[[1] Alkemade F., La Poutre H., Amman H. M. Robust Evolutionary Algorithm Design for Socio-economic Simulation, Computational Economics 28, 2006, pp. 355-470.10.1007/s10614-006-9051-5]Search in Google Scholar
[[2] Bartoszczuk P., Horabik J. Tradable Permit Systems: Considering Uncertainty in Emission Estimates, Water Air Soil Pollution: Focus (2007) 7, , Springer Verlag, 2007, pp 573-579.10.1007/s11267-006-9110-x]Search in Google Scholar
[[3] Bonatti M., Ermoliev Y., Gaivoronski A. Modeling of multi-agent market systems in the presence of uncertainty: The case of information economy, Robotics andAutonomous Systems, Vol. 24, Issue 3-4, 1998, pp. 93-113.10.1016/S0921-8890(98)00025-6]Search in Google Scholar
[[4] Cichosz P. Systemy uczące się (Learning systems; in Polish), WNT, Warszawa, 2000.]Search in Google Scholar
[[5] Clemens C., Riechmann T. Evolutionary Dynamics in Public Good Games, Computational Economics, 28, 2006, pp. 399-420.10.1007/s10614-006-9044-4]Search in Google Scholar
[[6] Ermoliev Y., Klaassen G., Nentjes A. Adaptive cost-effective ambient charges under incomplete information, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 31, 1996, pp. 37-48.10.1006/jeem.1996.0030]Search in Google Scholar
[[7] Ermoliev Y., Michalevich M., Nentjes A. Markets for Tradable Emission and Ambient Permits: A dynamic approach, Environmental and Resource Economics, 15, 2000, pp. 39-56.10.1023/A:1008369611378]Search in Google Scholar
[[8] Godal O. Simulating the Carbon Permit Market with Imperfect Observations of Emissions: Approaching Equilibrium through Sequential Bilateral Trade, InterimReport IR-00-060, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria, 2000.]Search in Google Scholar
[[9] Horabik J. On the costs of reducing GHG emissions and its underlying uncertainties in the context of carbon trading, Raport Badawczy RB/34/2005, IBS PAN, 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[[10] Klaasen G., Nentjes A., Smith M. Testing the dynamic theory of emissions trading: Experimental evidence for global carbon trading, Interim Report IR-01-063, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria, 2001.]Search in Google Scholar
[[11] Klaasen G., Matrosov I., Roehrl A., Tarasyev A. A Game-Dynamic Model of Gas Transportation Routes and Its Application to the Turkish Gas Market, Interim ReportIR-03-018, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria, 2003.]Search in Google Scholar
[[12] Mutlu F., Fescioglu-Unver N. Agent Based Simulation of Carbon Emissions Trading Market, Proceedings of PICMET '11 (Technology Management in the Energy SmartWorld), 2011, pp. 1-10.]Search in Google Scholar
[[13] Nahorski Z., Horabik J., Jonas M. Compliance and emissions trading under the Kyoto protocol; Rules for Uncertain Inventories, Water, Air, & Soil Pollution: Focus, Vol. 7, Numbers 4-5, Springer Verlag, 2007, pp. 539-558.10.1007/s11267-006-9112-8]Search in Google Scholar
[[14] Stańczak J. Evolutionary algorithm for market simulations, Evolutionary Computationand Global Optimization 2009, Prace Naukowe PW, Elektronika, z. 169, Warszawa, 2009, pp. 163-172.]Search in Google Scholar
[[15] Stańczak J. Application of an evolutionary algorithm to simulation of the CO2 emission permits market with purchase prices, Badania operacyjne i decyzje, 4, 2009, pp. 93-108.]Search in Google Scholar
[[16] Stańczak J., Bartoszczuk P. CO2 emission trading model with trading prices, ClimaticChange, 103 (1-2), 2010, pp. 291-301. 10.1007/s10584-010-9905-7]Search in Google Scholar