[
AFONASOVA, M. A., PANFILOVA, E. E., GALICHKINA, M. A. and ŚLUSARCZYK, B. Digitalization in economy and innovation: The effect on social and economic processes. Polish journal of management studies. 2019, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 22–32, DOI: https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2019.19.2.02
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ALESINA, A., GLAESER, E. and SACERDOTE, B. Why Doesn’t the United States Have a European-Style Welfare State? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 2001, no. 2, pp. 1–70 [online]. Available at: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/alesina/files/423__0332-alesina11.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ANDERSON, K. M. Social policy in the European Union. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
AWTREY, J. D. Jews and the Sources of Religious Freedom in Early Pennsylvania. LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 2018, no. 4544, pp. 1–373 [online]. Available at: https://repository.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/4544
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CRESPY, A. and MENZ, G. Commission entrepreneurship and the debasing of social Europe before and after the Eurocrisis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 2015, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 753–768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12241
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CUERVO, M. R. V. and MENÉNDEZ, A. J. L. A multivariate framework for the analysis of the digital divide: Evidence for the European Union-15. Information & Management. 2006, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 756–766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission. Social innovation: inspirational practices supporting people throughout their lives, 2020 [online]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/european-social-fund-plus/en/publications/social-innovation-inspirational-practices-supporting-people-throughout-their-lives
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EVANGELISTA, R., GUERRIERI, P. and MELICIANI, V. The economic impact of digital technologies in Europe. Economics of Innovation and new technology. 2014, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 802–824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2014.918438
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FALK, Z. W. Hebrew Law in Biblical Times: An Introduction. Maxwell Institute Publications. 2001, no. 41, pp. 1–144 [online]. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/mi/41
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FERRERA, M. The ‘Southern model’ of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European social policy. 1996, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 17–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879600600
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GÁBRIŠ, T., HAMUĽÁK, O. Pandemics in Cyberspace – Empire in Search of a Sovereign?. Baltic Journal of Law and Politics. 2021, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 103–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2021-0005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GÁBRIŠ, T., HAMUĽÁK, O. 5G and Digital Sovereignty of the EU: The Slovak Way. Taltech Journal of European Studies. 2021, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 25–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2021-0013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HAFERKAMP, H. and SMELSER, N. J. (eds.). Social Change and Modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HAMUĽÁK, O. Lessons from the “Constitutional Mythology” or How to Reconcile the Concept of State Sovereignty with European Integration. Danube: Law and Economics Review. 2015, vol.. 6, no. 2, pp. 75–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/danb-2015-0005.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HAMUĽÁK, O., TROITIÑO, D. R. and CHOCHIA, A. La carta de los derechos fundamentales de la union europea y los derechos sociales. Estudios constitucionales. 2018, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 167–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-52002018000100167
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HASKINS, Ch. I. Gender Bias in the Roman Catholic Church: Why Can‘t Women be Priests? University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class. 2003, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 99–124 [online]. Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/rrgc/vol3/iss1/4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KWILINSKI, A., VYSHNEVSKYI, O. and DZWIGOL, H. Digitalization of the EU economies and people at risk of poverty or social exclusion. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2020, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13070142
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LEIBFRIED, S. and PIERSON, P. (1992). Prospects for social Europe. Politics & Society. 1992, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 333–366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003232929202000305
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PINK, S., FERGUSON, H. and KELLY, L. (2022). Digital social work: Conceptualising a hybrid anticipatory practice. Qualitative Social Work. 2022, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 413–430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250211003647
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PÕDER, K., KEREM, K. “Social Models” in a European Comparison. Eastern European Economics. 2011, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 55–74, DOI: 10.2753/EEE0012-8775490503
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PONTUSSON, J. Inequality and Prosperity: Social Europe vs Liberal America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501713385.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ROUSSEAU, J. J. (1762). The Social Contract or Principles of Political Right (Translated by G. D. H. Cole). Fœderis æquas Dicamus leges. Vergil, Æneid XI, 1762, pp. 1–73 [online]. Available at: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/125486/5017_Rousseau_The_Social_Contract.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SAVOLDELLI, A., CODAGNONE, C. and MISURACA, G. Understanding the e-government paradox: Learning from literature and practice on barriers to adoption. Government Information Quarterly. 2014, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 63–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
STJERNØ, S. The idea of solidarity in Europe. European Journal of Social Law. 2011, no. 3, pp. 156–167 [online]. Available at: https://soc.kuleuven.be/ceso/life-sciences-society-lab/files/stjerno-the-idea-of-solidarity-in-ejsl-2011-3-b.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ŠIŠKOVÁ, N. Lidskoprávní mechanismy na úrovni EU a otázky související. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, 2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ŠIŠKOVÁ, N. The EU concept of the rule of law and the procedures de lege lata and de lege ferenda for its protection. International and Comparative Law Review. 2019, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 116–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2019-0017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
TROITIÑO, D. R., KERIKMÄE, T., HAMUĽÁK, O. (eds.). Digital Development of the European Union. Cham: Springer, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27312-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
TROITIÑO, D. R. and KERIKMÄE, T. (eds.). Pasado, presente y futuro de la Unión Europea. Mc Graw Hill Interamericana S. L., 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
TROITIÑO, D. R. and KERIKMÄE, T. Europe facing the digital challenge: obstacles and solutions. IDP. Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política. 2021, no. 34, pp. 1–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7238/idp.v0i34.393310
]Search in Google Scholar
[
TROITIÑO, D. R. La Unión Europea y el Reino Unido. Divergencia histórica y miopismo contemporáneo. Tempo Exterior. 2020, vol. XX, no. 40, pp. 61–73 [Online]. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344241840_La_Union_Europea_y_el_Reino_Unido_Divergencia_historica_y_miopismo_contemporaneo
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VARDANYAN, L. and KOCHARYAN, H. Critical views on the phenomenon of EU digital sovereignty through the prism of global data governance reality: main obstacles and challenges. European Studies: the Review of European law, Politics and Economics. 2022, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 110–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eustu-2022-0016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VASILESCU, M. D., SERBAN, A. C., DIMIAN, G. C., ACELEANU, M. I. and PICA-TOSTE, X. Digital divide, skills and perceptions on digitalisation in the European Union – Towards a smart labour market. PLoS ONE. 2020, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232032
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WALLACE, H., POLLACK, M. A., ROEDERER-RYNNING, C. and YOUNG, A. R. Policy-making in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
