[Brandt, Line, Per Aage Brandt (2005). Making sense of a blend. A cognitive-semiotic approach to metaphor. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 3: 216-249.10.1075/arcl.3.12bra]Search in Google Scholar
[Chaban, Natalia, Jessica Bain, Katrina Stats (2007). Under construction: Images of the enlarging EU in the Australasian news media. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 1(2): 79-95.]Search in Google Scholar
[Coulson, Seana (1996). The Menendez brothers virus: Analogical mapping in blended spaces. Goldberg, Adele, ed. Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language. Stanford: CSLI, 67-81.]Search in Google Scholar
[Coulson, Seana, Todd Oakley (2000). Blending basics. Cognitive Linguistics 11(3-4): 175-196.10.1515/cogl.2001.014]Search in Google Scholar
[Coulson, Seana, Cristobal Pagán Cánovas (2013). Understanding timelines: Conceptual metaphor and conceptual integration. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics 5(1-2): 198-219.10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.198]Search in Google Scholar
[Đurović, Tatjana, Nadežda Silaški (2018). The end of a long and fraught marriage: Metaphorical images structuring the Brexit discourse. Metaphor and the Social World 8(1): 25-39.10.1075/msw.17010.dur]Search in Google Scholar
[Gibbs, Raymond (2000). Making good psychology out of blending theory. Cognitive Linguistics 11(3-4): 347-358.10.1515/cogl.2001.020]Search in Google Scholar
[Grady, Joseph, Todd Oakley, Seana Coulson (1999). Conceptual blending and metaphor. Gibbs, Raymond, Gerard Steen eds. Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 101-124.10.1075/cilt.175.07gra]Search in Google Scholar
[Fauconnier, Gilles (1985). Mental Spaces. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fauconnier, Gilles (2009). Generalized integration networks. Evans, Vyvyan, Stéphanie Pourcel, eds. New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 147-160.10.1075/hcp.24.12fau]Search in Google Scholar
[Fauconnier, Gilles, Mark Turner (2000). Compression and global insight. Cognitive Linguistics 11(3-4): 283-304.10.1515/cogl.2001.017]Search in Google Scholar
[Fauconnier, Gilles, Mark Turner (2001). Conceptual integration networks. Extended version of “Conceptual integration networks.” 1998. Cognitive Science 22(2): 133-187, available at <www.markturner.org/cin.web/cin.html>]Search in Google Scholar
[Fauconnier, Gilles, Mark Turner (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fauconnier, Gilles, Mark Turner (2006). Conceptual integration networks. Geeraerts, Dirk, ed. Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 303-371. Reprint of “Conceptual integration networks.” 1998. Cognitive Science 22(2): 133-187.10.1207/s15516709cog2202_1]Search in Google Scholar
[Fauconnier, Gilles, Mark Turner (2008). Rethinking metaphor. Gibbs, Raymond, ed. The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press, 53-66.10.1017/CBO9780511816802.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Koller, Veronika (2004a). Metaphor and Gender in Business Media Discourse: A Critical Cognitive Study. Basingstoke – New York: Palgrave.10.1057/9780230511286]Search in Google Scholar
[Koller, Veronika (2004b). Businesswomen and war metaphors: “Possessive, jealous and pugnacious”? Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(1): 3–23.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2004.00249.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Kövecses, Zoltán (2002). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kövecses, Zoltán (2005). Metaphor in Culture. Universality and Variation. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511614408]Search in Google Scholar
[Kövecses, Zoltán (2008). Conceptual metaphor theory. Some criticisms and alternative proposals. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 6: 168–184.10.1075/arcl.6.08kov]Search in Google Scholar
[Kövecses, Zoltán (2009a). Metaphor, culture, and discourse: The pressure of coherence. Zinken, Jörg, Andreas Musolff, eds. Metaphor and Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave – Macmillan, 11-24.10.1057/9780230594647_2]Search in Google Scholar
[Kövecses, Zoltán (2009b). The effect of context on the use of metaphor in discourse. Ibérica 17: 11–24.10.1057/9780230594647_2]Search in Google Scholar
[Kövecses, Zoltán (2009c). Aspects of metaphor in discourse. Belgrade English Language and Literature Studies (Belgrade BELLS) 1: 81–95.10.18485/bells.2009.1.4]Search in Google Scholar
[Kövecses, Zoltán (2010a). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. (2nd ed). New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kövecses, Zoltán (2010b). A new look at metaphorical creativity in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics 21(4): 663–697.10.1515/cogl.2010.021]Search in Google Scholar
[Kövecses, Zoltán (2011). Recent developments in metaphor theory: Are the new views rival ones? Gonzálvez-García, Francisco, María Sandra Peña Cervel, Lorena Pérez Hernández, eds. Metaphor and metonymy revisited beyond the Contemporary Theory of Metaphor: Recent developments and applications, Special issue of Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9(1): 11–25.10.1075/rcl.9.1.02kov]Search in Google Scholar
[Kövecses, Zoltán (2015). Where Metaphors Come From: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Kövecses, Zoltán (2017). Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics 28(2): 321–347.10.1515/cog-2016-0052]Search in Google Scholar
[Lakoff, George (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago – London: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Lakoff, George (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. Ortony, Andrew, ed. Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 202-251.10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013]Search in Google Scholar
