[Adami, Ch., Ofria, Ch. and Collier, T.C., 2000. Evolution of biological complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97 (9): 4463–4468.10.1073/pnas.97.9.4463]Search in Google Scholar
[Allen, C.R., Holling, C.S., 2010. Novelty, adaptive capacity, and resilience. Ecology and Society, 15 (3): 24. [cit. 2012-08-15]. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss3/art24/10.5751/ES-03720-150324]Search in Google Scholar
[Anand, M., Gonzales, A., Guichard, F., Kolasa, J., Parrot, L., 2010. Ecological systems as complex systems: challenges for an emerging science. Diversity, 2: 395–410.10.3390/d2030395]Search in Google Scholar
[Anfodillo T., Carrer, M., Valle, E.D., Giacoma, E., Lamedica, S., Pettenella, D., 2008. Activity 2.7: forestry and timber industry. Report on current state of forest resources in the Carpathians. Padova: Universita degli studi. 158 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Appleton, M.R., Meyer, H. (eds), 2014. Development of common integrated management measures for key natural assets in the Carpathians. Work package 4. Integrated management of biological and landscape diversity for sustainable regional development and ecological connectivity in the Carpathians. Vienna: WWF Danube-Carpathian Programme. 158 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Badea, O., Tanase, M., Georgeta, J., Anisoara, L., Peiov, A., Uhlirova, H., Pajtik, J., Wawrzoniak, J., Shparyk, Y., 2004. Forest health status in the Carpahian Mountains over the period 1997–2001. Environmental Pollution, 130: 93–98.10.1016/j.envpol.2003.10.024]Search in Google Scholar
[Cain, M.L., Bowman, W.D., Hacker, S.D., 2014. Ecology. Third edition. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates. 596 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carpenter, S., Gunderson, L., 2001.Coping with collapse: ecological and social dynamics in ecosystem management. Bioscience, 51 (6): 451–457.10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0451:CWCEAS]2.0.CO;2]Search in Google Scholar
[Christensen, M., Emborg, J., Nielsen, A.B., 2007. The forest cycle of Suserup Skov – revisited and revised. In Hahn, K., Emborg, J. (eds). Suserup Skov: Structures and processes in a temperate, deciduous forest reserve. Ecological Bulletins, No. 52. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwel, p. 33–42.]Search in Google Scholar
[Colinvaux, P.A., de Oliveira, P.E., Moreno, J.E., Miller, M.C., Bush, M.B., 1996. A long pollen record from lowland Amazonia: forest and cooling in glacial times. Science, 274 (5284): 85–88.10.1126/science.274.5284.85]Search in Google Scholar
[Čaboun, V., 2000. Priestorová štruktúra lesa a jej vplyv na ekologickú stabilitu [Spatial structure of forest and its effect on ecological stability]. Lesnícky časopis – Forestry Journal, 46 (1): 15–36.]Search in Google Scholar
[EEA, 2017. Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2016. Luxembourg: European Environment Agency. 419 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C.S., 2004. Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 35: 557–581.10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711]Search in Google Scholar
[Forman, R.T.T., Godron, M., 1993. Krajinná ekologie [Landscape ecology]. Praha: Academia. 584 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Franklin, J.F., Mitchell, R.J., Palik, B.J., 2007. Natural disturbance and stand development principles for ecological forestry. General Technical Report NRS-19. New-town Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. 44 p.10.2737/NRS-GTR-19]Search in Google Scholar
[Gelatičová, K., Šibik, J., 2015. Vývoj zmladenia smrekového lesa po gradácii podkôrnikov pri rôznych režimoch manažmentu [A progress in regeneration of spruce forest after the bark beetle outbreak under the different management regimes]. Bulletin Slovenskej Botanickej Spoločnosti, 37 (1): 69–85.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ghazou, J., Burivalova, Z., Garcia-Ulloa, J., King, L.A., 2017. Conceptualizing forest degradation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30 (10): 622–632.10.1016/j.tree.2015.08.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Gratzer, G., Canham, C., Dieckmann, U., Fischer, A., Iwasa, Y., Law, R., Lexer, M.J., Sandmann, H., Spies, T.A., Splechtna, B.E., Szwagrzyk, J., 2004. Spatio-temporal development of forests – current trends in field methods and models. Oikos, 107: 3–15.10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13063.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S., 2002. Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, Covelo, London: Island Press. 450 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hassan, R.M., Scholes, R., Ash, N., 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Program). Condition and Trends Working Group. Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends. Findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Washington, D. C.: Island Press. xxi p., 917 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Heylighen, F., 1999. The growth of structural and functional complexity during evolution. In Heylighen, F., Bollen, J., Riegler, A. (eds). The evolution of complexity. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, p. 17–44.]Search in Google Scholar
