This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Adler, P. S. & Kwon, S. W. (2017). Social Capital: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. In Lesser, E. L., ed., Knowledge and Social Capital: Foundation and Application (pp. 89–115). Boston, MA: Butterworth and Heinemann. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.186928.Search in Google Scholar
Hiebert, B., Regan, S. & Ipert, B. (2018). Tokenism and Mending Fences: How Rural Male Farmers and Their Health Needs Are Discussed in Health Policy and Planning Documents. Healthcare Policy, 13(4), 50–64. DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2018.25494.Search in Google Scholar
Ahenkan, A., Bawole, J. & Domfeh, K. (2013). Improving Citizens’ Participation in Local Government Planning and Financial Management in Ghana: A Stakeholder Analysis of the Sefwi Wiawso Municipal Assembly. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 3(2), 191–210. DOI: 10.5296/jpag.v3i2.3782.Search in Google Scholar
Aldea-Partanen, A. (2011). Social innovation in service delivery to youth in remote and rural areas. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development 3(1), 63–81. DOI: 10.1504/IJIRD.2011.038063.Search in Google Scholar
Ansu-Mensah, M., Danquah, F. I., Bawontuo, V., Ansu-Mensah, P., Mohammed, T. & Udoh, R. H. & Kuupiel, D. (2021). Quality of care in the free maternal healthcare era in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review of providers’ and managers’ perceptions. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21(1), Article ID: 220. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03701-z.Search in Google Scholar
Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Jurnal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216–224. DOI: 10.1080/01944366908977225.Search in Google Scholar
Arrighetti A., Lasagni, A. & Seravalli, G. (2003). Capitale sociale, associazionismo economico e istituzioni: indicatori statistici di sintesi. Rivista Di Politica Economica, 93(4), 47–88.Search in Google Scholar
Bamakan, S. M. H., Bondarti, A. B., Bondarti, P. B. & Qu, Q. (2021). Blockchain technology forecasting by patent analytics and text mining. Blockchain: Research and Applications, 2(2), Article ID: 100019. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcra.2021.100019.Search in Google Scholar
Ban, R. & Rao, V. (2008). Tokenism or agency? The impact of women’s reservations on village democracies in South India. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 56(3), 501–530. DOI: 10.1086/533551.Search in Google Scholar
Bellina, A., De Colle, A., Moretti, A. & Quendolo, A. (2006). Venzone – la ricostruzione di un centro storico. Fagagna: Arti Grafiche Friulane.Search in Google Scholar
Belussi, F. & Pilotti, L. (2000). Learning and innovation by networking within the Italian industrial districts: The development of an explorative analytical model. Sinergie Italian Journal of Management 3–43. DOI: 10.7433/S58.2002.03.Search in Google Scholar
Berner, M. M., Amos, J. M. & Morse, R. S. (2011). What constitutes effective citizen participation in local government? views from city stakeholders. Public Administration Quarterly, 35(1), 128–163. DOI: 10.2307/41804544.Search in Google Scholar
Bess, K. D., Prilleltensky, I., Perkins, D. D. & Collins, L. V. (2009). Participatory organizational change in community-based health and human services: From tokenism to political engagement. American Journal of Community Psychology, 43(1–2), 134–148. DOI: 10.1007/s10464-008-9222-8.Search in Google Scholar
Bock, B. B. (2016). Rural marginalisation and the role of social innovation; a turn towards nexogenous development and rural reconnection. Sociologia Ruralis 56(4), 552–573. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12119.Search in Google Scholar
Bos, D. G. & Brown, H. L. (2015). Overcoming barriers to community participation in a catchment-scale experiment: Building trust and changing behavior. Freshwater Science, 34(3), 1169–1175. DOI: 10.1086/682421.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, L. D. & Ashman, D. (2017). Participation, social capital, and intersectoral problem solving: African and Asian cases. World Development, 24(9), 1467–1479. DOI: 10.1016/0305-750X(96)00053-8.Search in Google Scholar
