traits in an ecosystem-foundational oak species. Forests, 12:569.Search in Google Scholar
Bruce, T. J. A., Matthes, M. C., Napier, J. A., Pickett, J. A., 2007: Stressful “memories” of plants: evidence and possible mechanisms. Plant Science, 173:603–608.Search in Google Scholar
Burczyk, J., Lewandowski, A., Chalupka, W., 2004: Local pollen dispersal and distant gene flow in Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.). Forest Ecology and Management, 197:39–48.Search in Google Scholar
Čepl, J., Holá, D., Stejskal, J., Korecký, J., Kočová, M., Lhotáková, Z. et al., 2016: Genetic variability and heritability of chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Tree Physiology, 36:883–895.Search in Google Scholar
Chapuis, M.-P., Estoup, A., 2007: Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 24:621−631.Search in Google Scholar
Comps, B., Gömöry, D., Letouzey, J., Thiébaut, B., Petit, R. J., 2001: Diverging trends between heterozygosity and allelic richness during postglacial colonization in the European beech. Genetics, 157:389–397.Search in Google Scholar
Doyle, J. J., Doyle, J. L., 1987: A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemistry Bulletin, 19:11–15.Search in Google Scholar
Earl, D. A., 2012: Structure harvester: A website and program for visualizing Structure output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources, 4:359–361.Search in Google Scholar
Evanno, G., Regnaut, S., Goudet, J., 2005: Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software Structure: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology, 14:2611–2620.Search in Google Scholar
Feng, Z. Z., Yuan, X. Y., Fares, S., Loreto, F., Li, P., Hoshika, Y. et al., 2019: Isoprene is more affected by climate drivers than monoterpenes: A meta-analytic review on plant isoprenoid emissions. Plant Cell & Environment, 42:1939–1949.Search in Google Scholar
Fluch, S., Burg, A., Kopecky, D., Homolka, A., Spiess, N., Vendramin, G. G., 2011: Characterization of variable EST SSR markers for Norway spruce (Picea abies L.). BMC Research Notes, 4:401.Search in Google Scholar
Gömöry, D., 1992: Effect of stand origin on the genetic diversity of Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) populations. Forest Ecology and Management, 54:215–223.Search in Google Scholar
Gömöry, D., Himanen, K., Tollefsrud, M. M., Uggla, C., Kraigher, H., Bordács, S. et al., 2021: Genetic aspects in production and use of forest reproductive material: Collecting scientific evidence to support the development of guidelines and decision support tools. European Forest Genetic Resources Programme, European Forest Institute, Barcelona, 216 p.Search in Google Scholar
Hájíčková, M., Plichta, R., Urban, J., Volařík, D., Gebauer, R., 2021: Low resistance but high resilience to drought of flushing Norway spruce seedlings. Tree Physiology, 41:1848–1860.Search in Google Scholar
Haselhorst, M. S. H., Parchman, T. L., Buerkle, C. A., 2019: Genetic evidence for species cohesion, substructure and hybrids in spruce. Molecular Ecology, 28:2029–2045.Search in Google Scholar
Jakobsson, M., Rosenberg, N. A., 2007: CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformaticst, 23:1801–1806.Search in Google Scholar
Jandl, R., 2020: Climate-induced challenges of Norway spruce in Northern Austria. Trees For People, 1:100008.Search in Google Scholar
Jordan, R., Prober, S. M., Hoffmann, A. A., Dillon, S. K., 2020: Combined analyses of phenotype, genotype and climate implicate local adaptation as a driver of diversity in Eucalyptus macrocarpa (Grey Box). Forests, 11:495.Search in Google Scholar
Kleiber, A., Duan, Q. X., Jansen, K., Junker, L. V., Kammerer, B., Rennenberg, H. et al., 2017: Drought effects on root and needle terpenoid content of a coastal and an interior Douglas fir provenance. Tree Physiology, 37:1648.Search in Google Scholar
König, A., 2005: Provenance research: evaluation the spatial pattern of genetic variation. In: Geburek, T., Turok, J. (eds.): Conservation and Management of Forest Genetic Resources in Europe. Arbora Publishers, Zvolen and IPGRI, Rome, p. 275–334.Search in Google Scholar
Konnert, M., Fady, B., Gömöry, D., A’Hara, S., Wolter, F., Ducci, F. et al., 2015: Use and transfer of forest reproductive material in Europe in the context of climate change. European Forest Genetic Resources Programme, Bioversity International, Rome, xvi and 75 p.Search in Google Scholar