[Holling, C.S., 2001. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological and social systems. Ecosystems, 4: 390–405.10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Holling, C.S., 2004. From complex regions to complex worlds. Ecology and Society, 9 (1): 11. [online cit. 2012-08-15]. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss1/art11/.10.5751/ES-00612-090111]Search in Google Scholar
[Jørgensen, S.E., 2012. Introduction to systems ecology. Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group. 320 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jørgensen, S.E., Svirezhev, Y.M., 2004. Towards a thermodynamic theory for ecological systems. Oxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier. 366 p.10.1016/B978-008044166-5/50009-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Jørgensen, S.E., Fath, B.D., Bastianovi, S., Marques, J.C., Müller, F., Nielsen, S.N., Patten, B., Tiezzi, E., Ulanowicz, R.E., 2007. A new ecology: systems perspective. Oxford, UK; Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier. 275 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kay, J. J., 2000. Ecosystems as self-organizing holarchic open systems: narratives and the second law of thermodynamics. In Jorgensen, S.E., Müller, F. (eds). Handbook of ecosystem theories and management. Boca Raton: CRC Press – Lewis Publishers, p. 135–160.]Search in Google Scholar
[Korpeľ, Š., 1982. Degree of equilibrium and dynamical changes of the forest on example of natural forests of Slovakia. Acta Facultatis Forestalis Zvolen, 24: 9–30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Korpeľ, Š., 1989. Pralesy Slovenska [Old-grow forests in Slovakia]. Bratislava: Veda. 329 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Korpeľ, Š., 1991. Pestovanie lesa [Silviculture]. Bratislava: Príroda. 465 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Korpeľ, Š., 1995. Die Urwälder der Westkarpaten [Old-grow forests in Western Carpathians]. Stuttgart: Fischer. 310 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Košulič, M., 2010. Cesta k přírode blízkému hospodářskému lesu [How to grow a close-to-nature commercial forest]. Brno: FSC ČR – Forest Stewardship Council. 452 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Král, K., Daněk, P., Janík, D., Krůček, M., Vrška, P., 2018. How cyclical and predictable are Central European temperate forest dynamics in terms of development phases? Journal of Vegetation Science, 29: 84–97.10.1111/jvs.12590]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuemmerle, T., Chaskovskyy, O., Knorn, J., Radeloff, V.C., Kruhlov, I., Keeton, W.S., Hostert, P., 2009. Forest cover change and illegal logging in the Ukrainian Carpathians in the transition period from 1988 to 2007. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113: 1194–1207.10.1016/j.rse.2009.02.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Leibundgut, H., 1959. Über Zweck und Methodik der Struktur und Zuwachsanalyse von Urwäldern. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Forstwesen, 110 (3): 111–124.]Search in Google Scholar
[Levin, S.A., 1998. Ecosystems and the biosphere as complex adaptive systems. Ecosystems, 1: 431–436.10.1007/s100219900037]Search in Google Scholar
[Levin, S.A., 2005. Self-organization and the emergence of complexity in ecological systems. BioScience, 55 (12): 1075–1079.10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[1075:SATEOC]2.0.CO;2]Search in Google Scholar
[Lindenmayer, D., Thorn, S., Banks, S., 2017. Please do not disturb ecosystems further. Nature, Ecology & Evolution, 1 (3): 1–3. [cit. 06-20-2010]. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-016-0031.pdf10.1038/s41559-016-0031]Search in Google Scholar
[Míchal, I. (ed), 1992. Obnova ekologické stability lesů [Restoration of ecological stability of forests]. Praha: Academia. 169 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Míchal, I., 1994. Ekologická stabilita [Ecological stability]. Brno: Veronica. 275 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Míchal, I., 1998. Přírodní les a jeho dynamika (obecná část) [Natural forest and its dynamic (General part)]. In Míchal I., Petříček, V. (eds). Péče o chráněná území. II. Lesní společenstva [Management of protected areas. II. Forest communities]. Praha: Agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny ČR, p. 10–87.]Search in Google Scholar