Brownill, S. & Inch, A. (2019). Framing people and planning: 50 years of debate. Built Environment, 45(1), 7–25. DOI: 10.2148/benv.45.1.7.Search in Google Scholar
Bull, R., Petts, J. & Evans, J. (2010). The importance of context for effective public engagement: Learning from the governance of waste. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 53(8), 991–1009. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2010.495503.Search in Google Scholar
Campbell, H. & Marshall, R. (2000). Public involvement and planning: Looking beyond the one to the many. International Planning Studies, 5(3), 321–344. DOI: 10.1080/713672862.Search in Google Scholar
Campbell, J. T., Lobao, L. M. & Betz, M. R. (2017). Collaborative Counties: Questioning the Role of Civil Society. Economic Development Quarterly, 31(3), 228–243. DOI: 10.1177/0891242417710497.Search in Google Scholar
Campos-Matos, I., Subramanian, S. V. & Kawachi, I. (2016). The “dark side” of social capital: Trust and self-rated health in European countries. European Journal of Public Health, 26(1), 90–95. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv089.Search in Google Scholar
Carlucci, D., Nocella, G., De Devitiis, B., Viscecchia, R., Bimbo, F. & Nardone, G. (2015). Consumer purchasing behaviour towards fish and seafood products. Patterns and insights from a sample of international studies. Appetite, 84, 212–227. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.008.Search in Google Scholar
Carpenter, J. P., Daniere, A. G. & Takahashi, L. M. (2004). Cooperation, trust, and social capital in Southeast Asian urban slums. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55, 533–551. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2003.11.007.Search in Google Scholar
Castell, P. (2016). Institutional framing of citizen initiatives: a challenge for advancing public participation in Sweden. International Planning Studies, 21(4), 305–316. DOI: 10.1080/13563475.2015.1124756.Search in Google Scholar
Chakraborty, S. & Chakraborty, S. (2022). A Scoping Review on the Applications of MCDM Techniques for Parametric Optimization of Machining Processes. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 29(6), 4165–4186. DOI: 10.1007/s11831-022-09731-w.Search in Google Scholar
Chinyele, B. J. & Lwoga, N. B. (2019). Participation in decision making regarding the conservation of heritage resources and conservation attitudes in Kilwa Kisiwani, Tanzania. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 9(2), 184–198. DOI: 10.1108/JCHMSD-05-2017-0019.Search in Google Scholar
Christensen, H. E. & Grant, B. (2016). Participatory Budgeting in Australian Local Government: An Initial Assessment and Critical Issues. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 75(4), 457–475. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8500.12219.Search in Google Scholar
Christoforou, A. (2013). On the identity of social capital and the social capital of identity. Cambridge Journal of Economics 37(4), 719–736. DOI: 10.1093/cje/bes059.Search in Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology 94(Suppl.), S95–S120.Search in Google Scholar
Cortés-Selva, L. & Pérez-Escolar, M. (2016). Civic participation and interactive documentaries: A contribution to the open government model. Profesional de La Informacion, 25(4), 578–587. DOI: 10.3145/epi.2016.jul.07.Search in Google Scholar
Dax, T., Fischer, M. (2018). An alternative policy approach to rural development in regions facing population decline. European Planning Studies 26(2), 297–315. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1361596.Search in Google Scholar
de la Cruz del Río-Rama, M., Maldonado-Erazo, C. P., Álvarez-García, J. & Durán-Sánchez, A. (2020). Cultural and natural resources in tourism Island: Bibliometric mapping. Sustainability 12(2), Article ID: 724. DOI: 10.3390/su12020724.Search in Google Scholar
Dedding, C., Goedhart, N. S., Broerse, J. E. W. & Abma, T. A. (2021). Exploring the boundaries of ‘good’ Participatory Action Research in times of increasing popularity: dealing with constraints in local policy for digital inclusion. Educational Action Research, 29(1), 20–36. DOI: 10.1080/09650792.2020.1743733.Search in Google Scholar
