Acceso abierto

Mediating role of fear of progression between sensory processing sensitivity and stigma in lung cancer patients: a cross-sectional study^†

,

,

Yang, Qian-Rong

,

,

,

,

y

16 dic 2024

Mediating role of fear of progression between sensory processing sensitivity and stigma in lung cancer patients: a cross-sectional study†'s Cover Image

Frontiers of Nursing

Volumen 11 (2024): Edición 4 (Diciembre 2024)

Acerca de este artículo

Artículo anterior

Artículo siguiente

Cite

Compartir

Descargar portada

Categoría del artículo: Original article

Publicado en línea: 16 dic 2024

Páginas: 373 - 378

Recibido: 12 ene 2024

Aceptado: 25 mar 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fon-2024-0041

Palabras clave
fear of progression, lung cancer, mediating role, sensory processing sensitivity, stigma

© 2024 Nan Shen et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The coefficient “a” is the effect of the independent variable SPS on dependent variable stigma; The coefficient “b” between the mediating variable FoP on dependent variable; The coefficient “c” is the total effect between SPS and stigma; The coefficient “c’” is the direct effect between SPS and stigma without FoP.

Mediating role of FoP between SPS and Stigma.
Note: FoP, Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form; SPS, sensory processing sensitivity; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001; the results were obtained by controlling for demographic variables. — Mediating role of FoP between SPS and Stigma. Note: FoP, Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form; SPS, sensory processing sensitivity; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001; the results were obtained by controlling for demographic variables.

Analysis procedure of mediating analysis_

Step	Independent variable	Dependent variable	R	R2	F	β	t
1	SPS	Stigma	0.418	0.175	7.089***	0.120	2.882**
2	SPS	FoP	0.350	0.122	4.664***	0.068	2.490*
3	SPS	Stigma	0.472	0.222	8.327***	0.095	2.318*
	FoP					0.365	3.768***

Correlations, means, SDs, and α coefficients of scale variables_

Scale	M	SD	α	1	2	3
1. FoP	28.80	8.80	0.87	-
2. CLCSS	52.71	13.81	0.94	0.217**	-
3. HSP	125.04	20.43	0.88	0.199**	0.187**	-

Total, direct, and indirect effects of SPS on FoP

Effects	Effect size	Effect ratio	95% CI
Total effect	0.120		[0.038, 0.202]
Direct effect	0.095	79%	[0.014, 0.176]
Indirect effect	0.025	21%	[0.004, 0.054]

Descriptive analysis and t-values of scale variables by demographic characteristics_

Item	FoP			CLCSS			HSPS
Item	M	SD	t	M	SD	t	M	SD	t
Nationality			2.065*			–1.159			0.35
Han (N = 209, 86.4%)	29.26	8.86		52.31	13.16		125.22	20.59
Ethnic minority (N = 33, 13.6%)	25.88	7.89		55.3	17.4		123.88	19.63
Gender			–4.44***			1.024			–2.786**
Male (N = 119, 49.2%)	26.34	7.79		53.64	12.76		121.37	20.12
Female (N = 123, 50.8%)	31.17	9.08		51.82	14.75		128.59	20.16
Smoking history			–3.388**			3.803***			–1.31
Yes (N = 97, 40.1%)	26.51	8.44		56.73	14.04		122.94	20.57
No (N = 145, 59.9%)	30.33	8.72		50.03	13.02		126.44	20.28
Place of residence			0.329			4.297***			–0.316
Rural (N = 111, 45.9%)	29	9.11		56.78	14.82		124.59	21.05
City (N = 131, 54.1%)	28.63	8.55		49.27	11.9		125.42	19.95
Month income			–0.285			3.699***			1.401
3000–3999 and below (N = 168, 39.4%)	28.69	9.05		54.84	13.98		126.26	20.65
4000–4999 and above (N = 74, 30.6%)	29.04	8.25		47.89	12.2		122.27	19.76
Education level			–0.016			2.289*			–1.242
Middle school and below (N = 138, 57%)	28.79	8.87		54.46	13.99		123.62	21.43
High school and above (N = 104, 43%)	28.81	8.73		50.39	13.28		126.91	18.95

Idioma:: Inglés

Calendario de la edición:: 4 veces al año
Temas de la revista:: Medicina, Profesiones auxiliares, enfermería

RSS Feed de revista