[Michener, W.K., Baerwald, T.J., Firth, P., Palmer, M.A., Rosenberger, J.L., Sandlin, E.A., Zimmerman, H., 2001. Defining and unraveling biocomplexity. BioScience, 51 (12): 1018–1023.10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[1018:DAUB]2.0.CO;2]Search in Google Scholar
[Mikusiński, G., Angelstam, P., 1998. Economic geography, forest distribution, and woodpecker diversity in central Europe. Conservation Biology, 12: 200–208.10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96310.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Odum, E.P., 1977. Základy ekologie [Fundamentals of ecology]. Praha: Academia. 733 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Oliver, T.H., Heard, M.S., Isaac, N.J.B., Roy, D.B., Procter, D., Eigenbrod, F., Freckleton, R., Hector, A., Orme, C.D.L., Petchey, O.L., Proença, V., Raffaelli, D., Suttle, K.B., Mace, G.M., Martín-López, B., Woodcock, B.A., Bullock, J.M., 2015. Biodiversity and resilience of ecosystem functions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30 (11): 673–684.10.1016/j.tree.2015.08.00926437633]Search in Google Scholar
[Paluch, J.G., 2007. The spatial pattern of a natural European beech (Fagus sylvatica (L.) – silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) forest: a patch-mosaic perspective. Forest Ecology and Management, 253: 161–171.10.1016/j.foreco.2007.07.013]Search in Google Scholar
[Paluch, J. G., Kolodziej, Z., Pach, M., Jastrzebski, R., 2015. Spatial variability of close-to-primeval Fagus--Abies-Picea forests in the Western Carpathians (Central Europe): a step towards a generalised pattern. European Journal of Forest Research, 134: 235–246.10.1007/s10342-014-0846-y]Search in Google Scholar
[Pan, Y., Birdsey, R.A., Fang, J., Houghton, R., Kauppi, P.E., Kurz, W.A., Phillips, O.L., Shvidenko, A., Lewis, S.L., Canadell, J.G., 2011. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science, 333: 988–993.10.1126/science.120160921764754]Search in Google Scholar
[Parrott, L., 2010. Measuring ecological complexity. Ecological Indicators, 10: 1069–1076.10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.03.014]Search in Google Scholar
[Pickett, S.T.A., White, P.S. (eds), 1985. The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Orlando: Academic Press. 472 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pimm, S.L., 1984. The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature, 307: 321–326.10.1038/307321a0]Search in Google Scholar
[Plesník, J., 2010. Příroda jako proudícií mozaika. Co přinesly novější poznatky ekosystémové ekologie [Nature as a flowing mosaic. What recent knowledge in ecosystem science has revealed]. Ochrana Přírody, 65 (3): 27–30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Plesník, J., 2018. Ekosystém v teorii a praxi ochrany přírody. Honosný pohřeb se (prozatím) nekoná [Ecosystem in nature conservation theory and practice. No luxury funeral (so far)]. Vesmír, 97: 2–3.]Search in Google Scholar
[Plesník, J., Vačkář, D., 2005. Biodiverzita a fungování ekosystémů. Jak hlouběji pochopit, co se v ekosystému děje? [Biodiversity and functioning of ecosystems. How can you deeper understand what’s happening in the ecosystem?]. Vesmír, 84: 32–37.]Search in Google Scholar
[Prigogine, I., 1997. The end of certainty. New York: The Free Press. 240 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Primack, R.B., Kindlmann, P., Jersáková, J., 2011. Úvod do biologie ochrany přírody [Essentials of conservation biology]. Praha: Portál. 466 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Proulx, R., 2007. Ecological complexity for unifying ecological theory across scales: a field ecologist’s perspective. Ecological Complexity, 4 (3): 85–92.10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.03.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Ptretzsch, H., 2008. Forest dynamics, growth and yield. From measurement to model. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. 617 p.10.1007/978-3-540-88307-4_1]Search in Google Scholar
[Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Ĺ., Chapin, F., Lambin, E., Lenton, T., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, C.J., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C., Hughes, T., vander Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falken-mark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R., Fabry, V., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P., Foley, J.A., 2009. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461: 472–475.10.1038/461472a19779433]Search in Google Scholar