Elstad, B. & Ladegard, G. (2012). Women on corporate boards: Key influencers or tokens? Journal of Management and Governance, 16(4), 595–615. DOI: 10.1007/s10997-010-9165-y.Search in Google Scholar
Farrell, H. & Knight, J. (2003). Trust, Institutions, and Institutional Change: Industrial Districts and the Social Capital Hypothesis. Politics and Society, 31(4), 537–566. DOI: 10.1177/0032329203256954.Search in Google Scholar
Fernandez-Bou, A. S., Ortiz-Partida, J. P., Classen-Rodriguez, L. M., Pells, C., Dobbin, K. B., Espinoza, V., Rodríguez-Flores, J. M., Thao, C., Hammond Wagner, C. R., Fencl, A., Flores-Landeros, H., Maskey, M. L., Cole, S. A., Azamian, S., Gamiño, E., Guzman, A., Alvarado, A. G. F., Campos-Martínez, M. S., Weintraub, C., Sandoval, E., Dahlquist-Willard, R. M., Bernacchi, L. A., DeLugan, R. M. & Medellín-Azuara, J. (2021). 3 challenges, 3 errors, and 3 solutions to integrate frontline communities in climate change policy and research: Lessons from California. Frontiers in Climate 3, Article ID: 717554. DOI: 10.3389/fclim.2021.717554.Search in Google Scholar
Furmankiewicz, M. (2017). Government within governance ? Polish rural development partnerships through the lens of functional representation. Journal of Rural Studies 46, 12–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.05.004.Search in Google Scholar
Godfrey, C. M., Harrison, M. B., Graham, I. D., Ross-White, A. (2010). Utilisation of theoretical models and frameworks in the process of evidence synthesis. JBI Library of Systematic Reviews 8(18), 730–751. DOI: 10.11124/01938924-201008180-00001.Search in Google Scholar
Haldar, A., Datta, S. & Shah, S. (2020). Tokenism or realism? Gender inclusion in corporate boards. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, 39(6), 707–725. DOI: 10.1108/EDI-04-2019-0126.Search in Google Scholar
Halonen, M. & Kattilakoski, M. (2018). Well-Being and Participation: Views on Policy Measures in Sparsely Populated Rural Municipalities in Finland, European Countryside 10(2), 300–320. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2018-0018.Search in Google Scholar
Hart, K. & Bas-Defossez, F. (2018). CAP 2021-27: Proposals for increasing its environmental and climate ambition. Brussel/London: Institute for European Environmental Policy.Search in Google Scholar
Jocom, S. G., Memah, M. Y. & Pngemanan, L. R. (2021). Community participation in local economic development in the village of Makalu, Posumaen sub-district. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 681. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/681/1/012084.Search in Google Scholar
Kafková, M., Vidovićová, L. & Wija, P. (2018). Older Adults and Civic Engagement in Rural Areas of the Czech Republic. European Countryside, 10(2), 247–262. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2018-0015.Search in Google Scholar
Kamols, N., Foth, M. & Guaralda, M. (2021). Beyond engagement theatre: challenging institutional constraints of participatory planning practice. Australian Planner, 57(1), 23–35. DOI: 10.1080/07293682.2021.1920993.Search in Google Scholar
Kenny, A., Farmer, J., Dickson-Swift, V. & Hyett, N. (2015). Community participation for rural health: A review of challenges. Health Expectations, 18(6), 1906–1917. DOI: 10.1111/hex.12314.Search in Google Scholar
Kersten, W. C., Crul, M. R. M., Geelen, D. V., Meijer, S. A. & Franken, V. (2015). Engaging beneficiaries of sustainable renovation – Exploration of design-led participatory approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 690–699. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.060.Search in Google Scholar
Khan, R. (2016). How Frugal Innovation Promotes Social Sustainability. Sustainability 8(10), Article ID: 1034. DOI: 10.3390/su8101034.Search in Google Scholar
Kotus, J. & Sowada, T. (2017). Behavioural model of collaborative urban management: extending the concept of Arnstein’s ladder. Cities, 65, 78–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.02.009.Search in Google Scholar
Kumi-kyereme, A. (2008). Community participation in the Ghana Poverty Reduction Strategy in the Twifu-Heman-Lower Denkyira District. 62, 222–230. DOI: 10.1080/00291950802335939.Search in Google Scholar
