[
Allegro.pl (2022). Retrieved from https://www.allegro.pl.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Backus, M., Blake, T., Masterov, D., Tadelis, S. (2015). Is sniping a problem for online auction markets? WWW 2015 – Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 88–96). DOI: 10.1145/2736277.2741690.10.1145/2736277.2741690
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balingit, R., Trevathan, J., Read, W. (2009). Analysing bidding trends in online auctions. In 2009 Sixth International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations (pp. 928–933). DOI: 10.1109/ITNG.2009.315.10.1109/ITNG.2009.315
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bandyopadhyay, S., Bandyopadhyay, S. (2009). Estimating time required to reach bid levels in online auctions. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26 (3), 275-301. DOI: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222260309.10.2753/MIS0742-1222260309
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bapna, R., Day R., Rice, S. (2020). Allocative Efficiency in Online Auctions: Improving the Performance of Multiple Online Auctions Via Seek-and-Protect Agents. Production and Operations Management, 29 (8), 1878–1893. DOI: 10.1111/poms.13194.10.1111/poms.13194
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ben Rhouma, T., Zaccour, G. (2012). An empirical investigation of late bidding in online auctions. Economics Letters, 117 (3), 715–717. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2011.12.022.10.1016/j.econlet.2011.12.022
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borle, S., Boatwright, P., Kadane, J. (2006). The timing of bid placement and extent of multiple bidding: An empirical investigation using eBay online auctions. Statistical Science, 21 (2), 194–205. DOI: 10.1214/08834230600000012.10.1214/088342306000000123
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bose, S., Daripa, A. (2017). Shills and snipes. Games and Economic Behavior, 104, 507–516. DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2017.05.010.10.1016/j.geb.2017.05.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bradlow, E., Park, Y. (2007). Bayesian estimation of bid sequences in Internet auctions using a generalized record-breaking model. Marketing Science, 26 (2), 218–229. DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1060.0225.10.1287/mksc.1060.0225
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Canals-Cerdá, J. (2012). The value of a good reputation online: An application to art auctions. Journal of Cultural Economics, 36 (1), 67–85. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1123599.10.2139/ssrn.1123599
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chan, N., Li, Z., Yau, C. (2014). Forecasting online auctions via self-exciting point processes. Journal of Forecasting, 33 (7), 501–514. DOI: 10.1002/for.2313.10.1002/for.2313
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chow, V. (2019). Predicting Auction Price of Vehicle License Plate with Deep Residual Learning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11607, 179–188. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1910.04879.10.1007/978-3-030-26142-9_16
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cui, X., Lai, V., Lowry, P., Lei, Y. (2020). The effects of bidder factors on online bidding strategies: A motivation-opportunity-ability (MOA) model. Decision Support Systems, 138, 1–36. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3679508.10.2139/ssrn.3679508
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Czerwonka, P. Zakonnik, L., (2015). Analysis of Selected Behavior of Online Auctions Users. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzania, XVI (9, II), 67–81.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Czerwonka, P., Zakonnik, L., Podgórski G. (2022). The Issue of Overestimating the Final Price in Online Auctions In The Context of User Experience – Based on Selected EEU Markets. Proceeding 39th International Business Information Management Association Conference (IBIMA).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Du, L., Hua, G. (2010). Bidding strategy and participating threshold in online English auction with buy-it-now option. Proceedings – 2010 IEEE 17th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. IE and EM2010. DOI: 10.1109/ICIEEM.2010.5646603.10.1109/ICIEEM.2010.5646603
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Elhadary, O. (2010). Is the first bid really important in online auctions? International Conference e-Commerce 2010 (pp. 139–143). MCCSIS.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Feng, C., Fay, S., Sivakumar, K. (2016). Overbidding in electronic auctions: factors influencing the propensity to overbid and the magnitude of overbidding. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44 (2), 241–260. DOI: 10.1007/s11747-015-0450-9.10.1007/s11747-015-0450-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haruvy, E., Popkowski-Leszczyc, P. (2010). Search and choice in online consumer auctions. Marketing Science, 29 (6), 1152–1164. DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1100.0601.10.1287/mksc.1100.0601
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hayne, S., Wang, H., Mendonca, S. (2012). eBay as the ‘Terminator’: Determining User Suspension From Feedback Ratings. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 22 (2), 160–183. DOI: 10.1080/10919392.2012.667714.10.1080/10919392.2012.667714
]Search in Google Scholar
[
IBM Support, Cox-Snell and Nagelkerke R^2 (R-squared) statistics – formula and references (2022). Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/cox-snell-and-nagelkerke-r2-r-squared-statistics-formula-and-references.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jank, W., Shmueli, G. (2010). Forecasting online auctions using dynamic models. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 218, 137–148. DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-633-1-137.10.1002/9780470642603
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kamins, M., Noy, A., Steinhart, Y., Mazursky, D. (2011). The Effect of Social Cues on Sniping Behavior in Internet Auctions: Field Evidence and a Lab Experiment. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 25 (4), 241–250. DOI: 10.1016/j.intmar.2011.03.002.10.1016/j.intmar.2011.03.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaur, P., Goyal, M., Lu, J. (2017). A Comparison of Bidding Strategies for Online Auctions Using Fuzzy Reasoning and Negotiation Decision Functions. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 25 (2), 425–438. DOI: 10.1109/tfuzz.2016.2598297.10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2598297
