1. bookVolumen 10 (2018): Edición 2 (June 2018)
Detalles de la revista
License
Formato
Revista
eISSN
1803-8417
Primera edición
24 Feb 2009
Calendario de la edición
4 veces al año
Idiomas
Inglés
access type Acceso abierto

Well-Being and Participation: Views on Policy Measures in Sparsely Populated Rural Municipalities in Finland

Publicado en línea: 29 Jun 2018
Volumen & Edición: Volumen 10 (2018) - Edición 2 (June 2018)
Páginas: 300 - 320
Detalles de la revista
License
Formato
Revista
eISSN
1803-8417
Primera edición
24 Feb 2009
Calendario de la edición
4 veces al año
Idiomas
Inglés
Abstract

This article examines how do municipalities aim to promote well-being in sparsely populated rural villages, and how are villagers involved in the measures of well-being undertaken in their municipality. The main analysis is based on the interviews of municipal representatives in the case study of North Karelia, Finland. The analysis of well-being and participation, and their relation to the social inclusion of rural inhabitants is executed under the themes of mobility, services, democratic involvement and civic action. The policy measures seek to improve liveability of the environment and the villagers’ quality of life. Participation, as a means and an end of well-being and inclusion, involves the dimensions of structural inclusion, as well as genuine participation and citizen engagement.

Keywords

[1] Abbott, P. & Sapsford, R. (2005). Living on the margins. Policy Studies 26(1), 29-46. DOI: 10.1080/01442870500041660.10.1080/01442870500041660Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

[2] Alastalo, M. & Åkerman, M. (2017). Asiantuntijahaastattelun analyysi: Faktojen jäljillä. In Ruusuvuori, J., Nikander, P. & Hyvärinen, M., eds., Haastattelun analyysi (pp. 372-392). Tampere: Vastapaino.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Allardt, E. (1993). Having, loving, being: An alternative to the Swedish model of welfare research. In Nussbaum, M. & Amartya, S., ed., The quality of life (pp. 88-94). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Atkinson, S., Fuller, S. & Painter, J. (2012). Wellbeing and Place. Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Bock, B. B. (2016). Rural marginalisation and the role of social innovation: a turn towards nexogenous development and rural reconnection. Sociologia Ruralis 56(4), 552-573. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12119.10.1111/soru.12119Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

[6] Copus, A. K., Courtney, P., Dax, T., Meredith, D., Noguera. J., Shucksmith, M. & Talbot, H. (2011). EDORA: European development opportunities for rural areas, Applied Research 2013/1/2 [final report]. Luxembourg: EPSON & UHI Millennium Institute.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Bowling, A. & Windsor, J. (2001). Towards the good life: a population survey of dimensions of quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies 2(1), 55-82. DOI: 10.1023/A:1011564713657.10.1023/A:1011564713657Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

[8] Erikson, R. (1993). Descriptions of inequality: The Swedish approach to welfare research. In Nussbaum, M. & Amartya, S., eds., The quality of life (pp. 67-83). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Evers, A. (2009). Civicness and civility: their meanings for social services. Voluntas 20: 239-259. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-009-9088-x.10.1007/s11266-009-9088-xAbierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

[10] Evers, A. & Guillemard, A.-M. (2012). Reconfiguring welfare and reshaping citizenship. In Evers, A. & Guillemard, A.-M., eds., Social policy and citizenship: The changing landscape (pp. 359-388). New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Farrington, J. & Farrington, C. (2005). Rural accessibility, social inclusion and social justice: towards conceptualization. Journal of Transport Geography 13, 1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.10.002.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.10.002Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

[12] Halonen, M., Kotilainen, J., Tykkyläinen, M. & Vatanen, E. (2015). Industry life cycles of a resource town in Finland: the case of Lieksa. European Countryside 7(1), 16-41. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2015-0002.10.1515/euco-2015-0002Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

[13] Hayward, C., Simpson, L. & Wood, L. (2004). Still left out in the cold: problematising participatory research and development. Sociologia Ruralis 44(1), 95-108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00264.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00264.xAbierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