Lee, M. & Gambiza, J. (2022). The adoption of conservation agriculture by smallholder farmers in southern Africa: A scoping review of barriers and enablers. Journal of Rural Studies, 92, 214–225. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.03.031.Search in Google Scholar
Levenda, A. M., Keough, N., Rock, M. & Miller, B. (2020). Rethinking public participation in the smart city. Canadian Geographer, 64(3), 344–358. DOI: 10.1111/cag.12601.Search in Google Scholar
Lewis, L. (2013). Recognition politics as a human rights perspective on service users’ experiences of involvement in mental health services. In Staddon, P., ed., Mental health service users in research: Critical sociological perspectives (pp. 87–104). Bristol: Policy Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lim, S. B., Mazhar, M. U., Malek, J. A. & Yigitcanlar, T. (2021). The Right or Wrong to the City? Understanding Citizen Participation in the Pre-and Post-COVID-19 Eras in Malaysia. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(4), Article ID: 238. DOI: 10.3390/joitmc7040238.Search in Google Scholar
Linkov, V. (2014). Tokenism in Psychology: Standing on the Shoulders of Small Boys. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 48(2), 143–160. DOI: 10.1007/s12124-014-9266-2.Search in Google Scholar
Littell, J. H., Corcoran, J. & Pillai, V. (2008). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Oxrord: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195326543.001.0001.Search in Google Scholar
Littig, B., Grießler, E. (2005). Social sustainability: a catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. International Journal of Sustainable Development 8(1–2), 65–79.Search in Google Scholar
Love, T. R. & Hall, C. M. (2022). Decolonising the marketing academy: An indigenous Māori perspective on engagement, methodologies and practices. Australasian Marketing Journal, 30(3), 202–208. DOI: 10.1177/18393349211062270.Search in Google Scholar
Luisi, D. & Hämel, K. (2021). Community participation and empowerment in primary health care in Emilia-Romagna: A document analysis study. Health Policy, 125(2), 177–184. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.11.007.Search in Google Scholar
Ly, A. M. & Cope, M. R. (2023). New Conceptual Model of Social Sustainability: Review from Past Concepts and Ideas. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(7), Article ID: 5350. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20075350.Search in Google Scholar
Maier, K. (2001). Citizen Participation in Planning: Climbing a Ladder? European Planning Studies, 9(6), 707–719. DOI: 10.1080/713666506.Search in Google Scholar
Matthews, A. (2020). The new CAP must be linked more closely to the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Agricultural and Food Economics, 8, Article ID: 19. DOI: 10.1186/s40100-020-00163-3.Search in Google Scholar
McManus, P., Walmsley, J., Argent, N., Baum, S., Bourke, L., Martin, J., Pritchard, B., Sorensen, T. (2012). Rural Community and Rural Resilience: what is important to farmers in keeping their country towns alive? Journal of Rural Studies 28(1), 20–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.09.003.Search in Google Scholar
Mohammadi, S. H., Ahmad, N., Emby, Z., Norazizan, S. and Soroush, A. (2011). Relationship Between Citizen's Perception and Level of Participation in Local Government”, International Proceedings of Economics Development & Research, vol. 5, no. 2.Search in Google Scholar
Hamzi, M., Hidayah, N., Qistina, N. & Mahmud, A. (2020). Overview of Public Private Partnership in Primary Health Care in Malaysia: a Scoping Review. International Journal of Public Health and Clinical Sciences, 7(3), 129–147. DOI: 10.32827/ijphcs.7.3.129.Search in Google Scholar
Monno, V. & Khakee, A. (2012). Tokenism or Political Activism? Some Reflections on Participatory Planning. International Planning Studies, 17(1), 85–101. DOI: 10.1080/13563475.2011.638181.Search in Google Scholar
Morrison, C. & Dearden, A. (2013). Beyond tokenistic participation: Using representational artefacts to enable meaningful public participation in health service design. Health Policy, 112(3), 179–186. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.05.008.Search in Google Scholar