Kopaczyk, J. M., Wargula, J., Jelonek, T., 2020: The variability of terpenes in conifers under developmental and environmental stimuli. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 180:104–197.Search in Google Scholar
Latalowa, M., van der Knaap, W. O., 2006: Late Quaternary expansion of Norway spruce Picea abies [L.] Karst. in Europe according to pollen data. Quaternary Science Reviews, 25:2780–2805.Search in Google Scholar
Leinonen, T., Cano, J. M., Mäkinen, H., Merilä, J., 2006: Contrasting patterns of body shape and neutral genetic divergence in marine and lake populations of threespine sticklebacks. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 19:1803–1812.Search in Google Scholar
Leinonen, T., O’Hara, R. B., Cano, J. M., Merilä, J., 2008: Comparative studies of quantitative trait and neutral marker divergence: a metaanalysis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21:1–17.Search in Google Scholar
Lepais, O., Bacles, C. F., 2014: Two are better than one: combining landscape genomics and common gardens for detecting local adaptation in forest trees. Molecular Ecology, 23:4671–4673. Search in Google Scholar
Lévesque, M., Saurer, M., Siegwolf, R., Eilmann, B., Brang, P., Bugmann, H. et al., 2013: Drought response of five conifer species under contrasting water availability suggests high vulnerability of Norway spruce and European larch. Global Change Biology, 19:3184–3199.Search in Google Scholar
Li, L., Zhang, Q., Huang, D. F., 2014: A review of imaging techniques for plant phenotyping. Sensors 14:20078–20111.Search in Google Scholar
Loreto, F., Schnitzler, J. P., 2010: Abiotic stresses and induced BVOCs. Trends in Plant Science, 15:154–166Search in Google Scholar
Lüpke, M., Leuchner, M., Steinbrecher, R., Menzel, A., 2016: Impact of summer drought on isoprenoid emissions and carbon sink of three Scots pine provenances. Tree Physiology, 36:1382–1399.Search in Google Scholar
Marozas, V., Augustaitis, A., Pivoras, A., Baumgarten, M. et al., 2019: Comparative analyses of gas exchange characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence of three dominant tree species during the vegetation season in hemi-boreal zone, Lithuania. Journal of Agricultural Meteorology, 75:3–12.Search in Google Scholar
McKay, J. K., Latta, R. G., 2002: Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17:285–291.Search in Google Scholar
Meirmans, P. G., 2012: The trouble with isolation by distance. Molecular Ecology, 21:2839–2846.Search in Google Scholar
Merilä, J., Crnokrak, P., 2001: Comparison of genetic differentiation at marker loci and quantitative traits. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 14:892–903.Search in Google Scholar
Merilä, J., Hendry, A. P., 2014: Climate change, adaptation, and phenotypic plasticity: the problem and the evidence. Evolutionary Applications, 7:1–14.Search in Google Scholar
Mosca, E., Di Pierro, E. A., Budde, K. B., Neale, D. B., González-Martínez, S. C., 2018: Environmental effects on fine-scale spatial genetic structure in four Alpine keystone forest tree species. Molecular Ecology, 27:647–658.Search in Google Scholar
O’Connell, L. M., Mosseler, A., Rajora, O. P., 2007: Extensive long distance pollen dispersal in a fragmented landscape maintains genetic diversity in white spruce. Journal of Heredity, 98:640–645.Search in Google Scholar
Pollastrini, M., Nogales, A. G., Benavides, R., Bonal, D., Finer, L., Fotelli, M. et al., 2017: Tree diversity affects chlorophyll a fluorescence and other leaf traits of tree species in a boreal forest. Tree Physiology, 37:199–208.Search in Google Scholar
Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M., Donnelly, P., 2000: Inference of population structure from multilocus geno-type data. Genetics, 155:945–959.Search in Google Scholar
Pujol, B., Wilson, A. J., Ross, R. I. C., Pannell, J. R., 2008: Are QST–FST comparisons for natural populations meaningful? Molecular Ecology, 17:4782–4785.Search in Google Scholar
Ravazzi, C., 2002: Late Quaternary history of spruce in southern Europe. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 120:131–177.Search in Google Scholar
Roberts, D. A., Roth, K. L., Wetherley, E. B., Meerdink, S. K., Perroy, R. L., 2018: Hyperspectral vegetation indices. In: Thenkabail, P. S., Lyon, J. G., Huete, A. (eds.): Hyperspectral Indices and Image Classifications for Agriculture and Vegetation. CRC Press, Boca Raton (FL), p. 3–26.Search in Google Scholar
