Non-equilibrium thermodynamics and development cycles of temperate natural forest ecosystems

Adami, Ch., Ofria, Ch. and Collier, T.C., 2000. Evolution of biological complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97 (9): 4463–4468.10.1073/pnas.97.9.4463Search in Google Scholar

Allen, C.R., Holling, C.S., 2010. Novelty, adaptive capacity, and resilience. Ecology and Society, 15 (3): 24. [cit. 2012-08-15]. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss3/art24/10.5751/ES-03720-150324Search in Google Scholar

Anand, M., Gonzales, A., Guichard, F., Kolasa, J., Parrot, L., 2010. Ecological systems as complex systems: challenges for an emerging science. Diversity, 2: 395–410.10.3390/d2030395Search in Google Scholar

Anfodillo T., Carrer, M., Valle, E.D., Giacoma, E., Lamedica, S., Pettenella, D., 2008. Activity 2.7: forestry and timber industry. Report on current state of forest resources in the Carpathians. Padova: Universita degli studi. 158 p.Search in Google Scholar

Appleton, M.R., Meyer, H. (eds), 2014. Development of common integrated management measures for key natural assets in the Carpathians. Work package 4. Integrated management of biological and landscape diversity for sustainable regional development and ecological connectivity in the Carpathians. Vienna: WWF Danube-Carpathian Programme. 158 p.Search in Google Scholar

Badea, O., Tanase, M., Georgeta, J., Anisoara, L., Peiov, A., Uhlirova, H., Pajtik, J., Wawrzoniak, J., Shparyk, Y., 2004. Forest health status in the Carpahian Mountains over the period 1997–2001. Environmental Pollution, 130: 93–98.10.1016/j.envpol.2003.10.024Search in Google Scholar

Cain, M.L., Bowman, W.D., Hacker, S.D., 2014. Ecology. Third edition. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates. 596 p.Search in Google Scholar

Carpenter, S., Gunderson, L., 2001.Coping with collapse: ecological and social dynamics in ecosystem management. Bioscience, 51 (6): 451–457.10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0451:CWCEAS]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

Christensen, M., Emborg, J., Nielsen, A.B., 2007. The forest cycle of Suserup Skov – revisited and revised. In Hahn, K., Emborg, J. (eds). Suserup Skov: Structures and processes in a temperate, deciduous forest reserve. Ecological Bulletins, No. 52. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwel, p. 33–42.Search in Google Scholar

Colinvaux, P.A., de Oliveira, P.E., Moreno, J.E., Miller, M.C., Bush, M.B., 1996. A long pollen record from lowland Amazonia: forest and cooling in glacial times. Science, 274 (5284): 85–88.10.1126/science.274.5284.85Search in Google Scholar

Čaboun, V., 2000. Priestorová štruktúra lesa a jej vplyv na ekologickú stabilitu [Spatial structure of forest and its effect on ecological stability]. Lesnícky časopis – Forestry Journal, 46 (1): 15–36.Search in Google Scholar

EEA, 2017. Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2016. Luxembourg: European Environment Agency. 419 p.Search in Google Scholar

Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C.S., 2004. Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 35: 557–581.10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711Search in Google Scholar

Forman, R.T.T., Godron, M., 1993. Krajinná ekologie [Landscape ecology]. Praha: Academia. 584 p.Search in Google Scholar

Franklin, J.F., Mitchell, R.J., Palik, B.J., 2007. Natural disturbance and stand development principles for ecological forestry. General Technical Report NRS-19. New-town Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. 44 p.10.2737/NRS-GTR-19Search in Google Scholar

Gelatičová, K., Šibik, J., 2015. Vývoj zmladenia smrekového lesa po gradácii podkôrnikov pri rôznych režimoch manažmentu [A progress in regeneration of spruce forest after the bark beetle outbreak under the different management regimes]. Bulletin Slovenskej Botanickej Spoločnosti, 37 (1): 69–85.Search in Google Scholar

Ghazou, J., Burivalova, Z., Garcia-Ulloa, J., King, L.A., 2017. Conceptualizing forest degradation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30 (10): 622–632.10.1016/j.tree.2015.08.001Search in Google Scholar

Gratzer, G., Canham, C., Dieckmann, U., Fischer, A., Iwasa, Y., Law, R., Lexer, M.J., Sandmann, H., Spies, T.A., Splechtna, B.E., Szwagrzyk, J., 2004. Spatio-temporal development of forests – current trends in field methods and models. Oikos, 107: 3–15.10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13063.xSearch in Google Scholar

Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S., 2002. Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, Covelo, London: Island Press. 450 p.Search in Google Scholar

Hassan, R.M., Scholes, R., Ash, N., 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Program). Condition and Trends Working Group. Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends. Findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Washington, D. C.: Island Press. xxi p., 917 p.Search in Google Scholar

Heylighen, F., 1999. The growth of structural and functional complexity during evolution. In Heylighen, F., Bollen, J., Riegler, A. (eds). The evolution of complexity. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, p. 17–44.Search in Google Scholar

Holling, C.S., 2001. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological and social systems. Ecosystems, 4: 390–405.10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5Search in Google Scholar

Holling, C.S., 2004. From complex regions to complex worlds. Ecology and Society, 9 (1): 11. [online cit. 2012-08-15]. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss1/art11/.10.5751/ES-00612-090111Search in Google Scholar

Jørgensen, S.E., 2012. Introduction to systems ecology. Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group. 320 p.Search in Google Scholar

Jørgensen, S.E., Svirezhev, Y.M., 2004. Towards a thermodynamic theory for ecological systems. Oxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier. 366 p.10.1016/B978-008044166-5/50009-4Search in Google Scholar

Jørgensen, S.E., Fath, B.D., Bastianovi, S., Marques, J.C., Müller, F., Nielsen, S.N., Patten, B., Tiezzi, E., Ulanowicz, R.E., 2007. A new ecology: systems perspective. Oxford, UK; Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier. 275 p.Search in Google Scholar

Kay, J. J., 2000. Ecosystems as self-organizing holarchic open systems: narratives and the second law of thermodynamics. In Jorgensen, S.E., Müller, F. (eds). Handbook of ecosystem theories and management. Boca Raton: CRC Press – Lewis Publishers, p. 135–160.Search in Google Scholar

Korpeľ, Š., 1982. Degree of equilibrium and dynamical changes of the forest on example of natural forests of Slovakia. Acta Facultatis Forestalis Zvolen, 24: 9–30.Search in Google Scholar

Korpeľ, Š., 1989. Pralesy Slovenska [Old-grow forests in Slovakia]. Bratislava: Veda. 329 p.Search in Google Scholar

Korpeľ, Š., 1991. Pestovanie lesa [Silviculture]. Bratislava: Príroda. 465 p.Search in Google Scholar

Korpeľ, Š., 1995. Die Urwälder der Westkarpaten [Old-grow forests in Western Carpathians]. Stuttgart: Fischer. 310 p.Search in Google Scholar

Košulič, M., 2010. Cesta k přírode blízkému hospodářskému lesu [How to grow a close-to-nature commercial forest]. Brno: FSC ČR – Forest Stewardship Council. 452 p.Search in Google Scholar

Král, K., Daněk, P., Janík, D., Krůček, M., Vrška, P., 2018. How cyclical and predictable are Central European temperate forest dynamics in terms of development phases? Journal of Vegetation Science, 29: 84–97.10.1111/jvs.12590Search in Google Scholar

Kuemmerle, T., Chaskovskyy, O., Knorn, J., Radeloff, V.C., Kruhlov, I., Keeton, W.S., Hostert, P., 2009. Forest cover change and illegal logging in the Ukrainian Carpathians in the transition period from 1988 to 2007. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113: 1194–1207.10.1016/j.rse.2009.02.006Search in Google Scholar

Leibundgut, H., 1959. Über Zweck und Methodik der Struktur und Zuwachsanalyse von Urwäldern. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Forstwesen, 110 (3): 111–124.Search in Google Scholar

Levin, S.A., 1998. Ecosystems and the biosphere as complex adaptive systems. Ecosystems, 1: 431–436.10.1007/s100219900037Search in Google Scholar

Levin, S.A., 2005. Self-organization and the emergence of complexity in ecological systems. BioScience, 55 (12): 1075–1079.10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[1075:SATEOC]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

Lindenmayer, D., Thorn, S., Banks, S., 2017. Please do not disturb ecosystems further. Nature, Ecology & Evolution, 1 (3): 1–3. [cit. 06-20-2010]. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-016-0031.pdf10.1038/s41559-016-0031Search in Google Scholar

Míchal, I. (ed), 1992. Obnova ekologické stability lesů [Restoration of ecological stability of forests]. Praha: Academia. 169 p.Search in Google Scholar

Míchal, I., 1994. Ekologická stabilita [Ecological stability]. Brno: Veronica. 275 p.Search in Google Scholar