Nardone, G., Sisto, R. & Lopolito, A. (2010). Social Capital in the LEADER Initiative: a methodological approach. Journal of Rural Studies, 26(1), 63–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.09.001.Search in Google Scholar
Nkansa, G. A. & Chapman, D. W. (2006). Sustaining community participation: What remains after the money ends? International Review of Education, 52(6), 509–532. DOI: 10.1007/s11159-006-9009-9.Search in Google Scholar
Nugroho, I. A., Darwo, D. & Yuniarti, D. (2021). Stakeholders’ mapping and strategy for restoring peatland forest in west tanjung jabung jambi, indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research, 8(1), 37–57. DOI: 10.20886/IJFR.2021.8.1.37-57.Search in Google Scholar
Nunkoo, R. & Ramkissoon, H. (2011). Developing a community support model for tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(3), 964–988. DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2011.01.017.Search in Google Scholar
Ocloo, J. & Matthews, R. (2016). From tokenism to empowerment: Progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement. BMJ Quality and Safety, 25(8), 626–632. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004839.Search in Google Scholar
Oliveira, A. S., de Barros, M. D., de Carvalho Pereira, F., Gomes, C. F. S. & da Costa, H. G. (2018). Prospective scenarios: A literature review on the Scopus database. Futures, 100, 20–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2018.03.005.Search in Google Scholar
Oredo, J. (2022). Evaluating the Impact of e-Government Initiatives on Citizens: Empowerment or Tokenism? In 2022 IST-Africa Conference (pp. 1–8). Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers.Search in Google Scholar
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P., Moher, D. (2021). The prisma 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Medicina Fluminensis, 57(4), 444–465. DOI: 10.21860/medflum2021_264903.Search in Google Scholar
Pappalardo, G., Sisto, R. & Pecorino, B. (2018). Is the Partnership Governance Able to Promote Endogenous Rural Development? A Preliminary Assessment Under the Adaptive Co-Management Approach. European Countryside, 10(4). 543–565. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2018-0031.Search in Google Scholar
Parker, G. & Murray, C. (2012). Beyond tokenism? Community-led planning and rational choices: Findings from participants in local agenda-setting at the neighbourhood scale in England. Town Planning Review 83(1), 1–28. DOI: 10.3828/tpr.2012.1.Search in Google Scholar
Petts, J. (2008). Public engagement to build trust: False hopes? Journal of Risk Research, 11(6), 821–835. DOI: 10.1080/13669870701715592.Search in Google Scholar
Pipan, P. & Zorn, M. (2013). Public participation in recovery after earthquakes in Friuli (NE Italy) and the Upper Soča Valley (NW Slovenia) in 1976, 1998, and 2004. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 1(3), 2231–2253. DOI: 10.5194/nhessd-1-2231-2013.Search in Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R. & Nonetti, R. Y. (1993). Making Democracy Work Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt7s8r7.Search in Google Scholar
Rizzi, P., Vol, E. & Luglio, N. (2011). Capitale sociale, sviluppo economico e felicità. EyesReg 1(2).Search in Google Scholar
Ruming, K. (2019). Public perceptions of stakeholder influence on Australian metropolitan and local plans. International Planning Studies, 24(2), 110–124. DOI: 10.1080/13563475.2018.1517037.Search in Google Scholar
Rusnaini, R. (2016). Citizen Participation in Medium-Term Local Development Plan in Indonesia. In Proceedings of the 2016 Global Conference on Business, Management and Entrepreneurship (pp. 805–809). Amsterdam: Atlantis Press. DOI: 10.2991/gcbme-16.2016.150.Search in Google Scholar
Santana, C. & Albareda, L. (2022). Blockchain and the emergence of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs): An integrative model and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, Article ID: 121806. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121806.Search in Google Scholar
Shucksmith, M. (2000). Endogenous Development, Social Capital and Social Inclusion: Perspectives from LEADER in the UK. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(2), 208–218. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00143.Search in Google Scholar