Rungis, D., Berube, Y., Zhang, J., Ralph, S. et al., 2004: Robust simple sequence repeat markers for spruce (Picea spp.) from expressed sequence tags. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 109:1283–1294.Search in Google Scholar
Savolainen, O., Pyhäjärvi, T., Knürr, T., 2007: Gene flow and local adaptation in trees. Annual Reviews in Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 38:595–619.Search in Google Scholar
Schurman, J. S., Trotsiuk, V., Bače, R., Čada, V. et al., 2018: Large-scale disturbance legacies and the climate sensitivity of primary Picea abies forests. Global Change Biology, 24:2169–2181.Search in Google Scholar
Scotti, I., Magni, F., Fink, R., Powell, W., Binelli, G., Hedley, P., 2000: Microsatellite repeats are not randomly distributed within Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) expressed sequences. Genome, 43:41–46.Search in Google Scholar
Spitze, K., 1993: Population structure in Daphnia obtusa – quantitative genetic and allozymic variation. Genetics, 135:367–374.Search in Google Scholar
Tattini, M., Loreto, F., Fini, A., Guidi, L., Brunetti, C., Velikova, V. et al., 2015: Isoprenoids and phenylpropanoids are part of the antioxidant defense orchestrated daily by drought-stressed Platanus × acerifolia plants during Mediterranean summers. New Phytolo-gist, 207:613–626.Search in Google Scholar
Teskey, R., Wertin, T., Bauweraerts, I., Ameye, M., McGuire, M. A., Steppe, K., 2015: Responses of tree species to heat waves and extreme heat events. Plant Cell & Environment, 38:1699–1712.Search in Google Scholar
Tognetti, R., Michelozzi, M., Lauteri, M., Brugnoli, E., Giannini, R., 2000: Geographic variation in growth, carbon isotope discrimination, and monoterpene composition in Pinus pinaster Ait. provenances. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 30:1682–1690. Search in Google Scholar
Tollefsrud, M. M., Kissling, R., Gugerli, F., Johnsen, Ø., Skrøppa, T., Cheddadi, R. et al., 2008: Genetic consequences of glacial survival and postglacial colonization in Norway spruce: combined analysis of mitochondrial DNA and fossil pollen. Molecular Ecology, 17:4134–4150.Search in Google Scholar
Turtola, S., Manninen, A. M., Rikala, R., Kainulainen, P., 2003: Drought stress alters the concentration of wood terpenoids in Scots pine and Norway spruce seedlings. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 29:1981–1995.Search in Google Scholar
Ullah, A., Manghwar, H., Shaban, M., Khan, A. H., Akbar, A., Ali, U. et al., 2018: Phytohormones enhanced drought tolerance in plants: a coping strategy. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25:33103–33118. Search in Google Scholar
van Meeningen, Y., Wang, M., Karlsson, T., Seifert, A., Schurgers, G., Rinnan, R. et al., 2017: Isoprenoid emission variation of Norway spruce across a European latitudinal transect. Atmospheric Environment, 170:45–57.Search in Google Scholar
Vasemägi, A., Primmer, C. R., 2005: Challenges for identifying functionally important genetic variation: the promise of combining complementary research strategies. Molecular Ecology 14:3623–3642.Search in Google Scholar
Verta, J. P., Landry, C. R., MacKay, J. J., 2013: Are long-lived trees poised for evolutionary change? Single locus effects in the evolution of gene expression networks in spruce. Molecular Ecology, 22:2369–2379.Search in Google Scholar
Vitali, V., Forrester, D. I., Bauhus, J., 2018: Know your neighbours: drought response of Norway spruce, silver fir and Douglas fir in mixed forests depends on species identity and diversity of tree neighbourhoods. Ecosystems, 21:1215–1229. Search in Google Scholar
Wilkinson, S., Davies, W. J., 2010: Drought, ozone, ABA and ethylene: new insights from cell to plant to community. Plant Cell & Environment, 33:510–525. Search in Google Scholar
Winner, W. E., Thomas, S. C., Berry, J. A., Bond, B. J., Cooper, C. E., Hinckley, T. M. et al., 2004: Canopy carbon gain and water use: Analysis of old-growth conifers in the Pacific Northwest. Ecosystems, 7:482–497.Search in Google Scholar
Wright, S., 1951: The genetical structure of populations. Annals of Eugenics 15:323–354.Search in Google Scholar
Yazdani, R., Rudin, D., Aldén, T., Lindgren, D., Harbom, B., Ljung, K., 1982: Inheritance pattern of 5 monoterpenes in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L). Hereditas, 97:261–272. Search in Google Scholar
European Communities, 1999: Council Directive 1999/105/EC of 22 December 1999 on the marketing of forest reproductive material. Search in Google Scholar
