Acceso abierto

Is the care performance of critical care unit nurses in angina management consistent with evidence-based guidelines? An observational study

, ,  y   
11 jun 2025

Cite
Descargar portada

Demographic and job-related characteristics of nurses_

Variable Number/average* Percent/standard deviation**
Age (year) 33.87* 7.14**
Gender
  Female 10 14.5
  Male 59 85.5
Education
  Bachelor’s 60 87.0
  Master’s 14 13.0
Employment status
  Permanent 44 64.7
  Contractual 12 17.6
  Conscripted 12 17.6
Shift status
  Fixed 14 20.3
  Rotational 55 79.9
Education on angina pectoris management
  Yes 58 84.1
  No 11 15.9

The average score of care performance at different levels of nurses’ demographic and occupational variables_

Variable Average Standard deviation Statistics The significance level
Gender t = –0.127 0.899
  Female 20.60 7.20
  Male 20.82 4.79
Education Z = –1.686* 0.092
  Bachelor’s 21.27 4.64
  Master’s or higher 17.63 7.27
Employment status X2 = 0.230** 0.631
  Permanent 20.19 5.40
  Contractual 20.58 2.48
  Conscripted 22.53 5.72
Shift status Z = –0.037* 0.970
  Fixed 20.02 6.62
  Rotational 20.99 4.75
Education about angina management T = 1.179 0.243
  Yes 21.11 5.46
  No 19.12 2.57
Age 33.87 7.14 r = –0.265*** 0.031

Care performance (and its domains) based on angina management guidelines_

Variable The range of attainable scores Mean Standard deviation Average out of 100 Standard deviation from 100
Assessment 0–17 12.51 3.31 73.60 19.45
Implementation 0–7 5.02 1.45 71.78 20.67
Reevaluation 0–5 3.18 1.41 63.51 28.27
Total score 0–29 20.71 5.60 71.42 19.31

Sociodemographic details of patients_

Variable Number/average* Percent/standard deviation**
Age (year) 55.16* 10.67**
Gender (187)
  Male 100 53.5
  Female 87 46.5
Marital status (186)
  Single 15 8.1
  Married 160 86.0
  Widow 11 5.9
Educational level (186)
  Elementary 32 17.2
  Middle School 68 36.6
  Diploma 45 24.2
  Associate Degree 9 4.8
  Bachelor’s Degree and Higher 11 17.2
History of hospitalization (183)
  Yes 84 45.9
  No 99 54.1

Distribution of the frequency of performing a care function based on EBGs in the management of angina_

Item Performed
Frequency Percent
Checking the intensity of pain 103 50.2
Checking the time of pain onset 188 91.7
Examining the pain site 199 97.1
Assessing the spread of pain to other organs 167 81.5
Checking the duration of pain 143 69.8
Checking pain continuity or interruption 103 50.2
Examining pain aggravating factors 153 74.6
Reviewing pain relief symptoms 169 82.4
Examining pain-related symptoms 183 89.3
Examining pain improvement with position change 131 63.9
Examining pain quality (burning, pressing, sharp, etc.) 118 57.6
Examining cardiac biomarkers such as troponin 191 93.2
Checking the status of the oxygen supply 186 90.7
Checking vital signs 195 95.1
Examining the patient’s ECG in terms of ischemic changes 190 92.7
Auscultating the patient’s lungs (to see if there is shortness of breath) 48 23.4
Examining the patient’s anxiety level (restlessness, frowning, etc.) 98 47.8
Placing the patient in a comfortable position (preferably Fowler’s position) 155 75.6
Absolute rest (CBR) for the patient 202 98.5
NPO until pain control and symptom stabilization 177 86.3
Pain relief as prescribed by the physician 197 96.1
Teaching the patient how to use the nurse call button 48 23.4
Assessing the reduction or resolution of the patient’s pain 168 82.0
Education about angina pectoris and its care to the patient 97 47.3
Education about pain notification to the nurse 154 75.1
Leg pain monitoring every 2 h 145 70.7
Checking the duration of pain every 2 h 82 40.0
Checking the patient’s vital signs every minute until it stabilizes 168 82.0
Examining the patient’s non-verbal reactions 88 42.9
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
4 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Medicina, Profesiones auxiliares, enfermería