[
Baskent, E. Z, Keles, S., 2005: Developing alternative wood harvesting strategies with linear programming in preparing forest management plans. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 30:67-79.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bettinger, P., Boston, K., Siry, J. P., Grebner, D. L., 2009: Forest Management and Planning. Academic press, 326 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Buongiorno, J., Gilles, J. K., 2003: Decision methods for forest resource management. Academic Press, 439 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crowe, K. A., Nelson, J. D., Boyland, M., 2003: Solving the area-restricted harvest scheduling model using the branch and bound algorithm. Canadian Journal of Forest Resource 33:1804-1814.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Černý, M., Pařez, J., Malík, Z., 1996: Růstové a taxační tabulky pro hlavní dřeviny České republiky (smrk, borovicve, buk, dub). Ústav pro výzkum lesních ekosystémů. Jílové u Prahy. ESRI, 2014: ArcGis Desktop Reference Manual, www.esri.com Gurobi Optimization Inc., 2014: Gurobi Optimizer Reference Manual. Available at: < www.gurobi.com>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Green Report, 2012: Report on the state of forests and forestry in the Czech Republic in 2012. Ministry of Agriculture of Czech Republic. Prague.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
IPCC WG II., 2007: Fourth assessment report for government and expert review. Chapter 12: Europe. Bruxelles.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kašpar, J., Marušák, R., Vopěnka, P., 2013: Comparison of two alternative optimization techniques for spatial harvest planning. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica 44:90-96.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Konôpka, J., Konôpka B., 2008: Koncept stratégie ochrany lesa proti hlavným druhom abiotických škodlivých činiteľov. Lesnícky časopis - Forestry Journal, 54:193-212.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Konôpka, J., Konôpka B., 2009: Krátkodobá prognóza ohrozenia smreka obyčajného škodlivými činiteľmi v najrizikovejších oblastiach Slovenska. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 54:52-68.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Konoshima, M., Marušák, R., Yoshimoto, A., 2011. Harvest scheduling with spatial aggregation for two and three cut system under shelterwood management. Journal of Forest Science 57:271-277.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kouba, J., Zahradník, D., 2004: Forest production steering to sustained yield under risk condition by interactive linear programming task construction. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica 35:140-146.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marušák, R., 2005: Hodnotenie stavu a vývoja rubných vekových stupňov. Acta Facultatis Forestalis Zvolen 47:279-290.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marušák, R., 2007: Alternative harvest scheduling for final cut with respect to silvicultural requirements. Lesnícky časopis - Forestry Journal 53:117-127.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McDill, M., Braze, J., 2000. Comparing adjacency constraint formulations for randomly generated forest planning problems with four age-class distributions. Forest Science 46:423-436.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McDill, M., Rebain, S., Braze, J., 2002. Harvest scheduling with area-based adjacency constraints. Forest Science, 48:631-642.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Priesol, A., Polák, L., 1991: Hospodárská úprava lesov. Bratislava: Príroda, 447 p. Schlyter, P., Stjernquist, I., Barring, L., Anna Maria, J., Nilsson, C., 2006: Assessment of the impacts of climate change and weather extremes on boreal forests in northern Europe, focusing on Norway spruce. Climate Research 31:75-84.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Šišák, L., 2011: Forest visitors´ opinions on the importance of forest operations, forest functions and sources of their financing. Journal of Forest Science 57:266-270.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yoshimoto, A., Brodie, J.D., 1994: Comparative analysis of algorithms to generate adjacency constraints. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 24:1277-1288.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zeng, H., Peltola, H., Väisänen, H., Kellomäki, S., 2009: The effects of fragmentation on the susceptinility of boreal forest ecosystem to wind damage. Forest Ecology and Management 257:1165-1173.
]Search in Google Scholar