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Khadge, M., Kulkarni, M. (2016). Machine learning approach for predicting end price of online auction. Proceedings of the International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies. ICICT. DOI: 10.1109/INVENTIVE.2016.7830232.10.1109/INVENTIVE.2016.7830232
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Klemperer, P. (2004). Auctions: Theory and Practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691186290
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kuruzovich, J. (2012). Time and online auctions. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 13 (1), 23–32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li, C. (2012). Characteristics of bid processes in online auctions. Advanced Materials Research, 403–408, 5199–5203. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.403-408.5199.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.403-408.5199
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li, X., Dong, H., Han, S. (2020). Multiple Linear Regression with Kalman Filter for Predicting End Prices of Online Auctions. Proceedings – IEEE 18th International Conference on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing. DASC/PiCom/CBDCom/CyberSciTech. DOI: 10.1109/DASC-PICom-CBDCom-CyberSciTech49142.2020.00042.10.1109/DASC-PICom-CBDCom-CyberSciTech49142.2020.00042
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liu, Y., Feng, Y., Shao, Z. (2009). Online auction final price forecasting model based on Bagging and decision tree. Systems Engineering – Theory & Practice, 29 (12), 134–140.10.1016/S1874-8651(10)60093-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Majadi, N., Trevathan, J., Bergmann, N. (2018). Real-time collusive shill bidding detection in online auctions. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 34, 184–192. DOI: 10.1016/j. elerap.2019.100831.10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100831
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Majadi, N., Trevathan, J., Gray, H. (2018). A run-time algorithm for detecting shill bidding in online auctions. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 13 (3), 17–49. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-18762018000300103.10.4067/S0718-18762018000300103
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muthitacharoen, A., Tams, S. (2017). The Role of Auction Duration in Bidder Strategies and Auction Prices. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 21 (1), 71–102. DOI: 10.1080/10864415.2016.1204190.10.1080/10864415.2016.1204190
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Niedzwiedziński, M., Zakonnik, L. (2018). Participants of Online Auctions and their Behavior in the Process of Shaping Prices – Consumer Surveys. Przedsiebiorczosc i Zarzadzanie, XIX (5, I), 237–250.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ødegaard, F., Puterman, M. (2012). Estimating intermediate price transitions in online auctions. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 28 (6), 529–541. DOI: 10.1002/asmb.928.10.1002/asmb.928
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Onur, I., Velamuri, M. (2014). Competition, endogeneity and the winning bid: An empirical analysis of eBay auctions. Information Economics and Policy, 26 (1), 68–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2013.11.003.10.1016/j.infoecopol.2013.11.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Park, Y., Bradlow, E. (2005). An integrated model for bidding behavior in Internet auctions: Whether, who, when, and how much. Journal of Marketing Research, 42 (4), 470–482. DOI: 10.1509/jmkr.2005.42.4.470.10.1509/jmkr.2005.42.4.470
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Porebski, K., Zakonnik, L. (2019). Analysis of the Impact of Specific Factors on Purchase Decisions. Przedsiebiorczosc i Zarzadzanie, XX (12, 1), 213–225.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rószkiewicz, M. (2011). Analiza Klienta. Kraków: SPPS Polska.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Srinivasan, K., Wang, X. (2010). Bidders’ experience and learning in online auctions: Issues and implications. Marketing Science, 29 (6), 988–993. DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1100.0581.10.1287/mksc.1100.0581
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trevathan, J., Read, W. (2006). Undesirable and Fraudulent Behaviour in Online Auctions. Proceedings of the International Conference on Security and Cryptography (pp. 1–9). Setúbal. DOI: 10.5220/0002100704500458.10.5220/0002100704500458
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trevathan, J., Read, W., Lee, Y., Atkinson, I. (2011). Targeting the strategies of a bid sniper. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2011.396.10.1109/HICSS.2011.396
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tsai, M., Huang, T. (2011). Using genetic algorithm to help the seller strategies in online auction. Key Engineering Materials, 474–476, 1760–1763. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.474-476.1760.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.474-476.1760
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yokotani, T., Huang, H., Kawagoe, K. (2012). Predicting online auction final prices using time series splitting and clustering. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7235, 207–218. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-29253-8_18.10.1007/978-3-642-29253-8_18
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zafari, B., Soyer, R. (2020). Modeling first bid in retail secondary market online auctions: A Bayesian approach. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 36 (3), 452–464. DOI: 10.1002/asmb.2498.10.1002/asmb.2498
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zafari, B., Soyer, R. (2021). Assessment of uncertainty in bid arrival times: A Bayesian mixture model. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 72 (11), 2517–2528. DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2020.1796539.10.1080/01605682.2020.1796539
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zakonnik, L. (2019). Consumer behavior and the price formation of used goods on the electronic market. Zachowania konsumenta a kształtowanie się ceny dóbr używanych na rynku elektronicznym. Łódź: Uniwersytet Łódzki.10.18778/8088-934-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zakonnik L. (2021). Editorial models of 19th-century polish bibles – An attempt at identification, Biblical Annals, 11 (2), 327–374, DOI: 10.31743/biban.12185.10.31743/biban.12185
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zakonnik, L., Czerwonka, P., Podgórski, G., Zajdel, K., Zajdel, R. (2022). Art Market Investment Bubble during COVID-19 – Case Study of the Rare Books Market in Poland. Sustainability, 14 (18), 11648, DOI: 10.3390/su141811648.10.3390/su141811648
]Search in Google Scholar
, 