[Lakoff, George (1996). Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lakoff, George (2016). Understanding Trump. Available at: https://georgelakoff.com/2016/07/23/understanding-trump-2/ Retrieved: June 16, 2018]Search in Google Scholar
[Lakoff, George, Mark Johnson (1980). Metaphors We Live by. Chicago - London: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lakoff, George, Mark Johnson (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lakoff, George, Mark Turner (1989). More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Matovac, Darko, Goran Tanacković Faletar (2009). TCM i CIT – dvije suprotstavljene teorije ili krajnje točke istoga procesa? Jezikoslovlje 10(2): 133-151.]Search in Google Scholar
[Musolff, Andreas (2000a). Mirror-Images of Europe: The imagery used in the public debate about European Politics in Britain and Germany. München: iudicium.]Search in Google Scholar
[Musolff, Andreas (2000b). Political imagery of Europe: A house without exit doors? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 21(3): 216-229.10.1080/01434630008666402]Search in Google Scholar
[Musolff, Andreas (2001). Cross-language metaphors: parents and children, love, marriage and divorce in the European family. Cotterill, Janet, Anne Ife, eds. Language across Boundaries. London – New York: Continuum, 119-134.]Search in Google Scholar
[Musolff, Andreas (2004a). Metaphor and Political Discourse. Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave.]Search in Google Scholar
[Musolff, Andreas (2004b). The heart of the European body politic. British and German perspectives on Europe’s central organ. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development 25(5–6): 437-452.10.1080/01434630408668917]Search in Google Scholar
[Musolff, Andreas (2006). Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 21(1): 23–38.10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2]Search in Google Scholar
[Musolff, Andreas (2009). Love, parenthood, and gender in the European family: The British perspective. Renger, Almut-Barbara, Roland Alexander Ißler, eds. Europa: Stier und Sternenkranz. Von der Union mit Zeus zum Staatenverbund. Gottingen: V&R unipress – Bonn University Press, 536–548.]Search in Google Scholar
[Musolff, Andreas (2010). The Eternal outsider? Scenarios of Turkey’s ambitions to join the EU in the German press. Šaric, Ljiljana, Andreas Musolff, Stefan10.21832/9781847693259-013]Search in Google Scholar
[Manz, Ingrid Hudabiunigg, eds. Contesting Europe’s Eastern Rim: Cultural Identities in Public Discourse. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 157-171.]Search in Google Scholar
[Musolff, Andreas (2016). Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London-Oxford – New York: Bloomsbury.]Search in Google Scholar
[Musolff, Andreas (2017a). Truths, lies and figurative scenarios: Metaphors at the heart of Brexit. Journal of Language and Politics 16(5): 641–657.10.1075/jlp.16033.mus]Search in Google Scholar
[Musolff Andreas (2017b). How metaphors can shape political reality. The figurative scenarios at the heart of Brexit. Papers in Language and Communication Studies 1(1): 2-16.10.1075/jlp.16033.mus]Search in Google Scholar
[Petrica, Monica (2011). “Overt” vs. “covert” cultural variance in metaphor usage: ‘Europe’ vs. Malta and the EU-membership debate. Handl, Sandra, Hans-Jörg Schmid, eds. Windows to the Mind: Metaphor, Metonymy and Conceptual Blending. Berlin – New York: Walter de Gruyter, 143-166.10.1515/9783110238198.143]Search in Google Scholar
[Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáňez, Francisco J. (1998). On the nature of blending as a cognitive phenomenon. Journal of Pragmatics 30(3): 259-274.10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00006-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáňez, Francisco J., Sandra Peña Cervel (2002). Cognitive operations and projection spaces. Jezikoslovlje 3(1-2): 131-158.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáňez, Francisco J., Olga I. Díez Velasco (2003). Patterns of conceptual interaction. Dirven, René, Ralf Pörings, eds. Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 489-533.]Search in Google Scholar
[Semino, Elena (2002). A sturdy baby or a derailing train? Metaphorical representations of the Euro in British and Italian newspapers. Text 22(1): 107-139.10.1515/text.2002.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Semino, Elena (2008). Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816802.015]Search in Google Scholar
[Šarić, Ljiljana (2005). Metaphorical models in EU discourse in the Croatian media. Jezikoslovlje 6(2): 145-170.]Search in Google Scholar
[Turner, Mark (2007). Conceptual integration. Geeraerts, Dirk, Hubert Cuyckens, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 377–393.]Search in Google Scholar
[Turner, Mark, Gilles Fauconnier (1995). Conceptual integration and formal expression. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10(3): 183-204.10.1207/s15327868ms1003_3]Search in Google Scholar
[Turner, Mark, Gilles Fauconnier (1999). A mechanism of creativity. Poetics Today 20(3): 297-418.]Search in Google Scholar
[Turner, Mark, Gilles Fauconnier (2003). Metaphor, metonymy, and binding. Dirven, René, Ralf Pörings, eds. Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 469-487.10.1515/9783110894677.133]Search in Google Scholar
[Werkmann, Ana, Gabrijela Buljan (2013). Knocking on EU’s door: on the changing and conflicting metaphorical images of Croatia in selected EU press. Jezikoslovlje 14(2-3): 337-362.]Search in Google Scholar