Míchal, I., 1998. Přírodní les a jeho dynamika (obecná část) [Natural forest and its dynamic (General part)]. In Míchal I., Petříček, V. (eds). Péče o chráněná území. II. Lesní společenstva [Management of protected areas. II. Forest communities]. Praha: Agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny ČR, p. 10–87.Search in Google Scholar

Michener, W.K., Baerwald, T.J., Firth, P., Palmer, M.A., Rosenberger, J.L., Sandlin, E.A., Zimmerman, H., 2001. Defining and unraveling biocomplexity. BioScience, 51 (12): 1018–1023.10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[1018:DAUB]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

Mikusiński, G., Angelstam, P., 1998. Economic geography, forest distribution, and woodpecker diversity in central Europe. Conservation Biology, 12: 200–208.10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96310.xSearch in Google Scholar

Odum, E.P., 1977. Základy ekologie [Fundamentals of ecology]. Praha: Academia. 733 p.Search in Google Scholar

Oliver, T.H., Heard, M.S., Isaac, N.J.B., Roy, D.B., Procter, D., Eigenbrod, F., Freckleton, R., Hector, A., Orme, C.D.L., Petchey, O.L., Proença, V., Raffaelli, D., Suttle, K.B., Mace, G.M., Martín-López, B., Woodcock, B.A., Bullock, J.M., 2015. Biodiversity and resilience of ecosystem functions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30 (11): 673–684.10.1016/j.tree.2015.08.00926437633Search in Google Scholar

Paluch, J.G., 2007. The spatial pattern of a natural European beech (Fagus sylvatica (L.) – silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) forest: a patch-mosaic perspective. Forest Ecology and Management, 253: 161–171.10.1016/j.foreco.2007.07.013Search in Google Scholar

Paluch, J. G., Kolodziej, Z., Pach, M., Jastrzebski, R., 2015. Spatial variability of close-to-primeval Fagus--Abies-Picea forests in the Western Carpathians (Central Europe): a step towards a generalised pattern. European Journal of Forest Research, 134: 235–246.10.1007/s10342-014-0846-ySearch in Google Scholar

Pan, Y., Birdsey, R.A., Fang, J., Houghton, R., Kauppi, P.E., Kurz, W.A., Phillips, O.L., Shvidenko, A., Lewis, S.L., Canadell, J.G., 2011. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science, 333: 988–993.10.1126/science.120160921764754Search in Google Scholar

Parrott, L., 2010. Measuring ecological complexity. Ecological Indicators, 10: 1069–1076.10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.03.014Search in Google Scholar

Pickett, S.T.A., White, P.S. (eds), 1985. The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Orlando: Academic Press. 472 p.Search in Google Scholar

Pimm, S.L., 1984. The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature, 307: 321–326.10.1038/307321a0Search in Google Scholar

Plesník, J., 2010. Příroda jako proudícií mozaika. Co přinesly novější poznatky ekosystémové ekologie [Nature as a flowing mosaic. What recent knowledge in ecosystem science has revealed]. Ochrana Přírody, 65 (3): 27–30.Search in Google Scholar

Plesník, J., 2018. Ekosystém v teorii a praxi ochrany přírody. Honosný pohřeb se (prozatím) nekoná [Ecosystem in nature conservation theory and practice. No luxury funeral (so far)]. Vesmír, 97: 2–3.Search in Google Scholar

Plesník, J., Vačkář, D., 2005. Biodiverzita a fungování ekosystémů. Jak hlouběji pochopit, co se v ekosystému děje? [Biodiversity and functioning of ecosystems. How can you deeper understand what’s happening in the ecosystem?]. Vesmír, 84: 32–37.Search in Google Scholar

Prigogine, I., 1997. The end of certainty. New York: The Free Press. 240 p.Search in Google Scholar

Primack, R.B., Kindlmann, P., Jersáková, J., 2011. Úvod do biologie ochrany přírody [Essentials of conservation biology]. Praha: Portál. 466 p.Search in Google Scholar

Proulx, R., 2007. Ecological complexity for unifying ecological theory across scales: a field ecologist’s perspective. Ecological Complexity, 4 (3): 85–92.10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.03.003Search in Google Scholar

Ptretzsch, H., 2008. Forest dynamics, growth and yield. From measurement to model. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. 617 p.10.1007/978-3-540-88307-4_1Search in Google Scholar

Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Ĺ., Chapin, F., Lambin, E., Lenton, T., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, C.J., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C., Hughes, T., vander Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falken-mark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R., Fabry, V., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P., Foley, J.A., 2009. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461: 472–475.10.1038/461472a19779433Search in Google Scholar

