[
[1] Almendros-Jiménez JM, Validation of XML Documents with SWRL, in: Bertino E., Tjoa A M. (eds.), International Conference on Availability, Reliability, and Security, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012, 44-57.10.1007/978-3-642-32498-7_4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[2] Benvenuti F., Diamantini C., Potena D., Storti E., An ontology-based framework to support performance monitoring in public transport systems, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 81, 2017, 188-208.10.1016/j.trc.2017.06.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[3] Ceusters W., Smith B., Aboutness: Towards foundations for the information artifact ontology, in: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (ICBO), CEUR, 2015, 1-5.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[4] Chaves-Fraga D., Pozo-Gilo L., Toledo J., Ruckhaus E., Corcho Ó., Morph-CSV: Virtual Knowledge Graph Access for Tabular Data, in: ISWC (Demos/Industry), CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2020, 11-16.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[5] Ciccarese P., Peroni S., The Collections Ontology: creating and handling collections in OWL 2 DL frameworks, Semantic Web, 5, 7, 2014, 515-52910.3233/SW-130121
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[6] Cox S., Little C., Time Ontology in OWL https://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/. [Accessed 19 April 2022].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[7] Daconta MC, Obrst LJ, Smith KT, The Semantic Web: a guide to the future of XML, Web services, and knowledge management, John Wiley & Sons, 2003.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[8] Diamantini C., Potena D., Storti E. Sem PI, A Semantic Framework for the Collaborative Construction and Maintenance of a Shared Dictionary of Performance Indicators, Future Generation Computer Systems (FGCS), 54, 2016, 352-365.10.1016/j.future.2015.04.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[9] Falco R., Gangemi A., Peroni S., Shotton D., Vitali F., Modeling OWL ontologies with Graffoo, in: European Semantic Web Conference, Springer, Cham, 2014, 320-325.10.1007/978-3-319-11955-7_42
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[10] Gangemi A., Peroni, S., Shotton D., Vitali F., The publishing workflow ontology (PWO), Semantic Web, 8, 5, 2017, 703-718.10.3233/SW-160230
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[11] Garijo D., Poveda-Villalón M., Best practices for implementing fair vocabularies and ontologies on the web, Applications and Practices in Ontology Design, Extraction, and Reasoning, 49, 2020, 39.10.3233/SSW200034
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[12] Gayo JEL, Prud’hommeaux E., Solbrig HR, Boneva I., Validating and describing linked data portals using shapes, CoRR, abs/1701.08924, 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[13] Giunchiglia F., Zaihrayeu I., Lightweight Ontologies, in: Liu L., Özsu MT (eds.), Encyclopedia of Database Systems, Springer, Boston, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_1314
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[14] Gómez-Pérez A., From knowledge based systems to knowledgesharing technology: Evaluation and assessment, Stanford University, 1994.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[15] Guarino N., Giaretta P. Ontologies and knowledge bases, in: Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases: Knowledge Building and Knowledge Sharing, 1995, 25-32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[16] Hall J.A., Accounting information systems, Cengage Learning, 2015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[17] Kellogg G., CSVW Namespace Vocabulary Terms https://www.w3.org/ns/csvw. [Accessed 12 April 2022].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[18] Knublauch H., Kontokostas D., Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/. [Accessed 19 April 2022].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[19] Kozachenko D., Berezovyi N., Malashkin V., Arbuzov M., Skovron I., Development of the typical passport structure of industrial railways, Transport systems and transportation technologies, 14, 2017, 42-49.10.15802/tstt2017/123168
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[20] Lewis R., A semantic approach to railway data integration and decision support, University of Birmingham, 2015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[21] Malone J., Brown A., Lister AL, Ison J., Hull D., Parkinson H., Stevens R., The Software Ontology (SWO): a resource for reproducibility in biomedical data analysis, curation and digital preservation, Journal of biomedical semantics, 5, 1, 2014, 1-1310.1186/2041-1480-5-25409895325068035
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[22] Miles A., Bechhofer S., SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference https://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-skos-reference-20090818/. [Accessed 12 April 2022].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[23] Noy NF, McGuinness DL, Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology”, Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory and Stanford Medical Informatics, 2001.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[24] Oberle D., Grimm S., Staab S., An ontology for software, in: Handbook on ontologies, Springer, Berlin, 2009, 383-402.10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_17
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[25] Panov P., Džeroski S., Soldatova LN, Representing entities in the OntoDM data ontology, in: Inductive mining Databases and Constraint-Based Data Mining, Springer, New York, 2010, 27-58.10.1007/978-1-4419-7738-0_2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[26] Panov P., Soldatova LN, Džeroski S., Generic ontology of datatypes, Information Sciences, 329, 2016, 900-920.10.1016/j.ins.2015.08.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[27] Pauwels P., Van De ursen D., Verstraeten R., De Roo J., De Meyer R., Van de Walle R, Van Campenhout J., A semantic rule checking environment for building performance checking, Automation in construction, 20, 5, 2011, 506-51810.1016/j.autcon.2010.11.017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[28] Peroni S., Error Ontology https://github.com/SPAROntologies/error. [Accessed November 19, 2021].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[29] Roman D., Alexiev V., Paniagua J., Elvesæter B., von Zernichow BM, Soylu A., Simeonov B., Taggart C., The euBusinessGraph ontology: A lightweight ontology for harmonizing basic company information, Semantic Web, 13, 1, 2022, 41-68.10.3233/SW-210424
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[30] Rosen G., Analysis of Tabula: A PDF-Table extraction tool, Uppsala University, Uppsala, 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[31] Shynkarenko V., Zhuchyi L., Ontological Harmonization of Railway Transport Information Systems, International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Systems, CEUR-WS Team, Aachen, Germany, 2021, 541–554.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[32] Shynkarenko V., Zhuchyi L., Ivanov O., Conceptualization of the tabular knowledge representation, International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technologies, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, 2021.10.1109/CSIT52700.2021.9648761
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[33] Skalozub V., Ilman V., Shynkarenko V., Development of ontological support of constructive synthesizing modeling of information systems, Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6, 4, 2017, 58-69.10.15587/1729-4061.2017.119497
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[34] Skalozub V., Ilman V., Shynkarenko V., Ontological support formation for constructive-synthesizing modeling of information systems development processes, Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5, 4(95), 2018, 55-6310.15587/1729-4061.2018.143968
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[35] Tutcher J., Development of semantic data models to support data interoperability in the rail industry, University of Birmingham, 2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[36] Zhang S., Bou kamp F., Teizer J., Ontology-based semantic modeling of construction safety knowledge: Towards automated safety planning for job hazard analysis (JHA), Automation in Construction, 52, 2015, 29-41.10.1016/j.autcon.2015.02.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[37] Directive 2008/57/E C of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the interoperability of the rail system within the Community
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[38] EZhDA Contact Group. Analysis of parameters defining to maintain the technical and operational compatibility of the 1520 mm track railway system at the cis-EU border. subsystem:infrastructure. Railroad and travel facilities
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[39] Relation Ontology https://obofoundry.org/ontology/ro.html. [Accessed 12 April 2022].
]Search in Google Scholar