Sisto, R., Portillo, L., Yazdani, M., Estepa-Mohedano, L. (2022). Strategic Planning of Rural Areas: Integrating Participatory Backcasting and Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis Tools. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 1. DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101248.Search in Google Scholar
Sisto, R., Lopolito, A. & van Vliet, M. (2018). Stakeholder participation in planning rural development strategies: Using backcasting to support Local Action Groups in complying with CLLD requirements. Land Use Policy, 70, 442–450. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.022.Search in Google Scholar
Sisto, R., van Vliet, M. & Prosperi, M. (2016). Puzzling stakeholder views for long-term planning in the bio-economy: A back-casting application. Futures, 76, 42–54. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2015.04.002.Search in Google Scholar
Snape, D., Kirkham, J., Britten, N., Froggatt, K., Gradinger, F., Lobban, F., Popay, J., Wyatt, K. & Jacoby, A. (2014). Exploring perceived barriers, drivers, impacts and the need for evaluation of public involvement in health and social care research: A modified Delphi study. BMJ Open, 4(6), Article ID: 4943. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004943.Search in Google Scholar
Sobels, J., Curtis, A. & Lockie, S. (2001). The role of Landcare group networks in rural Australia: exploring the contribution of social capital. Journal of Rural Studies, 17(3), 265–276. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(01)00003-1.Search in Google Scholar
Sundberg, L. & Gidlund, K. (2022). Dimensions of e-Participation: Levels of Participation and Citizen Configurations. In Amaral, L., Soares, D., Zheng, L., Peixoto, M. & Braga, C., eds., Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 173–179). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.Search in Google Scholar
Tritter, J. Q. & McCallum, A. (2006). The snakes and ladders of user involvement: Moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy, 76(2), 156–168. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.05.008.Search in Google Scholar
Vijayanand, S. (2013). Stakeholders and public private partnerships role in tourism management. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 4(2), 1–11.Search in Google Scholar
Walker, A. M., Opferkuch, K., Roos Lindgreen, E., Simboli, A., Vermeulen, W. J. V. & Raggi, A. (2021). Assessing the social sustainability of circular economy practices: Industry perspectives from Italy and the Netherlands. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 831–844. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.01.030.Search in Google Scholar
Weck, S., Madanipour, A., Schmitt, P. (2021). Place-based development and spatial justice, European Planning Studies 30(5), 791–806. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2021.1928038.Search in Google Scholar
Weinstein, J. (2010). Introduction. In Weinstein, J., ed., Mental health, service users involvement and recovery (pp. 9–14). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, B. & Osborne, M. (2004). Social Capital: A Commentary on Issues, Understanding and Measurement, Observatory PASCAL – Place Management, Social Capital and Learning Regions, 1–27, pdf available on https://pascalobservatory.org/sites/default/files/scribd/cavaye.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Woodhouse, A. (2006). Social capital and economic development in regional Australia: A case study. Journal of Rural Studies, 22(1), 83–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.07.003.Search in Google Scholar
Zarra Nezhad, M. (2007). Social Capital: Conceptual Overview and Measurements. Quarterly Journal of Human Development, 1(4), 3–21.Search in Google Scholar
European Commission (2006). The LEADER Approach: a Basic Guide. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Search in Google Scholar
European Commission (2021). EU Rural Review 31 'Rural social economy'. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Search in Google Scholar
The sustainable development goals report 2019 (2019). New York, NY: United Nations.Search in Google Scholar