[14] Helminen, V., Nurmio, K., Rehunen, A., Ristimäki, M., Oinonen, K., Tiitu, M., Kotavaara, O., Antikainen, H. & Rusanen, J. (2014). Kaupunki-maaseutu-alueluokitus: Paikkatietoihin perustuvan alueluokituksen muodostamisperiaatteet. Helsinki: The Finnsh Environmental Institute.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Hirvilammi, T. (2015). Kestävän hyvinvoinnin jäljillä: Ekologisten kysymysten integroiminen hyvinvointitutkimukseen [Doctoral thesis]. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Juhila, K., Raitakari, S. & Löfstrand, C. H. (2017). Responsibilities and current welfare discourses. In Juhila, K., Raitakari, S. & Hall, C., eds., Responsibilisation at the margins of welfare services (pp. 35-56). London, New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Kainulainen, S. & Rintala, T. (2003). Maaseutukuntien mosaiikki - menestyjiä ja häviäjiä. Maaseudun Uusi Aika 2, 26-35.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Kilpeläinen, A. & Seppänen, M. (2014). Information technology and everyday life in ageing rural villages. Journal of Rural Studies 33, 1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.10.005.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.10.005Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

[19] Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. 2nd ed. Thousands Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Küntzel, S. (2012). The local dimension of active inclusion policy. Journal of European Social Policy 22(1), 3-16. DOI: 10.1177/0958928711425270.10.1177/0958928711425270Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

[21] Marsden, T. (1998). New rural territories: regulating the differentiated rural spaces. Journal of Rural Studies 14(1), 107-117. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(97)00041-7.10.1016/S0743-0167(97)00041-7Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

[22] Matthies, A.-L., Kattilakoski, M. & Rantamäki, N. (2011). Citizens participation and community orientation - indicators of social sustainability of rural welfare services. Nordic Social Work Research 1(2), 125-139. DOI: 10.1080/2156857X.2011.613575.10.1080/2156857X.2011.613575Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

[23] Matthies, A.-L. (2014). How participation, marginalization and welfare are connected. In Matthies, A.-L. & Uggerhøj, L., eds., Participation, marginalization and welfare services: Concepts, politics and practices across European countries (pp. 3-18). Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Mewes, J. & Mau, S. (2013). Globalization, socio-economic status and welfare chauvinism: European perspectives on attitudes toward the exclusion of immigrants. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 54(3), 228-245. DOI: 0.1177/0020715213494395.10.1177/0020715213494395Search in Google Scholar

[25] Morse, J. M. & Niehaus, L. (2009). Mixed method design: principles and procedures. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Osti, G. (2010). Mobility demands and participation in remote rural areas. Sociologia Ruralis 50(3), 296-310. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00517.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00517.xAbierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

[27] Rantamäki, N. & Kattilakoski, M. (2016). Local welfare systems in rural Finland as a representation of sustainable development. In Matthies, A-L. & Närhi, K., eds., The ecosocial transition of societies: The contribution of social work and social policy (pp. 174-189). London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Reimer, B. (2004). Social exclusion in a comparative context. Sociologia Ruralis 44(1), 76-94. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00263.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00263.xAbierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

[29] Room, G. (1995). Beyond the threshold: The measurement and analysis of social exclusion. Bristol: The Policy Press.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Room, G. (1999). Social exclusion, solidarity and the challenge of globalization. International Journal of Social Welfare 8(3), 166-174. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2397.00080.10.1111/1468-2397.00080Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

[31] Rubin, H. & Rubin, I. (2012). The qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. London: SAGE Publications.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Saari, J. (2011). Hyvinvoinnin kentät. In Saari, J., ed., Hyvinvointi: Suomalaisen yhteiskunnan perusta. Helsinki: Gaudeamus Helsinki University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. In Nussbaum, M. & Amartya, S., eds., The quality of life (pp. 30-53). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Shorthall, S. (2004). Exclusion zones: inadequate resources and civic rights in rural areas. Sociologia Ruralis 44(1), 40-42. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00260.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00260.xAbierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

[35] Shortall, S. (2008). Are rural development programmes socially inclusive? Social inclusion, civic engagement, participation, and social capital: exploring the differences. Journal of Rural Studies 24, 450-457. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.01.001.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.01.001Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

[36] Shucksmith, M. (2004). Young people and social exclusion in rural areas. Rural Studies 44(1), 43-59. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00261.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00261.xAbierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