Rohde, R.A., 2006. 62 million year cycle in biodiversity and associated geological changes. Geological Society of America Meeting, Abstracts with Program: 63–67.Search in Google Scholar

Rubner, K., 1925. Das Urdwaldproblem. Forstarchiv, 1: 145–151.10.1002/zaac.19251450111Search in Google Scholar

Runkle, J.R., 1981. Gap regeneration in some old-growth forests of the eastern United States. Ecology, 62: 1041–1051.10.2307/1937003Search in Google Scholar

Runkle, J.R., 2000. Canopy tree turnover in old-growth mesic forests of Eastern North America. Ecology, 81 (2): 554–567.10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[0554:CTTIOG]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

Saniga, M., Bruchánik, R., 2009. Prírode blízke obhospodarovanie lesa [Close nature forest stand management]. Zvolen: Národné lesnícke centrum. 104 p.Search in Google Scholar

ScienceDaily, 2018. Biodiversity loss raises risk of „extinction cascades”. University of Exeter, Science News, 19 February 2018. [cit. 10-06-2018]. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/02/180219155019.htmSearch in Google Scholar

Schmidt-Vogt, H., 1991. Naturnahe Fichtenwirtschaft. Beiträge zur Lebensqualität, Walderhaltung und Umweltschutz, Gesundheit, Wandern und Heimatpflege, Heft 31. Wilhelm-Münker Stiftung, im Selbstverlag. 56 p.Search in Google Scholar

Smail, R. A., Lewis, D.J., 2009. Forest-land conversion, ecosystem services, and economic issues for policy: a review. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-797. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 40 p.10.2737/PNW-GTR-797Search in Google Scholar

Splechtna, B.E., Gratzer, G., 2005. Natural disturbances in Central European forests: approaches and preliminary result from Rothwald, Austria. Forest Snow and Landscape Research, 79 (1/2): 57–67.Search in Google Scholar

Splechtna, B.E.; Gratzer, G., Black, B. A. 2005. Disturbance history of a European old-growth mixed-species forest: A spatial dendro-ecological analysis. Journal of Vegetation Science, 16: 511–522.10.1111/j.1654-1103.2005.tb02391.xSearch in Google Scholar

Szwagrzyk, J., Szewczyk, J., 2001. Tree mortality and effect of release from competition in an old-growth Fagus--Abies-Picea stand. Journal of Vegetation Science, 12: 621–626.10.2307/3236901Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, I., 2011. Biodiversity, ecosystem thresholds, resilience and forest degradation. Unasylva, 238 (62): 25–30.Search in Google Scholar

Uriarte, M., Condit, R., Canham, Ch.D., Hubbel, S.P., 2004. A spatially explicit model of sapling growth in a tropical forest: does the identity of neighbours matter? Journal of Ecology, 92 (2): 348-360.10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00867.xSearch in Google Scholar

Van Der Maarel, E., 1988. Vegetation dynamics: patterns in time and space. Vegetatio, 77: 1–19.10.1007/BF00045745Search in Google Scholar

Vološčuk, I., 2001. Teoretické a praktické problémy ekologickej stability lesných ekosystémov [Theoretical and practical problems of forest ecosystems ecological stability]. Vedecké štúdie, 1/2001/A. Zvolen: Technická univerzita vo Zvolene. 90 p.Search in Google Scholar

Vyskot, I. (ed.), 2003. Kvantifikace a hodnocení funkcí lesů České republiky [Quantification and evaluation of forest functions on the example of the Czech Republic]. Praha: Ministerstvo životního prostředí ČR. 186 p.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, S., Loreau, M., 2016. Biodiversity and ecosystem stability across scales in metacommunities. Ecology Letters, 19 (5): 510–518.10.1111/ele.12582Search in Google Scholar

Whitmore, T.C., 1978. Gap in the forest canopy. New York: Cambrige University Press, p. 639–655.Search in Google Scholar

Woods, K.D., 2000. Long-term change and spatial pattern in a late-successional hemlock–northern hardwood forest. Journal of Ecology, 88: 267–282.10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00448.xSearch in Google Scholar

Würtz, P., Anilla, A., 2010. Ecological succession as an energy dispersal process. Biosystems, 100 (1): 70–78.10.1016/j.biosystems.2010.01.004Search in Google Scholar

Yamamoto, S., 2000. Forest gap dynamics and tree regeneration. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 5: 223–229.10.1007/BF02767114Search in Google Scholar