[Rohde, R.A., 2006. 62 million year cycle in biodiversity and associated geological changes. Geological Society of America Meeting, Abstracts with Program: 63–67.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rubner, K., 1925. Das Urdwaldproblem. Forstarchiv, 1: 145–151.10.1002/zaac.19251450111]Search in Google Scholar
[Runkle, J.R., 1981. Gap regeneration in some old-growth forests of the eastern United States. Ecology, 62: 1041–1051.10.2307/1937003]Search in Google Scholar
[Runkle, J.R., 2000. Canopy tree turnover in old-growth mesic forests of Eastern North America. Ecology, 81 (2): 554–567.10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[0554:CTTIOG]2.0.CO;2]Search in Google Scholar
[Saniga, M., Bruchánik, R., 2009. Prírode blízke obhospodarovanie lesa [Close nature forest stand management]. Zvolen: Národné lesnícke centrum. 104 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[ScienceDaily, 2018. Biodiversity loss raises risk of „extinction cascades”. University of Exeter, Science News, 19 February 2018. [cit. 10-06-2018]. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/02/180219155019.htm]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmidt-Vogt, H., 1991. Naturnahe Fichtenwirtschaft. Beiträge zur Lebensqualität, Walderhaltung und Umweltschutz, Gesundheit, Wandern und Heimatpflege, Heft 31. Wilhelm-Münker Stiftung, im Selbstverlag. 56 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Smail, R. A., Lewis, D.J., 2009. Forest-land conversion, ecosystem services, and economic issues for policy: a review. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-797. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 40 p.10.2737/PNW-GTR-797]Search in Google Scholar
[Splechtna, B.E., Gratzer, G., 2005. Natural disturbances in Central European forests: approaches and preliminary result from Rothwald, Austria. Forest Snow and Landscape Research, 79 (1/2): 57–67.]Search in Google Scholar
[Splechtna, B.E.; Gratzer, G., Black, B. A. 2005. Disturbance history of a European old-growth mixed-species forest: A spatial dendro-ecological analysis. Journal of Vegetation Science, 16: 511–522.10.1111/j.1654-1103.2005.tb02391.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Szwagrzyk, J., Szewczyk, J., 2001. Tree mortality and effect of release from competition in an old-growth Fagus--Abies-Picea stand. Journal of Vegetation Science, 12: 621–626.10.2307/3236901]Search in Google Scholar
[Thompson, I., 2011. Biodiversity, ecosystem thresholds, resilience and forest degradation. Unasylva, 238 (62): 25–30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Uriarte, M., Condit, R., Canham, Ch.D., Hubbel, S.P., 2004. A spatially explicit model of sapling growth in a tropical forest: does the identity of neighbours matter? Journal of Ecology, 92 (2): 348-360.10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00867.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Der Maarel, E., 1988. Vegetation dynamics: patterns in time and space. Vegetatio, 77: 1–19.10.1007/BF00045745]Search in Google Scholar
[Vološčuk, I., 2001. Teoretické a praktické problémy ekologickej stability lesných ekosystémov [Theoretical and practical problems of forest ecosystems ecological stability]. Vedecké štúdie, 1/2001/A. Zvolen: Technická univerzita vo Zvolene. 90 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vyskot, I. (ed.), 2003. Kvantifikace a hodnocení funkcí lesů České republiky [Quantification and evaluation of forest functions on the example of the Czech Republic]. Praha: Ministerstvo životního prostředí ČR. 186 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, S., Loreau, M., 2016. Biodiversity and ecosystem stability across scales in metacommunities. Ecology Letters, 19 (5): 510–518.10.1111/ele.12582]Search in Google Scholar
[Whitmore, T.C., 1978. Gap in the forest canopy. New York: Cambrige University Press, p. 639–655.]Search in Google Scholar
[Woods, K.D., 2000. Long-term change and spatial pattern in a late-successional hemlock–northern hardwood forest. Journal of Ecology, 88: 267–282.10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00448.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Würtz, P., Anilla, A., 2010. Ecological succession as an energy dispersal process. Biosystems, 100 (1): 70–78.10.1016/j.biosystems.2010.01.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Yamamoto, S., 2000. Forest gap dynamics and tree regeneration. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 5: 223–229.10.1007/BF02767114]Search in Google Scholar