[37] Shucksmith, M., Cameron, S., Merridew, T. & Pichler, F. (2009). Urban-rural differences in quality of life across the European Union. Regional Studies 43(10), 1275-1289. DOI: 10.1080/00343400802378750.10.1080/00343400802378750Search in Google Scholar

[38] Siisiäinen, M. (2014). Four Faces of Participation. In Matthies, A.-L. & Uggerhøj, L., eds., Participation, marginalization and welfare services: Concepts, politics and practices across European countries (pp. 29-46). Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Tuuva-Hongisto, S., Pöysä, V. & Armila, P. (2016). Syrjäkylien nuoret- unohdetut kuntalaiset? Helsinki: Kunnallisalan kehittämissäätiön, Tutkimusjulkaisu-sarjan julkaisu 99.Search in Google Scholar

[40] Vaarama, M., Moisio, P. & Karvonen, S. (2010). Hyvinvointipolitiikka 2010-luvulla. Vaarama, M., Moisio, P. & Karvonen, S. eds., Suomalaisten hyvinvointi 2010 (pp. 278-286). Helsinki: National Institute for Health and Welfare.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Veenhoven, R. (2000a). The Four Qualities of Life. Journal of Happiness Studies 1(1), 1-39. DOI: 10.1023/A:1010072010360.10.1023/A:1010072010360Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

[42] Veenhoven, R. (2000b). Well‐being in the welfare state: level not higher, distribution not more equitable. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 2(1), 91-125. DOI: 10.1080/13876980008412637.10.1080/13876980008412637Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

[43] Veenhoven, R. (2002). Why social policy needs subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research 58, 33-45. DOI: 10.1007/0-306-47513-8_3.10.1007/0-306-47513-8_3Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

[44] Walsh, K., O’Shea, E., Scharf, T. & Shucksmith, M. (2014). Exploring the impact of informal practices on social exclusion and age-friendliness for older people in rural communities. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 24(1), 37-49. DOI: 10.1002/casp.2176.10.1002/casp.2176Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar

[45] Willis, J. W., Muktha, J. & Nilakanta, R. (2007). Foundations of qualitative research: interpretive and critical approaches. Thousands Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.Search in Google Scholar

[46] Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: design and methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Search in Google Scholar

[47] Basic Education Act 628/1998.Search in Google Scholar

[48] Health Care Act 1326/2010.Search in Google Scholar

[49] Local Government Act 410/2015.Search in Google Scholar

[50] Ministry of Finance (2015) Kuntien itsehallinnolliset tehtävät ja niiden laajuus. Valtiovarainministeriön julkaisuja 40/2015.Search in Google Scholar

[51] Ministry of Social Affairs and Health (2017). Promoting participation <http://stm.fi/en/promoting-participation> Accessed 8.8.2017.Search in Google Scholar

[52] Rural Policy Programme 2014-2020. Mahdollisuuksien maaseutu. Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriön julkaisuja, Alueiden kehittäminen 9/2014.Search in Google Scholar

[53] Siun sote (2016). Treaty of federation of North Karelia municipalities.Search in Google Scholar

[54] Social Welfare Act 1301/2014.Search in Google Scholar

[55] SYKE, Finnish Environment Institute (2014). Urban-rural classification. <http://www.ymparisto.fi> Published 18.3.2014.Search in Google Scholar

[56] Statistics Finland (2017). Key figures on population by region in 1990 to 2016. Demographic dependency ratio 2016. <http://pxnet2.stat.fi/PXWeb/pxweb/en/StatFin/StatFin__vrm__vaerak/048_vaerak_tau_203.px/?rxid=b4fcd82d-96bd-40a1-a8c9-194a2ef2040e> Updated 22.9.2017.Search in Google Scholar

[57] The Strategic Programme of Prime Minister Juha Sipilä’s Government (2015). Finland, a land of solutions. Government Publications 12/2015.Search in Google Scholar

[58] THL, Sotkanet (2017a). Unemployed people, as % of labour force, Regions, 2016. <https://www.sotkanet.fi/sotkanet/en/haku?g=470> accessed 10.8.2017.Search in Google Scholar

[59] THL, Sotkanet (2017b). THL’s morbidity index, age standardised, Regions, 2014. <https://www.sotkanet.fi/sotkanet/en/haku?g=291> accessed 10.6.2017.Search in Google Scholar

Artículos recomendados de Trend MD

Planifique su conferencia remota con Sciendo